Takaaki Komiyama, Yukiya Tanoue1, Mizuki Sudo2, Joseph T Costello3, Yoshinari Uehara4, Yasuki Higaki4, Soichi Ando5. 1. Graduate School of Sports and Health Science, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, JAPAN. 2. Meiji Yasuda Life Foundation of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, JAPAN. 3. Extreme Environments Laboratory, Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UNITED KINGDOM. 4. Faculty of Sports Science, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, JAPAN. 5. Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo, JAPAN.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Cognitive performance appears to be impaired during high-intensity exercise, and this occurs concurrently with a reduction in cerebral blood flow (CBF). However, it is unclear whether cognitive impairment during high-intensity exercise is associated with reduced CBF. We tested the hypothesis that a reduction in CBF is responsible for impaired cognitive performance during high-intensity exercise. METHODS: Using a randomized crossover design 17 healthy males performed spatial delayed response and Go/No-Go tasks in three conditions (exercise [EX], exercise+CO2 [EX+CO2], and a nonexercising control [CON]). In the EX and EX+CO2, they performed cognitive tasks at rest and during 8 min of moderate and high-intensity exercise. Exercise intensity corresponded to ~50% (moderate) and ~80% (high) of peak oxygen uptake. In the EX+CO2, the participants inspired hypercapnic gas (2% CO2) during high-intensity exercise. In the CON, they performed the cognitive tasks without exercise. RESULTS:Middle cerebral artery mean velocity increased during high-intensity exercise in the EX+CO2 relative to the EX (69.4 [10.6] cm·s, vs 57.2 [7.7] cm·s, P < 0.001). Accuracy of the cognitive tasks was impaired during high-intensity exercise in the EX (84.1% [13.3%], P < 0.05) and the EX+ CO2 (85.7 [11.6%], P < 0.05) relative to rest (EX: 95.1% [5.3%], EX+CO2: 95.1 [5.3%]). However, no differences between the EX and the EX+CO2 were observed (P > 0.10). These results demonstrate that restored CBF did not prevent cognitive impairment during high-intensity exercise. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a reduction in CBF is not responsible for impaired cognitive performance during high-intensity exercise.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Cognitive performance appears to be impaired during high-intensity exercise, and this occurs concurrently with a reduction in cerebral blood flow (CBF). However, it is unclear whether cognitive impairment during high-intensity exercise is associated with reduced CBF. We tested the hypothesis that a reduction in CBF is responsible for impaired cognitive performance during high-intensity exercise. METHODS: Using a randomized crossover design 17 healthy males performed spatial delayed response and Go/No-Go tasks in three conditions (exercise [EX], exercise+CO2 [EX+CO2], and a nonexercising control [CON]). In the EX and EX+CO2, they performed cognitive tasks at rest and during 8 min of moderate and high-intensity exercise. Exercise intensity corresponded to ~50% (moderate) and ~80% (high) of peak oxygen uptake. In the EX+CO2, the participants inspired hypercapnic gas (2% CO2) during high-intensity exercise. In the CON, they performed the cognitive tasks without exercise. RESULTS: Middle cerebral artery mean velocity increased during high-intensity exercise in the EX+CO2 relative to the EX (69.4 [10.6] cm·s, vs 57.2 [7.7] cm·s, P < 0.001). Accuracy of the cognitive tasks was impaired during high-intensity exercise in the EX (84.1% [13.3%], P < 0.05) and the EX+ CO2 (85.7 [11.6%], P < 0.05) relative to rest (EX: 95.1% [5.3%], EX+CO2: 95.1 [5.3%]). However, no differences between the EX and the EX+CO2 were observed (P > 0.10). These results demonstrate that restored CBF did not prevent cognitive impairment during high-intensity exercise. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a reduction in CBF is not responsible for impaired cognitive performance during high-intensity exercise.
Authors: Ricardo Schultz Martins; Phillip J Wallace; Scott W Steele; Jake S Scott; Michael J Taber; Geoffrey L Hartley; Stephen S Cheung Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-12-22
Authors: Alicen A Whitaker; Mohammed Alwatban; Andrea Freemyer; Jaime Perales-Puchalt; Sandra A Billinger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 3.240