BACKGROUND: Extracellular vesicles (EV) are purported to mediate type 2 diabetes and CVD risk and development. Physical activity and a balanced diet reduce disease risk, but no study has tested the hypothesis that short-term interval (INT) training would reduce EV compared with continuous (CONT) exercise in adults with prediabetes. METHODS: Eighteen obese adults (age, 63.8 ± 1.5 yr; body mass index, 31.0 ± 1.3 kg·m) were screened for prediabetes using American Diabetes Association criteria (75 g oral glucose tolerance test). Subjects were randomized to INT (n = 10, alternating 3-min intervals at 90% and 50% HRpeak, respectively) or CONT (n = 8, 70% HRpeak) training for 12 supervised sessions over 13 d for 60 min·d. Cardiorespiratory fitness (V˙ O2peak), weight (kg), as well as ad libitum dietary intake were assessed and arterial stiffness (augmentation index via applanation tonometry) was calculated using total AUC during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test performed 24 h after the last exercise bout. Total EV, platelet EV (CD31/CD41), endothelial EV (CD105; CD31/ CD41), platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM) (CD31), and leukocyte EV (CD45; CD45/CD41) were analyzed via imaging flow cytometry preintervention/postintervention. RESULTS: The INT exercise increased V˙O2peak (P = 0.04) compared with CONT training. Although training had no effect on platelet or leukocyte EV, INT decreased Annexin V- endothelial EV CD105 compared with CONT (P = 0.04). However, after accounting for dietary sugar intake, the intensity effect was lost (P = 0.18). Increased ad libitum dietary sugar intake after training was linked to elevated AV+ CD105 (r = 0.49, P = 0.06) and AV- CD45 (r = 0.59, P = 0.01). Nonetheless, increased V˙O2peak correlated with decreased AV+ CD105 (r = -0.60, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Interval exercise training decreases endothelial-derived EV in adults with prediabetes. Although increased sugar consumption may alter EV after a short-term exercise intervention, fitness modifies EV count.
BACKGROUND: Extracellular vesicles (EV) are purported to mediate type 2 diabetes and CVD risk and development. Physical activity and a balanced diet reduce disease risk, but no study has tested the hypothesis that short-term interval (INT) training would reduce EV compared with continuous (CONT) exercise in adults with prediabetes. METHODS: Eighteen obese adults (age, 63.8 ± 1.5 yr; body mass index, 31.0 ± 1.3 kg·m) were screened for prediabetes using American Diabetes Association criteria (75 g oral glucose tolerance test). Subjects were randomized to INT (n = 10, alternating 3-min intervals at 90% and 50% HRpeak, respectively) or CONT (n = 8, 70% HRpeak) training for 12 supervised sessions over 13 d for 60 min·d. Cardiorespiratory fitness (V˙ O2peak), weight (kg), as well as ad libitum dietary intake were assessed and arterial stiffness (augmentation index via applanation tonometry) was calculated using total AUC during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test performed 24 h after the last exercise bout. Total EV, platelet EV (CD31/CD41), endothelial EV (CD105; CD31/ CD41), platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM) (CD31), and leukocyte EV (CD45; CD45/CD41) were analyzed via imaging flow cytometry preintervention/postintervention. RESULTS: The INT exercise increased V˙O2peak (P = 0.04) compared with CONT training. Although training had no effect on platelet or leukocyte EV, INT decreased Annexin V- endothelial EV CD105 compared with CONT (P = 0.04). However, after accounting for dietary sugar intake, the intensity effect was lost (P = 0.18). Increased ad libitum dietary sugar intake after training was linked to elevated AV+ CD105 (r = 0.49, P = 0.06) and AV- CD45 (r = 0.59, P = 0.01). Nonetheless, increased V˙O2peak correlated with decreased AV+ CD105 (r = -0.60, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Interval exercise training decreases endothelial-derived EV in adults with prediabetes. Although increased sugar consumption may alter EV after a short-term exercise intervention, fitness modifies EV count.
Authors: Monique E Francois; Etienne Myette-Cote; Tyler D Bammert; Cody Durrer; Helena Neudorf; Christopher A DeSouza; Jonathan P Little Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Martin Whitham; Benjamin L Parker; Martin Friedrichsen; Janne R Hingst; Marit Hjorth; William E Hughes; Casey L Egan; Lena Cron; Kevin I Watt; Rhiannon P Kuchel; Navind Jayasooriah; Emma Estevez; Tim Petzold; Catherine M Suter; Paul Gregorevic; Bente Kiens; Erik A Richter; David E James; Jørgen F P Wojtaszewski; Mark A Febbraio Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Felix Jansen; Xiaoyan Yang; Bernardo S Franklin; Marion Hoelscher; Theresa Schmitz; Jörg Bedorf; Georg Nickenig; Nikos Werner Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: J Piťha; I Králová Lesná; P Stávek; A Mahrová; J Racek; A Sekerková; V Teplan; M Štollová Journal: Physiol Res Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 1.881
Authors: Natalie Z M Eichner; Nicole M Gilbertson; Julian M Gaitan; Emily M Heiston; Luca Musante; Sabrina LaSalvia; Arthur Weltman; Uta Erdbrügger; Steven K Malin Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2018-05
Authors: Emily M Heiston; Anna Ballantyne; Sabrina La Salvia; Luca Musante; Uta Erdbrügger; Steven K Malin Journal: J Physiol Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 6.228