Literature DB >> 31609887

Fast Starters, Slow Starters, and Late Dippers: Trajectories of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Results from a Dutch Nationwide Database.

B Hesseling1, N M C Mathijssen1, L N van Steenbergen2, M Melles3, S B W Vehmeijer1, J T Porsius3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore whether subgroups of patients with different functional recovery trajectories after total hip arthroplasty can be discerned, as well as their predictors, using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten [LROI]).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) up to 1 year postoperatively for patients who had undergone a primary total hip arthroplasty. Latent class growth modeling was used to classify subgroups of patients according to the trajectory of functional recovery represented by the patients' OHS. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis to explore factors associated with class membership.
RESULTS: A total of 6,030 patients were analyzed. Latent class growth modeling identified fast starters (fast initial improvement, high 12-month scores; 87.7%), slow starters (no initial change and subsequent improvement; 4.6%), and late dippers (initial improvement and subsequent deterioration; 7.7%). Factors associated with slow starters were female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14 to 2.33]) and smoking (OR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.26 to 3.03]); an anterior approach (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.78]) had a protective effect against a less favorable response. Factors associated with late dippers were age of >75 years (OR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.22 to 2.15]), smoking (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.17 to 2.42]), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade of III or IV (OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.91]), obesity (OR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.43 to 2.69]), poorer EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care (OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.82] for "some problems" and OR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.39 to 6.03] for "unable"), poorer EQ-5D Anxiety/Depression (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.71] for "moderately" and OR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.06 to 3.24] for "extremely"), poorer EQ-5D visual analog scale (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.86 to 0.97] per 10 points), direct lateral approach (OR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.58 to 3.02]), and hybrid fixation with a cemented acetabular implant (OR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.00 to 3.21]).
CONCLUSIONS: We discerned fast starters, slow starters, and late dippers after total hip arthroplasty. Female sex, older age, obesity, higher ASA grades, and worse EQ-5D scores were associated with a less favorable response to total hip arthroplasty, as well as hybrid fixation (cemented acetabular implant) and direct lateral approach. Anterior approach had a protective effect against a less favorable response. However, all subgroups experienced functional improvement following total hip arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31609887     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  8 in total

1.  Patient-reported outcome of 95% of young patients improves after primary total hip arthroplasty: identification of 3 recovery trajectories in 3,207 patients younger than 55 years from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Martijn F L Kuijpers; Liza N Van Steenbergen; B Willem Schreurs; Gerjon Hannink
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.925

2.  Implant positioning in total hip arthroplasty: influence of horizontal and vertical offset on functionality of prosthetic hip joint.

Authors:  Arun Vaishy; Mohd Arif; Rahul Aanand; Kamaldeep Singh; Hitesh Kumar Rulaniya; Naveen Kumawat; Ramakishan Choudhary; Paras Choudhary
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Progression patterns of range of motion progression after open release for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

Authors:  Farhan Ahmad; Luis Torres-Gonzales; Nabil Mehta; Mark S Cohen; Xavier Simcock; Robert W Wysocki
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-28

4.  A Patient-Reported Outcome Tool to Triage Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients to Hospital or Video Consultation: Pilot Study With Expert Panels and a Cohort of 1228 Patients.

Authors:  Yvette Pronk; Peter Pilot; Walter van der Weegen; Justus-Martijn Brinkman; Berend Willem Schreurs
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-12-20

5.  Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Results in 2 Recovery Patterns Based on Preoperative Pain and on Arthritis: Improvers and Non-improvers.

Authors:  Maarten A Röling; Brechtje Hesseling; Nina M C Mathijssen; Rolf M Bloem
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-24

6.  Appraisal and patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Bruce D Rapkin; Jhase Sniderman; Joel A Finkelstein
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-05

Review 7.  Osteoarthritis Progression: Mitigation and Rehabilitation Strategies.

Authors:  Devin Drummer; Jeremy McAdam; Regina Seay; Arny Ferrando; S Louis Bridges; Jasvinder A Singh; Marcas Bamman
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-08-23

8.  The influence of short-term complications on the outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arno A Macken; Ante Prkić; Niels Vermeulen; Iris van Oost; Koen L M Koenraadt; Bertram The; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-04-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.