Literature DB >> 31611751

Acenocoumarol's pharmacokinetic: linear or not?

Parveen Kumar1, Puneet Kapoor1, Chhikara Meenu2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31611751      PMCID: PMC6785764          DOI: 10.17179/excli2019-1714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EXCLI J        ISSN: 1611-2156            Impact factor:   4.068


× No keyword cloud information.



Acenocoumarol, is a racemic mixture of the optical R (+) and S (-) enantiomers. R (+) enantiomer is several times more potent than the S (-) enantiomer (Godbillon et al., 1981[1]). Acenocoumarol is rapidly absorbed following oral absorption with approximately 60 % of the dose available systemically (Trailokya, 2015[13]). After a single dose of 10 mg, the peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of acenocoumarol are reached within 1-3 h and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) values are proportional to the dose in the dosage range of 8 to 16 mg (Sasso et al., 2012[8]). The protein binding of acenocoumarol is 98 % (Trailokya et al., 2016[14]). Acenocoumarol is mainly metabolized by CYP2C9 (Trailokya, 2015[13]); 6- and 7-hydroxylation of both enantiomers of acenocoumarol are the major metabolites (Thijssen et al., 2000[11]). The elimination half-life of acenocoumarol is 8 to 11 h (Sánchez et al., 2013[7]). Approximately, 29 % of acenocoumarol excrete in feces and 60 % in urine. The starting dose of acenocoumarol usually ranged from 2 to 4 mg. Based on the prothrombin time, subsequent loading doses may be recommended (Trailokya, 2015[13]). Acenocoumarol is reported to exhibit a dose-proportional pharmacokinetics for the 8 to 16 mg doses (Trailokya, 2015[13]). However, no information is available for the dose-proportionality of lower doses of acenocoumarol (i.e. 1 to 4 mg doses). We aimed to evaluate the dose-proportionality of acenocoumarol by performing a literature search and plotting a linear curve for AUC vs. dose from the available information. Literature related to pharmacokinetics of acenocoumarol was searched in PubMed. A total of 115 from 1618 articles were identified related to acenocoumarol's pharmacokinetics. From, 115 articles, 9 articles were identified as potentially relevant, as these articles reported the AUC values at different time points such as 24, 48, 72 h and at infinite time. These articles were finally considered for the evaluation of linearity of acenocoumarol pharmacokinetics. Various studies have reported the AUC0-48 and AUC0-∞ values of acenocoumarol for 1, 4, 10 and 12 mg dose (Table 1(Tab. 1); References in Table 1: Huang et al., 2008[2]; Masche et al., 1999[3]; Popovic et al., 1994[4]; Rolan et al., 2003[6]; Sasso et al., 2012[8]; Sunkara et al., 2004[9]; Thijssen and Baars, 1983[10]; Thijssen and Hamulyàk, 1989[12]). No other information on AUC0-48 and AUC0-∞ were available with the 2, 8 and 16 mg dose. The pharmacokinetics data across these studies were used to generate a dose-proportionality curve (acenocoumarol dose vs. AUC0-48 or acenocoumarol dose vs. AUC0-∞). The dose-proportionality curves between AUC and acenocoumarol doses (AUC0-48 vs. dose, and AUC0-∞ vs. dose) are presented in Figure 1(Fig. 1).
Table 1

AUC0-48 and AUC0-∞ values of acenocoumarol from literature search

Figure 1

Dose-proportionality curves between AUC and acenocoumarol doses (AUC0-48 vs. dose, and AUC0-∞ vs. dose)

An R2 of 1 indicates that the regression predictions perfectly fit the data. Therefore, from the value of R2 (0.9988 for AUC0-48 vs. dose, and 0.9874 for AUC0-∞ vs. dose), it is clear that acenocoumarol exhibits a dose-proportional pharmacokinetics.
  11 in total

1.  A placebo-controlled pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction study between tamsulosin and acenocoumarol.

Authors:  P Rolan; I J Terpstra; C Clarke; F Mullins; J N Visser
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Bioequivalence of acenocoumarol in chilean volunteers: an open, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, 2-period, and 2-sequence crossover study for 2 oral formulations.

Authors:  J Sasso; P Carmona; L Quiñones; M Ortiz; E Tamayo; N Varela; D Cáceres; I Saavedra
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  2012-07-06

Review 3.  Acenocoumarol: A Review of Anticoagulant Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Abhijit Trailokya; J S Hiremath; Jps Sawhney; Y K Mishra; Vivek Kanhere; R Srinivasa; Mangesh Tiwaskar
Journal:  J Assoc Physicians India       Date:  2016-02

4.  Pharmacokinetic analysis of a new acenocoumarol tablet formulation during a bioequivalence study.

Authors:  J Popović; M Mikov; V Jakovljević
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

5.  The interaction of the prostaglandin E derivative rioprostil with oral anticoagulant agents.

Authors:  H H Thijssen; K Hamulyàk
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Cytochrome P4502C9 is the principal catalyst of racemic acenocoumarol hydroxylation reactions in human liver microsomes.

Authors:  H H Thijssen; J P Flinois; P H Beaune
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.922

7.  No clinically relevant effect of lornoxicam intake on acenocoumarol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  U P Masche; K M Rentsch; A von Felten; P J Meier; K E Fattinger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Effect of aliskiren, an oral direct renin inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of acenocoumarol in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  H-L A Huang; S Vaidyanathan; C-M Yeh; M-N Bizot; H A Dieterich; W P Dole; D Howard
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.580

9.  Active metabolites of acenocoumarol: do they contribute to the therapeutic effect?

Authors:  H H Thijssen; L G Baars
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  The effect of nateglinide on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of acenocoumarol.

Authors:  Gangadhar Sunkara; Hilde Bigler; Yibin Wang; Harold Smith; Pratapa Prasad; James McLeod; Monica Ligueros-Saylan
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.