| Literature DB >> 31608275 |
Jonathan Hopkins1,2, Kristina Fidanovski1,2, Antonio Lauto3, Damia Mawad1,2,4.
Abstract
Organic semiconductors remain of major interest in the field of bioelectrochemistry for their versatility in chemical and electrochemical behavior. These materials have been tailored using organic synthesis for use in cell stimulation, sustainable energy production, and in biosensors. Recent progress in the field of fully organic semiconductor biosensors is outlined in this review, with a particular emphasis on the synthetic tailoring of these semiconductors for their intended application. Biosensors ultimately function on the basis of a physical, optical or electrochemical change which occurs in the active material when it encounters the target analyte. Electrochemical biosensors are becoming increasingly popular among organic semiconductor biosensors, owing to their good detection performances, and simple operation. The analyte either interacts directly with the semiconductor material in a redox process or undergoes a redox process with a moiety such as an enzyme attached to the semiconductor material. The electrochemical signal is then transduced through the semiconductor material. The most recent examples of organic semiconductor biosensors are discussed here with reference to the material design of polymers with semiconducting backbones, specifically conjugated polymers, and polymer semiconducting dyes. We conclude that direct interaction between the analyte and the semiconducting material is generally more sensitive and cost effective, despite being currently limited by the need to identify, and synthesize selective sensing functionalities. It is also worth noting the potential roles of highly-sensitive, organic transistor devices and small molecule semiconductors, such as the photochromic and redox active molecule spiropyran, as polymer pendant groups in future biosensor designs.Entities:
Keywords: biosensor; conjugated polymer; electrochemical; material design; organic semiconductor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31608275 PMCID: PMC6773807 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Figure 1(A) The two modes of detection mechanism in organic electrochemical biosensors. Mode-1 detection involves direct interaction between polymer functionalities and the analyte, while mode-2 detection requires additional, biosensing moieties such as enzymes, antibodies, or bacteria to be chemically attached to the polymer. (B) Chemical structures of organic semiconductors used in electrochemical biosensors in recent literature.
Summary of biosensor configurations, mechanisms, and performances.
| 1 | GOx, AuNPs | Glucose | Mode-2, enzymatic | CA | NR | 50.0/100–2,500 | Azak et al., |
| 2 | GOx, AuNPs | Glucose | Mode-2, enzymatic | CA | NR | 0.0986/50–1,000 | Azak et al., |
| 3 | GOx | Glucose | Mode-2, enzymatic | CV | NR | 0.348/50–900 | Azak et al., |
| 4 | GOx | Glucose | Mode-2, enzymatic | AM | NR | 22/45–50,000 | Cevik et al., |
| 4 | Glucose | Mode-2, bacterial | AM | NR | 81/190–50,000 | Cevik et al., | |
| 5 | GOx | Glucose | Mode-2, enzymatic | AM | 105.12 | 2.88/25–1,000 | Buber et al., |
| 6 | GOx | Glucose | Mode-2, enzymatic | AM | 65.44 | 12.8/5–700 | Soylemez et al., |
| 7 | — | Dopamine | Mode-1 | EIS | NR | 0.3/7.8–125 | Dervisevic et al., |
| 7 | — | Sialic acid (AGS cells) | Mode-1 | EIS | NR | 10/10–106
| Dervisevic et al., |
| 8 | Acetylcholinesterase/ choline oxidase, AuNPs | Acetylcholine | Mode-2, enzymatic | CA | NR | 0.6/0.7–1,500 | Akhtar et al., |
| 9 | Anti-IL-1β antibodies | Interleukin 1β | Mode-2, immunosensor | EIS | NR | 3 × 10−6/1 × 10−5–0.003 | Aydin et al., |
| 10 | GOx | Glucose | Mode-2, enzymatic | CA/EIS | NR | 10/10–10,000 | Savva et al., |
| 10 | Lactate oxidase | Lactate | Mode-2, enzymatic | CA | NR | 10/10–1,000 | Pappa et al., |
| 11a | — | Sodium ions | Mode-1 | CA/CV/SS | 37 | 20/10–106 | Wustoni et al., |
| 11b | — | Potassium ions | Mode-1 | CA/CV/SS | 49 | 100/100–106 | Wustoni et al., |
| 12 | GDH, NAD+ | Glucose | Mode-2, enzymatic | AM | NR | 4.0/10–1,000 | Dilgin et al., |
| 12 | — | Creatine | Mode-1 | DPV | 0.133 | 0.2/0.5–900 | Pandey et al., |
SC, Semiconductor; GOx, glucose oxidase; AuNPs, gold nanoparticles; GDH, glucose dehydrogenase; NAD+, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; SCNs, single-walled carbon nanotubes; CA, chronoamperometry; CV, cyclic voltammetry; AM, amperometry; EIS, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; DPV, differential pulse voltammetry; SS, steady-state OECT measurements; NR, not reported.
Units are μA decade−1.
Units are μA ng mL−1.
Units are ng mL−1.
Units are cells mL.