Rujnan Tuna1, Birsen Dalli2. 1. Department of Health Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
AIM: The purpose of this study is to adapt the English version of the Handover Evaluation Scale to a Turkish nursing sample. METHODS: This is a methodological and cross-sectional study. This study was conducted with 192 nurses working in different units in a public hospital between September 2016 and January 2017. A descriptive information form and the Handover Evaluation Scale were used to collect data. First, language validity and content validity were determined regarding the adaptation of the scale. RESULTS: As a result of the adaptation process, it was determined that the scale's structure, which consisted of 10 items and two factors explaining 68.96% of the total variance, was valid and reliable for the Turkish nursing sample. A Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test and Bartlett's test of sphericity indicated that the sample met the criteria required for factor analysis. The reliability coefficient for the overall scale was 0.92. The test-retest reliability results were 0.87 for the overall intraclass correlation coefficient, and the t-test result was P > .05. CONCLUSION: This adaptation study revealed that the scale is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of the handover of Turkish nurses.
AIM: The purpose of this study is to adapt the English version of the Handover Evaluation Scale to a Turkish nursing sample. METHODS: This is a methodological and cross-sectional study. This study was conducted with 192 nurses working in different units in a public hospital between September 2016 and January 2017. A descriptive information form and the Handover Evaluation Scale were used to collect data. First, language validity and content validity were determined regarding the adaptation of the scale. RESULTS: As a result of the adaptation process, it was determined that the scale's structure, which consisted of 10 items and two factors explaining 68.96% of the total variance, was valid and reliable for the Turkish nursing sample. A Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test and Bartlett's test of sphericity indicated that the sample met the criteria required for factor analysis. The reliability coefficient for the overall scale was 0.92. The test-retest reliability results were 0.87 for the overall intraclass correlation coefficient, and the t-test result was P > .05. CONCLUSION: This adaptation study revealed that the scale is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of the handover of Turkish nurses.