William J Moss1,2, Andrey Finegersh1, Ajay Narayanan3, Danielle Gillard1, Joseph Califano1, Kevin T Brumund1,4, Charley S Coffey1,4, Ryan K Orosco1. 1. Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 8784University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. 2. Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 162433Commonwealth Health Center, Northern Mariana Islands, Garapan, Saipan. 3. Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 89063University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA. 4. Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Posterior neck masses are a relatively poorly characterized entity. The authors attempt to further characterize the anatomy and pathology of the posterior neck by way of a combined single-institution retrospective chart review and systematic review of the literature. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review was undertaken for all patients undergoing excision of a posterior neck mass between January 1, 2012, and January 1, 2017. A systematic review of the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane database was undertaken in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in search of case reports and series describing posterior neck masses. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients who underwent excision of a posterior neck mass were encountered during the retrospective chart review. All pathologies were benign, the most prevalent of which was lipoma (22/28, 79%). A total of 19 articles describing a collective 36 posterior neck masses were encountered during the systematic review. Lipomas were the most common pathology (15/36, 42%). All but one of the masses reported were benign (35/36, 97%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with posterior neck masses can be reassured of a low risk of malignancy. The majority of posterior neck masses can be appropriately evaluated via physical examination and ultrasound.
OBJECTIVE: Posterior neck masses are a relatively poorly characterized entity. The authors attempt to further characterize the anatomy and pathology of the posterior neck by way of a combined single-institution retrospective chart review and systematic review of the literature. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review was undertaken for all patients undergoing excision of a posterior neck mass between January 1, 2012, and January 1, 2017. A systematic review of the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane database was undertaken in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in search of case reports and series describing posterior neck masses. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients who underwent excision of a posterior neck mass were encountered during the retrospective chart review. All pathologies were benign, the most prevalent of which was lipoma (22/28, 79%). A total of 19 articles describing a collective 36 posterior neck masses were encountered during the systematic review. Lipomas were the most common pathology (15/36, 42%). All but one of the masses reported were benign (35/36, 97%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with posterior neck masses can be reassured of a low risk of malignancy. The majority of posterior neck masses can be appropriately evaluated via physical examination and ultrasound.