Site-Directed Fluorescence Approaches for Dynamic Structural Biology of Membrane Peptides and Proteins.

Membrane proteins mediate a number of cellular functions and are associated with several diseases and also play a crucial role in pathogenicity. Due to their importance in cellular structure and function, they are important drug targets for ~60% of drugs available in the market. Despite the technological advancement and recent successful outcomes in determining the high-resolution structural snapshot of membrane proteins, the mechanistic details underlining the complex functionalities of membrane proteins is least understood. This is largely due to lack of structural dynamics information pertaining to different functional states of membrane proteins in a membrane environment. Fluorescence spectroscopy is a widely used technique in the analysis of functionally-relevant structure and dynamics of membrane protein. This review is focused on various site-directed fluorescence (SDFL) approaches and their applications to explore structural information, conformational changes, hydration dynamics, and lipid-protein interactions of important classes of membrane proteins that include the pore-forming peptides/proteins, ion channels/transporters and G-protein coupled receptors.

Introduction

Biological membranes are composed of heterogeneous mixtures of lipids and proteins which facilitate cellular compartmentalization for specialized functions. The biological membrane serves as a platform for many important functions like signal transduction, muscle contraction, ion transport, cell-contact, and recognition (Shai, 2001). Interestingly, one third of proteins produced by genomes of prokaryotes and eukaryotes are membrane proteins (Wallin and Heijne, 1998; Fagerberg et al., 2010). Further, membrane proteins are important drug targets for two-thirds of approved drugs—G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) and ion channels represent the largest groups (Terstappen and Reggiani, 2001; Yildirim et al., 2007; Bakheet and Doig, 2009; Bull and Doig, 2015). Therefore, understanding the mechanistic details of the function of membrane proteins is crucial for biomedical research and drug discovery.

Generally, the structure and function of membrane proteins is influenced by its membrane environment and the interactions within the structure (protein-protein interactions) and between lipids and proteins (lipid-protein interactions). Therefore, knowledge of how membranes shape protein structure with respect to its partitioning, change in orientation of α-helices, oligomerization, structural transition etc. is of vital importance to decipher the mechanism(s) of membrane protein function (Figure 1). Further, there exists significant differences between soluble and membrane proteins (Eilers et al., 2002; Zhou and Cross, 2013). For instance, the intrahelical hydrogen bonds are shorter in membrane proteins (Kim and Cross, 2002) and the backbone atoms of transmembrane helices experience less competition from water and hydrophilic side chains. In addition, the transmembrane helices of membrane proteins have significantly reduced highly polar (Asn and Gln) and charged (Arg and Lys) residues by a factor of ~3 (Eilers et al., 2002). A notable exception is the S4 helix of the voltage-sensing domains of voltage-gated ion channels and voltage-sensitive phosphatases (Jiang et al., 2003; Murata et al., 2005), in which there are several charged residues—mainly Arg and are called gating charges—present that help to generate electrical signaling in biology (Jiang et al., 2003; Catterall, 2010). Even the amino acids Gly and Pro, which are known as helix breakers, are present in high content throughout the transmembrane helices compared to helices from soluble proteins. Particularly, Gly plays an important role in facilitating interhelical interactions and folding stability of α-helical proteins.

Figure 1

Schematic representations of functionally-relevant structural changes in membrane proteins are shown. (A) Conformational changes in response to a physiological signal such as voltage, ligand, pH, membrane tension etc. (B) Oligomerization involving protein-protein interactions, (C) Partitioning, folding and insertion of membrane proteins such as pore-forming proteins (D) Lipid-protein interactions resulting in structural transition.

Interestingly, transmembrane proteins have significantly higher content of Trp amino acids compared to water-soluble proteins (Schiffer et al., 1992; Eilers et al., 2002). Generally, Trp residues comprise ~1 mol% in soluble proteins, whereas the relative abundance of Trp is much higher (~3–7%) in most membrane proteins (Wallace and Janes, 1999). For instance, membrane proteins like bacteriorhodopsin, cytochrome oxidase, α-hemolysin, and KcsA potassium channel have ~3% of Trp residues; photosynthetic reaction center and maltoporin have ~4.5%; and light harvesting complex has as high as 7% Trp residues. Of course, there are exceptions to this high abundance of Trp residues in membrane proteins—MgtE magnesium channel has 1.3% of Trp residues that is comparable to soluble proteins, and OmpF, a beta-barrel porin, has only 0.6% of Trp residues. Another important difference is the distribution of Trp residues in soluble and membrane proteins. While Trp residues are distributed throughout the soluble protein structures (Chothia, 1976), it is well known that Trp (and Tyr) amino acids in many transmembrane proteins and peptides are not uniformly distributed and that they prefer to localize at the membrane interface, which accounts for almost half of the bilayer's thermal thickness (White and Wimley, 1994; Raghuraman et al., 2005). For example, crystal structures of membrane proteins like potassium channels, KcsA (Zhou et al., 2001) and KirBac1.1 (Kuo et al., 2003), MgtE magnesium channel (Hattori et al., 2009; Tomita et al., 2017), maltoporin (Schirmer et al., 1995), glycerol-conducting channel (Fu et al., 2000), and others have shown that Trp and Tyr residues seem to have an anchoring role by forming an “aromatic ring” around them at the membrane interface (Figure 2) and defines the hydrophobic length of transmembrane helices (Yau et al., 1998; Killian and von Heijne, 2000; Demmers et al., 2001; de Jesus and Allen, 2013). It is also worth noting that the distribution of aromatic residues in the membrane bilayer for β-barrel membrane proteins is different from those of α-helical membrane proteins. Although “aromatic ring” is formed in different families of both α-helical and β-barrel membrane proteins (see Figure 2), the “aromatic rings” from both sides of the membrane are closer together in β-barrel proteins (spacing of ~20 Å) compared to ~30 Å spacing in α-helical membrane proteins (Ulmschneider and Sansom, 2001). Contrary to the preferential localization of Trp residues in membrane proteins, the Trp is also localized at the hydrophobic core of the membrane in a few cases, e.g., KvAP voltage-sensing domain (Krepkiy et al., 2009) and transmembrane domain of human inositol requiring enzyme, IRE1α (Cho et al., 2019).

Figure 2

“Aromatic ring” formed by Trp and Tyr residues of membrane proteins at the membrane interface. Cartoon representations of Gramicidin A; human voltage-dependent anion channel, VDAC; potassium channel, KcsA and magnesium channel, MgtE with their respective tryptophan (blue) and tyrosine (red) residues depicting the membrane interfacial localization of the aromatic ring. Only the transmembrane Tyr and Trp residues are shown for MgtE. PDB IDs of the respective protein are indicated below each representation. See text for details.

Despite technological advances in synchrotron radiation and recent excellent successes in structural determination of membrane proteins (Moraes et al., 2014; Hendrickson, 2016), the high-resolution molecular characterization of membrane proteins and peptides is still a great challenge due to various reasons pertaining to low extraction and yield of stable and functional proteins, complexity of source membranes (Carpenter et al., 2008) and difficulty in obtaining diffraction-grade crystals (Moraes et al., 2014). Although the first X-ray structure determination of a membrane protein was accomplished more than three decades back (Deisenhofer et al., 1985), the number of unique membrane protein structures solved is only ~2% of all solved protein structures (Feroz et al., 2018). Interestingly, with the exception of bacteriorhodopsin (Grigorieff et al., 1996), structural characterization of all membrane proteins have been done in non-native, membrane-mimetic systems. Through X-ray diffraction data, the detailed static structural information at high resolution can be obtained, however, the dynamic information is usually lacking. However, it is well recognized that structural dynamics play important roles in the function of proteins. Furthermore, high-resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) methods, which are sophisticated to obtain the structure and dynamics of proteins, have limited applications for membrane proteins due to slow reorientation times of molecules in membranes (Opella, 1997).

Classic techniques used to determine the structure of protein like X-ray crystallography, NMR, and cryo-EM subject the protein to non-native or non-physiological conditions (specifically X-ray crystallography). Further, the above techniques require large amounts of pure and stable protein, which are often difficult to obtain in case of membrane proteins. Even after obtaining large amounts of pure, stable and functional protein, there is no guarantee of crystal formation that is needed for X-ray crystallography (Kaback and Wu, 1999). For these reasons, studies involving structural analyses of membrane proteins have employed various biophysical techniques mainly on spectroscopic approaches. Of these, fluorescence spectroscopic approaches are the most versatile and are used to asses both the structure and dynamics of membrane-bound proteins in their physiological conditions (Chattopadhyay and Raghuraman, 2004; Johnson, 2005).

Why Site-Directed Fluorescence?

Intrinsic Protein Fluorescence

Among the aromatic acids (Trp, Tyr, and Phe), intrinsic Trp fluorescence is the most widely used tool to monitor the changes in local structure and dynamics in proteins (Vivian and Callis, 2001; Raghuraman et al., 2005; Callis and Tusell, 2014). In case of membrane-active peptides and proteins such as the hemolytic peptide melittin (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2005, 2007a), cytochrome b5 (Ladokhin et al., 1991), γM4 transmembrane domain peptide of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (Barrantes et al., 2000; de Almeida et al., 2004), colicin E1 channel peptide (Tory and Merrill, 2002), pore-forming channel protein OmpF (Pattnaik et al., 1997), and the isolated voltage sensing domain of KvAP potassium channel (Krepkiy et al., 2009), intrinsic fluorescence from the single Trp residue has been used to monitor membrane partitioning, folding, orientation and topology. In addition, environment sensitivity of Trp fluorescence has been extensively used to characterize lipid-protein interactions in micelles and membranes (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2004a,b,c; Rawat et al., 2004; Raghuraman et al., 2006; Haldar et al., 2010b).

However, as mentioned earlier, membrane proteins contain higher content of Trp and hence the fluorescence data interpretation from multi-Trp proteins is generally complicated due to complex fluorescence processes and environment-sensitive nature of individual Trp residues (Eftink, 1991; Engelborghs, 2003). Further, light scattering from lipid vesicles is an important concern and care must be taken while analysing the Trp fluorescence of membrane peptides and proteins in membranes (Ladokhin et al., 2000). Although analyses of ensemble tryptophan fluorescence from multi-tryptophan containing membrane proteins is complicated, it provides information regarding overall structural integrity and functional organization of the protein (Chatterjee et al., 2019). However, the information related to site-specific dynamic changes that are relevant for the function of protein cannot be obtained. This concern can easily be avoided by using extrinsic fluorophores with excellent spectral properties. In this regard, an approach which combines the traditional site-directed mutagenesis (SDM) technique with attachment of extrinsic fluorophore to the single-site of interest in a site-specific manner is known as site-directed fluorescence labeling (Heuck and Johnson, 2002; Chattopadhyay and Raghuraman, 2004; Johnson, 2005).

Site-Directed Fluorescence Labeling

The most widely used and faithful fluorophores to monitor conformational changes and protein backbone positions are cysteine-reactive labels (Heuck and Johnson, 2002; Johnson, 2005; Mansoor et al., 2010). Site-directed fluorescence labeling therefore involves mutating a specific residue of interest to a Cys residue by SDM and covalent attachment of a thiol-reactive extrinsic fluorophore. The choice of Cys is very attractive for site-specific labeling due to its low abundance throughout the proteome. An efficient and rapid procedure for cysteine labeling in proteins has been described (Kim et al., 2008). However, if the protein contains several cysteines, they need to be converted to a single cysteine mutant without perturbing the function. For instance, one of the earliest Cys scanning mutagenesis studies has produced functional lactose permease monomer devoid of eight native cysteine residues (Kaback and Wu, 1999). The use of site-directed biochemical and biophysical techniques has provided detailed mechanistic insights about the function of lactose permease especially in the absence of crystal structure. Recently, “cysteine metal protection and labeling” (CyMPL) method has been shown to be useful to specifically label the cysteine of interest in a protein mixture or in proteins containing several cysteines, or in the native environment of proteins (Puljung and Zagotta, 2011). This method involves reversible protection of the desired cysteine by binding metal ions and the background cysteines are blocked with nonfluorescent covalent modifiers with minimal perturbation of proteins. This method has the capability to specifically label proteins with multiple fluorophores in a controlled fashion.

Extrinsic Fluorophores—NBD and Bimane as Ideal Fluorophores for Intramolecular Protein Motions and Conformational Dynamics

The biggest advantage offered by extrinsic fluorophores is the availability of plethora of fluorophores that are tailor-made for specific applications (Haugland, 2005; Hawe et al., 2008). Most extrinsic fluorescent labels display high sensitivity to environmental polarity. Further, these fluorophores are weakly fluorescent or non-fluorescent in water but fluoresce strongly upon binding to membranes and membrane peptides/proteins, which makes the contribution from the unbound probe negligible. There are few specific criteria for the choice of the extrinsic fluorophores for site-specific incorporation throughout the protein, which are as follows:

The size of the fluorophore and linker (if any) should be small enough so as not to perturb the structure of the protein and can be efficiently inserted in relatively hydrophobic regions.

The fluorophore should be sensitive to changes in environmental polarity, i.e., it should exhibit environment-sensitive fluorescence. This is an important criteria for monitoring the membrane binding events and topology of the protein (whether solvent or lipid exposed) etc. However, for monitoring the conformational kinetics of membrane proteins utilizing resonance energy transfer and distance measurements, the environment-insensitive fluorophores are usually preferred.

Excitation and corresponding emission wavelengths should ideally be in the visible range so as to minimize fluorescence contributions from intrinsic Trp and Tyr residues.

Since a single fluorophore per molecule is expected, the fluorophore should have a high quantum yield to get good signal-to-noise ratio.

There are hundreds of extrinsic fluorescent probes, particularly several thiol-reactive probes, available commercially (Haugland, 2005). Despite the availability of a plethora of extrinsic fluorophores, only a few have been the most widely used in sequential site-specific incorporation to monitor the structural dynamics of membrane proteins. They are NBD, 7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl (Chattopadhyay, 1990), and bimane (Kosower et al., 1982), which meet all the criteria to serve as an excellent probe for spectroscopic and structural mapping of proteins (Figure 3). In aqueous medium, NBD is weakly fluorescent and fluoresces brightly in the visible range upon transfer to a hydrophobic medium and exhibits a high degree of environmental sensitivity (Chattopadhyay and London, 1988; Lin and Struve, 1991; Fery-Forgues et al., 1993; Chattopadhyay et al., 2002), which has been widely used in monitoring the orientation and conformational dynamics of membrane proteins (Crowley et al., 1993, 1994; Liao et al., 1997; Shepard et al., 1998; Shatursky et al., 1999; Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2007b). Further, NBD-labeled lipids are well-established fluorescent analogs of native lipids to monitor membrane dynamics and various cellular activities (Kobayashi and Pagano, 1988; Wüstner et al., 2001; Mukherjee et al., 2004; Elvington et al., 2005; Raghuraman et al., 2007). Since NBD is a polar fluorophore and its dipole moment changes by ~4D upon excitation (Mukherjee et al., 1994), its fluorescence has been extensively utilized to investigate the organization and dynamics of membranes and hydration dynamics of membrane proteins (Chattopadhyay et al., 2002; Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2007a; Raghuraman et al., 2014) utilizing the Red Edge Excitation Shift (REES) approach (see later). Importantly, due to visible range excitation and emission properties, NBD is also a suitable probe for microscopic and cell biological studies (Kobayashi and Pagano, 1988; Chattopadhyay, 1990; Elvington et al., 2005).

Figure 3

(A) Schematic representations of Tryptophan; monobromobimane (mBBr) and N, N′-Dimethyl-N-(iodoacetyl)-N′-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl) (IANBD) showing their size from the point of attachment to the Cα− protein backbone. (B) Environment-sensitivity of widely used fluorescent probes. A plot of emission maximum as a function of dielectric constant is shown for the widely used intrinsic fluorophore of a protein, Trp (indole as the fluorescing group) and for the popular extrinsic probes for site-directed fluorescence, NBD and bimane. Data are adapted from Sun and Song (1977) (indole); Fery-Forgues et al. (1993) (NBD); Ho et al. (2013) (bimane) and plotted. See text for details.

Like Trp and NBD, bimane is a small (comparable to the size of Trp), environment-sensitive probe (Figure 3) with well-characterized spectral properties (Kosower et al., 1982; Mansoor et al., 2010) and has been widely used to monitor the functionally-relevant dynamic structural changes in several membrane proteins (Islas and Zagotta, 2006; Yao et al., 2006; Semenova et al., 2009; Tsukamoto et al., 2009; Tsukamoto and Farrens, 2013). Further, there are several derivatives of bimane available that are quite useful for tryptophan-induced quenching (TrIQ) studies to monitor protein structure and dynamics (Mansoor et al., 2002, 2010; Mansoor and Farrens, 2004 and see later). These include monobromobimane (mBBr), a positively charged bimane (qBBr) and (2-pyridyl)dithiobimane (PDT-bimane). There are few disadvantages of using bimane for specific applications. Unlike NBD, bimane is a nonpolar fluorophore and is therefore not suitable for monitoring solvent relaxation/hydration dynamics. In addition, it has a low molar absorption coefficient (ϵ380nm = 5,000 M−1cm−1) compared to NBD (ϵ478nm = 25,000 M−1cm−1). Further, it is not a suitable probe for microscopic and cell-based biological applications since bimane requires UV excitation (~380 nm).

In addition to small extrinsic fluorescent dyes, several novel fluorescent reporters are also available for imaging in cell biology. In fact, a comprehensive “glowing fluorescent toolbox” is now available to assess protein localization and function utilizing microscopy-based sophisticated fluorescence spectroscopic approaches in mammalian systems (Giepmans et al., 2006; Rodriguez et al., 2017).

Site-Directed Fluorescence (SDFL) Approaches

In general, fluorescence provides several suitable parameters to obtain information regarding protein stability, folding, membrane binding, topology, conformational dynamics, solvent relaxation/hydration dynamics, lipid-protein interactions etc. These include the fluorescence emission maximum, steady-state fluorescence intensity, apparent quantum yield, mean fluorescence lifetime, fluorescence anisotropy (rotational correlation times), bimolecular quenching constant and energy transfer efficiency (Figure 4). In other words, an advantage of SDFL approaches is the multiplicity of measurable parameters which are complementary and can effectively be used to derive structural and dynamic information. SDFL is therefore useful in monitoring the structural dynamic changes along with simultaneous assessment of the protein function. Further, correlating spectral data with changes in structural and functional states of a protein often provides direct and unambiguous information about the mechanistic details associated with the function of proteins under physiological conditions making SDFL approaches a very powerful tool (Heuck and Johnson, 2002; Johnson, 2005). This is particularly true for membrane peptides and proteins for which there is no high-resolution structure available or when the structural information is limited. This is reflected in the extensive use of SDFL methods to study changes in conformational dynamics in different classes of membrane proteins like pore-forming peptides and proteins (Nagahama et al., 2002; Parker and Feil, 2005; Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2007a; Haldar et al., 2008; Ho et al., 2013), GPCR (Yao et al., 2006; Daggett and Sakmar, 2011; Dekel et al., 2012; Alexiev and Farrens, 2014), potassium channels (Cha and Bezanilla, 1997, 1998; Cha et al., 1999; Raghuraman et al., 2014), inward-rectifying potassium channels (Wang et al., 2016, 2018, 2019), mechanosensitive ion channels (Wang et al., 2014; Martinac, 2017), ligand-gated ion channels (Sasmal and Lu, 2014), membrane transporters (Liu and Sharom, 1996; Verhalen et al., 2012; Terry et al., 2018), and intrinsically disordered proteins (Ferreon et al., 2009). Therefore, the wide applicability of SDFL approaches to study diverse systems makes fluorescence a sophisticated yet reliable technique for ensemble and single molecule measurements in both in vitro and in vivo. This review is focused on the SDFL approaches (see Figure 4) and their applications to explore the dynamic structural biology of membrane peptides/proteins.

Figure 4

Applications of site-directed fluorescence approaches used in dynamic structural biology of membrane proteins.

Fluorescence Emission Maximum and Fluorescence Intensity to Monitor Membrane Partitioning and Secondary Structure of Membrane Proteins

Pore-forming peptides and toxins can exist as stable water-soluble state as well as in membrane-bound state and the conversion between these two states usually involves large conformational changes (Parker and Feil, 2005; Christie et al., 2018). In many cases, the membrane binding promotes the formation of secondary structures (folding) in pore-forming toxins (Ladokhin and White, 1999). In addition, the membrane binding efficiency, orientation and pore-formation depend on the phase state and the lipid composition of membranes. Importantly, the partitioning of soluble proteins to membranes and their refolding within membranes are of significant importance to many physiological and disease processes. Furthermore, the high-resolution structures of the soluble forms of these proteins have been solved using X-ray crystallography or NMR, however, capturing the high-resolution snapshot of membrane-bound/inserted forms of these proteins still remains a formidable challenge (Christie et al., 2018). In this regard, steady-state fluorescence emission spectra and its associated fluorescence intensity can offer enormous insights into the membrane partitioning, orientation and dynamics of pore-forming peptides and toxins. The fluorescence emission spectrum reveals information about the polarity of the immediate environment around a fluorophore (Chattopadhyay et al., 2002; Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2003; Demchenko et al., 2009). Specifically, when an environment-sensitive fluorophore changes its location from polar (aqueous) to a non-polar (membrane) environment, the emission spectrum generally increases in fluorescence intensity with a concomitant shift in the fluorescence emission maximum toward shorter wavelengths (blueshift). Thus, following these changes can monitor the partitioning of peptides/proteins between the aqueous solution and membranes (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2004c; Koehorst et al., 2008; Ho et al., 2013; Kyrychenko and Ladokhin, 2018).

The intrinsic Trp fluorescence is a widely used classical tool to investigate membrane binding events of proteins. For instance, the presence of cholesterol has been shown to reduce the binding of the pore-forming hemolytic honey bee venom peptide, melittin, to membranes utilizing the intrinsic Trp fluorescence (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2004c). Because melittin at low concentration adopts random coil conformation in buffer, its single Trp residue exhibits an emission maximum at 352 nm. Upon binding to membrane interface, melittin adopts α-helical conformation (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2004b,c) and exhibits emission maximum of 336 nm. The melittin-membrane binding has therefore been quantitated by the blue shift (from 352 to 336 nm) of fluorescence emission maximum of the single Trp residue of melittin upon binding to liposomes. In this case, the ratio of fluorescence intensities monitored at 336 nm (membrane-bound) and 352 nm (in buffer) has been effectively used to derive the binding curves of melittin with membranes containing different amounts of cholesterol (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2004c). Similar use of the ratio of fluorescence intensities has been used to monitor the membrane binding of the native as well as scrambled N-domain peptide (34-mer) of the chemokine receptor CXCR1, a peptide-binding GPCR (Haldar et al., 2010b). However, the fluorescence intensities ratio may not a reliable parameter when it comes to evaluating protein unfolding transitions because it leads to incorrect determination of thermodynamic parameters (Zoldak et al., 2017).

Further, increased fluorescence intensity concomitant with blue shifted emission maximum has been observed during membrane binding events in many cases like C-domain of the Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin using the site-directed fluorescence of Acrylodan and NBD (Nagahama et al., 2002), pH-dependent association of the apoptotic repressor Bcl-xL with membranes utilizing NBD fluorescence (Vargas-Uribe et al., 2013; Kyrychenko and Ladokhin, 2018), and protonation-trigged membrane interaction of diphtheria toxin T-domain (Perier et al., 2007). Pore formation by equinatoxin II, an eukaryotic pore-forming toxin representative from sea anemones, involves a novel single helix insertion mechanism has been shown using site-directed NBD fluorescence (Malovrh et al., 2003). The number of LukF (leucocidin fast fraction) components of Staphylococcal γ-hemolysin has been calculated in a single pore utilizing changes in single molecule Badan fluorescence (Nguyen et al., 2006).

One of the earliest studies that utilized SDFL approaches to probe conformational changes in an ion channel has been carried out on the voltage-dependent Shaker K+ channel (Mannuzzu et al., 1996; Cha and Bezanilla, 1997, 1998; Glauner et al., 1999). Particularly, the spectroscopic mapping of the voltage sensor (S4 helix) movement in Shaker K+ channel has been done using a combination of electrophysiology measurements and SDFL (called “voltage-clamp fluorometry”) to monitor the voltage sensor movement during voltage-dependent gating. This combined approach of using electrophysiology and fluorescence measurements gives an opportunity to simultaneously measure both the function and functionally-relevant structural changes using tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) fluorescence (Glauner et al., 1999). These changes correlated with gating, activation, and slow inactivation of the channel (Zheng and Zagotta, 2003). Change in fluorescence intensity measurements often give useful insights about the nature of conformational changes in a protein even though it cannot map the magnitude or direction of a movement of protein that undergoes functionally associated structural changes. For instance, as stated above, blue shifts in fluorescence emission maximum indicate a change in location of a labeled residue to a more nonpolar/hydrophobic environment. Further, if a set of labeled sites shows significantly large and correlated changes, this might indicate that the region of protein that contains the labeled residues experiences the conformational change in a coordinated manner. The resting state of a K+ channel has been modeled using this type of analysis (Pathak et al., 2007). Other membrane proteins such as KcsA K+ channel (Blunck et al., 2008), NaV channels (Chanda et al., 2004), Hv1 channels (Tombola et al., 2010), Ci-VSP (Villalba-Galea et al., 2009; Kohout et al., 2010), CNG channels (Zheng and Zagotta, 2000), and glutamate transporters (Larsson et al., 2004) have been mapped with intensity measurements coupled with functional manipulation to study the mechanism of protein rearrangement.

It is important to note that the magnitude of fluorescence changes is not always proportional to the magnitude and direction of conformational changes due to complex nature of fluorescent processes in heterogeneous environment (Taraska, 2012). This is especially true if only one labeled site is used. Sequential labeling of Cys residues with NBD or bimane and observing the fluorescence changes can yield secondary structural details in solution and membranes. The secondary structural elements have been predicted from the observed bimane fluorescence parameters (Musse et al., 2006; Wei et al., 2007; Ho et al., 2013) using the method of harmonic wave function analysis (Cornette et al., 1987). This method works because the motion of the protein-attached fluorescent label will be confined to certain defined angle and therefore the electronic center of the attached label will fluctuate in “wobble in a cone” manner. This probably makes the attached label to experience an average properties of local environment with respect to refractive index, dielectric constant, electric field etc. during its excited-state lifetime. As a result, for a helix that is labeled in all residues, the measured fluorescent property of respective probes will follow a change in amplitude and angular frequency as described by a harmonic wave function. This has been shown in case of colicin E1, which forms voltage-dependent ion channels in E. coli cells. Site-directed bimane fluorescence has been used demonstrate that helix 1 and helix 3 of the membrane-associated closed state of the channel is amphipathic α-helix oriented parallel to the membrane surface (Musse et al., 2006; Wei et al., 2007). In addition, a new model for the membrane-associated colicin E1 ion channel in the closed state has been developed using site-directed bimane fluorescence and novel helical periodicity analysis method (Ho et al., 2013). The above-mentioned secondary (helical) structure prediction in membrane proteins by fitting the data of measured fluorescence parameters with a harmonic wave function (Musse et al., 2006) has also been exploited to monitor the conformational changes in the translocon channel structure in an intact, functional membrane-embedded complex (Alder et al., 2008).

In another example, sequential site-directed NBD labeling has been used to monitor the membrane-induced secondary structural changes in cytolytic toxins. Many pathogenic gram-positive bacteria produce cholesterol-dependent cytolysins (CDC) (formerly “thiol-activated” cytolysins). The secreted forms of toxin exist as highly water-soluble monomers, yet they form large homooligomeric compelexes in the membrane—upto fifty individual monomers for perfringolysin O (Olofsson et al., 1993; Christie et al., 2018). As the name suggests, the cytolytic action of CDCs critically requires the presence of cholesterol in membranes. Several excellent studies examining the periodicity of site-directed NBD fluorescence in the labeled perfringolysin O have identified the membrane-spanning domain of this toxin and how membrane insertion promotes the structural transition upon membrane binding. Importantly, novel mechanistic insights of membrane insertion for a CDC have come through site-directed fluorescence approaches (Shepard et al., 1998; Shatursky et al., 1999; Ramachandran et al., 2004; Johnson, 2005; Christie et al., 2018).

Since transmembrane α-helices usually extend beyond the lipid bilayer and several high-resolution structures of membrane proteins have only a few lipids, defining the membrane boundary for these helices is therefore challenging. Site-specific NBD labeling and fluorescence has been shown to be a powerful tool to identify the ends of transmembrane α-helices in the bacterial diacylglycerol kinase (Jittikoon et al., 2007), which is the smallest known kinase. Further, fluorescence measurements also reveal that the hydrophobic matching between the hydrophobic core of the membrane and the diacylglycerol kinase is highly efficient for a significant variation in the bilayer thickness. In fact, the environment sensitivity of tryptophan has also been shown to be useful in defining the ends of transmembrane helices as in the case of mechanosensitive channel of large conductance, MscL (Powl et al., 2005). These studies clearly highlight the potential of such site-directed fluorescence approaches in dynamic structural biology of membrane proteins.

Fluorescence Polarization/Anisotropy to Monitor Membrane Partitioning and Protein Motions

Protein motions, particularly their conformational dynamics, regulate the function of proteins (Henzler-Wildman and Kern, 2007). Polarization or anisotropy studies have been used to study protein interactions for more than 50 years and is still a valuable tool to quantify of interaction of proteins in micro- and nanomolar concentration (Jameson and Ross, 2010; James and Jameson, 2014). Since fluorescence polarization provides information on molecular flexibility and rotational motion, it is also a powerful tool to monitor the structural dynamics of soluble and membrane proteins/peptides. Because the dynamics of the fluorescent dye is influenced by the motion of its attached region in a protein, valuable information regarding protein structure, dynamics and conformational changes can be obtained by fluorescence anisotropy or fluorescence polarization measurements. Molecules that are freely mobile (i.e., on the surface of a protein) will display a low anisotropy. However, molecules that are membrane-bound or at buried sites exhibit a higher anisotropy due to hindered rotational mobility of the probe. Membrane binding of melittin and how cholesterol influences its partitioning to membranes have been studied using the polarization of Trp fluorescence (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2004c). In the pH-gated potassium channel KcsA (Cuello et al., 2010; Raghuraman et al., 2012, 2014; Kratochvil et al., 2016), mapping the differences in the steady-state NBD polarization values between the inactivated and non-inactivated/conductive conformations has demonstrated the gating-induced differences in rotational dynamics of KcsA outervestibule (Raghuraman et al., 2014). Interestingly, the functional-state dependent changes in local dynamics of outervestibule in KcsA, detected by site-directed NBD fluorescence, have not been captured in the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) time scale. The reason could be the differences in timescales of fluorescence (ps-ns) and EPR (ns-μs) sensitivity to protein motions (Thomas, 1978; Alexiev et al., 2003). Since the outervestibule of KcsA not properly structured, the observed dynamic changes between the functional states using fluorescence approaches are probably averaged out in the time scale of EPR sensitivity (Raghuraman et al., 2014). Considering the motion of the lower activation gate of KcsA is sensitive to EPR time scale (Perozo et al., 2002), these results reinforces the existence of heterogenous dynamic modes throughout the protein.

It should be noted that the excited-state fluorescence lifetime of a probe strongly influences the steady-state anisotropy/polarization values (Lakowicz, 2006). Therefore, care must be taken to ensure that the changes in anisotropy/polarization values are not due to lifetime changes, which can be easily achieved by calculating the apparent rotational correlation times using Perrin's equation (Lakowicz, 2006) with the knowledge of limiting anisotropy (ro) of the fluorophore. For instance, ro value for Trp is 0.16 (Eftink et al., 1990) and the corresponding value for NBD is 0.354 (Mukherjee et al., 2004). While steady-state polarization (anisotropy) provides information about the overall dynamics of the protein, time-resolved anisotropy measurements are useful in isolating the local, segmental and global motions. Since fluorescent dyes in complex heterogenous systems generally have many lifetime components due to various dynamic modes like global motion (tumbling of whole protein with attached probe), segmental motion (probe mobility mediated by protein's local dynamics), and local motion (rotational motion of tethered probe with respect to attached protein), rotational correlation times (τ) are calculated to resolve the various dynamic modes in their timescale (Krishnamoorthy, 2018b).

Time-resolved anisotropy studies have been used on the AB-loop, EF-loop of bacteriorhodopsin (bR) and the fourth cytoplasmic loop of bovine rhodopsin to monitor the rotational dynamics and conformational changes in the inactive state (Alexiev et al., 2003; Schroder et al., 2005; Alexiev and Farrens, 2014). The conformational changes of the loop have been identified by assigning the τc to the loop. In another study, time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy experiments in a fluorescein-bound cation channel channelrhodopsin-2 (CrChR2) have been used to monitor the light-induced conformational dynamic changes near the inner gate in closed and open states of the channel (Volz et al., 2016). The observation of increased fluorescence anisotropy for the light-induced prolonged conducting state of fluorescein-bound CrChR2 evidently suggests that large conformational changes, particularly the outward tilt of helix B, is coupled with the transition to open state at the cytoplasmic surface. Since anisotropy/polarization quantifies the extent of change in orientationally-distributed emitting states after initial photoselection, the emission anisotropy/polarization is not only influenced by change in lifetimes and protein motions, but also due to homo-FRET. Hence, the influence of homo-FRET in fluorescence anisotropy decay can potentially be used to monitor membrane protein oligomerization (Clayton, 2018).

Fluorescence Lifetimes

Fluorescence emission intensity changes may not always be a reliable parameter to monitor the location of probes due to its composite property that is dependent on several factors (Shepard et al., 1998; Turconi et al., 2001; Lakowicz, 2006; Zoldak et al., 2017). The fluorescence lifetime is an intrinsic property of the probe and therefore is an excellent indicator of fluorophore's local environment (Prendergast, 1991; Berezin and Achilefu, 2010). When a fluorophore is excited, every dye molecule stays in the excited state briefly (typically nanoseconds) and relaxes back to the ground state with an emission. The dwell time period in the excited state is called the fluorescence lifetime (τ), which is the reciprocal of the sum of all transition rates back to the ground state (Lakowicz, 2006). In general, the emission lifetimes of Trp, NBD and other flurorophores are higher in nonaqueous than aqueous environment. Particularly, the fluorescence lifetime of NBD is highly sensitive to its local environment (Lin and Struve, 1991; Chattopadhyay et al., 2002) and the magnitude of lifetime directly reveals the environment of the probe and in particular its exposure to water (Crowley et al., 1993). NBD has a short lifetime of ~1.5 ns in aqueous media and has longer lifetimes (~5-10 ns) in a nonpolar milieu (Fery-Forgues et al., 1993; Chattopadhyay et al., 2002; Johnson, 2005; Raghuraman et al., 2007). Hence, measurements of fluorescence lifetime can distinguish the fluorophore's location as well as the heterogeneity of probe locations if more than one lifetime is observed in a given sample. As a result, lifetime distribution analyses can provide an ultrafast snapshot of the population distribution of fluorophores (Krishnamoorthy, 2018a). Site-directed NBD fluorescence lifetimes have been extensively utilized to characterize the orientation of melittin in membranes containing varying lipid composition (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2007b), cholesterol-dependent cytolysins with respect to membrane partitioning regions, structural transitions during insertion and pore formation (Shepard et al., 1998; Shatursky et al., 1999; Heuck et al., 2000; Ramachandran et al., 2004), movement of NBD-Lys signal sequence of a nascent protein in endoplasmic reticulum membrane (Crowley et al., 1993), and cotranslational integration of eukaryotic multispanning polytopic membrane proteins (Lin et al., 2011). Frequency-domain fluorescence lifetime measurements on tetramethylrhodamine-labeled KcsA mutants at the helix bundle crossing at the lower activation gate have revealed two channel populations with different lifetimes. Interestingly, the relative distribution of these lifetimes has been shown to be in excellent agreement with the open probability (i.e., the function) of KcsA K+ channel. Comparison of lifetimes obtained in wildtype KcsA, which undergoes C-type inactivation and has low open probability, and mutant channels that has increased open probability, it has been demonstrated that the selectivity filter of KcsA potassium channel acts as the crucial second gate for ion conduction (Blunck et al., 2006).

Generally, fluorescence decays are fitted with a sum of a few (1–4) discrete exponentials to obtain mean lifetimes in a given system. Apart from fitting the fluorescence decay curves with discrete exponentials, the mean fluorescence lifetime can also be obtained in a model-independent manner from the histogram of photons counted during the measurement as recently described (Fiserova and Kubala, 2012; Chatterjee et al., 2019). However, when a fluorophore is attached to a protein, its excited state lifetime population is a distribution of various degrees of heterogeneity (Krishnamoorthy, 2018a). Therefore, fitting the fluorescence intensity decay data to a probability distribution of lifetimes is judicious than conventional fitting of fluorescence decay curves to a sum of discrete exponentials. This model-independent, probability distribution analysis is known as Maximum Entropy Method (MEM), which maximizes the entropy while minimizing the χ2 has been widely used for analysing fluorescence lifetime distribution (Brochon, 1994; Esposito et al., 2015; Smith et al., 2017; Krishnamoorthy, 2018a).

In Na,K-ATPase, which contains 16 Trp residues, MEM analysis of tryptophan lifetimes has shown that long-living excited state population of Trp is heterogeneous, and the lifetime distribution is emission wavelength dependent (Demchenko et al., 1998). This underlines the significantly greater emission heterogeneity of multi-tryptophan containing proteins when compared to single-tryptophan proteins. Another multi-tryptophan containing protein in which MEM has been used to reveal the conformational heterogeneity is the gramicidin ion channel. Gramicidin channels can be stabilized in channel and non-channel conformations, whose architecture is dramatically different in both these states (Rawat et al., 2004). The four Trp residues in gramicidin channel conformation forms the “aromatic ring” in the interfacial region of the membrane, however, in the non-channel conformation, the Trp residues are spread across the protein along the membrane axis. MEM analysis in membrane-bound gramicidin ion channels has shown that the Trp residues in the non-channel state encounters relatively heterogeneous environment compared to the channel conformation. These results support the general opinion that structured proteins exhibit sharp distributions of Trp lifetimes, which is in contrast to relatively broad distributions obtained with unfolded/denatured proteins (Rawat et al., 2004; Haldar et al., 2010a). Although MEM analysis of fluorescence lifetimes is a well-developed analysis tool for monitoring heterogeneous organization and dynamics of native membranes (Mukherjee et al., 2007a) and folding of small soluble proteins (Lakshmikanth et al., 2001; Jha et al., 2009), it is under-utilized in monitoring the functionally-relevant conformational heterogeneity of membrane proteins.

Application of Fluorescence Quenching to Membrane Proteins

Fluorescence quenching results in decreased fluorescence emission intensity when there is an interaction between a fluorescent dye and a quencher (usually another molecule or a group). The interaction of quencher with the fluorescent dye in its excited state facilitates the deactivation rates of the excited state of the fluorescent dye. Therefore, the degree of quenching is governed by the quencher concentration that determines the close proximity with the fluorescent dye and also the competition between fluorescence and all the deactivation processes. In general, the quenching mechanism is of two major types depending on the motions of fluorophore and quencher typically in nanosecond time scale: dynamic (collisional) and static quenching (Eftink, 1991; Chattopadhyay and Raghuraman, 2004; Lakowicz, 2006). In bulk, non-viscous media, the distance between fluorophore and quencher molecules rapidly (dynamically) change and the quenching phenomenon happens only at times when close encounters of fluorophores and quenchers happen. This “dynamic quenching” is also called “collisional quenching” when the quenching of fluorescence emission intensity occurs due to only collisions between fluorescent dye and the quencher. On the other hand, the quenching mechanism is called “static quenching” when the distances between quencher and the fluorescent dye do not significantly change within the lifetime of the dye. This type of quenching is common in frozen or highly viscous solutions and membranes. The membrane components (lipids and proteins) laterally diffuse very slowly in membranes with a diffusion coefficient in the range of 10−8-10−12 cm2sec−1.

Collisional Quenching Using Aqueous Quenchers

Since the magnitude of fluorescence quenching depends on the accessibility of the fluorescent dye to the quencher, dynamic (collisional) quenching using the widely used neutral (acrylamide) and anionic (iodide ions) quenchers has been extensively utilized to explore the topology (surface exposed, buried or membrane-bound) of Trp residues in soluble and membrane proteins (Lehrer, 1971; Eftink, 1991; Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2004a,b,c). For a better quantitative understanding of quenching, the fluorescence intensity vs. quencher concentration is plotted. The slope of such a plot termed the Stern-Volmer constant (KSV) can give an idea of the degree of accessibility of the fluorophore, i.e., high values of slope means the increased extent of exposure to quencher. It is well known that the KSV value for a completely exposed Trp is ~18 M−1, whereas it is in the range of ~4–7 M−1 for Trp localized at the micellar interfacial region (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2004a; Chatterjee et al., 2019), and the KSV values of tryptophan localized at the interfacial region of the lipid bilayer is as low as ~2 M−1 (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2004b,c). However, there is a caveat while comparing results between samples only on KSV values, because these values are only relevant if the fluorescence lifetime does not change significantly between the samples. For this reason, the bimolecular quenching constant (kq) should be used over KSV as the former corrects for differences in fluorescence lifetimes in the absence of quencher (Johnson, 2005; Lakowicz, 2006).

Two of the most popular efficient aqueous quenchers of NBD fluorescence are cobaltous (Homan and Eisenberg, 1985; Morris et al., 1985; Chattopadhyay and London, 1988; Raghuraman et al., 2004; Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2007b) and iodide ions (Crowley et al., 1993; Shepard et al., 1998; Shatursky et al., 1999; Heuck and Johnson, 2002; Lin et al., 2011). Since both cobalt and iodide ions are charged, they are soluble in water and do not pass through the hydrophobic core of the membrane and the quenching of NBD fluorescence by them give us information about the insertion mechanism, topology and orientation of membrane-bound peptides and proteins. For instance, if a residue is particularly exposed to the aqueous environment it would show a higher kq compared to a labeled residue moving to a nonpolar environment, which could be either protein interior or moving into hydrophobic core of the membrane. In both scenarios, low values of kq is obtained and even lifetime measurements will not show significant differences because the overall microenvironment of the probe is nonpolar in nature. One can use additional quenching measurements in which the membrane is doped with nitroxide labeled phospholipids (efficient quencher of any fluorescence) to distinguish between the above scenarios. Cobalt quenching of NBD has been previously used to understand the effect of cholesterol and anionic lipid, dioleoylphosphatidylglycerol (DOPG) in changing the orientation of membrane-bound melittin (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2007b). Bacterial toxins punch holes in membranes by either inserting as α-helices or β-barrels and this insertion mechanism has been studied in detail using iodide quenching of NBD-labeled pore-forming toxins like cholesterol-dependent cytolysins and Bax (Shepard et al., 1998; Shatursky et al., 1999; Johnson, 2005; Kale et al., 2014). The pattern of NBD exposure of NBD-labeled residues of a transmembrane segment (TMS) or an amphipathic sequence to the membrane can be obtained by nitroxide labeled phospholipid quenching. For instance, a typical β-hairpin will show alternating aqueous and nonaqueous environment variation and the quenching pattern can also be subjected to helical wheel analysis to obtain the helical nature of the peptide or protein (Heuck and Johnson, 2002).

Parallax Method and Distribution Analysis to Monitor Penetration Depths of Membrane-Bound Peptides and Proteins

“Membrane penetration depth” is a valuable parameter in the study of structural organization of membranes and topology, orientation and folding membrane-bound peptides/proteins. This is because the lipid bilayer has both mobility and polarity gradients along its axis and therefore properties like water penetration, polarity, hydrogen bond forming capability, segmental dynamics change dramatically in a depth-dependent manner in membranes. An important application of fluorescence quenching has been to quantitatively characterize the membrane penetration depths of membrane-bound proteins/peptides by using the quenchers (usually nitroxide spin labels or heavy atoms like bromine) that are covalently attached to the polar/hydrophilic headgroup or to a specific regions of acyl chains of phospholipids which gives the quencher a defined depth (London and Ladokhin, 2002). Here, the interactions of fluorophore (either membrane-embedded or protein-labeled) involve predominantly static quenching within a typical range of 8–12 Å distance between the fluorophore and the quencher (Chattopadhyay and London, 1987; Ladokhin, 1999). Generally, the quenchers are distributed in both leaflets of the lipid bilayer to account for the trans-leaflet quenching of highly penetrated proteins or peptides. There are two popular methods of depth analysis namely the parallax approach and distribution analysis (London and Ladokhin, 2002). In parallax method (Chattopadhyay and London, 1987), the apparent location of fluorescent label along the membrane axis is determined by using phospholipid quenchers at different depths and the best pair of quenchers is used in the membrane depth analysis. The advantage of this method is that it can provide the depth of the protein or peptide in angstrom resolution. This quenching approach has been widely used to characterize the membrane penetration depths of intrinsic Trp residues and other extrinsic probes labeled at specific sites in nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (Chattopadhyay and McNamee, 1991), hemolytic peptide melittin (Ghosh et al., 1997; Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2004c, 2007b; Haldar et al., 2008), cholesterol oxidase (Chen et al., 2000), ricin (Ramalingam et al., 1994), calcium dependent membrane binding protein annexins (Meers, 1990), model ion channel peptide (Chung et al., 1992) and colicin (Palmer and Merrill, 1994). The parallax method has also been used to monitor the depths of penetration of NBD lipids and Nile Red in membranes (Mukherjee et al., 2004, 2007b). The distribution analysis method is similar to parallax method in many ways. However, this method involves fitting the fluorescence quenching data obtained from quenchers that are positioned at known depths in the membrane with a Gaussian function (Ladokhin, 1997, 2014; London and Ladokhin, 2002). This method has been used to monitor the depths of penetration of Trp in outer membrane protein Omp A (London and Ladokhin, 2002) and recently the depth of NBD-labeled mutants of diphtheria toxin T-domain (Kyrychenko et al., 2018).

Dual Quencher Analysis

“Dual fluorescence quenching” utilizes the combination of lipophilic and aqueous quenchers to calculate the quenching ratio (Q-ratio) to determine the topography of transmembrane helices of membrane proteins in model membranes (Caputo and London, 2003). The original method permits determination of membrane penetration depths of Trp residues in membranes by using two quenchers, acrylamide and 10-doxylnonadecane (10-DN), that are not located at fixed depths. The Q-ratio by these quenchers has been found to have a linear dependence on Trp depth in membranes and this quenching method can even be applied to situations in which the thickness of the lipid bilayer is changed. In addition to acrylamide, KI has also been used as an aqueous quencher in this method to determine the Q-ratio (Wei et al., 2007). In principle, residues that are surface-exposed in the membrane-bound state are quenched more efficiently by the aqueous quencher, which results in higher values of [(Fo/Faq) – 1] where Fo and Faq represents the fluorescence intensity of the fluorophore in the absence and presence of aqueous quencher, respectively. In contrast, if the residues buried in membrane-bound state are quenched more efficiently by the lipophilic quencher, it results in higher values of [(Fo/Flp) – 1] where Fo and Flp represents the fluorescence intensity of the fluorophore in the absence and presence of lipophilic quencher, respectively. Therefore, the quenching ratio (Q-ratio) of [(Fo/Flp) – 1/ (Fo/Faq) – 1] would give the relative penetration depth of membrane peptides/proteins (Caputo and London, 2003). This “dual fluorescence quenching” approach has been used successfully to determine the hydrophobic α-helix locations in membranes by measuring the Trp depth within the membrane. Further, in conjunction with SDFL, dual quencher analysis has been used to reveal the topology of helices 1, 3, 6, and 7 in colicin E1 channel (Musse et al., 2006; Wei et al., 2007; Ho et al., 2013) and the transmembrane helices of bacterial diacylglycerol kinase (Jittikoon et al., 2007).

Tryptophan-Induced Quenching (TrIQ) to Monitor Small-Scale Conformational Changes

As discussed above, quenching coupled with SDFL is a powerful tool to observe conformational changes in membrane proteins. Another important application of SDFL is measuring Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). However, FRET studies are not suitable for small intra or inter-protein structural changes especially to determine how a secondary structure packs to form a tertiary structure. The reason being that most FRET pairs are relatively large, a 100% labeling efficiency is generally needed for the acceptor dye, and importantly, most of the FRET methods are suitable for determining long distances (~20–100 Å). Farrens lab has developed a relatively novel method namely the Tryptophan-Induced Quenching (TrIQ), which exploits the phenomenon of tryptophan to quench the emission intensity of some fluorophores by an energy transfer technique called photo-induced electron transfer (PET) (Mansoor et al., 2002, 2010; Callis, 2014). Generally, FRET and PET are two mechanisms, which leads to changes in fluorescence emission of a fluorophore due to the presence of a quencher in a distance-dependent manner. Unlike FRET, PET between organic fluorophores and suitable electron donating moiety (such as Trp) requires van der Waals contact for efficient quenching (Doose et al., 2009). This PET based quenching can therefore be used as a reporter for monitoring conformational dynamics in proteins, particularly, to study short range interactions of ~5–15 Å between Trp and the fluorophore labeled site in question. Like tryptophan, it has recently been shown that bimane fluorescence is also quenched by tyrosine in a distance-dependent manner and can therefore be utilized to map distances in proteins (Brunette and Farrens, 2014). The TrIQ method has several advantages associated with it: only one probe is used in a TrIQ study, the labeling efficiency need not be 100% as TrIQ monitors the fluorescence of the fluorophore in the continuous presence of “quencher” Trp, and the need for only low sample concentration. A popular acceptor probe for the TriQ approach is bimane, which is small enough (~10 Å) and can be easily labeled in inaccessible regions without perturbing the tertiary packing of the protein. The TriQ-bimane approach has been widely used to study conformational changes in GPCRs like β-adrenergic receptors (Yao et al., 2006; Tsukamoto et al., 2009). This approach has also been used to study the interaction of rhodopsin with transducin (Janz and Farrens, 2004), the dynamic variations in the structure of cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel (Islas and Zagotta, 2006), the secondary structure near the S3–S4 loop of BK channel (Semenova et al., 2009). However, the study of TrIQ is not only limited to Trp-bimane pair, but also for other fluorophores like BODIPY (boron-dipyrromethene), lucifer yellow, and Atto-655, whose unique properties can be exploited to obtain comparatively larger conformational changes to study protein-protein interactions, drug screening assays etc. (Mansoor et al., 2010; Bohuszewicz and Low, 2018).

REES Approach to Monitor Hydration Dynamics and Protein Conformational Substates

When the mechanistic details of the function of proteins and other organized molecular assemblies are proposed, the hydration dynamics is largely ignored because most of the fluorescence-based approaches provide information on fluorophore itself. However, it is known that there exists an intrinsic relation between the dynamics of water molecules (i.e., hydration dynamics) and protein fluctuations (Li et al., 2007). Further, hydration dynamics has been shown to play a crucial modulatory role in lipid-protein interactions (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2007b; Raghuraman et al., 2014) and ion channel selectivity (Noskov and Roux, 2007). Red edge excitation shift (REES) is a wavelength-selective fluorescence approach, which is a convenient tool to probe relative hydration dynamics and the environment-induced restriction and dynamics around organized molecular assemblies like membranes, proteins etc. REES is operationally defined as “the shift in the wavelength of maximum fluorescence emission toward higher wavelengths, caused by a shift in the excitation wavelength toward the red edge of the absorption band.” There are several excellent reviews written on this topic highlighting the genesis of REES, criteria for obtaining REES and its applications to study dynamic organization of membranes and structural insights of soluble and membrane proteins (Demchenko, 2002, 2008; Raghuraman et al., 2003, 2005; Chattopadhyay and Haldar, 2014).

Basically, when a polar fluorophore (like NBD) is placed in bulk non-viscous solvent, the reorientation of solvent (water in biological systems) molecules occurs at a picosecond time scale, so that complete reorientation of all solvent molecules around the excited state dipole of the polar fluorophore takes place within its excited lifetime (usually nanoseconds). Therefore, irrespective of the excitation wavelength used (465 to 515 nm in case of NBD), fluorescence emission maximum of NBD is invariant because the emission is observed only from the solvent-relaxed state and hence no REES will be observed (i.e., 0 nm REES). However, if the same probe is located in a motionally-restricted environments (viscous medium, membranes and membrane proteins etc.), the process of reorientation of solvent molecules is slowed down to nanoseconds or longer. Hence, changing the excitation wavelength from 465 to 515 nm shifts the emission wavelength toward longer wavelengths (see Demchenko, 2002, 2008; Raghuraman et al., 2003, 2005 for details). This gives rise to different magnitude of REES and indicates a restricted mobility of the surrounding environment with respect to the fluorescent probe. This has an application to probe conformational heterogeneity in proteins (see below).

Since REES offers knowledge on water reorientation dynamics, this approach is sensitive to variations in local hydration dynamics (Chattopadhyay et al., 2002; Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2003). This has been widely exploited to investigate the dynamic organization of model membranes with physiologically-relevant lipid composition (Arora et al., 2004; Mukherjee et al., 2004, 2007b; Mukherjee and Chattopadhyay, 2005) and native hippocampal membranes (Mukherjee et al., 2006) and, lipid-protein interactions (Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2004a,b,c; Raghuraman et al., 2004, 2006, 2007; Rawat et al., 2004; Haldar et al., 2010b), folding, topology and hydration dynamics of soluble and membrane proteins (Tory and Merrill, 2002; Rawat et al., 2004; Raghuraman and Chattopadhyay, 2006; Raghuraman et al., 2014; Mishra and Jha, 2019). Using site-directed NBD fluorescence and REES approach, it has recently been shown that significant differences exist in hydration dynamics when the pH-gated potassium ion channel KcsA (Cuello et al., 2010; Raghuraman et al., 2012; Kratochvil et al., 2016) shuttles between open/conductive to open/inactivated conformation (Raghuraman et al., 2014). Precisely, the inactivated conformation of KcsA is correlated with the presence of restricted/bound water molecules in the outervestibule, whereas the open/conductive state has a relatively fast solvent relaxation. The increased hydration dynamics has been found to be linked with the highly dynamic outervestibule of KcsA in open/conductive conformation. This study supports the role of differential water dynamics in different functional states of KcsA and the idea that water could act as a structural component in selectivity filter gating mechanisms of potassium ion channels (Ostmeyer et al., 2013; Raghuraman et al., 2014).

Until recently, the application of REES approach is mainly restricted to obtain qualitative information related to hydration dynamics using the magnitude of REES in soluble and membrane proteins (Raghuraman et al., 2005, 2014; Chattopadhyay and Haldar, 2014). A novel application of REES approach has recently been reported, which demonstrates that the REES approach can be used as a powerful tool to probe dynamic proteins with a broad equilibrium of conformational states (Catici et al., 2016). Until recently, the potential of REES as a quantitative probe of molecular heterogeneity has been reported in the isolated voltage sensor of a voltage-gated K+ channel, KvAP. The results, which have been obtained using this novel approach of REES for membrane proteins for the first time, demonstrate that the physiologically-relevant paddle motif loop of the voltage sensor has lesser number of discrete equilibrium conformational states in phospholipid membranes compared to its organization in detergent micelles (Das et al., 2019).

Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy

Biological systems are complex and intrinsically heterogeneous with variable distributions of structural conformations. Analysis of these distributions can be useful in deciphering the mechanism of action of biological systems (Johnson et al., 2005; Garcia-Saez and Schwille, 2007). The individual inhomogeneities in the biological molecule can be studied in detail utilizing single-molecule techniques compared to ensemble measurements (Haustein and Schwille, 2004). Further, single-molecule techniques usually need low concentration of labeled molecules and are normally applied to systems in equilibrium. One such single-molecule technique, which has been quite useful for membrane protein research is fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS). It is a sensitive and powerful tool to measure important parameters like concentrations, mobility of molecules, equilibrium and rate constants for biomolecular interactions because FCS characterizes fluorescence intensity fluctuations in equilibrium (Haustein and Schwille, 2004; Enderlein et al., 2005; Ries and Schwille, 2012; Hink, 2015). FCS measurements are based on statistical correlation analyses of fluctuations in fluorescence intensity that arise from thousands of single-diffusion events of biomolecules through a femtolitre detection volume. FCS is therefore a suitable technique for monitoring the molecular binding events and aggregation.

Indeed, this technique has been used to study interfacial binding of peptides and proteins (Rusu et al., 2004; Rhoades et al., 2006) and the transmembrane insertion of proteins (Posokhov et al., 2008a,b; Melo et al., 2014) in vitro and in vivo. Further, FCS has been used to determine the dissociation constant for the F1b2 complex of E. coli ATP synthase (Diez et al., 2004a) and to study the dynamics of membrane receptors in live cells, which include CD8-induced ligand binding to T-cell receptor during T-cell activation (Gakamsky et al., 2005), determining the ligand binding constant to γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABAA) and to β2-adrenergic receptors (Meissner and Häberlein, 2003; Hegener et al., 2004). It has also been used in monitoring the conformational dynamics of H+-ATPase (Borsch et al., 1998). For in vitro studies of membrane proteins using FCS, giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) are an excellent model system because of their size similarity to eukaryotic cells and can therefore be visualized using a microscope (Méléard et al., 2009). Since efficient reconstitution of membrane proteins in GUVs is possible, FCS measurements in GUVs have been successfully carried out to monitor the light-induced mobility changes in bacteriorhodopsin (Kahya et al., 2002), lateral organization of mechanosensitive channel MscL, lactose transporter, ATP-binding cassette transport proteins etc. (Doeven et al., 2005). It should be noted that non-specific interactions between lipids and fluorescent probes can adversely affect the single molecule measurements of membrane proteins in liposomes and live cells. It is therefore important to choose the suitable fluorescent probe for single-molecule fluorescence studies in membranes and new insights have recently been provided to conduct experiments with minimal interference from the interactions between the probe and lipids in membranes (Zhang et al., 2017).

It is possible to use FCS to monitor the aggregation of labeled molecules, however, the sensitivity of autocorrelation analysis of aggregation/oligomerization process is restricted for molecules that form higher order clusters as shown in the case of 5HT3 receptor clustering (Pick et al., 2003). Monomer to dimer or tetramer transitions cannot be monitored by FCS because the diffusion coefficient of a spherical molecule depends on its hydrodynamic radius and thus on the cubic root of the molecular mass. The molecular mass between monomer and oligomer should therefore change by a factor of ~15–20 so as to get an appreciable difference in the diffusion coefficient of the molecule (Kahya, 2006). To overcome these limitations and to map specific biomolecular interactions, a variation of FCS namely the dual color FCS or fluorescence cross correlation spectroscopy (FCCS) is used, wherein the intensity fluctuations from two spectral channels that correspond to two labeled binding companions are cross-correlated (Haustein and Schwille, 2004; Bacia et al., 2006). The amplitude of the cross correlation function is highly sensitive to relative concentrations of the interacting partners diffusing together. The FCCS technique has been successfully employed to monitor dynamics of protein interactions (Larson et al., 2003) and to track the endocytic pathway of cholera toxin in live cells (Bacia et al., 2002). Combination of FCS with atomic force microscopy (AFM), which is a scanning probe high-resolution imaging technique, for the study of membranes and membrane-associated proteins has attracted a lot of attention (Chiantia et al., 2006a,b; Garcia-Saez and Schwille, 2007).

Two-photon excitation is advantageous for FCS studies (Berland et al., 1995; Schwille et al., 1999a,b). This is because the excitation volume is well defined and does not have usual problems like out-of-focus photobleaching and phototoxicity that are associated with single photon excitation. Further, the dynamic heterogeneities of the plasma membrane in cells have been probed using stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy (Eggeling et al., 2009). Importantly, combination of STED measurements using super-resolution microscopy can provide spatial resolution of ~50 nm, in other words, one can monitor the dynamics of membrane components at sub-diffraction resolution (Vicidomini et al., 2015; Sarkar and Chattopadhyay, 2019). In addition, FCS with total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) excitation has been used to study the immunoglobin binding kinetics to membranes (Thompson and Axelrod, 1983) and lateral mobility of membrane-binding proteins in live cell membranes (Ohsugi et al., 2006).

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer

Förster resonance energy transfer or fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is the most widely used method to monitor inter- and intra-molecular interactions, oligomerization, physiologically-relevant conformational changes and elucidating dynamic protein interactions both in vitro and in vivo (Lakowicz, 2006; Roy et al., 2008; Taraska, 2012; Ma et al., 2014; Lerner et al., 2018). Further, FRET is also a powerful tool to monitor membranes (Loura and Prieto, 2011) and folding of membrane proteins (Kang et al., 2012), protein-lipid selectivity (Loura et al., 2010) and role of lipid-protein interactions in forming functional membrane protein oligomers (Schick et al., 2010; Gorbenko and Kinnunen, 2013). In general, there are two types of FRET namely the hetero-FRET (conventional) and homo-FRET. Determination of distances in the range of 10 to 100 Å between the donor and acceptor probes is possible using FRET as a “spectroscopic ruler” (Stryer, 1978). Since an average diameter of proteins (>50 KDa) is ~50–100 Å (Erickson, 2009), FRET is therefore a powerful tool for monitoring protein-protein interactions and their associated dynamic conformational transitions (Selvin, 1995; Geddes et al., 2006; Lerner et al., 2018).

Hetero-FRET

In conventional hetero-FRET, two probes (donor and acceptor) are used. FRET is a non-radiative energy transfer process between the excited state donor fluorophore and ground state acceptor molecule that quenches the fluorescence intensity of the donor. The term “resonance energy transfer (RET)” implies that the energy transfer is due to intermolecular dipole-dipole coupling, which means that this process does not involve emission and reabsorption of photons (Förster, 1965; Van Der Meer et al., 1994). The energy transfer depends on the spectral overlap between the donor and acceptor fluorescent molecules, the orientation of the transition moments of the probes, and most importantly, the distance between the two probes (Wu and Brand, 1994; Lakowicz, 2006). Basically, FRET is optimal when the distance range between two probes is ~0.6–1.3 Ro, where Ro is the Förster distance (Selvin, 1995). The energy transfer can be detected either by the reduction of donor fluorescence intensity or lifetime or by an increase in acceptor fluorescence upon exciting at donor excitation wavelength. Observation of FRET clearly indicates some form of protein-protein interactions (oligomerization) in an ensemble cuvette-based measurement or on the cell surface (Sun et al., 2013; Khadria and Senes, 2015). A theoretical formalism has been developed by Veatch and Stryer (1977), which relates the size of the protein complex to the extent of FRET as a function of labeling ratio. This formalism has successfully been applied to confirm the dimeric nature of the gramicidin A transmembrane ion channel (Veatch and Stryer, 1977), the molecular oligomeric size of the colicin E1 channel in its closed state (Tory and Merrill, 1999), and bacterial multidrug ABC half-transporter BmrA (Dalmas et al., 2005). Among ion channels, the voltage-gated Shaker K+ channel has been the earliest system to be studied using FRET to monitor the voltage-driven movement of the voltage sensor (Cha et al., 1999; Glauner et al., 1999; Chanda et al., 2005). Since gating of ion channels usually involve complex structural dynamics changes, FRET has provided mechanistic insights into gating mechanisms of several ion channels, which include voltage-gated Kv2.1 (Kobrinsky et al., 2006) and Cav1.2 channels (Kobrinsky et al., 2003), L-type Ca2+ channels (Kobrinsky et al., 2004), chloride channels (Bykova et al., 2006; Ma et al., 2011), ryanodine receptors (George et al., 2006; Cornea et al., 2010), mechanosensitive channel MscL (Corry et al., 2005, 2010) etc. Recently, an interesting approach called FRET spectroscopy has been developed using spectral imaging (Raicu and Singh, 2013), where the pixel-by-pixel FRET efficiency is used to generate histograms. Information on distances and quaternary state can be obtained from this histogram since it relates to the statistical distribution of distances between fluorescent probes in oligomeric membrane proteins. This novel approach has already been applied to many membrane proteins, which include muscarinic M3 acetylcholine receptor (Patowary et al., 2013), ABC transporter (Singh et al., 2013), and sigma-1 receptor (Mishra et al., 2015). It should be noted that this approach can provide misleading information under certain conditions that exist simultaneously (Raicu and Singh, 2013).

Homo-FRET

In homo-FRET approach, a fluorescent probe with small Stokes shift is used. The same fluorescent probe acts as donor and acceptor in homo-FRET due to sufficient overlap between its absorption and emission (Lakowicz, 2006; Clayton, 2018). Unlike in conventional hetero-FRET, the intensity and/or the excited-state lifetime does not change in homo-FRET. Importantly, Weber (1960a,b) has discovered that homo-FRET results in depolarization, i.e., decrease of emission polarization, and homo-FRET efficiency is less effective when the fluorophore is excited at the red edge of its absorption spectrum. This “Weber red-edge effect” has been shown to be a general characteristic of homo-FRET (Weber and Shinitsky, 1970; Moens et al., 2004). However, as mentioned before, fluorescence polarization is strongly influenced by change in lifetimes as well as by protein motions (rotational diffusion), so care must be taken to ensure that the observed reduction in emission polarization is due to homo-FRET. Interestingly, a clever approach utilizing the “Weber red-edge effect” has been used to monitor homo-FRET between Trp in proteins (Moens et al., 2004). In this approach, the polarization values of Trp is measured using excitation at 295 and 310 nm (red-edge) and the 310/295 polarization ratio offers significant insights into homo-FRET between Trp residues. Further, in cellular studies, varying the extent of fluorophore labeling has been shown to be useful in detecting homo-FRET between proteins. Homo-FRET has been used to determine the clustering of GPI-anchored proteins (Varma and Mayor, 1998), epidermal growth factor receptor (Kozer et al., 2011) and serotonin 1A receptor (Ganguly et al., 2011) on the cell surface. Excellent reviews are available on FRET-based approaches to study the oligomerization of GPCRs (Gandia et al., 2008; Kaczor and Selent, 2011). Recently, the conformational plasticity in the KcsA K+ channel pore helix has been studied by homo-FRET of Trp fluorescence (Renart et al., 2019).

Variants of FRET

Several FRET approaches have been developed and each one has its own advantages and limitations (Sapsford et al., 2006; Ma et al., 2014; Kankanamge et al., 2019). They are luminescence resonance energy transfer (LRET), where lanthanide is used as a donor and a fluorophore is used as an acceptor. This has been used to monitor depolarization-induced voltage sensor movement (S4 helix) in Shaker K+ channels (Cha et al., 1999) and the topology of prokaryotic voltage-gated Na+ channel NaChBac and K+ channel KvAP (Richardson et al., 2006; Sandtner et al., 2007). Another FRET approach, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), uses the light emitted (440–480 nm) from the reaction of luciferase enzyme with its substrate as donor light and a fluorescent label (usually a fluorescent protein) as the acceptor for energy transfer. Due to donor light obtained chemically in BRET instead of conventional optical excitation of donor, the problem of excitation crosstalk is therefore eliminated (Bacart et al., 2008; Gandia et al., 2008). BRET approach has been successfully used to characterize the structural rearrangements of the receptor associated with GPCR activation (Kankanamge et al., 2019). Another recent technique, transition metal ion FRET (tmFRET) employs a fluorophore as donor and a transition metal divalent cation (Ni2+, Co2+, or Cu2+) as non-fluorescent FRET acceptor to precisely measure interatomic distances (Taraska et al., 2009a,b; Yu et al., 2013). This method is suitable for measuring short distances of ~5–20 Å, and provides a sparse, dynamic measurement of structure using very low concentration of functional proteins in their native environment.

smFRET

Importantly, the strength of FRET approach is that it can be extended to the single molecule level (Weiss, 2000; Roy et al., 2008; Tan et al., 2014; Sasmal et al., 2016a; Castell et al., 2018; Lerner et al., 2018). Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) is a powerful tool to characterize distinct conformational states in macromolecules and the dynamics of their interconversion (Lerner et al., 2018). This involves monitoring the time-dependent structural changes in a single protein molecule that is labeled with a pair of donor and acceptor molecules at the site of interest (Weiss, 2000; Roy et al., 2008). Typically, the fluorophores used in smFRET studies have Ro of ~50 Å (Ma et al., 2017). The advantage of smFRET over ensemble FRET is that it can detect conformational dynamics and heterogeneity within a single protein molecule instead of measuring average interactions among protein molecules in an ensemble. Further, ensemble FRET measurements can average out the heterogeneous structural substates in a protein. This can be unmasked by smFRET approach, which can reveal valuable insights on structural dynamic changes in a protein (Roy et al., 2008). Since the first report of smFRET (Ha et al., 1996), its usage has exploded in recent times, particularly for membrane proteins (see Table 1). Some early smFRET studies of membrane proteins have studied the dimerization of gramicidin monomers (Borisenko et al., 2003) and proton-powered subunit rotation in a single membrane-bound FoF1-ATPase (Diez et al., 2004b). Further, smFRET has been used to monitor the conformational dynamics of the Na+-coupled aspartate transporter GltPh (Akyuz et al., 2013; Erkens et al., 2013), change in diameter during the opening and closing of the mechanosensitive ion channel MscL (Wang et al., 2014; Martinac, 2017). Recently, smFRET approach has been employed on the bacterial homolog of mammalian inwardly-rectifying potassium (KirBac) (Sadler et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016). The gating behavior of the concatenated channels has been studied, which supports the “twist-to-shrink” mechanism for the channel closing. Further studies on KirBac1.1 reveal that the selectivity filter conformational dynamics is affected by ion occupancies (Wang et al., 2019). Similar studies have been carried out to study conformational dynamics of ligand-gated ion channels which include glutamate receptors (Vafabakhsh et al., 2015; MacLean et al., 2019) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in living cells (Sasmal and Lu, 2014; Sasmal et al., 2016b). Further, smFRET measurements have also been used to monitor the structural dynamics of SNARE proteins involved in membrane fusion (Choi et al., 2010; Sakon and Weninger, 2010) and membrane transporters like LeuT (Zhao et al., 2010) and EmrE (Morrison et al., 2012) as they are involved in translocation of substrates across the membrane. For successful experiments using fluorescent proteins and FRET approaches, it is imperative to be familiar with their potential limitations, which are discussed in detail elsewhere (Piston and Kremers, 2007; Ma et al., 2014; Sasmal et al., 2016a).

Table 1

FRET studies of membrane proteins.

Biological system	Donor	Acceptor	Förster radius (Ro)	References
Glycophorin A (GpA)	Pyrene	7-dimethyaminocoumarin	60 Å	Fisher et al., 1999
	Fluorescein	TAMRA	54 Å	Anbazhagan et al., 2010
Voltage-gated Shaker K+ channel	Fluorescein	TMR	55 Å	Glauner et al., 1999
Ryanodine receptor (RyR)	Alexa Fluor-488	Alexa Fluor-568	62 Å	Cornea et al., 2010
SLC4A1 anion exchanger	Alexa Fluor-488	TMR-MS	50 Å	Basu et al., 2010
Gramicidin	Cy3	Cy5	53 Å	Borisenko et al., 2003*
Leucine transporter (LeuT)	Cy3	Cy5	58.4 Å	Zhao et al., 2010*
Multidrug transporter (EmrE)	Alexa Fluor-488	Alexa Fluor-568	62 Å	Morrison et al., 2012*
Glutamate transporter	Alexa Fluor-488	TMR	50 Å	Koch and Larsson, 2005
	Cy3	Cy5	58.4 Å	Akyuz et al., 2013*
Neurotensin receptor 1 (NTS1)	ECFP	EYFP	45.6 Å	Harding et al., 2009
	mNeonGreen	ATTO-647	50 Å	Heitkamp et al., 2018*
Mechanosensitive channel MscL	Alexa Fluor-488	Alexa Fluor-568	62 Å	Corry et al., 2005, 2010; Wang et al., 2014*
NMDA receptor	Alexa Fluor-532	ATTO-594	50 Å	Sasmal and Lu, 2014*
Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR)	DY-547	Alexa Fluor-647	52 Å	Vafabakhsh et al., 2015*
KirBac1.1	Alexa Fluor-555	Alexa Fluor-647	51 Å	Wang et al., 2016*
	Cy3B	Alexa Fluor-647	–	Sadler et al., 2016*
	Alexa Fluor-555	Alexa Fluor-647	51 Å	Wang et al., 2019*
β2 adrenergic receptor	Cy3B	Cy7	50.7 Å	Gregorio et al., 2017*
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)	ATTO-532	ATTO-647N	59 Å	Krainer et al., 2018*

TMR, Tetramethylrhodamine; eCFP, Enhanced Cyan Fluorescent Protein; eYFP, Enhanced Yellow Fluorescent Protein; TAMRA, Tetramethylrhodamine Azide; TMR-MS, Tetramethylrhodamine methanesulfonate.

smFRET studies.

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

Membrane proteins are essential for the viability of every cell and are important therapeutic targets (Bull and Doig, 2015). The dynamic nature of the lipid bilayer impairs the applicability of high-resolution structural studies using X-ray crystallography, NMR and electron microscopy. As a result, SDFL approaches have become an important tool for monitoring the organization and structural dynamics of membrane proteins under native conditions in real time, which is otherwise not obtained from crystallographic data. The power of SDFL approaches can be appreciated from the fact that the mechanisms of membrane protein function determined from fluorescence approaches have been effectively used to modify the structural model derived from cryoelectron microscopy (Johnson, 2005; Tilley et al., 2005). Despite being used for several decades, the fluorescence approaches continue to evolve to address the complex conformational and dynamic changes associated with the function of membrane proteins. For example, one-dimensional smFRET (measured only between two fluorophores) may not be sufficient to characterize the conformational dynamics of proteins that are intrinsically complex, highly heterogeneous and multidimensional. For this purpose, multidimensional smFRET has been developed to probe three sites of the macromolecule simultaneously (Hohng et al., 2004). Further, the recently developed surface-induced fluorescence attenuation (SIFA) has the potential to monitor both vertical and lateral dynamic motions of membrane proteins in supported membranes at the single molecule level (Ma et al., 2018). This means that monitoring the three dimensional movements of proteins is possible with these new SDFL approaches. In addition, the improvements in computational methods in utilizing the set of restraints from SDFL approaches play a key role in achieving atomistic-like structural models (Brunger et al., 2011; Kalinin et al., 2012). Interestingly, the structural information obtained from SDFL approaches are complementary to site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance (SDSL-EPR) approaches, particularly the Double Electron Electron Resonance (DEER) for distance measurements (Torbeev et al., 2009, 2011; Jeschke, 2012; White et al., 2013; Raghuraman et al., 2014). Since membrane proteins mediate majority of cellular functions and also play a crucial role in pathogenicity (Marinko et al., 2019), knowledge of structural and dynamic insights from SDFL approaches of membrane proteins will be pivotal to understand the cellular structure and function in physiological and pathological conditions and also for potential drug discovery.

Author Contributions

SC and AD contributed to preparing figures. HR, SC, and AD wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.