| Literature DB >> 31607918 |
Zihao Wang1, Ke-Gang Linghu1, Yuanjia Hu1, Huali Zuo1, Hao Yi2, Shi-Hang Xiong1, Jinjian Lu1, Ging Chan1, Hua Yu1,3,4, Run-Yue Huang2,5.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease, causing articular and extra-articular dysfunctions among patients, and it could result in irreversible joint damages or disability if untreated. A traditional Chinese medicine formula, Huayu-Qiangshen-Tongbi (HT) formula, has been observed successful in controlling rheumatoid arthritis progression in traditional Chinese medicine clinics. In this study, we conducted a systematic analysis of the HT formula with a purpose of proposing for its potential mechanism of action using network pharmacological methods. The potential targets of the formula were collected and screened according to the topological features of their protein-protein interaction network, and we subsequently validated our prediction results through in vitro experiments. We proposed that the HT formula could interfere with the bone metabolism and the inflammatory pathways of the body. The experimental validation results indicated that HT formula could exhibit anti-inflammatory effects by regulating several signaling pathways specifically the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, phosphoinositide-3-kinase-Akt signaling pathway, hypoxia-inducible factor 1 signaling pathway, mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway and activator protein 1 signaling pathway.Entities:
Keywords: Huayu-Qiangshen-Tongbi formula; in vitro validation; network pharmacology; rheumatoid arthritis; traditional Chinese medicine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31607918 PMCID: PMC6767993 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1A scheme illustrating the general workflow of studying the HT formula using a systematic method.
List of the approved disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) sharing common targets with the Huayu-Qiangshen-Tongbi (HT) formula.
| Approved Drugs | DrugBank ID | Shared targets | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ibuprofen | DB01050 | 25 | NSAID |
| Indomethacin | DB00328 | 21 | NSAID |
| Diclofenac | DB00586 | 20 | NSAID |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | DB00945 | 15 | NSAID |
| Celecoxib | DB00482 | 10 | NSAID |
| Flurbiprofen | DB00712 | 10 | NSAID |
| Ketoprofen | DB01009 | 10 | NSAID |
| Sulindac | DB00605 | 10 | NSAID |
| Etodolac | DB00749 | 9 | NSAID |
| Naproxen | DB00788 | 9 | NSAID |
| Sulfasalazine | DB00795 | 9 | DMARD |
| Meloxicam | DB00814 | 7 | NSAID |
| Piroxicam | DB00554 | 7 | NSAID |
| Diflunisal | DB00861 | 6 | NSAID |
| Tolmetin | DB00500 | 6 | NSAID |
| Fenoprofen | DB00573 | 5 | NSAID |
| Leflunomide | DB01097 | 4 | DMARD |
| Meclofenamic acid | DB00939 | 4 | NSAID |
| Nabumetone | DB00461 | 4 | NSAID |
| Tenoxicam | DB00469 | 4 | NSAID |
| Azathioprine | DB00993 | 3 | DMARD |
| Oxaprozin | DB00991 | 3 | NSAID |
| Hydroxychloroquine | DB01611 | 2 | DMARD |
Figure 2A graph illustrating the major hubs of Huayu-Qiangshen-Tongbi–rheumatoid arthritis (HT–RA) protein–protein interaction (PPI) network and their frequently associated pathways. The pathway enrichment analysis showed that the major hubs were often involved with the nine pathways shown in the graph, and these pathways participated in the bone metabolism and inflammation of RA.
The major hubs of the Huayu-Qiangshen-Tongbi–rheumatoid arthritis (HT–RA) protein–protein interaction (PPI) network and their frequently associated pathways.
| Term | Nodes | Gene IDs |
|---|---|---|
| Osteoclast differentiation | 20 | LCK, PTPRC, NFKBIA, PIK3CG, MAP2K1, MAPK3, NFKB1, IL2, JUN, IL4, PIK3CD, CSF2, PIK3CA, IL10, RELA, MAPK1, FYN, MAPK14, FOS, AKT1 |
| T cell receptor signaling pathway | 20 | LCK, PTPRC, NFKBIA, PIK3CG, MAP2K1, MAPK3, NFKB1, IL2, JUN, IL4, PIK3CD, CSF2, PIK3CA, IL10, RELA, MAPK1, FYN, MAPK14, FOS, AKT1 |
| TNF signaling pathway | 19 | CCL2, NFKBIA, PTGS2, PIK3CG, MAP2K1, MAPK3, NFKB1, IL6, CREB1, JUN, PIK3CD, CSF2, PIK3CA, RELA, MAPK1, MAPK14, FOS, AKT1, MAPK8 |
| Prolactin signaling pathway | 17 | STAT1, SRC, PIK3CG, MAP2K1, MAPK3, NFKB1, ESR1, PIK3CD, JAK2, PIK3CA, RELA, MAPK1, MAPK14, FOS, AKT1, STAT3, MAPK8 |
| Toll-like receptor signaling pathway | 18 | STAT1, CD40, NFKBIA, PIK3CG, MAP2K1, MAPK3, NFKB1, IL6, JUN, PIK3CD, PIK3CA, RELA, MAPK1, MAPK14, FOS, IL8, AKT1, MAPK8 |
| HIF-1 signaling pathway | 13 | PIK3CD, PIK3CA, MAPK1, RELA, PIK3CG, MAPK3, MAP2K1, NFKB1, IL6, EGFR, STAT3, AKT1, BCL2 |
| PI3K–Akt signaling pathway | 19 | PIK3CG, MAPK3, MAP2K1, NFKB1, IL6, CREB1, TP53, IL2, HSP90AA1, IL4, PIK3CD, JAK2, SYK, PIK3CA, RELA, MAPK1, EGFR, AKT1, BCL2 |
| Chemokine signaling pathway | 17 | STAT1, SRC, CCL2, NFKBIA, PIK3CG, MAP2K1, MAPK3, NFKB1, CXCL12, PIK3CD, JAK2, PIK3CA, RELA, MAPK1, IL8, AKT1, STAT3 |
| Neurotrophin signaling pathway | 16 | NFKBIA, PIK3CG, MAPK3, MAP2K1, NFKB1, TP53, JUN, PIK3CD, CALM2, PIK3CA, RELA, MAPK1, MAPK14, AKT1, MAPK8, BCL2 |
Figure 3Ultraperformance liquid chromatography-photodiode array (UPLC-PDA) chromatograms of the mixed standards and HT. 1: Danshensu, 2: 3-caffeoylquinic acid, 3: caffeic acid, 4: paeoniflorin, 5: rutin, 6: quecertrin, 7: rosmarinic acid, 8: salvigenin, 9: calycosin, and 10: glyrrhizic acid.
Figure 4Effects of HT on RAW264.7 cells in the presence or absence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The cells were cotreated with the extracts in 96-well plate at indicated concentrations for 24 h; then, the cell viability was detected by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (A). The cells were pretreated with the extracts at the concentrations of 100, 200, and 400 μg/ml in 24-well plate for 1 h, then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for 24 h; the supernatants were collected to determine cytokines secretion with ELISA kit (B) and NO release with Griess reagent (C). Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ###P < 0.001 vs. the Ctrl group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. the LPS group.
Figure 5HT reduced inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. The cells were pretreated with HT extract at indicated concentrations in six-well plate for 1 h before stimulation with LPS (1 μg/ml) for 12 h; then, the expression of iNOS was examined by western blotting (A) and immunofluorescence staining (B). Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ###P < 0.001 vs. the Ctrl group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. the LPS group.
Figure 6Effects of the HT extract on the relevant proteins in the LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. Cells were pre-treated with the extract at the concentrations of 100, 200, 400 μg/mL in the 6-well plates for 1 h prior to the stimulation with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 12 h or 1 h, and the relevant proteins deduced from the computational predictions were analyzed by western blotting (A, C and D) and immunofluorescence staining (B) subsequently.