Literature DB >> 31608275

All-Organic Semiconductors for Electrochemical Biosensors: An Overview of Recent Progress in Material Design.

Jonathan Hopkins1,2, Kristina Fidanovski1,2, Antonio Lauto3, Damia Mawad1,2,4.   

Abstract

Organic semiconductors remain of major interest in the field of bioelectrochemistry for their versatility in chemical and electrochemical behavior. These materials have been tailored using organic synthesis for use in cell stimulation, sustainable energy production, and in biosensors. Recent progress in the field of fully organic semiconductor biosensors is outlined in this review, with a particular emphasis on the synthetic tailoring of these semiconductors for their intended application. Biosensors ultimately function on the basis of a physical, optical or electrochemical change which occurs in the active material when it encounters the target analyte. Electrochemical biosensors are becoming increasingly popular among organic semiconductor biosensors, owing to their good detection performances, and simple operation. The analyte either interacts directly with the semiconductor material in a redox process or undergoes a redox process with a moiety such as an enzyme attached to the semiconductor material. The electrochemical signal is then transduced through the semiconductor material. The most recent examples of organic semiconductor biosensors are discussed here with reference to the material design of polymers with semiconducting backbones, specifically conjugated polymers, and polymer semiconducting dyes. We conclude that direct interaction between the analyte and the semiconducting material is generally more sensitive and cost effective, despite being currently limited by the need to identify, and synthesize selective sensing functionalities. It is also worth noting the potential roles of highly-sensitive, organic transistor devices and small molecule semiconductors, such as the photochromic and redox active molecule spiropyran, as polymer pendant groups in future biosensor designs.
Copyright © 2019 Hopkins, Fidanovski, Lauto and Mawad.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biosensor; conjugated polymer; electrochemical; material design; organic semiconductor

Year:  2019        PMID: 31608275      PMCID: PMC6773807          DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol        ISSN: 2296-4185


Introduction

Bioelectrochemistry is the study of naturally-occurring, reduction/oxidation (redox) processes in living systems, encompassing electron transfer in biomolecules, enzyme redox behavior at an electrode, and interactions between synthetic, electro-responsive materials, and biological systems (Wu et al., 2017; Cervera et al., 2018; Oliveira-Brett et al., 2019). Recently, these natural electrochemical processes have been harnessed in sensors to detect molecules, including biomolecules relevant to the diagnosis, and management of human disease (Naveen et al., 2017). Biosensor materials change their physical, optical, or electrochemical properties in the presence of analyte molecules, thus “sensing” the analyte. For example, optical biosensors undergo changes in optical properties, including optical band gap and absorption and emission spectra, upon interaction with an analyte (Alvarez et al., 2011; Wang J. et al., 2018). Inorganic piezoelectric biosensors have been used as immunosensors and pesticide chemosensors (Skládal, 2016; Pohanka, 2017), while calorimetric (thermal) biosensors detect temperature changes from analyte reactions, and include purely-enzymatic thermistors (Antonelli et al., 2008; Bhand et al., 2010), and piezoelectric quartz oscillators (Gaddes et al., 2017). Electrochemical biosensors, which detect redox reactions of analyte molecules as electrical signals, are especially promising with their low cost, high sensitivity and selectivity, and simple apparatus (Aydin et al., 2018; Moon et al., 2018; Chai and Kan, 2019); they are therefore the focus of this review. To this end, organic semiconductors are of major interest since their chemical and electrochemical properties can be tailored using organic synthesis to the targeted application. They are the core component of organic bioelectronic devices for biomolecule sensing (Park et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2019), cell stimulation (Fidanovski and Mawad, 2019; Hopkins et al., 2019), and sustainable energy generation (Chen et al., 2004; Wallace et al., 2005; Li et al., 2017). In electrochemical biosensors, small molecule semiconductors are used individually or as polymer pendant groups; for example, spiropyran derivatives are photochromic and undergo ring-opening isomerization under various stimuli (Miyagishi et al., 2019), while organometallic “redox polymers” bearing pendant ferrocene, and osmium complexes have detected numerous neurotransmitter molecules (Casado et al., 2016). However, conjugated polymers (CPs)—polymers with π-conjugated, semiconducting backbones—exhibit improved sensitivity in biosensing due to their high electrical conductivity and efficient, tailorable charge transport characteristics, permitting rapid signal transduction (Park et al., 2008), and their biocompatibility allows their biological application (Cevik et al., 2019). Importantly, their redox-active backbone and propensity for flexible modification with numerous chemical functionalities allow them to mediate electrochemical reactions. Similarly, commercially-available, organic dyes such as methylene blue are readily electropolymerized, producing polymers with semiconducting backbones which efficiently mediate charge transport and redox reactions, with demonstrated utility in biosensing (Barsan et al., 2015). Given these polymeric materials' advantages, this review examines the material design of all-organic polymers with semiconducting backbones for electrochemical biosensors. We first discuss the operating principles and mechanisms of electrochemical biosensors. We then review the recent syntheses of novel, organic polymers with semiconducting backbones, including functional CPs and polymers of organic dyes, and outline their electrochemical detection of significant biomolecules.

Organic Semiconducting Polymers for Electrochemical Biosensors

Operating Principles of Electrochemical Biosensors

Electrochemical sensors operate as transducers in an electrochemical cell, facilitating analyte binding or electrochemical reaction at the surface under an applied potential (Park et al., 2008; Moon et al., 2018). This potential is applied using: amperometry, which monitors changes in current at constant potential; potentiometry, which measures potential with no current; impedometry, which measures the steady-state current response to a small alternating potential, typically using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS); and cyclic voltammetry (CV), which measures the current under a cyclic potential, generating current peaks from redox reactions. Sensor-analyte electron transfer results in electrochemical signals which are transduced through the semiconductor into an underlying electrode, and detected using a potentiostat. Transistor configurations, including organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs) introduced by White et al. (1984), utilize an additional gate voltage to amplify signals and improve biosensor sensitivity, as recently reviewed (Bai et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019). Electrochemical methods in general offer inexpensive, simple operation, high sensitivity and selectivity, low limits of detection (LOD), and broad linear detection ranges—all important criteria for biosensors (Aydin et al., 2018; Moon et al., 2018; Chai and Kan, 2019). Organic electrochemical biosensors have two modes of detection mechanism (Figure 1A). The organic semiconductor can be chemically modified with functionalities that directly facilitate analyte redox reactions. Alternatively, the organic semiconductor can be functionalized with complex moieties, including enzymes (enzymatic sensors), antibodies (immunosensors), and bacteria (bacterial sensors), which bind to the analyte, and mediate its reduction/oxidation. In this review, we refer to these mechanisms as “mode-1” and “mode-2,” respectively. Both mechanisms require semiconductor materials combining efficient charge carrier transport within the material with novel functionalities for either sensing mode. Consequently, for organic semiconductor-based biosensors, chemical synthesis is important to access novel material properties and functionalities tailored to detecting specific biomolecules. Therefore, we next discuss the recent syntheses of organic polymers with semiconducting backbones for electrochemical biosensors, focusing on conjugated polymers, and polymers of semiconducting organic dyes.
Figure 1

(A) The two modes of detection mechanism in organic electrochemical biosensors. Mode-1 detection involves direct interaction between polymer functionalities and the analyte, while mode-2 detection requires additional, biosensing moieties such as enzymes, antibodies, or bacteria to be chemically attached to the polymer. (B) Chemical structures of organic semiconductors used in electrochemical biosensors in recent literature.

(A) The two modes of detection mechanism in organic electrochemical biosensors. Mode-1 detection involves direct interaction between polymer functionalities and the analyte, while mode-2 detection requires additional, biosensing moieties such as enzymes, antibodies, or bacteria to be chemically attached to the polymer. (B) Chemical structures of organic semiconductors used in electrochemical biosensors in recent literature.

Material Design for Electrochemical Biosensors

The tailored synthesis of CPs for biosensors has received significant attention in recent literature. In particular, electrochemical glucose biosensors have been prominent since their invention by Clark and Lyons (1962) because glucose is relevant to many diseases, including endocrine disorders, and diabetes (Cevik et al., 2019). For example, the CP poly(dithieno(3,2-b:2′,3′-d)pyrrole) (PDTP) and its derivatives have previously attracted interest in organic field-effect transistors (OFETs), and more recently in electrochemical glucose biosensors, since their planar structures and fused ring systems yield high hole mobilities reaching 0.41 cm2 V−1 s−1 and efficient, enzyme-to-electrode charge transport (Parameswaran et al., 2009; Rasmussen and Evenson, 2013). Azak et al. (2016) synthesized PDTP derivatives bearing N-substituted aniline (Figure 1B, semiconductor 1) and biphenylamine (2) functionalities for “mode-2” glucose detection. The dithieno(3,2-b:2′,3′-d)pyrrole (DTP)-based monomers were synthesized using either Cu-catalyzed, Ullmann-type coupling or Pd-catalyzed, Buchwald-Hartwig coupling of 3,3′-dibromo-2,2′-bithiophene with aryl amines. Monomers underwent CV electropolymerization onto a gold substrate, then glucose oxidase (GOx) enzyme molecules, and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) modified with amine functionalities were immobilized on the polymer surface. AuNPs are commonly incorporated into biosensors to improve sensor sensitivity and selectivity (Naveen et al., 2017; Moon et al., 2018). The GOx catalyzed glucose oxidation in phosphate-buffered solution (PBS, pH = 7.4) during chronoamperometry. Both PDTP derivatives afforded wide linear detection ranges, and polymer 2 gave an especially low LOD of 0.0986 μM (Table 1). The biosensors reliably measured glucose concentrations in spiked human blood samples (<1% relative standard deviation, RSD), emphasizing their potential in diabetes treatment.
Table 1

Summary of biosensor configurations, mechanisms, and performances.

SCAdditional speciesAnalyteDetection mechanismDetection methodSensitivity (μA mM−1 cm−2)LOD/Linear range (μM)References
1GOx, AuNPsGlucoseMode-2, enzymaticCANR50.0/100–2,500Azak et al., 2016
2GOx, AuNPsGlucoseMode-2, enzymaticCANR0.0986/50–1,000Azak et al., 2016
3GOxGlucoseMode-2, enzymaticCVNR0.348/50–900Azak et al., 2018
4GOxGlucoseMode-2, enzymaticAMNR22/45–50,000Cevik et al., 2019
4G. oxydansGlucoseMode-2, bacterialAMNR81/190–50,000Cevik et al., 2019
5GOxGlucoseMode-2, enzymaticAM105.122.88/25–1,000Buber et al., 2018
6GOxGlucoseMode-2, enzymaticAM65.4412.8/5–700Soylemez et al., 2019
7DopamineMode-1EISNR0.3/7.8–125Dervisevic et al., 2017a
7Sialic acid (AGS cells)Mode-1EISNR10/10–106 dDervisevic et al., 2017b
8Acetylcholinesterase/ choline oxidase, AuNPsAcetylcholineMode-2, enzymaticCANR0.6/0.7–1,500Akhtar et al., 2017
9Anti-IL-1β antibodiesInterleukin 1βMode-2, immunosensorEISNR3 × 10−6/1 × 10−5–0.003cAydin et al., 2018
10GOxGlucoseMode-2, enzymaticCA/EISNR10/10–10,000Savva et al., 2019
10Lactate oxidaseLactateMode-2, enzymaticCANR10/10–1,000Pappa et al., 2018
11aSodium ionsMode-1CA/CV/SS37a20/10–106Wustoni et al., 2019
11bPotassium ionsMode-1CA/CV/SS49a100/100–106Wustoni et al., 2019
12GDH, NAD+GlucoseMode-2, enzymaticAMNR4.0/10–1,000Dilgin et al., 2018
12CreatineMode-1DPV0.133b0.2/0.5–900cPandey et al., 2018

SC, Semiconductor; GOx, glucose oxidase; AuNPs, gold nanoparticles; GDH, glucose dehydrogenase; NAD+, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; SCNs, single-walled carbon nanotubes; CA, chronoamperometry; CV, cyclic voltammetry; AM, amperometry; EIS, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; DPV, differential pulse voltammetry; SS, steady-state OECT measurements; NR, not reported.

Units are μA decade−1.

Units are μA ng mL−1.

Units are ng mL−1.

Units are cells mL.

Summary of biosensor configurations, mechanisms, and performances. SC, Semiconductor; GOx, glucose oxidase; AuNPs, gold nanoparticles; GDH, glucose dehydrogenase; NAD+, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; SCNs, single-walled carbon nanotubes; CA, chronoamperometry; CV, cyclic voltammetry; AM, amperometry; EIS, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; DPV, differential pulse voltammetry; SS, steady-state OECT measurements; NR, not reported. Units are μA decade−1. Units are μA ng mL−1. Units are ng mL−1. Units are cells mL. The authors subsequently developed PDTP biosensors without AuNPs (Azak et al., 2018). They synthesized alkoxyamine-functionalized PDTP (3) via Buchwald-Hartwig coupling and performed CV electropolymerization onto an indium tin oxide (ITO)-glass substrate. The electron-donating alkoxyamine side groups were chosen over alkyl amine groups to reduce the energy requirement for monomer oxidation during electropolymerization. GOx was immobilized by covalently bonding to polymer amine groups, assisted by glutaraldehyde (GA) crosslinking. Glucose was detected in PBS (pH = 7.0) with a low LOD of 0.348 μM, superior to many electrochemical glucose biosensors (Table 1). The bound enzymes exhibited impressive storage stability, retaining 80% enzymatic activity after 20 days—a significant step toward improving biosensor longevity. The same group synthesized N-decylamine-substituted DTP monomer by Buchwald-Hartwig coupling, as reported previously (Udum et al., 2014), followed by electrochemical polymerization onto a glassy carbon electrode giving polymer 4 (Cevik et al., 2019). They then fabricated enzymatic and bacterial biosensors for glucose by utilizing the decylamine functionalities to immobilize GOx and Gluconobacter oxydans (G. oxydans) onto the surface. G. oxydans has demonstrated utility in electrochemical biosensors for numerous functionalities (Katrlík et al., 2007). Both biosensors detected glucose via amperometry in PBS at optimized pH. While the bacterial biosensor exhibited more reliable detection in the presence of other molecules, the GOx biosensor was superior overall with a lower LOD (22 vs. 81 μM) and broader linear dynamic range (0.045–50.0 vs. 0.19–50.0 mM). Buber et al. (2018) explored an alternative glucose sensor involving a novel, bithiophene-phenazine-based CP (5) without amine functionalities as a GOx-immobilization substrate. The monomer, 10,13-bis(4-hexylthiophen-2-yl)dipyridol[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine (HTPP), was synthesized by Stille coupling of thiophene and phenazine precursors, phenazine reduction to amines, and condensation with an aromatic dione (Esmer et al., 2011). The polymer was deposited using CV onto a graphite substrate. Structurally, the polymer was designed to improve GOx adhesion via hydrophobic interactions with hexyl side chains and intermolecular π-π interactions with the numerous aromatic rings. Through GA crosslinking, GOx was immobilized on the surface to oxidize and detect β-d-glucose in PBS by measuring molecular oxygen consumption using amperometry. After optimization, the sensor exhibited superior sensitivity (105.12 μA mM−1 cm−2), and LOD (2.88 μM) to comparable published systems, and accurately measured glucose levels in commercial beverages (<10% deviation from product label). Donor-acceptor CPs, containing electron donor and acceptor repeat units, exhibit efficient electrochromic switching, and applications in OFETs and solar cells (Soylemez et al., 2019), and also possess biosensing capabilities. Soylemez et al. (2019) synthesized a donor-acceptor CP (6) containing furan (donor) and thiazole (acceptor) moieties in a “proof-of-concept” glucose biosensor. The monomer, 2,5-di(furan-2-yl)thiazolo[5,4-d]thiazole, was synthesized in a mild, single-step reaction and underwent CV electropolymerization onto a graphite electrode. The polymer exhibited reversible electrochromic behavior with fast redox switching times (0.3 and 0.4 s). After immobilizing GOx with GA crosslinking, glucose was detected in beverages with good sensitivity (65.44 μA mM−1 cm−2) and reasonable LOD (12.8 μM). Although these values are inferior compared to Buber et al. (2018), this work emphasizes the wide range of CP designs applicable to biosensing. CPs have also been used to detect neurotransmitters including dopamine, a neurotransmitter involved in several neurological conditions including Alzheimer's disease. Dopamine binds strongly and selectively to boronic acids, permitting mode-1 dopamine detection. However, the low physiological concentration of dopamine necessitates high biosensor sensitivity and selectivity (Jiang et al., 2017). As such, Dervisevic et al. (2017a) copolymerized thiophene and 3-thienylboronic acid by CV onto pencil graphite, producing a PT derivative (7) with boronic acid groups. In dopamine solution, these groups immobilized dopamine molecules at physiological pH, altering the devices' impedimetric response. This permitted selective dopamine detection in human urine with a wide linear range (7.8–125 μM) and very low LOD (0.3 μM). This CP also selectively detected tumor cells (Dervisevic et al., 2017b): electrodes coated with electropolymerized CP were submerged in a medium containing human Caucasian gastric adenocarcinoma (AGS) cancer cells, which generate abnormally large quantities of sialic acid (1,000× greater). Through EIS, the boronic acid-functionalized CP detected sialic acid with high selectivity and a low cell LOD (10 cells mL−1), highlighting its potential in reliable, early cancer diagnosis. Akhtar et al. (2017) developed an innovative biosensor for the neurotransmitter acetylcholine associated with various neurological and physiological conditions. They used a dual-electrode, microfluidic device to improve enzyme loading, and minimize signal interference. The monomer, 2,2′:5′,2″-terthiophene-3-(p-benzoic acid), was synthesized by boronic acid functionalization of 3′-bromo-2,2′:5′,2″-terthiophene, Suzuki coupling with 4-bromobenzonitrile, and alkaline hydrolysis of nitrile groups to carboxylic acid groups (Kim et al., 2012). This monomer underwent CV electropolymerization, depositing polymer 8 onto an AuNP-coated “reaction electrode” and a porous, Au-coated “detection electrode.” Acetylcholinesterase was immobilized on the reaction electrode and choline oxidase was immobilized on the detection electrode. Detection involved successive conversion of acetylcholine into choline at the reaction electrode, then into betaine and hydrogen peroxide at the detection electrode. Reduction of hydrogen peroxide by hydrazine released electrons which were detected by chronoamperometry. The sensor exhibited a wide dynamic range (0.7 nM−1,500 μM), very low average LOD (0.6 nM), and high selectivity to acetylcholine from the multi-step reaction sequence. This sensor monitored the in-vitro extracellular release of acetylcholine by leukemic T-cells triggered by calcium ions. Aydin et al. (2018) utilized self-assembled films of a densely carboxylated PT derivative, poly(3-thiophene malonic acid) (P3-TMA, 9), as electrochemical immunosensors for the protein Interleukin 1β (IL-1β) involved in human immune response. The polymer was synthesized by chemical oxidation of the methyl ester monomer, then hydrolysis yielding ionizable, carboxylic acid groups. These groups both bound to a treated ITO substrate with hydroxyl surface functionalities, forming a self-assembled P3-TMA monolayer, and immobilized anti-IL-1β antibodies on the monolayer permitting biorecognition. Selective immunodetection of IL-1β antigen in human serum and saliva was demonstrated with a very low LOD (3 fg/mL), two orders of magnitude lower than the next-best, CP-free system (300 fg/mL). CP-based OECT configurations are gaining popularity as sensitive electrochemical biosensors. OECT biosensors commonly utilize water-processable poly(ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) (Liao et al., 2019), for example in conjunction with lipid bilayers to detect the ion pore α-hemolysin (Zhang et al., 2016). Recent OECT biosensors have explored alternative CPs with tailored structures. Giovannitti et al. (2018) synthesized a naphthalene-bithiophene-based donor-acceptor copolymer (10) and introduced glycol side chains via amine-anhydride coupling to improve ion transport in OECTs. The CP was coated with GOx or lactate oxidase without enzyme immobilization and used for glucose (Savva et al., 2019), or lactate (Pappa et al., 2018) detection, respectively, with good LODs (both 10 μM). Wustoni et al. (2019) synthesized thiophene derivatives functionalized with 15-crown-5 and 18-crown-6 ethers to selectively trap sodium and potassium ions, respectively, two important ions in cell signaling. Each monomer was copolymerized with ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) onto OECTs using various electropolymerization methods. Under an optimized OECT gate potential, the copolymers (11a/11b) performed selective, real-time detection of sodium and potassium ions with good LODs (20/100 μM), broad linear detection ranges (10–106/100–106 μM), and comparable sensitivities to the “gold-standard” PEDOT:PSS. Alternatively to CPs, semiconducting dyes are commercially available and readily undergo electropolymerization forming redox-active polymers. The earlier use of organic dye-based polymers in electrochemical biosensors has been reviewed (Barsan et al., 2015). However, here we summarize the many recent biosensing applications of poly(methylene blue) (PMB, 12), a prominent redox-active polymer, with one mode-1 and one mode-2 electrochemical biosensor. Dilgin et al. (2018) electropolymerized methylene blue onto poly(amidoamine)-coated, disposable graphite electrodes using CV, and immobilized glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) on the PMB with GA crosslinking. Aided by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), this PMB-GDH system facilitated mode-2, amperometric glucose detection via several reactions. First, GDH oxidized glucose and reduced NAD+ to NADH; the underlying PMB then re-oxidized NADH; finally, an electrochemical potential re-oxidized PMB generating an electrical signal. This sensor selectively detected glucose in artificial blood serum and commercial dextrose solutions under flow conditions with a reasonable LOD (4.0 μM). Considering the disadvantages of enzymatic biosensors, including poor storage stability and high cost, Pandey et al. (2018) fabricated a non-enzymatic, mode-1 PMB biosensor for creatinine, an indicator of renal dysfunction. Dendritic PMB nanofibers were synthesized using CV onto a Cu-doped carbon nanofiber substrate, producing a polymer/metal/carbon nanocomposite sensor. Through PMB and creatine coordination to Cu centers, this sensor showed excellent selectivity, sensitivity (0.133 μA ng mL−1), and LOD (0.2 ng mL−1), with consistent measurements in clinical human saliva samples (1–2% RSD). Examples abound of recent electrochemical biosensors with polymers including PMB (Koyun and Sahin, 2018; Li et al., 2018; Wang and Ma, 2018; Bollella et al., 2019a,b), poly(alizarin yellow R) (Amini et al., 2019), poly(azure A) (Agrisuelas et al., 2018), poly(azure B) (Porfireva et al., 2019; Stoikov et al., 2019), poly(azure C) (Liu et al., 2019), poly(brilliant cresyl blue) (da Silva et al., 2019), and poly(thionine) (Shamspur et al., 2018; Wang Y. et al., 2018; Zhao and Ma, 2018; Chai and Kan, 2019; Stoikov et al., 2019), demonstrating the versatility of organic dyes in designing novel, semiconducting polymers for biosensors.

Conclusions

Organic semiconducting polymers are a highly versatile, promising class of materials for biosensors since their organic synthesis can be tailored to achieve various functionalities for different applications. This versatility is evidenced by the numerous, innovative techniques in recent literature to synthesize organic biosensor materials. Electrochemical biosensors have especially great potential for widespread, in-vivo application, since recent biosensor materials exhibit high sensitivity, LODs as low as 0.0986 μM, and broad linear ranges spanning five orders of magnitude. Novel electrochemical transistor configurations including OECTs enhance sensitivity through signal amplification and represent a popular new direction in biosensor design. Mode-2 biosensors utilizing complex moieties are most common and historically well-established; here the organic semiconductor only transduces the electrochemical signal, while additional moieties including enzymes and bacteria are primarily responsible for detection. Consequently, numerous semiconductor functionalities have been developed to bind to these moieties, including amine groups for enzymes, and fused-ring backbones which also improve charge transfer. Developing chemical functionalities with improved enzyme binding may also reduce the current overdependence on GA crosslinking for enzyme adhesion. Recent mode-1 biosensors, which directly mediate analyte redox, exhibit competitive LODs, and detection ranges compared to mode-2 biosensors (Table 1). Both mechanisms can achieve selectivity by introducing specific functionalities, including GOx for glucose, and boronic acids for dopamine. However, Pandey et al. (2018) note that mode-2 biosensors often suffer from reduced storage stability and higher cost from the additional, detecting moiety. Conversely, mode-1 biosensors are uncommon since they require the identification and synthesis of selective biosensing functionalities replacing naturally-occurring moieties. While both mechanisms are worth pursuing, future syntheses should also investigate novel semiconductors for mode-1 detection to complement established, “mode-2” technologies. Continued development of mode-1 biosensors would likely increase their impact in multiplying opportunities for low-cost, disposable devices for clinical use, especially when combined with “disposable” electrode materials including pencil graphite (Dilgin et al., 2018). One material design strategy to expand the scope of mode-1 biosensors would involve introducing small molecule organic semiconductors such as spiropyran as pendant groups on aliphatic or conjugated polymers. As part of a growing trend toward small molecule semiconductors in biosensors, spiropyran derivatives are becoming increasingly common in optical biosensors due to their reversible photochromism under various stimuli. Recently, Li et al. (2013) utilized silyl-modified spiropyran for optical fluoride detection in biological media, while Shao et al. (2018) used siloxane polymers with spiropyran pendant groups for optical silver and iron(III) ion detection. Tao et al. (2016) extended the use of spiropyran derivatives to mode-1 electrochemical detection of fluoride. Future developments in synthesizing small molecule semiconductors as polymer pendant functionalities would help establish their viability in mode-1 electrochemical detection, expanding our ever-growing “library” of organic semiconductors for electrochemical biosensors.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  30 in total

1.  Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery.

Authors:  L C CLARK; C LYONS
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1962-10-31       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Functionalized Organic Thin Film Transistors for Biosensing.

Authors:  Naixiang Wang; Anneng Yang; Ying Fu; Yuanzhe Li; Feng Yan
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 3.  Conjugated Polymers in Bioelectronics: Addressing the Interface Challenge.

Authors:  Kristina Fidanovski; Damia Mawad
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Facile synthesis of polyaniline-polythionine redox hydrogel: Conductive, antifouling and enzyme-linked material for ultrasensitive label-free amperometric immunosensor toward carcinoma antigen-125.

Authors:  Lihua Zhao; Zhanfang Ma
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 6.558

5.  Au-polythionine nanocomposites: a novel mediator for bisphenol A dual-signal assay based on imprinted electrochemical sensor.

Authors:  Rong Chai; Xianwen Kan
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  A novel microbial biosensor based on cells of Gluconobacter oxydans for the selective determination of 1,3-propanediol in the presence of glycerol and its application to bioprocess monitoring.

Authors:  Jaroslav Katrlík; Igor Vostiar; Jana Sefcovicová; Ján Tkác; Vladimír Mastihuba; Milan Valach; Vladimír Stefuca; Peter Gemeiner
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Microneedle-based biosensor for minimally-invasive lactate detection.

Authors:  Paolo Bollella; Sanjiv Sharma; Anthony Edward George Cass; Riccarda Antiochia
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 8.  Electrochemical Sensors Based on Organic Conjugated Polymers.

Authors:  Md Aminur Rahman; Pankaj Kumar; Deog-Su Park; Yoon-Bo Shim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Direct metabolite detection with an n-type accumulation mode organic electrochemical transistor.

Authors:  Anna Maria Pappa; David Ohayon; Alexander Giovannitti; Iuliana Petruta Maria; Achilleas Savva; Ilke Uguz; Jonathan Rivnay; Iain McCulloch; Róisín M Owens; Sahika Inal
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 10.  Functional Sensing Interfaces of PEDOT:PSS Organic Electrochemical Transistors for Chemical and Biological Sensors: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Jianjun Liao; Hewei Si; Xidong Zhang; Shiwei Lin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of Humidity and Temperature on the Impedances and Voltage of Al/Gr-Jelly/Cu-Rubber Composite-Based Flexible Electrochemical Sensors.

Authors:  Muhammad Tariq Saeed Chani; Khasan S Karimov; Esraa M Bakhsh; Mohammed M Rahman
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-01-24

2.  Ultraviolet and Infrared Irradiations Sensing of Gel-Orange Dye Composite-Based Flexible Electrochemical Cells.

Authors:  Muhammad Tariq Saeed Chani; Khasan S Karimov; Abdullah M Asiri; Tahseen Kamal; Esraa M Bakhsh; Mohammed Muzibur Rahman
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-01-28

3.  Preparation of Smart Surfaces Based on PNaSS@PEDOT Microspheres: Testing of E. coli Detection.

Authors:  Elena Tomšík; Svetlana Laishevkina; Jan Svoboda; Kristýna Gunar; Jiřina Hromádková; Natalia Shevchenko
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Syntheses of Thiophene and Thiazole-Based Building Blocks and Their Utilization in the Syntheses of A-D-A Type Organic Semiconducting Materials with Dithienosilolo Central Unit.

Authors:  Tomi A O Parviainen; Petri M Salmela; Roosa J Sippola; Juha P Heiskanen
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-07-21

Review 5.  New Opportunities for Organic Semiconducting Polymers in Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Kyunghun Kim; Hocheon Yoo; Eun Kwang Lee
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.967

6.  Label-free electrochemical aptasensor for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein based on carbon cloth sputtered gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Muhammad Adeel; Kanwal Asif; Fahad Alshabouna; Vincenzo Canzonieri; Md Mahbubur Rahman; Sajid Ali Ansari; Firat Güder; Flavio Rizzolio; Salvatore Daniele
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron X       Date:  2022-09-24

7.  Strategic Electrochemical Determination of Nitrate over Polyaniline/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes-Gum Arabic Architecture.

Authors:  Samia Abdulhammed Mohamad Kosa; Amna Nisar Khan; Sana Ahmed; Mohammad Aslam; Wafa AbuBaker Bawazir; Abdul Hameed; Muhammad Tahir Soomro
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 8.  Printed Electrochemical Biosensors: Opportunities and Metrological Challenges.

Authors:  Emilio Sardini; Mauro Serpelloni; Sarah Tonello
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.