Literature DB >> 31608653

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Standard Hand Pump Infuser Irrigation vs an Automated Irrigation Pump During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Ureteroscopy: Assessment of Operating Room Efficiency and Surgeon Satisfaction.

Francis A Jefferson1, John M Sung1, Luke Limfueco1, Sherry Lu1, Courtney M Cottone1, Shlomi Tapiero1, Roshan M Patel1, Ralph V Clayman1, Jaime Landman1.   

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine if use of an automated irrigation pump (AIP) during ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) affects circulating nurse labor, irrigation-related issues, and surgeon and nurse satisfaction when compared to manual hand pump (HP) irrigation.
Methods: Eighty consecutive adult patients undergoing unilateral URS or PCNL were prospectively randomized to irrigation with the HP or AIP. Preoperative pump setup time, intraoperative pump maintenance time, total pump time (setup+maintenance), and the number of irrigation-related concerns verbalized by the surgeon intraoperatively were recorded; postoperatively, surgeons and nurses rated their satisfaction with the irrigation system (1 = highly dissatisfied to 10 = highly satisfied).
Results: Eighty patients were enrolled (39 AIP and 41 HP); 51 patients underwent URS and 29 patients underwent PCNL. On univariate analysis, the AIP resulted in a significantly reduced total pump time for URS (2.9 vs 5.9 minutes) and PCNL (4.6 vs 33.9 minutes; p < 0.001). The number of irrigation-related concerns was significantly lower in the AIP group during URS (1.2 vs 2.8, p < 0.001), but not during PCNL (1.9 vs 4.0, p = 0.07). The AIP was associated with significantly higher nurse satisfaction during URS (9.2/10 vs 6.5/10, p < 0.001) and PCNL (9.4/10 vs 4.4/10, p = 0.001). There was no significant association between pump type and surgeon satisfaction. On multivariate analysis of URS cases controlling for body mass index and number of stones, use of the AIP was a predictor of total pump time <5 minutes (odds ratio 25.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-165.4; p < 0.001) and favorable (8-10/10) nurse satisfaction rating (odds ratio 25.4, 95% CI 4.1-164.0; p < 0.001). Operative time, stone-free rate, and liters of irrigant used with the HP and AIP were similar. Conclusions: During URS and PCNL, the AIP was associated with a significant reduction in irrigation pump time and higher nurse satisfaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopy; irrigation; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; ureteroscopy; urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31608653      PMCID: PMC7047110          DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  22 in total

1.  Identification and use of operating room efficiency indicators: the problem of definition.

Authors:  Tamas Fixler; James G Wright
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Qualitative analysis of barriers to efficient operating room turnovers in a tertiary care academic medical center.

Authors:  Marc T Pimentel; Hugh Flanagan; Beverly K Philip; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Med Pract Manage       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

3.  Transurethral ureterorenolithotripsy using new automated irrigation/suction system controlling pressure and flow compared with standard irrigation: a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Eric Lechevallier; Martin Luciani; Olivier Nahon; Franck Lay; Christian Coulange
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Comparison of intrarenal pressure and irrigant flow during percutaneous nephroscopy with an indwelling ureteral catheter, ureteral occlusion balloon, and ureteral access sheath.

Authors:  Jaime Landman; Ramakrishna Venkatesh; Maged Ragab; Jamil Rehman; David I Lee; Kevin G Morrissey; Manoj Monga; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Endoscopic Valves and Irrigation Devices for Flexible Ureteroscopy: Is There a Difference?

Authors:  Sarah Tarplin; Michael Byrne; Nolan Farrell; Manoj Monga; Sri Sivalingam
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Comparison of Peditrol irrigation device and common methods of irrigation.

Authors:  Brian D M Blew; A Joel Dagnone; Kenneth T Pace; R John D'A Honey
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever?

Authors:  Wen Zhong; Guohua Zeng; Kaijun Wu; Xun Li; Wenzhong Chen; Houmeng Yang
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation.

Authors:  Brian K Auge; Paul K Pietrow; Costas D Lallas; Ganesh V Raj; Robert W Santa-Cruz; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Why we are wasting time in the operating theatre?

Authors:  Prithwiraj Saha; Anita Pinjani; Nawar Al-Shabibi; Sheethal Madari; John Ruston; Adam Magos
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep

10.  An investigation of the basic physics of irrigation in urology and the role of automated pump irrigation in cystoscopy.

Authors:  Dwayne Chang; Rustom P Manecksha; Konstantinos Syrrakos; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-15
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of vacuum suction ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and traditional ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted upper ureteral stones.

Authors:  Zhong-Hua Wu; Yong-Zhi Wang; Tong-Zu Liu; Xing-Huan Wang; Ci Zhang; Wei-Bing Zhang; Hang Zheng; Yin-Gao Zhang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.661

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.