Jize Xu1,2,3, Xiaodong Yu4, Mengzhao Lu4, Jiajun Hu3, Odeshnee Moodley4,5, Chunlan Zhang2, Lei Gong3, Yu Li3,4. 1. Agricultural College, Jilin Agriculture Science and Technology College, Jilin, China. 2. School of Landscape Architecture, Changchun University, Changchun, China. 3. Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China. 4. Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China. 5. South African Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Pretoria, South Africa.
Abstract
Two new species (Melanoleuca galerina and M. subgrammopodia) and seven new recorded species from northern China are described here using morphological and molecular methods. Melanoleuca galerina is mainly characterized by its hygrophanous pileus, decurrent lamellae, fibrous stipe and spores with round warts. Key characteristics of M. subgrammopodia include its discolored pileus, fibrous stipe and urticiform cystidia. The divergence time of Melanoleuca fungi as well as the phylogenetic relationships within this genus were analyzed using DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the nuclear large subunit rDNA (nrLSU) gene fragments. Analyses revealed that morphological identifications and phylogenetic relationships were consistent with the results of divergence time, thereby confirming that M. galerina and M. subgrammopodia are new species.
Two new species (Melanoleuca galerina and M. subgrammopodia) and seven new recorded species from northern China are described here using morphological and molecular methods. Melanoleuca galerina is mainly characterized by its hygrophanous pileus, decurrent lamellae, fibrous stipe and spores with round warts. Key characteristics of M. subgrammopodia include its discolored pileus, fibrous stipe and urticiform cystidia. The divergence time of Melanoleuca fungi as well as the phylogenetic relationships within this genus were analyzed using DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the nuclear large subunit rDNA (nrLSU) gene fragments. Analyses revealed that morphological identifications and phylogenetic relationships were consistent with the results of divergence time, thereby confirming that M. galerina and M. subgrammopodia are new species.
Individuals from Melanoleuca Pat. are widely distributed throughout the world and include some edible species (Singer, 1986). Currently, Index Fungorum[1] lists 422 validly published species within Melanoleuca. Whereas, Kirk et al. (2008) only accepted 50 species from this genus. In respect of China, a total of 19 Melanoleuca species have been reported (Bau and Li, 1999; Zhang et al., 2001; Chen, 2007; Mao, 2009; Sun et al., 2012; Wang, 2013; He et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2014; Wei et al., 2015; Du et al., 2016; Tian et al., 2018). Melanoleuca is a genus with limited morphological characteristics. It is mainly characterized by a collybioid to tricholomatoid habit, a rarely bright-colored pileus, with warty and strongly amyloid spores and having either absent or present cystidia (Singer, 1986). The divisions among Melanoleuca species are vague. Different taxonomists often have their own interpretations of morphological features, resulting in different classifications of the same species based on those differing opinions (Singer, 1986; Boekhout, 1988; Hyde et al., 2013). The following division views are currently widely approved. Singer (1962, 1986) divided Melanoleuca into four sections primarily based on the color of the pileus or stipe and the ornamentation of spores. Boekhout (1988) focused mainly on microscopic features, on the basis of presence and shape of cystidia and divided the genus into three subgenera namely: Subg. Melanoleuca Boekhout, Subg. Urocystis Boekhout and Subg. Macrocystis Boekhout. Bon (1991) introduced the spore Q value for delimiting subsections and divided the genus into three subgenera and eight sections (Vizzini et al., 2011). Before the advent of molecular phylogenetic tools, the taxonomical units of Boekhout (1988) were most frequently used for morphological identification of Melanoleuca. However, Vizzini et al. (2011) divided Melanoleuca into two subgenera (Subg. Urticocystis Vizzini and Subg. Melanoleuca Vizzini) by constructing phylogenetic relationships with the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Then, Yu et al. (2014) and Kalmer et al. (2018) confirmed the results of Vizzini et al. (2011). Even now, the division views proposed by Vizzini et al. (2011) are widely supported by molecular systematics (Yu et al., 2014; Kalmer et al., 2018).Some reports have established divergence times in the fungi. For example, Hennig (1966) first recommended the use of divergence time as a universal criterion for taxa ranking. Berbee and Taylor (2010), Oberwinkler (2012), and Hibbett (2014) estimated the divergence times of Basidiomycota and Ascomycota. Time-trees indicated that Basidiomycota are estimated to have diverged around 500 million years ago (Ma), and is a sister group to Ascomycota, being of similar age. Agaricomycetes diverged about 290 Ma as estimated by Floudas et al. (2012). Zhao et al. (2016) first attempted creating a taxonomic system of fungi based on divergence time which was a reconstruction of the taxonomic system used for Agaricus. Furthermore, Chen et al. (2017) utilized the taxonomic system based on divergence time for reconstruction of Agaricus subg. Minores, A. sect. Minores (Fr.) Henn. Additionally, Zhao et al. (2017) proposed that the divergence time of a lineage could be used as a universal criterion for ranking taxa and estimated the divergence time of Basidiomycota. Until now, divergence time has not been introduced into studies of Melanoleuca, moreover, its possible usage in taxonomic studies of the genus needs further verification.Therefore, in the present study, we made use of universal sequences in fungi (ITS + nrLSU) to estimate the divergence time of Melanoleuca, and discussed the infrageneric classifications of 19 species from northern China based on morphological identifications and clarified their phylogenetic relationships in order to provide a theoretical basis for the study of Melanoleuca.
Materials and Methods
Materials and Morphological Observations
All samples were collected from 2011 to 2018 from northern China, and have been deposited in the Herbarium Mycology of Jilin Agricultural University (HMJAU) and Herbarium Mycology of Jinlin Agricultural Science and Technology University (HMJU). The specific details are shown in Table 1. Pictures of the habitats were taken by a Canon 80D camera. Macroscopic features were recorded using fresh collections. Color descriptions were based upon the classifications made by Kornerup and Wanscher (1978). Dried specimens were used for microscopic observations, using 5% KOH as the floating agent, Melzer’s reagent was used to examine the presence of amyloid or dextrinoid reactions. Slices of lamellae and pileipellis were observed under the Olympus BX 53 microscope. Free hand drawings were made from all microscopic observations. Shooting and measurements of anatomical features were presented in the Cellsens Standard. The data was recorded by (a) b–c × d–e (f), n was the number of examined basidiospores and Q (length: breadth ratios) was calculated from 30 mature basidiospores of 3 basidiocarps. Cystidial shapes were described as per Vizzini et al. (2011). In addition, basidiosopres were observed under the scanning electron microscope, using the following procedure: gills were attached to specimen holders by carbon tape, coated with platinum-palladium using a Hitachi MC 1000 Ion Sputter Coater and examined with a FEI Quanta 200 FE-SEM operated at 5–10 kV.
TABLE 1
List of specimens used in this study.
Species
Collection
Public database accession number
Geographic origin
ITS
LSU
Clitocybe subditopoda
AFTOL-ID 533
DQ 202269
AY 691889
United States
Leucopaxillus cerealis
GB:0068845
KJ 417282
KJ 417198
United States
M. angelesiana
HMJU 00114
MK 659970
MK 660080
Heilongjiang, China
M. angelesiana
HMJU 00120
MK 659976
MK 660074
Heilongjiang, China
M. arcuata
HMJU 00118
MK 659974
MK 660076
Jilin, China
M. arcuata
HMJU 00141
MK 659995
MK 660054
Jilin, China
M. arcuata
HMJU 00149
MK 660003
MK 660046
Jilin, China
M. arcuata
TENN 050387
JX 429187
JX 429177
Switzerland
M. brevipes
HMJU 00125
MK 659980
MK 660069
Liaoning, China
M. cinereifolia
HMJU 00124
MK 659979
MK 660070
Jilin, China
M. cognata
GB 65454
JX 429190
JX 429180
Sweden
M. communis
HMJU 00108
MK 659964
MK 660086
Sichuan, China
M. communis
HMJU 00117
MK 659973
MK 660077
Jilin, China
M. communis
HMJU 00139
MK 659993
MK 660056
Liaoning, China
M. communis
HMJU 00143
MK 659997
MK 660052
Jilin, China
M. communis
HMJU 00144
MK 659998
MK 660051
Liaoning, China
M. communis
HMJU 00146
MK 660000
MK 660049
Jilin, China
M. dryophila
HMJU 00121
MK 659977
MK 660073
Jilin, China
M. dryophila
HMJU 00123
MK 659978
MK 660071
Jilin, China
M. dryophila
HMJU 00126
MK 659981
MK 660068
Liaoning, China
M. dryophila
HMJU 00140
MK 659994
MK 660055
Liaoning, China
M. dryophila
HMJU 00145
MK 659999
MK 660050
Liaoning, China
M. exscissa
HMJU 00107
MK 659963
MK 660087
Liaoning, China
M. exscissa
TENN 057720
JX 429191
JX 429184
Germany
M. exscissa
GB 65455
JX 429192
JX 429178
Sweden
M. friesii
HMJU 00129
MK 659983
MK 660065
Liaoning, China
M. friesii
HMJU 00136
MK 659990
MK 660058
Qinghai, China
M. friesii
HMJU 00137
MK 659991
MK 660057
Gansu, China
M. friesii
HMJU 00142
MK 659996
MK 660053
Liaoning, China
M. galerina
HMJU 00103
MK 583563
MK 660072
Jilin, China
M. galerina
HMJAU 48287
MN173526
MN173536
Jilin, China
M. grammopodia
TENN 037162
JX 429194
JX 429179
Poland
M. griseobrunnea
HMJU 00134
MK 659988
MK 660060
Gansu, China
M. herrerae
JCB 3445
JX 429224
JX 429164
Mexico
M. herrerae
TXLM AME 1282
JX 429199
JX 429165
Mexico
M. jaliscoensis
GL 50
JX 429222
JX 429176
Mexico
M. jaliscoensis
MRSJ 966
JX 429218
JX 429173
Mexico
M. leucopoda
HMJU 00109
MK 659965
MK 660085
Neimenggu, China
M. leucopoda
HMJU 00115
MK 659971
MK 660079
Heilongjiang, China
M. leucopoda
HMJU 00130
MK 659984
MK 660064
Jilin, China
M. leucopoda
HMJU 00147
MK 660001
MK 660048
Liaoning, China
M. longisterigma
ENCB Guzman 11494
JX 429212
JX 429171
Mexico
M. melaleuca
CBS 230.46
MH 856170
MH 867694
France
M. microcephala
HMJU 00132
MK 659986
MK 660062
Gansu, China
M. microcephala
HMJU 00133
MK 659987
MK 660061
Gansu, China
M. microcephala
HMJU 00138
MK 659992
MK 660045
Gansu, China
M. nivea
HMJU 00148
MK 660002
MK 660047
Jilin, China
M. paedida
HMJU 00135
MK 659989
MK 660059
Gansu, China
M. polioleuca
GB 65471
JX 429196
JX 429181
Sweden
M. porphyropoda
HMJU 00110
MK 659966
MK 660084
Neimenggu, China
M. porphyropoda
HMJU 00116
MK 659972
MK 660078
Jilin, China
M. pseudopaedida
HMJU 00155
MK 978844
MK 979277
Qinghai, China
M. strictipes
GB 65498
JX 429116
JX 429162
Sweden
M. stridula
HMJU 00105
MK 660004
MK 660089
Heilongjiang, China
M. stridula
HMJU 00111
MK 659967
MK 660083
Neimenggu, China
M. stridula
HMJU 00127
MK 659982
MK 660067
Jilin, China
M. subgrammopodia
HMJAU 48288
MN173526
MN173526
Jilin, China
M. subgrammopodia
HMJU 00104
MK 583562
MK 660066
Jilin, China
M. verrucipes
HMJU 00131
MK 659985
MK 660063
Liaoning, China
Melanoleuca sp.
HMJU 00119
MK 659975
MK 660075
Jilin, China
Mycena plumbea
AFTOL-ID 1631
DQ 494677
DQ 470813
United States
Pluteus romellii
AFTOL-ID 625
AY 854065
AY 634279
United States
Suillus pictus
AFTOL-ID 717
AY 854069
AY 684154
United States
List of specimens used in this study.
DNA Extraction, PCR, Purification and Sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from the dried specimens following the procedure described by Zhao et al. (2011). Polymerase chain reaction amplified sequences of the ITS and the nrLSU regions. Primers ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al., 1990) were used for the ITS region while primers LROR (Rehner and Samuels, 1994) and LR7 (Vilgalys and Hester, 1990) were used for the nrLSU region. The total volume of the PCR amplification reaction system was 50 μL containing of 10 μL of 5 × PCR buffer (Dingguo, Beijing, China), 4 μL of 200 μmol/L deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1 μL of 200 μmol/L each primer, 5 U of Taq DNA polymerase and 10 μL of template DNA. The program parameters were set as follows, for ITS: initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min; repeated for 30 cycles, denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, with annealing at 55°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, left at 72°C for 5 min and saved at 4°C; nrLSU: initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, repeated for 30 cycles, denaturation at 94°C for 90 s, with annealing at 55°C for 90 s, extension at 72°C for 90 s, left at 72°C for 5 min and saved at 4°C.The products of PCR amplification were purified with the EasyPure Plasmid MiniPrep Kit (TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.), and resolved on a 1.0% agarose gel and subsequently submitted for sequencing (sequencing was completed by BGI Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).
Phylogenetic Analysis
A total of 110 sequences (ITS and nrLSU) representing 29 species were incorporated in the phylogenetic analyses, of which 26 sequences were retrieved from GenBank. Clitocybe subditopoda was used as the outgroup. Detailed specimen information appears on Table 1. All the sequences were aligned in Clustal X 2.1 (Lin et al., 2017). The conservative region was selected in Gblock[2] and the vacancy gap in the data were treated as missing data (Talavera and Castresana, 2007). Saturation was tested using DAMBE 5.2 (Posada and Crandall, 1998) (model = test by Xia, 2013). MrModel Test 2.3 were used to select the fragment models (Wilgenbusch and Swofford, 2003; Nylander, 2004). The best model was used (ITS-nrLSU: GC) to construct a Maximum likelihood (ML) tree with PhyML (Guindon et al., 2009). The ML tree was evaluated by bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates (Stamatakis, 2006). Bootstrap values greater than or equal to 60% were indicated along nodes.
Divergence-Time Analysis
Sequences incorporated in phylogenetic analyses were used to estimate the divergence time. All the sequences were aligned by MEGA v.7.0[3]. Four species of Tricholomataceae were used as the outgroup. We used divergence times of Boletales (189 ± 20Ma), Archaeomarasmius leggetti (90 Ma), Quatsinoporises cranhanaii (125 Ma) and Mycena plumbea (90 ± 30 Ma) as calibration points (Hibbett et al., 1997; Smith et al., 2004; Feng, 2012). Divergence time was estimated in BEAST v.2.5.1. The best substitution model for each partition was inferred with the program MrModeltest 2.2 (Nylander, 2004): GTR + G + I for ITS and nrLSU. The number of substitution rate categories and Gamma shape parameters were 4.0362 and 4.0343, respectively. BEAUti v.2.5.1[4] was used to construct an XML file. The Relaxed clock model was selected according to the ESS value exceeding 200. Substitution models were independently estimated for each gene partition. The Yule speciation prior set was used to estimate the divergence time and the corresponding credibility intervals were constructed using treeModel. We ran an independent Monte Carlo Markov Chains (MCMC) of 10 million generations, logging states every 10,000 generations.The checking for convergence and mixing of Log files were completed in Tracer v1.6[5]. Tree files were summarized by the TreeAnnotator v.2.5.1., discarding 10% of states as burn-in and annotating clades with ≥0.8 posterior probability, and the maximum-clade-credibility tree (MCC) was generated. The resulting files were viewed using Figtree v.1.4[6].
Results
Taxanomy
YL and JX, sp. nov. (Figures 1, 2, 3A–C, 4A–C)
FIGURE 1
Basidiomata of Melanoleuca galerina (Holotype, HMJAU48281).
FIGURE 2
Microscopic characteristics of Melanoleuca galerina (Holotype, HMJAU48281). (A,B) Basidiospores; (C,D) Basidia; and (E) Trama (A,B = 5 μm; C–E = 10 μm).
Scanning electron microscope images of basidiospores: (A–C)
Melanoleuca galerina (Holotype, HMJAU48281); (D–F)
M. subgrammopodia (Holotype, HMJAU48287).
Basidiomata of Melanoleuca galerina (Holotype, HMJAU48281).Microscopic characteristics of Melanoleuca galerina (Holotype, HMJAU48281). (A,B) Basidiospores; (C,D) Basidia; and (E) Trama (A,B = 5 μm; C–E = 10 μm).Line drawings: (A–C)
Melanoleuca galerina (Holotype, HMJAU48281), (A) Basidiospores; (B) Pileipellis; (C) Basidia; (D–G)
Melanoleuca subgrammopodia (Holotype, HMJAU48287), (D) Basidia; (E) Pileipellis; (F) Cheilocystidia; and (G) Basidiospores (A,G = 5 μm; B–E, F = 10 μm).Scanning electron microscope images of basidiospores: (A–C)
Melanoleuca galerina (Holotype, HMJAU48281); (D–F)
M. subgrammopodia (Holotype, HMJAU48287).MycoBank no.: MB 830397Diagnosis: Pileus 8.5–9.8 cm, plane or slightly depressed at disc, pale when young, pale brown (5C4) to margin at the later stage, margin pale (1A2), surface hygrophanous, dehiscent in the center in the mature period. Lamellae white (1A2) when young, pale rose pink (4A2) in the mature period. Stipe 10–13 × 1.3–1.7 cm, longitudinally fibrous striate, slightly distorted, hollow. Cystidia absent. Clamp connections absent. Basidiospores (6.7) 7.1–8.4 × (3.5) 4.4–5.4 μm, amyloid.Type: China: Jilin Province, Jilin City, Zuojia Town, 44°05′N, 126°05′E, 7 September 2016, Jize Xu, HMJAU48281 (Holotype).Etymology: referring to the basidiospores, which are similar to Galerina.Pileus 8.5–9.8 cm, plane or slightly depressed at disc, near round, light brown (5C4) in the center, slightly paling toward the margin, surface hygrophanous, smooth, not viscid when moist, margin pale (1A2), even, slightly cracked when matured. Lamellae 0.3–0.4 cm broad, decurrent, white (1A2) at first, pale rose pink (4A2) in the mature period, 19 lamellae/cm in the edge of the pileus. Stipe 10–13 × 1.3–1.7 cm, white (2A2) to creamy (29A2), pale brown (5C4) when moist, subcylindrical, longitudinally fibrous striate, slightly distorted, subequal, slightly attenuated in the middle, with poor pallid (1A1) tomentum toward the base, hollow when matured. Context 0.5 cm thick at pileus center, dirty white (28A2) to pale brown (5C4), with indistinct or slight fungoid smell and mild taste. Spore print white.Basidiospores (6.7) 7.1–8.4 × (3.5) 4.4–5.4 μm, Q = (1.43) 1.51–1.89 (2.16), (n = 30), oblong-ellipsoid, hyaline, some with one oil drop, few with encrusted crystals on the surface, ornamented with round warts, warts up to 0.5 μm wide and 0.3–0.6 μm high, amyloid. Basidia 31–36 (39) × (7.4) 7.8–8.5 μm, clavate to subcylindrical, slightly broadened at apex, with two or four sterigmata, sterigmata up to 2.5–4.0 μm long. Cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia absent. Trama regular, hyphae 9.5–12 μm wide, cylindrical, thin-walled, hyaline. Pileipellis a cutis of radially parallel, thin-walled, dense hyphae, hyphae 10–14 μm wide, cylindrical, not or slightly constricted at the septa, hyaline. Clamp connections absent.Habitat and distribution: Scattered on grass. Known from Jilin Province in China.Additional specimens examined: China: Jilin Province: Jilin City, Zuojia Town, 44°05′N, 126°05′E, 7 September 2016, Jize Xu, HMJU00103.Notes: Melanoleuca galerina is mainly characterized as having medium to large basidiomata, with a hygrophanous pileus, decurrent lamellae and a fibrous stipe which is hollow at maturity. It belongs to the subgenus Melanoleuca which has a key characteristic in that it lacks cystidia (Boekhout, 1988). In the subgenus Melanoleuca, M. galerina differs from M. ustaliformis Murrill, M. melaleuciformis Murrill, M. subfulvidisca Murrill and M. westiana Murrill in having a pale brown pileus and decurrent lamellae (Hesler, 2013b). Melanoleuca compressipes Murrill, M. albissima Murrill and M. watsonii Murrill are easily distinguished from M. galerina by their glabrous stipes (Murrill, 1940; Hesler, 2013b), apart from this, the spores in M. watsonii are much smaller than those of M. galerina (4–5 × 2.3–2.5 μm in M. watsonii, 7.2–8.3 × 4.3–4.9 μm in M. galerina). Melanoleuca compressipes differs from M. galerina in its sordid-white to dark-brown lamellae. In gross morphology, M. galerina is exceedingly similar to M. clelandii Grgur., but M. clelandii differs from M. galerina in having a larger basidiomata, with a pileus diameter up to 15.2 cm while the pileus diameter of M. galerina is approximately 9 cm (Grgurinovic, 1985).YL and JX, sp. nov. (Figures 3D–G, 4D–F, 5, 6).
FIGURE 5
Basidiomata of Melanoleuca subgrammopodia (Holotype, HMJAU48287).
FIGURE 6
Microscopic characteristics of Melanoleuca subgrammopodia (Holotype, HMJAU48287). (A) Trama; (B,C) Cheilocystidia; (D) Basidiospores; and (E,F) Basidia (A–C = 10 μm; D = 5 μm; E,F = 10 μm).
Basidiomata of Melanoleuca subgrammopodia (Holotype, HMJAU48287).Microscopic characteristics of Melanoleuca subgrammopodia (Holotype, HMJAU48287). (A) Trama; (B,C) Cheilocystidia; (D) Basidiospores; and (E,F) Basidia (A–C = 10 μm; D = 5 μm; E,F = 10 μm).MycoBank no.: MB830552Diagnosis: Pileus 10–13 cm, depressed in the center, dark brown (9F6) at first, then becoming lighter, margin incurved when young, applanated after maturity. Lamellae 0.2–0.3 cm broad, white (1A2), separated from the edge of pileus after maturity. Stipe 6.5–7.5 × 0.7–0.9 cm near black (7F3) when young, light brown (6C6) when mature, longitudinally fibrous striate. Clamp connections absent. Cheilocystidia urticiform, of brevipes-type, septate, without crystals at the apex. Basidiospores (6.2) 7.2–8.3 (8.6) × 4.3–4.9 (5.3) μm, amyloid.Type: China: Jilin Province, Jiaohe City, Hongyegu, 43°40′N, 127°04′E, 6 September 2018, Jize Xu, Jiajun Hu, HMJAU48287 (Holotype).Etymology: refers to the longitudinally fibrous striate stipe.Pileus 10–13 cm, depressed in the center, shallow funnel, dark brown (9F6) at first, then becoming lighter, pale brown (5B3) in the mature period, surface dry, smooth, not viscid when moist, margin even, slightly cracked, incurved when young, applanated after maturity. Lamellae 0.2–0.3 cm broad, adnate to decurrent, white (1A2), 9–11 lamellae/cm in the edge of the pileus, with intercalated lamellulae, separated from the edge of pileus after maturity. Stipe 6.5–7.5 × 0.7–0.9 cm, near black (7F3) when young, light brown (6C6) in the mature period, broadened at base, longitudinally fibrous striate. Context 0.2 cm thick at pileus center, dirty white (6B1), smell and taste indistinct. Spore print white.Basidiospores (6.2) 7.2–8.3 (8.6) × 4.3–4.9 (5.3) μm, Q = (1.26) 1.46–1.76 (1.81), (n = 30), elliptical to subovoid, most with one oil drop, hyaline, ornamented with warts, warts round, up to 0.3 μm wide and 0.2–0.6 μm high, amyloid. Basidia 39–43 × 9.2–10.3 μm, clavate, slightly broadened at apex, with two or four sterigmata, sterigmata up to 1.5–4 μm long. Cheilocystidia urticiform, 38–50 × 6–10 μm, of brevipes-type, attenuated toward the apex, septate, without crystals at apex, hyaline. Pleurocystidia rare, similar to cheilocystidia. Trama regular, hyphae 11–13 μm cylindrical, thin-walled, hyaline. Pileipellis a cutis of radially parallel, thin-walled, dense hyphae, hyphae 11–14 μm wide, cylindrical, not or slightly constricted at the septa, hyaline. Clamp connections absent.Habitat and distribution: Scattered on grass. Known from Jilin Province in China.Additional specimens examined: China: Jilin Province, Jiaohe City, Hongyegu, 43°40′N, 127°04′E, 6 September 2018, Jize Xu, Jiajun Hu, HMJU00104.Notes: The main characteristics of M. subgrammopodia are its larger basidiocarps, white lamellae, short stipe and urticiform cystidia. Melanoleuca subgrammopodia is related to members of the section Grammpodiae in the subgenus Urticocystis (Boekhout, 1988). Melanoleuca floridana Murrill is distinct from M. subgrammopodia in having a subtomentose pileus and stipe which are basal part clavate (Hesler, 2013a). Melanoleuca juliannae Rimóczi, Antonín, L. Nagy and Tomšovský is characterized by a violaceous-blue stipe and two types of cheilocystidia (the exscissa-type is most common while the brevipes-type is less frequent) (Vladimír et al., 2014). However, there is only one type of cheilocystidia in M. subgrammopodia (brevipes-type). Melanoleuca subgrammopodia is also close to M. subacris Murrill and M. subcylindrispora Murrill, M. subacris is distinct from M. subgrammopodia in having a uniform white pileus. The main characteristic of M. subcylindrispora are its subcylindrical spores, but the spores of M. subgrammopodia are elliptical to subovoid (Hesler, 2013b).
New Recorded Species in China
Melanoleuca griseobrunnea Antonín, Ďuriška and Tomšovský, M. pseudopaedida Bon, M. angelesiana A. H. Smith, M. microcephala (P. Karst.) Singer, M. communis Sánchez-García and J. Cifuentes, M. cinereifolia (Bon) Bon, M. nivea Métrod ex Boekhout are first recorded in China.A. H. Smith, Mycologia 36: 252. 1944 (Figures 7A, 8G–I, 9G–I, 10C,D).
FIGURE 7
Basidiomata: (A)
Melanoleuca angelesiana (HMJU00120); (B)
M. cinereifolia (HMJU00124); (C)
M. griseobrunnea (HMJU00134); (D)
M. pseudopaedida (HMJU00155); (E,F)
M. nivea (HMJU00148); (G,H)
M. communis (HMJU00139); and (I)
M. microcephala (HMJU00132).
Line drawings: (A–C)
M. pseudopaedida (HMJU00155), (A) Basidia; (B) Basidiospores; (C) Pileipellis; (D–F)
M. microcephala (HMJU00132), (D) Basidia; (E) Basidiospores; (F) Pileipellis; (G–I)
M. angelesiana (HMJU00120), (G) Basidia; (H) Basidiospores; (I) Pileipellis; (J–M)
M. communis (HMJU00139), (J) Basidia; (K) Basidiospores; (L) Cheilocystidia; (M) Pileipellis; (N–Q)
M. nivea (HMJU00148), (N) Basidia; (O) Basidiospores; (P) Cheilocystidia; (Q) Pileipellis; (R–U)
M. cinereifolia (HMJU00124), (R) Basidia; (S) Basidiospores; (T) Cheilocystidia; (U) Pileipellis; (V–Y)
M. griseobrunnea (HMJU00134), (V) Basidia; (W) Basidiospores; (X) Cheilocystidia; (Y) Pileipellis (A,D,G,J,L,N,P,R,T,V,X = 10 μm; B,C,E,F,H,I,K,M,O,Q,S,U,W,Y = 5 μm).
FIGURE 10
Scanning electron microscope images of basidiospores: (A,B)
M. cinereifolia (HMJU00124); (C,D)
M. angelesiana (HMJU00120); (E,F)
M. communis (HMJU00139); (G,H)
M. microcephala (HMJU00132); (I,J)
M. griseobrunnea (HMJU00134); (K,L)
M. nivea (HMJU00148); (M–O)
M. pseudopaedida (HMJU00155).
Basidiomata: (A)
Melanoleuca angelesiana (HMJU00120); (B)
M. cinereifolia (HMJU00124); (C)
M. griseobrunnea (HMJU00134); (D)
M. pseudopaedida (HMJU00155); (E,F)
M. nivea (HMJU00148); (G,H)
M. communis (HMJU00139); and (I)
M. microcephala (HMJU00132).Microscopic characteristics: (A–C)
Melanoleuca pseudopaedida (HMJU00155), (A) Trama; (B) Basidiospores; (C) Basidia; (D–F)
M. microcephala (HMJU00132), (D) Trama; (E) Basidiospores; (F) Basidia; (G–I)
M. angelesiana (HMJU00120), (G) Trama; (H) Basidiospores; (I) Basidia; (J–M)
M. cinereifolia (HMJU00124), (J) Trama; (K) Basidia; (L) Basidiospores; (M) Cheilocystidia (A,C,D,F,G,I,M = 10 μm; B,E,H,J,K,L = 5 μm).Line drawings: (A–C)
M. pseudopaedida (HMJU00155), (A) Basidia; (B) Basidiospores; (C) Pileipellis; (D–F)
M. microcephala (HMJU00132), (D) Basidia; (E) Basidiospores; (F) Pileipellis; (G–I)
M. angelesiana (HMJU00120), (G) Basidia; (H) Basidiospores; (I) Pileipellis; (J–M)
M. communis (HMJU00139), (J) Basidia; (K) Basidiospores; (L) Cheilocystidia; (M) Pileipellis; (N–Q)
M. nivea (HMJU00148), (N) Basidia; (O) Basidiospores; (P) Cheilocystidia; (Q) Pileipellis; (R–U)
M. cinereifolia (HMJU00124), (R) Basidia; (S) Basidiospores; (T) Cheilocystidia; (U) Pileipellis; (V–Y)
M. griseobrunnea (HMJU00134), (V) Basidia; (W) Basidiospores; (X) Cheilocystidia; (Y) Pileipellis (A,D,G,J,L,N,P,R,T,V,X = 10 μm; B,C,E,F,H,I,K,M,O,Q,S,U,W,Y = 5 μm).Scanning electron microscope images of basidiospores: (A,B)
M. cinereifolia (HMJU00124); (C,D)
M. angelesiana (HMJU00120); (E,F)
M. communis (HMJU00139); (G,H)
M. microcephala (HMJU00132); (I,J)
M. griseobrunnea (HMJU00134); (K,L)
M. nivea (HMJU00148); (M–O)
M. pseudopaedida (HMJU00155).Pileus 5–7 cm diameter, depressed at disc, dull olive brown, surface glabrous, dry, smooth, subviscid when moist, margin incurved, becoming plane or uplifted, paler grayish brown. Lamellae adnate, pale gray to pallid or white, moderately broad, narrowed toward the margin, 8–9 lamellae/cm in the edge of the pileus, with intercalated lamellulae, the edges even and staining brownish where bruised. Stipe 5–6 × 1–1.2 cm, surface concolorous with the pileus or paler, slightly flared at the base, longitudinally fibrous striate, glabrous, hollow when matured. Context 2–3 mm thick at pileus center, watery gray when moist, pallid when faded, odor none, taste mild. Spore print white.Basidiospores 6.5–7.7 (7.9) × 4.5–5.5 (6.1) μm, Q = (1.27) 1.34–1.70 (1.79), (n = 30), elliptical, covered with strongly amyloid minute warts. Basidia 34–42 × 9.1–12 μm, clavate, with four sterigmata. Pleurocystidia and cheilocystidia absent. Trama interwoven, inamyloid. Pileipellis a cutis composed of interwoven to radial, thin-walled, homogeneous, dense hyphae, hyphae 7–13 μm wide, cylindrical, not or slightly constricted at the septa, hyaline.Specimens examined: China: Heilongjiang Province, Yichun City, 12 September 2017, Jize Xu, HMJU00120; same location, 11 September 2017, Jize Xu, HMJU00114.Habitat and distribution: Solitary, on ground of coniferous mixed forest. Known from China and America.Notes: M. angelesiana is placed in clade A and belonging to subgenus Urticocystis. The Chinese collection shares very similar morphological features and DNA sequence (ITS and nrLSU). Differing from holotype (Smith, 1944), the material from Heilongjiang produces a dry pileus which is not umbonate.Sánchez-García & J. Cifuentes, Revista Mexicana de Micologia Suplemento-Micologia 116. 2013 (Figures 7G,H, 9J–M, 10E,F, 11A–D).
Microscopic characteristics: (A–D)
Melanoleuca communis (HMJU00139), (A) Trama; (B) Basidiospores; (C) Basidia; (D) Cheilocystidia; (E–H)
M. nivea (HMJU00148), (E) Trama; (F) Basidiospores; (G) Basidia; (H) Cheilocystidia; (I–L)
M. griseobrunnea (HMJU00134), (I) Basidiospores; (J) Basidia; (K) Cheilocystidia; (L) Trama (A,C,D,E,G,H,J,K,L = 10 μm; B,F,I = 5 μm).Pileus 2.8–16 cm diameter, plane to plane-convex, sometimes umbonate, brown slightly paler or yellowish-brown toward the margin, surface moist, not viscid, smooth, margin slightly incurved. Lamellae sinuate or adnate, white to yellowish, 6–8 lamellae/cm in the edge of the pileus, with intercalated lamellulae, edges jagged. Stipe 4–17 × 0.4–1.2 (1.8) cm, white to pale yellow, cylindrical to slightly attenuated toward the base, with yellowish longitudinal stripes, fleshy-fibrous, slightly whitish pruinose, solid. Context 1–2 mm thick at pileus center, white, sometimes brown-beige or grayish, smell sweetish, pleasant, sometimes absent, taste farinaceous, bitter, sometimes absent. Spore print white.Basidiospores (6.5) 6.7–8.9 (9.4) × 4.1 (4.9)–5.6 μm, Q = 1.41–1.64 (1.68), (n = 30), elliptical to oblong, ornamented with amyloid, isolated warts, hyaline. Basidia (18) 21–31 (39) × (5) 8–10 μm, clavate, with four sterigmata. Cheilocystidia 51–67 × 11–16 μm, fusiform, sometimes lageniform usually with crystals at the apices. Pleurocystidia similar to cheilocystidia. Trama regular, inamyloid. Pileipellis a cutis constituted of interwoven, thin-walled, dense hyphae, hyphae 6–18 μm wide, cylindrical, not or slightly constricted at the septa, hyaline.Specimens examined: China: Jilin Province, Jilin City, Zuojia Town, 5 September 2016, Jize Xu, HMJU00117; same location, 27 July 2016, Jize Xu, HMJU00146; same location, 27 July 2017, Jize Xu, HMJU00143; Liaoning Province, Fuxin City, Fumeng Town, Haitang Mountain, 6 August 2016, Jize Xu, HMJU00139, HMJU00144.Habitat and distribution: Scattered on grass. Known from China and Mexico.Notes: M. communis is included in clade B and belonging to subgenus Melanoleuca. Differing from holotype (Sánchez-García et al., 2013), the edges of lamellae for Chinese collections are jagged, and the stipes are slightly whitish pruinose.(Bon) Bon, Documents Mycologiques 9: 71. 1978 (Figures 7B, 8J–M, 9R–U, 10A,B).Pileus 3.5–5.0 cm diameter, plane-convex to plane, cafe-gray, surface smooth, moist not viscid, margin straight. Lamellae sinuate, adnate, white, 12–13 lamellae/cm in the edge of the pileus, with intercalated lamellulae. Stipe 4 × 0.3 cm, surface concolorous with the pileus, cylindrical, longitudinally striate, fleshy-fibrous, pruinose or finely floccose at base, solid. Context 1.5–2.5 mm thick at pileus center, cafe-gray to chocolate color, odor none, taste absent. Spore print white.Basidiospores 7.2–8.4 × 4.3–5.2 μm, Q = 1.42–2.00, (n = 30), elliptical to oblong, ornamented with warts, hyaline, amyloid; Basidia (20) 23–31 (33) × 8 (10) μm, clavate, with four sterigmata; Cheilocystidia (41) 49–59 (64) × (8) 10–12 (13) μm, fusiform to lageniform, with crystals at the apices. Pleurocystidia similar to cheilocystidia. Trama regular, inamyloid. Pileipellis tomentum, a cutis composed of thin-walled, dense hyphae, hyphae 6–18 μm wide, cylindrical, not or slightly constricted at the septa, hyaline.Specimens examined: China: Jilin Province, Jilin City, Zuojia Town, 7 September 2016, Jize Xu, HMJU00124.Habitat and distribution: Solitary, on grass of forest. Known from China and Mexico.Notes: M. cinereifolia is in clade B and belonging to subgenus Melanoleuca. Differing from interpretations of Sánchez-García et al. (2013), the material from Jilin produces a solid stipe which is pruinose or finely floccose at base.Antonín, Ďuriška & Tomšovský, Plant Systematics and Evolution 303: 1195. 2017 (Figures 7C, 9V–Y, 10I,J, 11I–L).Pileus 2.0–3.5 cm diameter, applanate with or without a shallow central depression and with small central umbo, dark gray-brown, sometimes paler toward margin, surface smooth, glabrous to finely tomentose, not viscid when moist, slightly pruinose at margin, margin slightly incurved. Lamellae adnexed to slightly decurrent with tooth, pale dirty cream, 16–19 lamellae/cm in the edge of the pileus, with intercalated lamellulae. Stipe 2.5–4.5 × 0.3–0.5 cm, gray brown, apex slightly paler, cylindrical, slightly clavate at base, pruinose or finely floccose at apex. Context 0.7–0.9 mm thick at pileus center, whitish to grayish brownish, smell fungoid, taste mild with unpleasant aftertaste. Spore print whitish.Basidiospores (5.7) 6.3–7.6 × (3.9) 4.1–5.4 μm, Q = 1.40–1.51, (n = 30), elliptical, ovoid, with verruculose ornamentation, amyloid. Basidia 18–42 × 6.0–12 μm, clavate, subcylindrical or subfusoid, with four sterigmata. Cheilocystidia 25–46 × 6.0–10.5 μm, urticiform of both the exscissa- and brevipes-type. Pleurocystidia similar to cheilocystidia. Trama regular, inamyloid. Pileipellis a cutis constituted of subradially arranged, thin-walled hyphae, hyphae 5–13 μm wide, cylindrical, hyaline.Specimens examined: China: Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan City, Suyukou National Forest Park, 13 August 2018, Jize Xu, HMJU00134.Habitat and distribution: Scattered on sandy soil. Known from China and Korea.Notes: M. griseobrunnea is placed in clade A and belonging to subgenus Urticocystis. The species is related to M. porphyropoda, but M. griseobrunnea is distinguished by having urticiform cystidia (Yu et al., 2014). Differing from holotype (Antonín et al., 2017), the edges of lamellae for Chinese collections are jagged, and the stipes are slightly whitish pruinose.(P. Karst.) Singer, Cavanillesia 7: 123. 1935 (Figures 7I, 8D–F, 9D–F, 10G,H).Pileus 1.8–2.5 cm diameter, plane or slightly depressed at disc, round or nearly circular, pale brown, sometimes lighter toward margin, surface dry, smooth, margin pale, incurved, slightly cracked. Lamellae adnate to slightly decurrent, white, 20–25 lamellae/cm in the edge of the pileus, with intercalated lamellulae. Stipe 5.3–6.3 × 0.3–0.5 cm, white at apex, became darker toward the base, light gray brown at base, cylindrical, slightly expanded at base. Context 0.5–0.7 mm thick at pileus center, milky white, odor none, taste mild. Spore print white.Basidiospores (6.8) 7.2–8.3 × (4.8) 5.0–5.9 μm, Q = 1.37–1.41, (n = 30), elliptical, smooth or with verruculose ornamentation, amyloid. Basidia 35–40 × 6.8–8.0 μm, clavate, with four sterigmata. Cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia absent. Trama regular, inamyloid. Pileipellis a cutis consisted of intertwined, thin-walled, dense hyphae, hyphae 6–18 μm wide, cylindrical, not or slightly constricted at the septa, hyaline.Specimens examined: China: Gansu Province, Zhangye City, Minle Town, 9 August 2018, Jize Xu, HMJU00133; Tianshui City, 8 August 2018 Jize Xu, HMJU00132, HMJU00138.Habitat and distribution: Scattered on grass. Known from China and Italy.Notes: M. microcephala is included in clade A and belonging to subgenus Urticocystis. Differing from interpretations of Fontenla et al. (2013), the stipe of the material from Gansu is slightly longer, and the color of stipe is darker.Métrod ex Boekhout, Persoonia 13: 417. 1988 (Figures 7E,F, 9N–Q, 10K,L, 11E–H).Pileus 3.0–5.0 cm diameter, convex to plane, mostly with low broad umbo, white to pale gray-brown, sometimes with some ochraceous spots, surface smooth, glabrous, slightly viscid when moist, margin somewhat inflexed and slightly exceeding. Lamellae emarginate to adnate, ventricose, thin, up to 8 mm wide, whitish or pale cream, 13–15 lamellae/cm in the edge of the pileus, with intercalated lamellulae, entire to minutely flocculose edge. Stipe 3–5.5 × 0.4–0.8 cm, whitish to pale grayish beige, finally becoming grayish and brownish toward base, cylindrical, somewhat broadening toward base, longitudinally striate, whitish pruinose, glabrous in lower parts when matured. Context 0.4 mm thick at pileus center, whitish, brown to orange-brown, smell faint, somewhat rancid, taste weak, unpleasant. Spore print yellowish white.Basidiospores 6.5–8.3 (9.1) × 4.1–5.0 μm, Q = 1.52–1.98, (n = 30), elongate, moderately densely ornamented with rather coarse amyloid warts. Basidia 23–33 × 7–9 pm, clavate, with four sterigmata. Cheilocystidia (35) 40–65 × 9–15 (20) μm, fusiform, partly tending to lageniform, mostly with the apex acute and encrusted by crystals. Pleurocystidia similar to cheilocystidia. Trama regular, inamyloid. Pileipellis an ixocutis composed of radially arranged, thin-walled hyphae, hyphae 5–8 μm wide, cylindrical, hyaline.Specimens examined: China: Liaoning Province, Huludao City, Bailang Mountain, 28 July 2016, Jize Xu, HMJU00148.Habitat and distribution: Single on the ground of forest. Known from China and Netherlands.Notes: M. nivea is placed in clade B and belonging to subgenus Melanoleuca. Differing from holotype (Boekhout, 1988), the Chinese collections produce a white to pale gray-brown pileus and darker colored stipe.Bon, Docums Mycol. 20: 58. 1990 (Figures 7D, 8A–C, 9A–C, 10M–O).Pileus 2.0–3.6 cm diameter, plane to depressed at disc, brown to fuliginous, becoming pale, some with white spots, surface smooth, glabrous, slightly viscid when moist, margin slightly incurved, slightly cracked. Lamellae adnate to emarginate, pale gray-brown, 16–18 lamellae/cm in the edge of the pileus, with intercalated lamellulae, edges entire, whitish pruinose. Stipe 2.5–4.5 × 0.3–0.5 cm, pale at apex, brown at center, cylindrical, longitudinally striate, hollow when matured. Context 0.5–0.7 mm thick at pileus center, dirty beige, odor none, taste absent. Spore print white.Basidiospores (6.7) 7.0–8.4 (8.7) × 5.0–6.0 μm, Q = (1.26) 1.30–1.58, (n = 30), elliptical to subovoid, densely ornamented with amyloid warts. Basidia 24–30 × 6.8–8.0 μm, clavate, with two or four sterigmata. Cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia absent. Trama regular, inamyloid. Pileipellis tomentum, a cutis composed of thin-walled hyphae, hyphae 6–14 μm wide, cylindrical, not or slightly constricted at the septa, hyaline.Specimens examined: China: Qinghai Province, Haixi State, Wulan Town, 7 August 2018, Jize Xu, HMJU00155.Habitat and distribution: Solitary, on grass. Known from China and France.Notes: M. pseudopaedida is included in clade A and belonging to subgenus Urticocystis. Differing from holotype (Bon, 1990), the lamellae of the Chinese collections are whitish pruinose and the color is paler.For the ITS-nrLSU ML analysis, 110 sequences relating to 29 species were added. The ML tree represented as Figure 12 shows detailed results with high bootstrapping values. Phylogenetic analysis produced two Clades: A and B. Clade A was formed in I node, with the bootstrapping value of 81%, while Clade B was formed in II node, having a bootstrapping value of 100%. Melanoleuca galerina and M. subgrammopodia were independently separated in III node, with a bootstrapping value of 87%. Both M. galerina and M. subgrammopodia were included in Clade A.
FIGURE 12
Maximum likelihood tree based on analyses of the ITS and nrLSU sequence data with Clitocybe subditopoda as the outgroup.
Maximum likelihood tree based on analyses of the ITS and nrLSU sequence data with Clitocybe subditopoda as the outgroup.
Divergence Time Estimation
A combination of ITS and nrLSU sequences were used to estimate the divergence time of Melanoleuca. The MCC tree represented in Figure 13 shows two diverged clades in Melanoleuca since 33.31 million years ago. Clade A contains 18 independent species: M. griseobrunnea, M. pseudopaedida, M. microcephala, M. galerina, M. subgrammopodia, M. angelesiana, M. porphyropoda X. D. Yu, M. stridula (Fr.) Singer, M. dryophila Murrill, M. brevipes (Bull.) Pat., M. exscissa (Fr.) Singer, M. paedida (Fr.) Kühner & Maire, M. grammopodia (Bull.) Murrill, M. herrerae Sánchez-García & J. Cifuentes, M. longisterigma Sánchez-García & J. Cifuentes, M. jaliscoensis Sánchez-García, J. Cifuentes & Guzm.-Dáv., M. cognata (Fr.) Konrad & Maubl. and M. melaleuca (Pers.) Murrill. Clade B contains 9 species: M. cinereifolia, M. communis, M. nivea, M. leucopoda X. D. Yu, M. strictipes (P. Karst.) Jul. Schäff., M. polioleuca (Fr.) Kühner & Maire, M. friesii (Bres.) Bon, M. arcuata (Bull.) Singer and M. verrucipes (Fr.) Singer. Furthermore, M. galerina and M. subgrammopodia diverged 11.48 million years ago.
FIGURE 13
Maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree based on BEAST analyses.
Maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree based on BEAST analyses.
Discussion
In this study, two new species from northeastern China were described in detail. Based on Boekhout (1988)
M. galerina belongs to the subgenus Melanoleuca and M. subgrammopodia belongs to the section Grammpodiae in the subgenus Urticocystis. However, using phylogenetic analyses, the species in our investigations are divided into two Clades. The species in clade A are with urticiform cystidia or without cystidia, and in clade B have macrocystidia. This result was corroborated by Vizzini et al. (2011) whereby the authors divided the genus Melanoleuca into two subgenera: the subgenus Urticocystis mainly included the species with urticiform cystidia or without cystidia, while the subgenus Melanoleuca mainly included the species with macrocystidiate. Therefore, in this study, our phylogenetic analyses of Melanoleuca species using combined ITS and nrLSU sequences suggests that M. galerina and M. subgrammopodia are new species belonging to the subgenus Urticocystis.In our investigations, the results of divergence time were in line with phylogenetic analysis, and supports that M. galerina and M. subgrammopodia are new species. In addition, results also indicate that divergence time of a lineage could be used as a criterion for ranking taxa (Zhao et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2017). But, the selection of proper calibration points provided by fossils is an important aspect. Moreover, reliable calibration points can provide evidence for divergence time (Feng, 2012).
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated can be found in NCBI, accession numbers can be found in Table 1.
Author Contributions
JX wrote the manuscript. JX, XY, ML, and CZ carried out the experiments. JX, CZ, and JH collected the specimens. LG and YL designed the experiments. OM had a contribution in revising the manuscript and taking SEM photographs.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Authors: Dimitrios Floudas; Manfred Binder; Robert Riley; Kerrie Barry; Robert A Blanchette; Bernard Henrissat; Angel T Martínez; Robert Otillar; Joseph W Spatafora; Jagjit S Yadav; Andrea Aerts; Isabelle Benoit; Alex Boyd; Alexis Carlson; Alex Copeland; Pedro M Coutinho; Ronald P de Vries; Patricia Ferreira; Keisha Findley; Brian Foster; Jill Gaskell; Dylan Glotzer; Paweł Górecki; Joseph Heitman; Cedar Hesse; Chiaki Hori; Kiyohiko Igarashi; Joel A Jurgens; Nathan Kallen; Phil Kersten; Annegret Kohler; Ursula Kües; T K Arun Kumar; Alan Kuo; Kurt LaButti; Luis F Larrondo; Erika Lindquist; Albee Ling; Vincent Lombard; Susan Lucas; Taina Lundell; Rachael Martin; David J McLaughlin; Ingo Morgenstern; Emanuelle Morin; Claude Murat; Laszlo G Nagy; Matt Nolan; Robin A Ohm; Aleksandrina Patyshakuliyeva; Antonis Rokas; Francisco J Ruiz-Dueñas; Grzegorz Sabat; Asaf Salamov; Masahiro Samejima; Jeremy Schmutz; Jason C Slot; Franz St John; Jan Stenlid; Hui Sun; Sheng Sun; Khajamohiddin Syed; Adrian Tsang; Ad Wiebenga; Darcy Young; Antonio Pisabarro; Daniel C Eastwood; Francis Martin; Dan Cullen; Igor V Grigoriev; David S Hibbett Journal: Science Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: J Chen; P Callac; L A Parra; S C Karunarathna; M-Q He; M Moinard; A De Kesel; O Raspé; K Wisitrassameewong; K D Hyde; R-L Zhao Journal: Persoonia Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 11.051