Literature DB >> 31610459

The high-resolution estimation of sulfur dioxide (SO2) concentration, health effect and monetary costs in Beijing.

Yu Wu1, Rui Li1, Lulu Cui1, Ya Meng1, Hanyun Cheng1, Hongbo Fu2.   

Abstract

Severe air pollution episodes with high SO2 loading have been frequently observed during the last decades in Beijing and have caused a noticeable damage to human health. To advance the spatiotemporal prediction of SO2 exposure in Beijing, we developed the monthly land use regression (LUR) models using daily SO2 concentration data collected from 34 monitoring stations during 2016 and 7 categories of potential independent variables (socio-economic factors, traffic and transport, emission source, land use, meteorological data, building morphology and Geographic location) in Beijing. The average adjusted R2 of 12 final LUR models was 0.62, and the root-mean-squared error (RMSE) was 4.12 μg/m3. The LOOCV R2 and RMSE of LUR models reached 0.56 and 5.43 μg/m3, respectively, suggesting that the LUR models achieved the satisfactory performance. The prediction results suggested that the average SO2 level in Beijing was 11.06 μg/m3 with the highest one up to 22.49 μg/m3 but the lowest one down to 3.86 μg/m3. The SO2 exposure showed strong spatial heterogeneity, which was much higher in the southern area than that in the northern in Beijing. The mortality and morbidity due to the excessive SO2 concentration were estimated to be 73 (95% CI:(38-125)) and 27854 (95% CI:(13852-41659)) cases per year in Beijing, leading to economic cost of 35.76 (95% CI:(16.45-54.06)) and 441.47 (95% CI:(318.31-562.04)) million RMB Yuan in 2016, respectively. This study clarified the intra- and inter-regional transport modeling of the SO2 pollution in Beijing and supplied an important support for the future air-quality and public health management strategies.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LUR model; Monetary costs; Mortality and morbidity; SO(2)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31610459     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  4 in total

1.  Correlation between environmental pollution indicators and COVID-19 pandemic: A brief study in Californian context.

Authors:  Muhammad Farhan Bashir; Ben Jiang Ma; Bushra Komal; Muhammad Adnan Bashir; Taimoor Hassan Farooq; Najaf Iqbal; Madiha Bashir
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Selecting Indicators to Monitor and Assess Environmental Health in a Portuguese Urban Setting: A Participatory Approach.

Authors:  Marta Salgado; Ana C L Vieira; Anália Torres; Mónica D Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Gender Differences in Association between Air Pollution and Daily Mortality in the Capital of the Green Lungs of Poland-Population-Based Study with 2,953,000 Person-Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Łukasz Kuźma; Krzysztof Struniawski; Szymon Pogorzelski; Hanna Bachórzewska-Gajewska; Sławomir Dobrzycki
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Environmental monitoring and health assessment in an industrial town in central India: A cross-sectional study protocol.

Authors:  Tanwi Trushna; Vikas Dhiman; Satish Bhagwatrao Aher; Dharma Raj; Rajesh Ahirwar; Swasti Shubham; Subroto Shambhu Nandi; Rajnarayan R Tiwari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.