Maryam Salimi1, Abolfazl Shirazi2,3, Mohsen Norouzian4, Mohammad Mehdi Mehrazar5, Mohammad Mehdi Naderi5, Mohammad Ali Shokrgozar6, Mirdavood Omrani7, Seyed Mahmoud Hashemi8. 1. Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. Electronic Address: a.shirazi@ari.ir. 3. Department of Gametes and Cloning, Research Institute of Animal Embryo Technology, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran. 4. Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Electronic Address: norozian93@gmail.com. 5. Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. 6. National Cell Bank of Iran, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran. 7. Department of Medical Genetics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 8. Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mouse chimeras have become a useful tool for studying
the mammalian development processes, including
formation of a specific cell lineage or tissue as well as
gene function (1). Chimeras are the animals with two
or more populations of genetically different cells or the
recipient embryos with pluripotent stem cells from the
same or different species (2). Previous studies showed
that microinjection of embryonic stem cells (ESCs)
is an efficient approach in producing good germ line-
transmitted chimeras (3). It has been shown that injected
ESCs into the 8-cell embryos or compacting morula
can migrate into the inner cell mass (ICM) of resulting
blastocysts (2, 4, 5) whose migration mechanisms has
still remained to be elucidated (6).On the other hand, chimeric animals are less viable
and exhibit some abnormalities such as large offspring
syndrome (LOS) and placental abruption. The
abnormalities in early fetal and placental development
may occur when embryos have been manipulated in vitro
(7). Manipulation process and embryo culture condition
can also change gene expression pattern and early
embryo development by epigenetic factor modifications
(8). Epigenetic changes, including modifications of
DNA and histones without changing DNA sequence,
are key regulatory factors in transcriptional activity and
repression of genes in pre-implantation embryo (9).
Recently the role of histone lysine methylation in embryo
development has been noticed by many investigators
(10). Previous studies have shown that histone H3 trimethylated
at lysine 4 (H3K4me3) and histone H3 trimethylated
at lysine 9 (H3K9me3) are respectively
associated with active and inactive chromatin
compartments (11). H3K4me3 is generally detected at
the 5'-end of proximal promoters and it is one of the
essential factors required for transcription activity in
ICM of embryo (12). In contrast, H3K9me3 is generally
localized at the promoter of repressed genes and it is
required for constitutive heterochromatin formation in
pericentromeric and centromeric DNA (13). Previous
study has shown that de-methylation of H3K9 at the
regulatory regions of ESCs significantly up-regulated
Oct4 and Nanog gene expressions (14).Gamete and embryo manipulations, such as oocytes
in vitro maturation (IVM), in vitro embryo production
through intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or in
vitro fertilization (IVF), have negative impacts on embryo
quality and epigenetic modifications (9, 15, 16). Although
many studies implicate the effects of in vitro manipulation
on alterations of epigenetic modification, the pattern of
these alterations (including histone methylations) in
chimeric embryos is still unclear. Therefore, in our study
we aimed to investigate the pattern of H3K4me3 and
H3K9me3 modifications in mouse chimeric blastocysts as
well as the effects of this modifications on the ICM lineage
specific gene expression (Oct4, Nanog) and trophectoderm
(TE) gene expressions (Tead4, Cdx2). Moreover, effect of
embryo compaction at morula stage on incorporation of
the injected mESCs into the ICM as well as the effects
of embryo manipulation on blastocyst quality, ICM, TE
numbers and ICM/TE ratio was investigated.
Materials and Methods
Animal care and chemicals
The study procedures were confirmed by the Research
Ethics Committee of Avicenna Research Institute,
Tehran, Iran (IR.SBMU.MSP.REC.1395.5.1). The
chemical materials were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich
(USA), unless otherwise mentioned in the text. The mice,
C57BL/6, were procured from Pasteur institute of Iran
and they were maintained in temperature- and humidity-
controlled rooms at 12-hours dark/light cycles.
Experimental groups
This study is comprised of three experimental steps,
including step 1: evaluating the effect of embryonic
compaction on producing chimeric blastocyst following
injection of GFP-mESCs into the subzonal space of
mouse pre-compacted and compacted morula-stage
embryos and step 2: determining the number of embryonic
cells type, TE, ICM and total cells in blastocyst derived
from different approaches including: i. In vivo-derived
blastocyst (blastocyst/in vivo, control), ii. Blastocyst
obtained from in vivo-derived morula (blastocyst/morula),
iii. Blastocyst obtained from in vivo-derived morula which
had been subjected to subzonal injection of the culture
Salimi et al.
medium (blastocyst/sham), and iv. Blastocyst obtained
from in vivo-derived morula which had been subjected to
subzonal mESCs injection (blastocyst/chimeric). Step 3 is
composed of assessment of the some lineage specific gene
expressions in ICM (Oct4, Nanog) and TE (Tead4, Cdx2),
in addition to the evaluation of H3K4me3 and H3K9me3
modification in the four above-mentioned groups of
blastocysts (Fig .1).
Fig.1
Workflow and study design for production of chimeric blastocysts. The procedure can be divided into four parts: i. Injection of GFP-mESCs, 129/Sv, into
the in vivo derived pre-compacted and compacted mouse embryos, C57BL/6, ii. Differential staining to determine ICM and TE cells allocation of blastocysts,
iii. The expression of lineage specific genes in the blastocysts derived from different approaches, using qRT-PCR, and iv. Histone methylation of H3K4me3 and
H3K9me3 in blastocysts derived from different approaches using immunocytochemistry. ICM; Inner cell mass, TE; Trophectoderm, and qRT-PCR; Quantitative
reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
Embryo collection
In this study, superovulation of 8-10 weeks old C57BL/6
female mice (n=53) was performed through intraperitoneal
injections of 10 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin
(PMSG) followed by human chorionic gonadotropin
(hCG) injection after 46-48 hours. In next step, the female
mice were allowed to mate with C57BL/6 male. Females
with vaginal plugs were sacrificed at 2.5 days post coitum
(dpc) by cervical dislocation, to collect the embryos. The
embryos were cultured in KSOM, supplemented with 4
mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) and amino acids
(KSOMaa) under mineral oil at 37°C in a humidified
atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Subzonal injection of green fluorescent protein-
embryonic stem cells (GFP-ESCs)
Mouse ESCs, 129/Sv, labelled with GFP (GFP-mESCs)
were considered for subzonal injection. The cells were
cultured in R2i-LIF medium consisting of 1:1 mixture of
DMEM:F12 (Invitrogen Carlsbad, USA) containing 15%
knockout serum replacement (KOSR), 2 mM L-glutamine,
1000 U/ml mouse leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), 1%
non-essential amino acids, 0.1 mM ß-mercaptoethanol,
100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 2% ESC
qualified FBS (ES-FBS), 1 µM PD0325901 and 10 µM
SB431542. SB431542 and PD0325901 are two chemicals
that respectively inhibit transforming growth factor
b (TGF-b) and MEK signalling pathways, which are
named R2i. R2i enhance ground state of pluripotency in
mESCs. In the absence of mouse embryonic fibroblasts
(MEFs), the mESCs grew on 0.1% gelatin-coated wells.
For preparation of single cell suspension, 79% confluent
mESCs were trypsinized and kept at 4°C in 1 ml of ESC
medium supplemented with 0.2 m HEPES until use (5).The injection of GFP-mESCs in subzonal space of
pre-compacted (n=42) and compacted embryos (n=36)
was carried out using a Narishige micromanipulator. A
number of laser beams (150 FU, Prime Tech Ltd., Japan)
were applied to thin the zona pellucida (ZP) before
piercing the tip of injection needle. After rinsing the inner
surface of injection needle (20 µm in diameter) with 10%
polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-PBS, about 15 GFP-mESCs
were aspirated and then injected into the perivitelline
space of embryos. For expansion of perivitelline space
and in order to facilitate subzonal mESCs injection, the
embryos were subjected to 0.2 M sucrose medium. The
GFP-mESCs-injected embryos were cultured in KSOMaa
at 37°C for 24 hours in a humidified atmospheres to
approach blastocyst stage (2).Workflow and study design for production of chimeric blastocysts. The procedure can be divided into four parts: i. Injection of GFP-mESCs, 129/Sv, into
the in vivo derived pre-compacted and compacted mouse embryos, C57BL/6, ii. Differential staining to determine ICM and TE cells allocation of blastocysts,
iii. The expression of lineage specific genes in the blastocysts derived from different approaches, using qRT-PCR, and iv. Histone methylation of H3K4me3 and
H3K9me3 in blastocysts derived from different approaches using immunocytochemistry. ICM; Inner cell mass, TE; Trophectoderm, and qRT-PCR; Quantitative
reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
Differential embryo staining
Differential staining of variant cell types of embryo,
including TE, ICM and total cells number, was performed
in each group by a previously described procedure (17).
Briefly, blastocysts were permeabilized in 0.2% Triton
X-100 in flushing holding medium (FHM) media for 20
seconds. They were then transferred into FHM media
supplemented by 30 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI) for 60
seconds. This was followed by an incubation of blastocysts
in cold ethanol supplemented by 10 µg/ml bisbenzimide
(Hoechst 33342) for 15 minutes and immediately
mounted on glass slides using glycerol. Finally, the
stained blastocysts were observed and counted using an
epifluorescent microscope (IX71 Olympus, Japan). In this
study, 15 blastocysts were considered for each group.
Immunofluorescence staining of H3K9me3 and
H3K4m3
In each group, the ZP of blastocysts was completely
dissolved by incubating them with acidic Tyrode
(pH=2.5) for 30 seconds. The embryos were washed
three times by phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) added
to 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and 0.1% Tween-20.
They were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (pH=7.4)
for 30 minutes. Subsequently, the fixed embryos were
treated by 0.3% Triton X-100 for one hour in PBS. For
blocking, these blastocysts were kept in PBS, followed
by adding 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) to them
for 40 minutes at 25°C. They were next treated with
primary anti-H3K4me3 (1:200, Abcam, USA) antibody
for one hour at 25°C and anti-H3K9me3 (1:200, Abcam,
USA) antibody overnight at 4°C. The embryos were
then washed three times (10 minutes each) with 0.1%
PVA+0.1% Tween-20 diluted in PBS, and they were then
treated with the secondary antibody, goat IgG anti-mouse
(PE/Cy5.5, 1:500, Abcam, USA) in blocking solution
for 60 minutes at 37°C, according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. After washing with PBS containing 0.1%
PVA+0.1% Tween-20, for 10 minutes, DNA was stained
for 10 minutes with 15 µg/ml 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The samples
were then mounted on the slides by glycerol. Each
experiment was biologically replicated three times and
at least 20 blastocysts were evaluated in each group. In
each experiment, embryos without primary antibody were
stained, as negative controls. The slides were evaluated
using an automated epifluorescent microscope (Nikon,
Japan). The fluorescence intensity of blastocyst images
was evaluated using ImageJ software (NIH Image, USA).
RNA isolation
Total RNA was isolated from single blastocyst using
Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Belgium) according to
the manufacture’s instruction. Briefly, to homogenate the
samples, 50 µl Trizol and 25 µl chloroform were added to
each sample. After precipitating with isopropanol, RNA was
washed with 70% ethanol and total RNA was diluted in 10 µl
RNase-free water. Total RNA was then kept at -80°C. In our
study, five blastocysts were considered in each group.Before cDNA synthesis, the purity and concentration of
isolated RNA was measured using a spectrophotometer
(Picodrop Real-Life, UK). cDNA was produced using
Prime Script QuantiTect Kit (Qiagen, Germany).
Reactions were carried out in RNase-free tubes in a total
volume of 20 µl, containing 2 µl gDNA, 6 µl total RNA,
4 µl RT buffer, 1 µl enzyme and 7 µl RNase-free water at
the following condition: 42°C for 2 minutes, 42°C for 15
minutes and 95°C for 3 minutes. For long term storage,
cDNA were kept at -20°C.
In this study, quantitative reverse transcription
polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to assess
the expression of:Oct4F: 5´-CGTGTGAGGTGGAGTCTGGA-3´,R: 5´-GCTGATTGGCGATGTGAGTG-3´,Nanog-F: 5´-CTGAGGAGGAGGAGAACAAGGTC-3´,R: 5´-CATCTGCTGGAGGCTGAGGTA-3´,Tead4F: 5´-CGGAGGAAGGCAAGATGTATG-3´,R: 5´-ACCTGGATGTGGCTGGAGAC-3´andCdx2F: 5´-GCTGCTGTAGGCGGAATGTAT-3´,R: 5´-CTCCCGACTTCCCTTCACC-3´using Rotor Gene Q instrument (Qiagen, Germany). qRT-
PCR reactions were done in a final volume of 10 µl including
5 µl SYBR green (Takara, Japan), 0.2 µl of each forward
and reverse primers (10 µM), 2 µl cDNA template (ten-fold
diluted), and 2.6 µl nuclease free water. The thermal cycling
was performed in 2 steps with following condition: one
cycle of 95°C for 30 seconds (holding time), followed by 50
cycles of 95°C for 5 seconds and 60°C for 30 seconds. High-
resolution melting curve analysis was performed in a ramp
rate of 0.2°C from 72°C up to 95°C.Gapdh-F: 5´-TTCCAGTATGATTCCACCCAC-3´,R: 5´-ACTCAGCACCAGCATCACC-3´ andH2afzF: 5´-CTCGTCTCTTCCTCGCTCGT-3´,R: 5´-CGTCCGTGGCTGGTTGTC-3´were considered as internal endogenous housekeeping
genes. At least, three replications from each cDNA
sample were evaluated and the expression level of the
gene was normalized against H2afz and Gapdh. Relative
expression of the genes was determined by REST 2009
Software (Qiagen, Germany).The expression levels
were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while
significant difference was reported as P<0.05.
Statistical analysis
The rates of development to the blastocyst in pre-compacted
and compacted embryos following mESCs injection and the
incorporation of injected mESCs into ICM were analysed by
non-parametric analysis test (Mann Whitney) and expressed
as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The blastocyst
cell number and fluorescent intensity of histone methylation
were evaluated with one-way ANOVA post hoc tests and
expressed as mean ± SD. Analyses were conducted using
SPSS statistical program (SPSS Inc., USA). Comparisons
were considered statistically different, if the p-value was
less than 0.05. Gene expression of the each groups were
evaluated by one-way ANOVA, REST 2009 Software
(Qiagen, Germany).
Results
Generation of mouse chimeras
Integration of subzonal injected GFP-mESCs into the
ICM of resulting blastocysts were significantly higher in
pre-compacted (31/42) than compacted (13/36) morulastage
embryos (P=0.012, Table 1). As shown, the injected
GFP-mESCs were incorporated into the ICM of resulting
chimeric blastocysts using epifluorescent microscope. There
was no difference in the blastocyst rate and developmental
block between morula-stage embryos receiving mESCs at
pre-compacted or compacted stages (Table 1).
Table 1
Subzonal injection of mESCs in morula stage of pre-compacted as well as compacted mouse embryos, and incorporation of mESCs into ICM of
resulting blastocysts
Injected morula
Produced blastocyst
Blastocyst
Blocked embryo
Incorporated mESCs
Non-incorporated mESCs
Compacted (n=36)
34 (94.4 ± 4.8)
13 (36.1 ± 7.5) a
23 (63.9 ± 10.6 )a
2 (5.5 ± 2.8)
Pre-compacted (n=42)
40 (95.2 ± 2)
31(73.8 ± 4.5 )b
11 (26.2 ± 3.1)b
2 (4.8 ± 1)
Total number: (n=78)
74 (94.67 ± 2.5)
44 (53.77 ± 7.17)
34 (40.90 ± 7.38)
4 (5.317 ± 1.56)
Data are presented as n (% ± SEM). a, b; The numbers with different uppercase letters at the same column are significantly different (P<0.05), mESC; Mouse
embryonic stem cells, and ICM; Inner cell mass.
Blastocyst cell count
As it has been shown in Table 2, the number of variant
cell types of embryo, including total cell numbers, TE
and ICM was measured in four groups to determine
the blastocyst quality (Fig .2). Chimeric blastocysts had
significantly fewer total cell, ICM and TE cell numbers
compared to the other groups (P<0.05). The average
number of ICM was respectively 9.7 ± 1.4 and 19.75 ±
1.3 in chimeric and derived blastocysts in vivo. The ration
of ICM to TE cells (ICM/TE) was decreased in chimeric
blastocysts compared to blastocyst/in vivo (P<0.05).
Fig.2
Epifluorescent microscopic imaging of mouse chimeric blastocysts produced by different approaches. ICM and TE nuclei were respectively stained
with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and PI (red). A. Blastocyst/in vivo, B. Blastocyst/morula, C. Blastocyst/sham, and D. Blastocyst/ESCs injecton (scale bar: 50 µm).
ICM; Inner cell mass, TE; Trophectoderm, and PI; Propidium iodide.
Subzonal injection of mESCs in morula stage of pre-compacted as well as compacted mouse embryos, and incorporation of mESCs into ICM of
resulting blastocystsData are presented as n (% ± SEM). a, b; The numbers with different uppercase letters at the same column are significantly different (P<0.05), mESC; Mouse
embryonic stem cells, and ICM; Inner cell mass.The number of variant cell types of blastocysts obtained from different approachesData are presented as mean ± SD. a-d ; The numbers with different uppercase letters at the same column differ significantly (P<0.05), TE; Trophectoderm,
ICM; Inner cell mass, and EScs; Embryonic stem cells.Epifluorescent microscopic imaging of mouse chimeric blastocysts produced by different approaches. ICM and TE nuclei were respectively stained
with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and PI (red). A. Blastocyst/in vivo, B. Blastocyst/morula, C. Blastocyst/sham, and D. Blastocyst/ESCs injecton (scale bar: 50 µm).
ICM; Inner cell mass, TE; Trophectoderm, and PI; Propidium iodide.
Immunocytochemistry analysis of H3K9me3 and
H3K4me3
Methylation of H3K4 and H3K9 in the TE
and ICM cells of blastocyst were measured by
immunocytochemistry assay (Fig .3). As shown in
Figure 4A, methylation of H3K4 in the ICM and TE of
chimeric blastocysts was decreased in comparison with
the other groups (P<0.05). Concerning tri-methylation
of H3K9 in ICM, the highest rate was observed in
chimeric embryos. Tri-methylation of H3K9 in ICM
and TE was significantly higher in chimeric and sham
groups compared to the other groups (P<0.05). On the
other hand, there was no significant difference between
expression of H3K9me3 in TE of sham groups and
chimeric groups (P. 0.05, Fig .4B).
Fig.3
Immunostaining. Immunocytochemistry staining of H3K4me3 (left) and H3K9me3 (right) in chimeric blastocysts and blastocysts derived from the
other groups: A. Blastocyst/embryonic stem cells (ESCs) injection, B. Blastocyst/sham, C. Blastocyst/morula, and D. Blastocyst/in vivo; control. The nuclei
(blue) were stained with DAPI. The H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 were stained with anti-Mouse IgG (red). The merged images of H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 with
DNA are purple (scale bars: 50 µm).
Fig.4
Three methylation of H3K4 and H3K9 as well as gene expressions in blastocysts produced by different approaches. A. H3K4me3 expression, B.
H3K9me3 expression, C. Expression of the ICM genes, and D. Expression of the TE genes in mouse blastocysts produced by different approaches. a, b, c
the columns with different type of the lowercase letters are significantly different (P<0.05). Data are shown as mean ± SD. ICM; Inner cell mass and TE;
Trophectoderm.
Inner cell mass and trophectoderm gene expressions
Relative expression analysis of particular lineage
specific genes in the ICM and TE cells represented some
differences. Oct4, Nanog and Tead4 relative expressions
in chimeric blastocysts was significantly lower than
blastocysts in sham and control groups (P<0.05). However,
no significant difference was observed for Cdx2 between
chimeric blastocysts and those derived from the other
groups, except the sham group. Indeed, Cdx2 expression
in blastocysts derived from sham group was significantly
lower than the other groups (Fig .4C, D, P<0.05).Immunostaining. Immunocytochemistry staining of H3K4me3 (left) and H3K9me3 (right) in chimeric blastocysts and blastocysts derived from the
other groups: A. Blastocyst/embryonic stem cells (ESCs) injection, B. Blastocyst/sham, C. Blastocyst/morula, and D. Blastocyst/in vivo; control. The nuclei
(blue) were stained with DAPI. The H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 were stained with anti-Mouse IgG (red). The merged images of H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 with
DNA are purple (scale bars: 50 µm).Three methylation of H3K4 and H3K9 as well as gene expressions in blastocysts produced by different approaches. A. H3K4me3 expression, B.
H3K9me3 expression, C. Expression of the ICM genes, and D. Expression of the TE genes in mouse blastocysts produced by different approaches. a, b, c
the columns with different type of the lowercase letters are significantly different (P<0.05). Data are shown as mean ± SD. ICM; Inner cell mass and TE;
Trophectoderm.
Discussion
Currently, mESCs microinjection is a highly stable and
reproducible technique which can produce full germ line-
transmitted chimeras (1). In the present study, integration
of mESCs into the ICM in pre-compacted embryos was
significantly higher than compacted type. Our results was
in agreement to the reports of Tokunaga and Tsunoda (18)
indicating that mESCs injection into the 8-cell embryos,
2.5 dpc before formation of ICM, led to the higher
incorporation of injected cells into the ICM. In our study,
blastocysts were incubated in 0.2 M sucrose medium prior
to mESCs injection into the subzonal cavity of morulastage
embryos. Our results were consistent with previous
studies clearly showing that hypertonic microinjection
method can generate the embryos with high percentages
of chimerism. The precise cellular mechanism underlying
this phenomenon is not yet clear (3, 19).In our study, the number of variant cell types of embryo
including total cells number, ICM and TE, as well as
the ICM/TE ratio, was reduced in chimeric blastocysts
compared to blastocysts in vivo. It seems that in vitro
manipulation of the embryo can compromise the quality
of produced blastocysts. So that, the number of ICM cells
in the injected mESCs group was lower than that of the
other groups. In other words, the number of ICM cells
was reduced by increasing embryo manipulation. As
expected, reducing the variant cell number of embryo, TE
and ICM, as well as the abnormal changes in blastocyst
cells allocation, reduced the quality and post implantation
development of blastocyst. It has also been shown that
the rate of embryonic cell proliferation and the ICM/TE
ratio in the blastocyst leads to placental abnormalities and
LOS (20). In the cloned embryos with a small number of
variant cell types, functional role of TE cells for successful
implantation was reduced (21).It has been demonstrated that mESCs-derived chimeras
suffer from reduced viability and other anomalies such
as altered growth rate and body weight (22). These
abnormalities could be mainly due to the changes in
gene expression of TE and ICM cells, causing by embryo
manipulation and in vitro culture (23, 24). In this context,
epigenetic modification has a profound effect on gene
expression. Histone modification plays an important role
in transcription activity via methylation of lysine and
chromatin structure remodelling in pre-implanted embryo
(25). Embryo manipulations, such as SCNT, ICSI and
cryopreservation, modify somewhat the normal pattern
of H3K9me3 and H3K4me3 methylation (16, 17, 26).
However, there is no study to assess methylation of H3K4
and H3K9 in chimeric embryos and evaluate the role of
this modification on gene expression.It has been shown that H3K4me3 is enriched in
transcription starting site of some transcription factors,
including Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 genes, which have
regulatory role in gene expression (27). Oct4 is one
of the main genes, known to act as a master regulator
of pluripotency (28). It belongs to POU family of
transcription factor genes. It is found in the promoter
and enhancer regions of many genes. Oct4 also regulates
expression of Nanog, Sox2 and other genes modulating
the cell fate during early embryo development (29, 30). In
our study, H3K4me3 in ICM cells of chimeric blastocysts
was decreased, in comparison with the other groups. It
probably reduced the expression of certain specific genes,
including Oct4 and Sox2 in ICM. This was in agreement
with many studies indicating that in vitro derived embryos
and embryo manipulation can alter methylation pattern,
consequently leading to the change in expression of
pluripotency genes, compared to the in vivo derived type
(28, 31).Our study shows that in chimeric embryos, duration
and severity of the manipulation in vitro were more than
the other groups. Based on that and in accordance with
the previous studies (31, 32), duration and severity of
the embryo manipulation may lead to more epigenetic
alterations in H3K9me3 and H3K4me3, consequently
reducing the ICM and TE gene expressions (32-34).
According to the our results, because of difference in the
type and duration of manipulation in vitro, there was a
significant trend in reduction of the ICM cells H3K4me3
methylation, but not TE cells. Another possibility for
decreasing H3K4 methylation in ICM cells of chimeric
blastocysts, compared to the other groups, might be due
to the possible interactions between injected mESC and
ICM cells in chimeric blastocysts. Methylation of H3K4
in chimeric blastocysts was also reduced compared to
other groups, although the difference between sham and
chimeric groups was not significant.In the normal process of blastocyst development,
generating ICM and TE cells, there is a relationship
between Oct4 and Cdx2 expressions. As such, the
increase in Oct4 expression leads to the reduction of Cdx2
expression in ICM cells and vice versa in TE cells. Cdx2 as a
transcription factor is responsible for embryo compaction
and TE lineage formation (35). In our study, despite the
significant decrease in expression of Oct4, Nanog and
Tead4, down-regulation of Cdx2 expression was not
significant in chimeric blastocysts under the impact of
manipulation compared to in vivo-derived counterparts.
Now, the question is why despite the reduced expression
of other genes, expression of Cdx2 has not been declined?
Whether genes associated with cellular fate (Tead4) and
pluripotency (Oct4 and Nanog) are more sensitive than
TE gene (Cdx2) in the face of inappropriate culture
conditions or manipulation? However, there are studies
indicating no significant difference in Cdx2 expression
between embryos with (cloned and ICSI embryos) and
without manipulation (36).H3K4me3 is generally associated with active chromatin,
whereas H3K9me3 preferentially correlates with
heterochromatin and transcription repression (37). Here,
we found a converse relationship between H3K9me3 and
gene expression in ICM and TE of chimeric embryos. In
other words, increasing level of H3K9me3 leads to the
reduction of Nanog, Oct4 and Tead4 gene expressions in
chimeric embryos, compared to in vivo derived blastocysts.
It is hypothesized that reduction of H3K9me3 level by
optimizing culture condition can improve epigenetic
pattern in the chimeric embryos. Consistently, it has
been shown in mouse and porcine cloned embryos (38,
39). In agreement with our study, H3K9me3 could down-
regulate the pluripotency gene expressions in the cloned
embryos (38). Regarding the Cdx2 expression, despite
decreasing trend of gene expression in the first three
groups, the expression in test group (chimeric blstocysts)
was increased in comparison with the sham group. One
explanation for the significant decrease in Cdx2 expression
in the sham, compared to test group, might be due to the
higher, though insignificant, level of H3K9me3 in sham
group. Alder et al. (40) indicated that down-regulation
of H3K9me3 in TE leads to the activation of Cdx2
transcription. As expected, in our study, H3K9 histone
methylation of the ICM cells was significantly increased
in chimeric blastocysts compared to the sham group. It
was in accordance to the general principle that further
manipulation will cause more epigenetic alterations. In
other words, more invasive operations, as with chimeric
embryos, cause more epigenetic changes.Concerning the level of H3K9me3 in TE cells, despite
determining consistently increased level of methylation
contrary to our expectations, there was no significant
difference between the chimeric and sham groups. There
are, however, other factors that can alter gene expressions,
such as DNA methylation and histone modification,
which may affect the gene expression pattern in chimeric
embryos, compared to the other groups. Apart from
Cdx2, the expression of Tead4 in TE cells was decreased,
while it was increased in the embryo manipulation. Thus,
the minimum expression level was shown in chimeric
blastocysts, compared to the other groups. These
alterations followed the pattern of H3K9me3 changes in
TE cells.
Conclusion
In our study, the embryonic stage had a profound
effect on production of chimeric blastocyst. Thus,
embryo compaction significantly reduced the rate of
mESCs incorporation to the ICM. Moreover, alterations
in the levels of H3K9me3 and H3K4me3 could reduce
the pluripotency and cell fate gene expressions, due to
embryo in vitro culture and its manipulation.
Table 2
The number of variant cell types of blastocysts obtained from different approaches
Groups
Number of ICM cells
Number of TE cells
Total cell number
ICM:TE
Ratio
Blastocyst/in vivo
19.75 ± 1.3a
64.5 ± 14.1a
84.25 ± 17a
0.31 ± 0.09a
Blastocyst/morula
16.57 ± 1.5b
55.28 ± 8.9a,b
71.85 ± 9.5a,b
0.30 ± 0.1a
Blastocyst/sham
12.83 ± 0.8c
48.5 ± 6.5b,c
61.33 ± 8.5b
0.26 ± 0.12b,c
Blastocyst/ESCs injection
9.7 ± 1.4d
38 ± 9c
47.7 ± 9.6d
0.25 ± 0.15c
Data are presented as mean ± SD. a-d ; The numbers with different uppercase letters at the same column differ significantly (P<0.05), TE; Trophectoderm,
ICM; Inner cell mass, and EScs; Embryonic stem cells.
Authors: Patricio Ventura-Juncá; Isabel Irarrázaval; Augusto J Rolle; Juan I Gutiérrez; Ricardo D Moreno; Manuel J Santos Journal: Biol Res Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 5.612
Authors: Maryam Salimi; Abolfazl Shirazi; Koushan Sineh Sepehr; Mohsen Norouzian; Vahid Ebrahimi; Maryam Mehravar; Mohammad Majidi; Mohammad M Mehrazar Journal: Vet Med Sci Date: 2021-05-06