Literature DB >> 31611358

Susceptibility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to Five Quinazolinone Antibacterials.

Sara Ceballos1, Choon Kim2, Yuanyuan Qian2, Shahriar Mobashery2, Mayland Chang3, Carmen Torres4.   

Abstract

The in vitro activities of five quinazolinone antibacterials, compounds Q1 to Q5, were tested against 210 strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The MIC50/MIC90 values (in μg/ml) were as follows: Q1, 0.5/2; Q2, 1/4; Q3, 2/4; Q4, 0.06/0.25; and Q5, 0.125/0.5. Several strains with high MIC values (from 8 to >32 μg/ml) for some of these compounds exhibited amino acid changes in the penicillin-binding proteins, which are targeted by these antibacterials.
Copyright © 2019 Ceballos et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureuszzm321990; penicillin-binding proteins; quinazolinones; staphylococci

Year:  2019        PMID: 31611358      PMCID: PMC7187613          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01344-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


INTRODUCTION

Nosocomial and community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections remain major clinical problems. Patients with MRSA infections have a 64% higher risk of mortality than those infected with nonresistant bacteria (1). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MRSA accounts for >80,000 severe infections and kills >11,000 individuals annually in the United States alone (2). Historically, β-lactam antibiotics have been agents of choice in the treatment of S. aureus infections (3). β-Lactams target inhibition of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), which are enzymes of cell wall biosynthesis. S. aureus has four native PBPs, but MRSA has acquired an additional PBP, designated PBP 2a, which affords broad resistance to β-lactam antibiotics in the face of their challenge (4–6). We have described the discovery of the quinazolinones as cell wall-active antibacterials with anti-S. aureus activity, including MRSA strains (7). We documented that the quinazolinones target PBP 1 and PBP 2a for inhibition (7). Preliminary structure-activity relationships and descriptions of in vitro and in vivo activities for the class have been described (7–14). In this report, we investigated the antibacterial activity profile of five quinazolinones of our design, compounds Q1 to Q5 (Fig. 1), against a collection of 210 MRSA strains (108 strains from the United States and 102 from Spain). The collection encompasses distinct clonal complexes and 54 MRSA strains with additional mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance, including resistance to the second-generation penicillin methicillin through the mecC gene and resistance to vancomycin or linezolid (Table 1). The 108 strains from the United States were obtained through BEI Resources. The 102 Spanish strains were obtained from four hospitals in three different regions (Aragón, La Rioja, and Madrid) (n = 94) and from animal, food, and water origins (n = 8, mostly with mecC mechanism).
FIG 1

Chemical structures of quinazolinones Q1 to Q5.

TABLE 1

Susceptibility of 210 MRSA strains, including S. aureus NCTC8325, to quinazolinones 1 to 5, ceftaroline, linezolid, and vancomycin

Antibacterial agentMIC for total MRSA population (n = 210) (μg/ml)
MIC range for MRSA with following resistance mechanismsa (μg/ml):
MIC for MSSAb NCTC8325 (μg/ml)
RangeMIC50MIC90VRSA (n = 15)VISA (n = 20)hVISA (n = 6)mecC-MRSA (n = 7)LRSA (n = 6)
Ceftaroline0.125 to 20.510.25 to 20.25 to 20.5 to 10.5 to 10.5 to 20.125
Linezolid0.5 to >16221 to 20.5 to 20.5 to 21 to 28 to >161
Vancomycin>324 to 82 to 81 to 21 to 41
10.03 to >320.520.125 to 20.25 to 40.125 to 40.25 to 20.25 to 10.25
20.06 to >32140.125 to 80.125 to 80.25 to 20.5 to 21 to 40.5
30.5 to 16242 to 160.5 to 160.5 to 21 to 21 to 41
4≤0.03 to >320.060.250.06 to 40.03 to >32≤0.03 to 0.125≤0.03 to 0.060.06 to 0.250.25
5≤0.03 to >320.1250.50.06 to 2≤0.03 to 1≤0.03 to 0.1250.06 to 0.250.06 to 0.250.125

VRSA, vancomycin-resistant S. aureus; VISA, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus; hVISA, heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus; LRSA, linezolid-resistant S. aureus.

MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. MIC values for ATCC 29213 (quality control strain) were in the range of those shown by CLSI for ceftaroline, linezolid, and vancomycin.

Chemical structures of quinazolinones Q1 to Q5. Susceptibility of 210 MRSA strains, including S. aureus NCTC8325, to quinazolinones 1 to 5, ceftaroline, linezolid, and vancomycin VRSA, vancomycin-resistant S. aureus; VISA, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus; hVISA, heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus; LRSA, linezolid-resistant S. aureus. MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. MIC values for ATCC 29213 (quality control strain) were in the range of those shown by CLSI for ceftaroline, linezolid, and vancomycin. The microdilution method supplemented with 2% NaCl was used to determine the MIC values of quinazolinones Q1 to Q5 (15), using S. aureus NCTC8325 as a reference and a quality-control strain (MIC ranges for Q1 to Q5, 0.125 to 1 μg/ml) (Table 1). Two clinically used anti-MRSA agents, ceftaroline (a β-lactam) and linezolid (an oxazolidinone), were included for the purpose of comparison. Vancomycin (a glycopeptide antibiotic) was included for vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA), vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus isolates. The MIC ranges for the five quinazolinones with the 210 MRSA strains and the values for MIC50 and MIC90 are shown in Table 1. The range of quinazolinone MIC values for the 210 MRSA strains was broad, from ≤0.03 to >32 μg/ml. High MICs for the quinazolinones of >32, 16, and 8 μg/ml were observed in 15, 2, and 18 strains, respectively. The MIC50/MIC90 values (in μg/ml) of the quinazolinones were as follows: Q1, 0.5/2; Q2, 1/4; Q3, 2/4; Q4, 0.06/0.25; and Q5, 0.125/0.5. Notwithstanding the broad MIC ranges for Q4 and Q5, note that compound Q4 MIC50/MIC90 values were 8- to 4-fold and 32- to 8-fold lower than those of ceftaroline and linezolid, respectively, and compound Q5 MIC50/MIC90 values were 4- to 2-fold and 16- to 4-fold lower than those of ceftaroline and linezolid, respectively (Table 1). For mecC-dependent MRSA and linezolid-resistant S. aureus (LRSA) strains, all quinazolinones had MIC values of ≤2 μg/ml (except for two LRSA strains with MICs of 4 μg/ml). Quinazolinones Q4 and Q5 showed excellent MICs of ≤1 μg/ml against the collected strains with few exceptions: for Q4, one VISA isolate with >32 μg/ml and one VRSA isolate with 4 μg/ml; and for Q5, two MRSA isolates with >32 μg/ml and one VRSA isolate with 2 μg/ml. Four MRSA strains (C1657, C5287, K399, and C2878) that showed high MICs (>32 μg/ml) for the quinazolinones were selected for sequence analysis of pbp1, pbp2, mecA, pbp3, and pbp4 genes by PCR and DNA sequencing (16, 17); these are the five PBP genes in MRSA. The corresponding amino acid sequences were compared with reference sequences available in the NCBI database: MRSA strain N315 for the mecA gene (GenBank accession number BA000018.3) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strain NCTC 8325 for the pbp1, pbp2, pbp3, and pbp4 genes (GenBank accession number LS483365.1). The resultant variations in the amino acids of the proteins are listed in Table 2, in addition to the MIC values for the β-lactams ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam in these MRSA strains. The clonal complexes (CC) of these four selected strains were known to belong to CC1, CC8, CC247, and CC398, respectively (18–20). Strain C1657, with an MIC for compound Q2 of >32 μg/ml, showed amino acid substitutions in all PBPs except PBP 2. Strain C5287 (MIC for Q1, >32 μg/ml) exhibited a single amino acid substitution in PBP 2. Strain K399 (MICs for Q1, Q2, and Q5, >32 μg/ml) showed one substitution in PBP 2a (G246E) and none in the other PBPs. Finally, strain C2878 (MICs for Q1, Q2, and Q5, >32 μg/ml) exhibited amino acid changes in all PBPs except PBP 3. The relationship between the amino acid substitutions and the quinazolinone reduced activity is not clear and should be further investigated. However, mutations in PBP 1 and PBP 2a are of special interest, in that these two PBPs are targets of quinazolinones (7, 14).
TABLE 2

Amino acid changes of PBPs in MRSA strains that showed high MIC values (>32 μg/ml) to quinazolinones

StrainspaMLSTCCMIC for β-lactamsa (μg/ml)Compound with MIC >32 μg/mlLocation of amino acid substitutions for:
PBP 1PBP 2PBP 2aPBP 3PBP 4
C1657t127ST1CC1 CPT, 0.5; BPR, 1; TZP, >256;MEM, >32Q2V617MNoneG246EH556LT189S
C5287t008ST8CC8 CPT, 0.5; BPR, 1; TZP, >256;MEM, >32Q1NoneR30KNoneNoneNone
K399t051ST247CC247 CPT, 1; BPR, 2; TZP, >256;MEM, >32Q1, Q2, Q5NoneNoneG246ENoneNone
C2878t1451ST398CC398CPT, 1; BPR, 1; TZP, >256; MEM, 6Q1, Q2, Q5F465L, D480E, D662N, S664TD270E, T439V, D489E, T691AS225RNoneE398A

TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; MEM, meropenem; CPT, ceftaroline; BPR, ceftobiprole.

Amino acid changes of PBPs in MRSA strains that showed high MIC values (>32 μg/ml) to quinazolinones TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; MEM, meropenem; CPT, ceftaroline; BPR, ceftobiprole. Quinazolinone Q5 has shown similar in vivo activity to the closely related Q3 in mouse models of infection by MRSA (9). Whereas the MIC for MRSA NRS70, the strain used in mouse neutropenic thigh infection, is 8-fold lower for Q5 than for Q3, the plasma protein binding of Q5 is very high (99.6% ± 0.04% for Q5 versus 96.5% ± 0.7% for Q3) (9), decreasing the in vivo efficacy of Q5. Q4 has slightly lower MICs (Table 1); however, its PK properties are poor, resulting in low systemic exposure and very high clearance in mice (9). As a result, Q4 shows poor efficacy in the mouse peritonitis MRSA model of infection (9). Thus, both compounds Q3 and Q5 were selected for susceptibility testing (microdilution method) with 32 additional methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant non-aureus staphylococci isolates, including 4 linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus (Table 3). Linezolid MIC was tested by the microdilution method in this study. All staphylococci included in the study belonged to the strain collection of the University of La Rioja (Spain). The range of MICs for Q5 in all Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains was 4 to 16 μg/ml, with only one methicillin-resistant strain showing a value of 16 μg/ml. Within the coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), all S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus strains showed MIC values for Q5 of ≤0.125 μg/ml, and the Staphylococcus saprophyticus strain exhibited an MIC of 2 μg/ml. The higher MIC of S. saprophyticus for the quinazolinones may be explained by the fact that methicillin-sensitive S. saprophyticus is resistant to most of the antibiotics used for treatment of urinary tract infections, including ceftriaxone (21). Accordingly, compound Q5 appears to be highly effective against some CoNS, such as S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus, including linezolid-resistant ones, which are important clinically as opportunistic pathogens causing catheter-associated urinary tract or bloodstream infections (22–24). The activity of Q3 in non-aureus staphylococci was lower (Table 3).
TABLE 3

MIC for quinazolinones Q3, Q5, and linezolid against non-aureus staphylococci

Speciesa No. of strains testedMIC range (μg/ml) for:
Q3Q5Linezolid
MR S. pseudintermedius916 to 324 to 160.5 to 1
MS S. pseudintermedius284 to 80.5
MR S. epidermidis100.06 to >32≤0.03 to 0.060.25 to 32b
MR S. haemolyticus100.125 to >32≤0.03 to 0.1250.5 to 16b
MS S. saprophyticus1>3221

MR, methicillin resistant; MS, methicillin susceptible.

Two MR S. epidermidis and two MR S. haemolyticus were linezolid resistant.

MIC for quinazolinones Q3, Q5, and linezolid against non-aureus staphylococci MR, methicillin resistant; MS, methicillin susceptible. Two MR S. epidermidis and two MR S. haemolyticus were linezolid resistant. In summary, the quinazolinones have excellent in vitro activity against a broad range of MRSA strains. Quinazolinone Q5 stands out for its low MIC50/MIC90 values against S. aureus isolates and its high antibacterial activity against other staphylococcal species.
  20 in total

Review 1.  4(3H)-Quinazolinone derivatives: Promising antibacterial drug leads.

Authors:  Srikanth Gatadi; T Vasanta Lakshmi; Srinivas Nanduri
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 2.  Coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  Karsten Becker; Christine Heilmann; Georg Peters
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Synthesis, antitumor and antimicrobial activity of some new 6-methyl-3-phenyl-4(3H)-quinazolinone analogues: in silico studies.

Authors:  Amer M Alanazi; Alaa A-M Abdel-Aziz; Taghreed Z Shawer; Rezk R Ayyad; Abdulrahman M Al-Obaid; Mohamed H M Al-Agamy; Azza R Maarouf; Adel S El-Azab
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.051

4.  Skin lesion by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398-t1451 in a Spanish pig farmer: possible transmission from animals to humans.

Authors:  Carmen Lozano; Carmen Aspiroz; Luis Charlez; Elena Gómez-Sanz; Miguel Toledo; Myriam Zarazaga; Carmen Torres
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.133

5.  Dynamic of nasal colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 and ST1 after mupirocin treatment in a family in close contact with pigs.

Authors:  Carmen Lozano; Carmen Aspiroz; Juan J Lasarte; Elena Gómez-Sanz; Myriam Zarazaga; Carmen Torres
Journal:  Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.268

6.  The basis for resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics by penicillin-binding protein 2a of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Cosimo Fuda; Maxim Suvorov; Sergei B Vakulenko; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-06-28       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Synthesis, antimicrobial, anticancer evaluation and QSAR studies of thiazolidin-4-ones clubbed with quinazolinone.

Authors:  Aakash Deep; Balasubramanian Narasimhan; Kalavathy Ramasamy; Vasudevan Mani; Rakesh Kumar Mishra; Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Structure-Activity Relationship for the 4(3H)-Quinazolinone Antibacterials.

Authors:  Renee Bouley; Derong Ding; Zhihong Peng; Maria Bastian; Elena Lastochkin; Wei Song; Mark A Suckow; Valerie A Schroeder; William R Wolter; Shahriar Mobashery; Mayland Chang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Catheter-related bloodstream infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci: are antibiotics necessary if the catheter is removed?

Authors:  Ursula Patricia Hebeisen; Andrew Atkinson; Jonas Marschall; Niccolò Buetti
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.887

Review 10.  Catheter associated urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Lindsay E Nicolle
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.887

View more
  1 in total

1.  Unconventional Antibacterials and Adjuvants.

Authors:  Mayland Chang; Kiran V Mahasenan; Juan A Hermoso; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 22.384

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.