Hossein Azizi1, Morteza Koruji2, Thomas Skutella3. 1. Faculty of Biotechnology, Amol University of Special Modern Technologies, Amol, Iran. Electronic Address: h.azizi@ausmt.ac.ir. 2. Cellular and Molecular Research Center and Department of Anatomical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran. 3. Institute for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 307, Heidelberg, Germany.
Germ cells are formed and matured during early
embryogenesis from primordial germ cells (PGCs) (1).
Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are the adult stem cells
located in the basal membrane of seminiferous tubules of testis.
They receive cytokines from somatic cells including Sertoli
cells, blood vessels, Leydig cells and macrophages. SSCs can
be isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS),
magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), matrix selection and
morphology-based selection (2-4). SSCs have the potential for
conversion into embryonic stem (ES)-like pluripotent stem
cells under defined in vitro culture conditions (2-5).Extrinsic secreted growth factors from the SSCs niche
and intrinsic gene expression play a crucial role in the
maintenance of SSCs (2, 6). Extrinsic factors which are
produced and secreted by Sertoli cells include glial cell-
derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and KIT ligand (KITL)
(7). Intrinsic factors include PLZF (8, 9), ETV5 (10), Taf4b
(11), Bcl6b (12), Pou5f1, Nrg1, Nanog and Gja1 (13-15) as
well as Gfra1 and RET (16). The transcription factor PLZF, as
a transcriptional repressor that regulates the epigenetic state of
undifferentiated cells, is involved in different cellular functions
such as cell proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation during
spermatogenesis, neurogenesis and embryonic development
(8, 17, 18).Filipponi et al. (19) demonstrated that PLZF directly
represses the transcription of kit, a marker of spermatogonial
differentiation. PLZF plays an essential role in the self-
renewal and maintenance of the SSC in the testis niche (8).
It has been shown that PLZF is co-expressed with Oct4 in
undifferentiated spermatogonia. It has also been demonstratedthat loss of the encoding PLZF gene produces limited numbers
of normal spermatozoa and then leading progressively to the
lack of respected germline after birth. During embryogenesis,
PLZF regulates the stage of gene expressions of limb and axial
skeletal patterning (8, 9, 20). During limb development, it has
been demonstrated that PLZF has genetic relationship with
Gli3 and Hox5 genes (21, 22). Previous studies showed that
PLZF was expressed in testis and SSCs, therefore recognized
as a SSC marker (23-25). In the present research we have
extended our study to the expression of PLZF marker in the
neonate and adult testis sections, isolated SSCs, ES cells
and generated ES-like cells from mouse testicular culture
to evaluate if PLZF has the same expression pattern in bothtesticular germ cells and pluripotent stem cells. The resultsindicated that PLZF is clearly expressed in germ cells, but not
in pluripotent stem cells.
Materials and Methods
Digestion and culture of testicular cells
In this experimental study, neonate and adult C57BL/6
mouse strain testis cells were isolated by collagenase IV
(0.5 mg/ml), DNase (0.5 mg/ml) and Dispase (0.5 mg/ml,
all from Sigma-Aldrich, USA) enzymatic digestion solution
solved in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) buffer
containing Ca2+ and Mg2+ (PAA, USA). Digested testicular
cells was cultured in SSC condition medium, composed of
StemPro-34 medium, 6 mg/ml D+glucose (Sigma-Aldrich,
USA), 1% L-glutamine (PAA, USA), 1% N2-supplement
(Invitrogen, USA), 0.1% ß-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen,
USA), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Pen/Strep, PAA, USA), 5
µg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich, USA),
1% non-essential amino acids (NEAA, PAA, USA), 30 ng/
ml estradiol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 60 ng/ml progesterone
(Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor
(EGF, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 10 ng/ml fibroblast growth
factor (FGF, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 8 ng/ml GDNF (Sigma-
Aldrich, USA), 100 U/ml human leukemia inhibitory factor
(LIF, Millipore, USA), 1% Minimum Essential Medium
(MEM) vitamins (PAA, USA), 1% ES cell qualified fetal
bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA), 100 µg/ml ascorbic acid,
30 µg/ml pyruvic acid and 1 µl/ml DL-lactic acid (all from
Sigma Aldrich, USA) at 37°C and 5% CO2 in air (2).
Culture of the embryonic stem and ES-like cells
ES and ES-like cell lines were originated from our
previous study (2). These cells were cultured in medium
with KO-DMEM, composed of 1% NEAA solution, 15%
FBS, 1% L-glutamine, 0.1% ß-mercaptoethanol, LIF at a
final concentration of 1000 U/ml and 1% Pen/Strep (2).
Gene expression analyses on the Fluidigm Biomark
system
Quantity of the PLZF gene expression (Mm01176868_
m1) in the neonate SSCs, adult SSCs, ES cells, and
ES-like cells were examined by dynamic array chips(Fluidigm). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(GAPDH, Mm99999915_g1) was used as housekeepinggene for normalization. Cultured cells were selected with amicromanipulator, lysed with lysis buffer solution containing
1.3 µl TE buffer, 0.2 µl RT/Taq Superscript III (Invitrogen,
USA), 9 µl RT-PreAmp Master Mix, 5.0 µl Cells Direct2× Reaction Mix (Invitrogen, USA), and 2.5 µl 0.2× assay
pool. Using TaqMan real-time PCR on the BioMark Real-
Time quantitative PCR (qPCR) system, the amount of RNA-
targeted copies was evaluated. Samples were examined intwo technical repeats. The Ct values were analyzed by GenEx
software from the MultiD analysis (2, 3, 6).
Immunocytochemical staining
SSCs, ES cells and ES-like cells were fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde and then permeabilized with 0.1%
Triton/PBS. Cells were blocked with 1% BSA/PBS and
followed by incubation with primary antibody PLZF. In
the next step, we used overnight incubation fluorochrome
species-specific secondary antibody and the labeled
cells were nuclear counterstained with 0.2 µg/ml of 4’,
6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) dye. The labeled
positive cells were studied with a confocal microscope
Zeiss LSM 700 (Germany), and images were acquired
using a Zeiss LSM-TPMT camera (Germany) (2, 26-28).
Tissue processing for immunohistofluorescence
staining
Mouse testis tissue was washed with PBS and fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde. Dehydrated tissue was surrounded in
Paraplast Plus and cut with a microtome machine at 10 µmthickness. Testis tissue sections were mounted on SuperfrostPlus slides and kept at room temperature until used. Forprocessing of immunohistofluorescence staining, sampleswere washed with xylene followed by gradually replacingwith water in ethanol before staining. For the tissue sections,
antigen retrieval was performed by heat-induced epitoperetrieval at 95°C for 20 minutes, non-specific binding site oftissue samples was blocked with 10% serum/0.3% Triton inPBS. The experiment of immunofluorescence staining for
these samples was continued as explained above (2).
Statistical analysis
The expression of PLZF in the indicated groups was
calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA),
continued with the Tukey’s post-hoc tests (t Test) and
compared with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney’s test.
The difference among groups was considered statistically
if P<0.05.
Results
We first studied the localization of PLZF in the neonate
and adult mouse testis (Fig .1). Immunohistochemical
analysis for the cross-section of testis demonstratedthat PLZF protein was expressed in the cells located on
the basal membrane of adult testis seminiferous tubule,
while in the neonate testis, these cells were located in
the center of the tubules (Fig .1). Counting PLZF positive
cells in the testis sections of the adult and neonate testis
revealed significantly higher expression (P<0.05) of
these cells in the adult compared to neonate (Fig .2).
Furthermore, neonate and adult SSCs, ES cells and ES-
like cells were cultivated in vitro, in the defined medium
to investigate PLZF expression. Neonate and adult SSCs
were isolated after enzyme digestion and generated cells
cultivated in the presence of growth factors supporting
SSC cultivation (Fig .3). Characterization of the isolated
SSCs was conducted as described in our former study (2).
Immunocytochemistry (ICC) analysis revealed that SSCs
were positive, while pluripotent ES and ES-like cells were
negative for the PLZF protein (Figes.3, 4). ES-like cell
lines containing promoter-reporter Oct4-GFP transgenicmice revealed that these pluripotent cells were positive for
Oct-4, but they were negative for PLZF (Fig .4). Similarly,
Fluidigm real-time RT-PCR results showed significant
PLZF gene expression in the neonate and 12-weeks old
SSCs, compared to ES cells and ES-like cells (P<0.05,
Fig .5).
Fig.1
Immunohistochemistry characterization of PLZF in testis section. A1. PLZF expression in neonate, A2. Representation of the merged images with DAPI, B1.
PLZF expression in Adult, and B2. Representation of the merged images with DAPI. PLZF; Red and DAPI; Blue.
Fig.2
PLZF positive cell counting in testis section. Counting PLZF positive cells in the sections of neonate and adult testes. Number of PLZF positive cells in
the adult testis was higher than neonate. a; At least P<0.05 versus other groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Fig.3
Immunocytochemical characterization of PLZF in spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs).
Immunocytochemistry analysis of PLZF expression in the SSC (scale bar: 50 µm).
A1. Bright field, A2. Green fluorescence shows PLZF
expression, A3. Blue shows DAPI, and A4. Representation of the
merged images.
Fig.4
Immunocytochemical characterization of PLZF in the pluripotent cells. Immunocytochemistry
analysis showed negative expression of PLZF in the embryonic stem (ES)-like and ES cells
(scale bar: 50 µm). A1. ES-like, green fluorescence for Oct4,
A2. ES-like, red fluorescence for PLZF, A3. ES-like, blue
fluorescence for DAPI, A4. ES-like, merged images, B1. ES,
blue fluorescence for DAPI, and B2. ES, red fluorescence fluorescence for
PLZF.
Fig.5
mRNA expression of PLZF gene. Fluidigm quantitative polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) analysis for PLZF expression in the neonate (N1), 12-weeks testis
(A12), ES-like and ES cells (a; at least P<0.05 versus other groups). Significant
PLZF expression levels difference in neonate and adult SSCs compared
to ES-like and ES cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Immunohistochemistry characterization of PLZF in testis section. A1. PLZF expression in neonate, A2. Representation of the merged images with DAPI, B1.
PLZF expression in Adult, and B2. Representation of the merged images with DAPI. PLZF; Red and DAPI; Blue.PLZF positive cell counting in testis section. Counting PLZF positive cells in the sections of neonate and adult testes. Number of PLZF positive cells in
the adult testis was higher than neonate. a; At least P<0.05 versus other groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD.Immunocytochemical characterization of PLZF in spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs).
Immunocytochemistry analysis of PLZF expression in the SSC (scale bar: 50 µm).
A1. Bright field, A2. Green fluorescence shows PLZF
expression, A3. Blue shows DAPI, and A4. Representation of the
merged images.Immunocytochemical characterization of PLZF in the pluripotent cells. Immunocytochemistry
analysis showed negative expression of PLZF in the embryonic stem (ES)-like and ES cells
(scale bar: 50 µm). A1. ES-like, green fluorescence for Oct4,
A2. ES-like, red fluorescence for PLZF, A3. ES-like, blue
fluorescence for DAPI, A4. ES-like, merged images, B1. ES,
blue fluorescence for DAPI, and B2. ES, red fluorescence fluorescence for
PLZF.mRNA expression of PLZF gene. Fluidigm quantitative polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) analysis for PLZF expression in the neonate (N1), 12-weeks testis
(A12), ES-like and ES cells (a; at least P<0.05 versus other groups). Significant
PLZF expression levels difference in neonate and adult SSCs compared
to ES-like and ES cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Discussion
It has been demonstrated that PLZF transcription factor
is a key regulator in SSCs (2). Our histological analysis
specified localization of the PLZF positive cells in the
center of neonatal testicular cords and basal compartment
of the seminiferous tubules of adult testis, co-localized
with Oct4 positive cells. PLZF/Oct4 co-localization, in a
few single SSCs attached to the basal membrane, implies
that these cells are SSCs, but not progenitor cells. The
cultured SSCs, which are grown under GDNF stimulation,
are also positive for PLZF. Although the number of PLZF
positive cells in adult testis was higher than neonate,
PLZF mRNA expression level in the neonate and adult
SSCs was similar. Protein analyses using immunohisto/
cytochemistry revealed that PLZF was expressed in
SSC, but neither in the differentiating germ cells nor
in the ES-like cells directly generated from SSCs. It
can be concluded that PLZF is down-regulated during
both differentiation (spermatogenesis) and conversion
of the unipotent SSCs into pluripotent ES-like cells.
Similarly, pluripotent ES cells generated from the inner
cell mass were negative for PLZF. This finding was also
confirmed by Fluidigm real-time RT-PCR and ICC. These
observations imply that PLZF strictly bind to and hold the
molecular state of a stem cell SCCs. It is proposed that
PLZF is a transcriptional repressor and activator involved
in the control of SCC (29).In undifferentiated spermatogonia, it has been shown
that PLZF is co-expressed with Oct4. Mutations in the
PLZF gene restrict the numbers of spermatozoa cells (9).
Mutations in the PLZF display a progressive defect of SSCs
and structure of the seminiferous tubule, while the function
of supporting Sertoli cells is normal (20). In type A and B
spermatogonia, PLZF was found to be localized in the nucleus
of undifferentiated SSCs of zebrafish (30). Further studies in
SSCs have indicated that the PLZF mutant shows an increase
of c-Kit expression (as a marker required for differentiated
SSCs), implying that PLZF maintains pool of the SSCs (19).
It has been demonstrated that PLZF suppresses transcription
activity of the retinoic acid receptors (31).Although PLZF expression is positive in undifferentiated
cells of stem cell compartment near the basement
membrane of adult mouse testis seminiferous tubules
but not in spermatocytes, it is unknown whether
or not PLZF expression is necessary for initiating
differentiation of the SSCs towards spermatocytes. It
has been well documented that PLZF plays an important
role in the self-renewal and maintenance of gonocytes
and undifferentiated spermatogonia (8). PLZF has been
demonstrated as a distinguished marker for the isolation
of human (23, 32, 33), mouse (24, 34) and sheep SSCs
in testicular culture (35).It is well-known that PLZF can function as both
transcription activator and transcription repressor. A direct
activated target of PLZF is REDD1. REDD1 mediates
PLZF-dependent down-regulation of TORC1 and it
is responsible for the maintenance of spermatogonial
progenitor cells in culture by mediating effective signaling
from GDNF, while it is normally blocked by TORC1
activity. It has been postulated that the effect of REDD1
on TORC1 could also raise the possibility that REDD1
controls cell growth, tumorigenicity and senescence (36).PLZF activates PTEN/AKT/FOXO3 signaling
pathways which can suppress prostate tumorigenesis
(37). Deficiency of PLZF expression in prostate cancer
is associated with tumor aggressiveness and metastasis
(38). Shen et al. (39) showed that PLZF expression
inhibited proliferation and metastasis via regulation of the
interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeat 2
and increasing STAT1 protein level.
Conclusion
Our data demonstrated that PLZF is expressed in unipotent Oct4+/VASA-SCCs in the basal
compartment of adult testis seminiferous tubules. Our findings indicate that in comparison
with unipotent SSCs, PLZF expression is not detectable in pluripotent ES-like cells which
are directly derived from SCCs. Furthermore pluripotent ES cells do not express PLZF.
Therefore, it could be proposed that PLZF represses and activates target genes which are
specifically important for the maintenance of SSC. In the future, it would be interesting to
anlyse the mechanism of PLZF down-regulation while SSCs shift to plutipotency and vice
versa, during differentiation of pluripotent stem cells towards SSC in
vitro.
Authors: Hooman Sadri-Ardekani; Sefika C Mizrak; Saskia K M van Daalen; Cindy M Korver; Hermien L Roepers-Gajadien; Morteza Koruji; Suzanne Hovingh; Theo M de Reijke; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Fulco van der Veen; Dirk G de Rooij; Sjoerd Repping; Ans M M van Pelt Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: José A Costoya; Robin M Hobbs; Maria Barna; Giorgio Cattoretti; Katia Manova; Meena Sukhwani; Kyle E Orwig; Debra J Wolgemuth; Pier Paolo Pandolfi Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2004-05-23 Impact factor: 38.330