Literature DB >> 31611231

Position Effects Influence Transvection in Drosophila melanogaster.

Thomas D King1, Justine E Johnson1, Jack R Bateman2.   

Abstract

Transvection is an epigenetic phenomenon wherein regulatory elements communicate between different chromosomes in trans, and is thereby dependent upon the three-dimensional organization of the genome. Transvection is best understood in Drosophila, where homologous chromosomes are closely paired in most somatic nuclei, although similar phenomena have been observed in other species. Previous data have supported that the Drosophila genome is generally permissive to enhancer action in trans, a form of transvection where an enhancer on one homolog activates gene expression from a promoter on a paired homolog. However, the capacity of different genomic positions to influence the quantitative output of transvection has yet to be addressed. To investigate this question, we employed a transgenic system that assesses and compares enhancer action in cis and in trans at defined chromosomal locations. Using the strong synthetic eye-specific enhancer GMR, we show that loci supporting strong cis-expression tend to support robust enhancer action in trans, whereas locations with weaker cis-expression show reduced transvection in a fluorescent reporter assay. Our subsequent analysis is consistent with a model wherein the chromatin state of the transgenic insertion site is a primary determinant of the degree to which enhancer action in trans will be supported, whereas other factors such as locus-specific variation in somatic homolog pairing are of less importance in influencing position effects on transvection.
Copyright © 2019 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromatin; long-range enhancer; position effects; somatic homolog pairing; transvection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31611231      PMCID: PMC6893391          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  48 in total

1.  Comparing enhancer action in cis and in trans.

Authors:  Jack R Bateman; Justine E Johnson; Melissa N Locke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The FLP recombinase of yeast catalyzes site-specific recombination in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  K G Golic; S Lindquist
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  The Capacity to Act in Trans Varies Among Drosophila Enhancers.

Authors:  Amanda J Blick; Ilana Mayer-Hirshfeld; Beatriz R Malibiran; Matthew A Cooper; Pieter A Martino; Justine E Johnson; Jack R Bateman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Transgene Coplacement and high efficiency site-specific recombination with the Cre/loxP system in Drosophila.

Authors:  M L Siegal; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Pairing between gypsy insulators facilitates the enhancer action in trans throughout the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Elena Kravchenko; Ekaterina Savitskaya; Oksana Kravchuk; Alexander Parshikov; Pavel Georgiev; Mikhail Savitsky
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  chinmo is a functional effector of the JAK/STAT pathway that regulates eye development, tumor formation, and stem cell self-renewal in Drosophila.

Authors:  Maria Sol Flaherty; Pauline Salis; Cory J Evans; Laura A Ekas; Amine Marouf; Jiri Zavadil; Utpal Banerjee; Erika A Bach
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 7.  Pairing and anti-pairing: a balancing act in the diploid genome.

Authors:  Eric F Joyce; Jelena Erceg; C-Ting Wu
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 5.578

8.  The Genomic Landscape of Position Effects on Protein Expression Level and Noise in Yeast.

Authors:  Xiaoshu Chen; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 10.304

9.  The Drosophila zeste protein binds cooperatively to sites in many gene regulatory regions: implications for transvection and gene regulation.

Authors:  M Benson; V Pirrotta
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Genome-wide landscape of position effects on heterogeneous gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xiao-Le Wu; Bing-Zhi Li; Wen-Zheng Zhang; Kai Song; Hao Qi; Jun-Biao Dai; Ying-Jin Yuan
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 6.040

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Multi-Scale Organization of the Drosophila melanogaster Genome.

Authors:  Samantha C Peterson; Kaylah B Samuelson; Stacey L Hanlon
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Co-expression of C9orf72 related dipeptide-repeats over 1000 repeat units reveals age- and combination-specific phenotypic profiles in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ryan J H West; Joanne L Sharpe; André Voelzmann; Anna L Munro; Ines Hahn; Richard A Baines; Stuart Pickering-Brown
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 7.801

3.  Isoform-specific roles of the Drosophila filamin-type protein Jitterbug (Jbug) during development.

Authors:  SeYeon Chung; Thao Phuong Le; Vishakha Vishwakarma; Yim Ling Cheng; Deborah J Andrew
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 4.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.