Maryam Ranjpour1, Saima Wajid1, Swatantra Kumar Jain2. 1. Department of Biotechnology, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India. 2. Department of Medical Biochemistry, HIMSR, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India. Electronic Address: skjain@jamiahamdard.ac.in.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is globally the fifth
most common cancer with a high rate of morbidity and
the third type of cancer causing maximum death among
the patients diagnosed with cancers (1, 2). Etiological
influences such as hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C
virus (HCV) infections, alcohol abuse, metabolic diseases
and carcinogen exposure lead to chronic inflammation
of liver and mutation causing heterogeneous HCC (3).
Lack of clear symptoms, numerous relapse and inefficient
therapy lead to poor prognosis and high mortality in
patients diagnosed with HCC (2). Finding new generation
noninvasive biomarkers to detect HCC at early stage
would help reduce the rate of cancer-related mortality (4).
Currently available markers, such as alpha-fetoprotein, do
not have high sensitivity and search for novel markers is
mandatory. Effective treatment and patient survival rate
are dependent on the early diagnosis of HCC which can
be provided based on the novel prognostic and diagnostic
biomarkers (5).In the present study, using animal model, we aimed to
find out differentially expressed proteins that are associated
with HCC initiation and progression to introduce as
potential biomarker(s) or to target as therapeutic agent at
very early stage of liver cancer initiation.
Materials and Methods
The experimental study involves analysis of rodent
model in vivo which has previously been developed in
our laboratory to study HCC. Further, the obtained data
are validated with sera of clinically approved liver cancer
patients.
Liver cancer induction and development of the rodent
model
Liver cancer was chemically induced in 4-6 weeks old
male Wistar rats weighing 80-100 g, by administrating
chemical carcinogens DEN and 2-AAF as reported
by our group earlier. Animal experimentation was
performed following approval from Jamia Hamdard
(New Delhi, India) Institutional Animal Ethics
Committee formed for the Purpose of Control and
Supervision of Experiments on Animals (project number
908). The protocol for HCC development in rats was
essentially the same as previously described instruction
(6). Briefly, the rats were kept in polypropylene cages
while temperature was maintained at 25 ± 2°C with 12
hours cycle of light/dark in the animal house of Jamia
Hamdard. These were fed ad libitum with free access
to standard laboratory food (Amrut Laboratory, rat and
mice feed, Navmaharashtra Chakan Oil Mills Ltd.,
India) and water daily. DEN (200 mg/kg body weight)
and 2-AAF dissolved in 1% carboxymethyl cellulose
(150 mg/kg body weight) were used as the initiator
and promoter of HCC, respectively. Animals were
randomly split up into two groups namely control and
treated groups. Treated groups were further divided
into two different groups namely, 1 M (sacrificed after
one month) and 4 M (sacrificed after four months).
The carcinogen treated animals were given a single
high dose intraperitoneally (I.P.) of DEN, and after
one week recovery period, the rats were administered
with 2-AAF. Three doses of 2-AAF were orally
administered on three alternative days among the
first week of each month for entire study period (four
months). Therefore, a total of 3 and 12 doses of 2-AAF
were administered to the animals in the 1 M and 4M
treated groups, respectively. The rats in control group
received normal saline at the same schedule. The
rats in the 1 M and 4 M groups were kept in a glass
chamber containing cotton soaked with diethyl ether to
be anesthetized and sacrificed at respectively one and
four months after carcinogen treatment, respectively.
At the time of sacrificing, the animals were perfused
transcardially with saline and after their death they
were dissected to excise livers for further analysis.
Histological examination
Livers were fixed in 10% formalin, sliced, dried out and
buried in paraffin. Cross-sections were taken and stained
with Hematoxylin and Eosin. Sections were mounted
with DPX mountant (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and checked
employing light microscope for histological changes.
Proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins
The Bradford’s method was used to measure protein
concentration (7). Depletion of albumin in serum samples
and their preparation, 2 dimensional (2D)-electrophoresis
of the total serum proteins and their analysis with PD-
Quest software and ultimately MALDI-TOF-MS/MS
characterization were performed as previously described
(8, 9).
Validation of protein expression by Western blot
analysis
30 µg of total serum protein was fractionated on
10% poly acrylamide gel at 80 V and it was transferred
to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane
employing Hoefer Western blotting apparatus (HoeferInc, USA, 4°C, 150 mA for three hours). Immunodetection
was performed using 1:500 diluted primary
antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in Tris-buffered
saline (TBS) overnight at 4°C and 1:4000 diluted
HRP conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody
(Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for three hours. The protein
expression was visualized with diaminobenzidine
(DAB, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and LuminataTM Forte
Western HRP Substrate (Millipore, USA) system.
Analyses of clinically approved liver cancer patients
sera (including two male patients aged 35 and 73
years used for the analyses) and controls (including
two matched age healthy males with liver cancer
patients used for the analyses) were carried out after
receiving the approval of Jamia Hamdard Institutional
Ethics Committee (JHIEC). The informed consent
was obtained from all participating subjects. The HCC
patients were clinically approved and were under
various therapies.
Statistical analysis
The experiments were carried out in triplicate and data
are revealed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
The significance of differences (control vs. treated groups)
was analyzed employing One-way ANOVA pursued
by Dunnett test and they were considered statistically
significant when P<0.05.
Results
Development of hepatocellular carcinoma model and
serum analysis of carcinogen treated rats and controls
HCC was induced by administrating chemical
carcinogens (DEN and 2-AAF) in male Wistar
rats, as previously reported by us (6). Histological
analysis revealed disease initiation at one month and
development of cancer and tumorigenesis at four
months after carcinogen treatment (Fig .1) (8).
Fig.1
Histological analysis of liver tissue. Photomicrographs show histological changes in liver at high power. A. Normal architecture of central vein (CV) and
bile duct (BD) are shown in the control liver (each treated group has its own control to be compared), B. One month post carcinogen treatment, inflammation
and hemorrhage leading to HCC initiation are shown, using the arrows, and C. Development of adenoma (within the circle) was observed at four months aftercarcinogen treatment. Cystic degeneration of hepatocytes has been shown at tumors within the circle (scale bar: 20 µm at ×400 magnifications).
Reproducible results were obtained following
repeatedly performing 2D-electrophoresis analyses.
The analyses of 2D gels using PD-Quest were assigned
unique sample spot protein (SSP) numbers to protein
spots and compared differentially expressed proteins
(8-10). One of these proteins, up-regulating at one
month (initiation stage of HCC) and four months
(tumorigenesis stage) after carcinogen treatment,
was selected for further analysis. Detailed expression
analysis of this protein following carcinogen
administration has been illustrated in Figure 2. Changes
in the levels of protein expression were statistically
significant (P<0.05). The protein spot was excised
from 2D gels, digested and the mass fingerprinting
of its peptides was obtained by MALDI-TOF-MS/
MS characterization. The protein was characterized
as orthologue of cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta,
gi|109470683, [Rattus norvegicus], using NCBI
database search by MASCOT software (Fig .3A, B).
Detailed analysis and characterization of cytosolic
phospholipase A2 delta have been shown in Table 1.
Fig.2
PD-Quest analysis of serum protein on 2D gels. The master gel represents protein spots from both control and treated groups, with pop up graph for proteinof interest. The protein expression has been quantified based on intensity (INT) × area. A. The protein of interest quantification for the SSP 7404 master gel hasbeen calculated based on the protein intensity of four months post carcinogen-treatment group. The protein spots were quantified and compared to B. SSP 5420 in
control, C. SSP 5420 in one month post treatment groups, and D. SSP 7404 in the four months after carcinogen-treatment group. The expression intensity showedsignificant elevation of target protein level. SSP; Stands for sample spot protein and each spot protein has a unique SSP number.
Fig.3
MALDI-TOF-MS/MS characterization of target spot. A. Spectra for the target spot were shown by MALDI-TOF-MS/MS characterization and B.
MASOT histogram analysis: probability based on MOWSE score is defined as -10×log (P), where P is probability of the observed match with a random
event. Individual protein scores, greater than 59, indicate identity or extensive homology (P<0.05).
Table 1
MALDI-TOF-MS/MS characterization of cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta
Observed
Mr (Expt)
Mr (Calc)
ppm
Start-End
Miss
Peptide
1094.6700
1093.6627
1093.5516
102
389-398
0
K.DLEGPISHAR.E
1267.8339
1266.8267
1266.6357
151
478-487
0
K.ENHLETLHFK.E
1639.0371
1638.0298
1637.8485
111
445-458
1
K.LHGQVTDQKLSEQR.A
1740.0199
1739.0126
1738.8348
102
291-305
0
R.LSYGLCPEEQAFLGR.R
1839.1123
1838.1051
1838.0513
29.3
309-325
1
K.LVAAALKQALQLDEDLK.E
1994.2330
1993.2257
1992.9840
121
689-706
1
K.GLQQSGKYCSAQGLPFPR.V
2047.2940
2046.2867
2046.0745
104
791-808
0
R.LSEYNIQNNQGTILQALK.T
2107.4134
2106.4061
2106.0700
160
180-199
1
R.AGSTTMAAGQDKLELELMLK.G
2121.3561
2120.3488
2120.0936
120
24-41
1
R.QEEASVFCQLTVKILEAR.S
2319.4037
2318.3964
2318.1430
109
132-151
0
K.TFSLNPQGPEELDVEFLVER.T
2324.3359
2323.3286
2323.1630
71.3
286-305
1
K.ELSVRLSYGLCPEEQAFLGR.R
2399.2732
2398.2659
2398.1490
48.8
502-522
1
K.YGGFVPSELFGSEFFMGRLMK.R
2418.4232
2417.4159
2417.1493
110
169-191
1
R.ELSHLDVSLDRAGSTTMAAGQDK.L+Oxidation (M)
2832.5611
2831.5539
2831.3775
62.3
357-381
0
K.LGLLDCVTYFSGISGATWTMAHLYR.D
3023.9028
3022.8955
3022.4634
143
755-781
1
R.SPDELKAGQVDLTGVASPYFLYNMTYK.N+Oxidation (M)
3257.9532
3256.9459
3256.6616
87.3
425-453
1
R.EEQGYTVTIADLWGLVLESKLHGQVTDQK.L
Mr; Average molecular mass of the peptide in kilodalton, Expt; Experimentally determined molecular mass, Calc; Theoretically calculated mass of peptide
based on atomic mass of the component, and Ppm; Parts per million.
Histological analysis of liver tissue. Photomicrographs show histological changes in liver at high power. A. Normal architecture of central vein (CV) and
bile duct (BD) are shown in the control liver (each treated group has its own control to be compared), B. One month post carcinogen treatment, inflammation
and hemorrhage leading to HCC initiation are shown, using the arrows, and C. Development of adenoma (within the circle) was observed at four months aftercarcinogen treatment. Cystic degeneration of hepatocytes has been shown at tumors within the circle (scale bar: 20 µm at ×400 magnifications).PD-Quest analysis of serum protein on 2D gels. The master gel represents protein spots from both control and treated groups, with pop up graph for proteinof interest. The protein expression has been quantified based on intensity (INT) × area. A. The protein of interest quantification for the SSP 7404 master gel hasbeen calculated based on the protein intensity of four months post carcinogen-treatment group. The protein spots were quantified and compared to B. SSP 5420 in
control, C. SSP 5420 in one month post treatment groups, and D. SSP 7404 in the four months after carcinogen-treatment group. The expression intensity showedsignificant elevation of target protein level. SSP; Stands for sample spot protein and each spot protein has a unique SSP number.MALDI-TOF-MS/MS characterization of target spot. A. Spectra for the target spot were shown by MALDI-TOF-MS/MS characterization and B.
MASOT histogram analysis: probability based on MOWSE score is defined as -10×log (P), where P is probability of the observed match with a random
event. Individual protein scores, greater than 59, indicate identity or extensive homology (P<0.05).MALDI-TOF-MS/MS characterization of cytosolic phospholipase A2 deltaMr; Average molecular mass of the peptide in kilodalton, Expt; Experimentally determined molecular mass, Calc; Theoretically calculated mass of peptide
based on atomic mass of the component, and Ppm; Parts per million.Western blot analysis revealed up-regulation of cytosolic
phospholipase A2 delta expression in the serum of carcinogen
treated rats vis-a-vis age-matched controls. Expression of
cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta was elevated at one month
after carcinogen treatment and it was continued to increase
during cancer progression until tumor stage at four months
post carcinogen treatment. Expression of ß-actin was
considered as internal control (Fig .4A).
Fig.4
Expression analysis of cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta by Western
blotting. A. ß-actin was used as internal control. Analyses showed time anddose dependent elevation in the expression of protein of interest, in ratsbelong to carcinogen treated groups, by liver cancer progression. Consistentincrease in protein expression has been shown during liver cancer progressionand B. Significant elevation in expression of cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta has been shown in sera of clinically confirmed liver cancer patients ascompared to the healthy controls (P<0.001, n=3, serum samples were takenfrom two male patients at age 35 and 73 for the analyses. Sear of healthycontrol was drawn from the same age group). The Image j software wasused to quantify the intensity of protein bands. Fold change in expressionof cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta was normalized over the age-matchedcontrols. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n=3), using one way ANOVAfollowed by Dunnett test.
Moreover, Western blot analyses of clinically
confirmed liver cancer patients’ sera showed elevation
of cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta expression compared
to the controls (Fig .4B). This observation validated our
experimental results.Expression analysis of cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta by Western
blotting. A. ß-actin was used as internal control. Analyses showed time anddose dependent elevation in the expression of protein of interest, in ratsbelong to carcinogen treated groups, by liver cancer progression. Consistentincrease in protein expression has been shown during liver cancer progressionand B. Significant elevation in expression of cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta has been shown in sera of clinically confirmed liver cancer patients ascompared to the healthy controls (P<0.001, n=3, serum samples were takenfrom two male patients at age 35 and 73 for the analyses. Sear of healthycontrol was drawn from the same age group). The Image j software wasused to quantify the intensity of protein bands. Fold change in expressionof cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta was normalized over the age-matchedcontrols. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n=3), using one way ANOVAfollowed by Dunnett test.
Discussion
Neoplastic cell induction served as implication of
cancer initiation in liver tissue of rats. Our method for
animal model development is novel, as it neither requires
carcinogen doses causing necrosis nor partial hepatectomy
(6, 10). The serum protein profile of carcinogen treated rats
and controls were compared and differentially expressed
proteins were identified. However, one of these proteins
was further characterized as cytosolic phospholipase A2delta. Changes taking place in the expression of HCC-
related proteins have been systematically monitored
during various stages of HCC development, from the
initiation of cancer to hepatotumorigenesis, when fully
grown tumors were observed.The importance of cytosolic phospholipase Aenzymes
in cancer progression is of the considerable interests,
as these enzymes play important role in the pathways
associated with progression of cancer. This enzyme
family controls cell proliferation, differentiation,
survival and motility in almost all tissues. Their
increased expression results in dysregulation and
facilitates unlimited growth of tumors and metastasis
for cancer cells. Significant role of this family
members has been implicated in tumor progression
and tumorigenesis (11). This family is composed of
six intracellular enzymes simply indicated as cytosolic
phospholipase A2-α, -β, -γ, -δ, -ε and –ζ (12). Cytosolic
phospholipase A2 family mediates biologically active
fatty acids release from the pool of phospholipids
located in membranes (13) of virtually all cells in
humans and rodents (12). Aberrant expression of
cytosolic phospholipase A2 family has been linked to
progression of malignancies such as prostate, liver
(13) and colon cancers (14). A study has reported that
elevating cytosolic phospholipase A2 expression has
been taken place through pathways associated with
ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK. The study reported that
cytosolic phospholipase A2 expression is significantly
associated with vascular endothelial growth factor
expression; however, its expression was not related to
any clinico-pathological specification (14). No much
information is available about the function of cytosolic
phospholipase A2 family in vivo (12). Among three
main classes of cytosolic phospholipase A2 family in
mammals, cytosolic phospholipase A2-α has gained
the most attention, regarding that is widely expressed
in virtually all mammalian cells (14). Cytosolic
phospholipase A2-α is activated by transforming
growth factor beta (TGF-ß) regulating growth of
primary and transformed hepatocytes. The inter
relationship among cytosolic phospholipase A2-α and
TGF-ß signaling pathways has been reported in primary
hepatocytes of rats and human HCC; thus cytosolic
phospholipase A2-α is an important factor regulating
TGF-ß signaling pathway and controlling proliferation
of hepatocytes and hepatocarcinogenesis (15).
Cytosolic phospholipase A2-α regulates biosynthesis of
prostaglandins through arachidonic acid cleavage, from
membrane phospholipids (12), through cyclooxigenase
(COX) (16). The prostaglandins increase storage of
triglycerides in hepatocytes leading to liver damage
and cirrhosis (12). This pathway is activated in variety
of cancers including HCC (15). Arachidonic acid, as
a substrate for COXs and lipoxygenases (14), is a
necessary factor that producing bioactive eicosanoids
and platelet activating factor which, in turn,
regulate inflammation (17), tumor cell proliferation
and motility, differentiation, survival, invasion,
angiogenesis and metastasis in HCC (13, 15). We
observed elevated levels of cytosolic phospholipase A2
delta in the serum of HCC rats and in human patients
with liver cancer. This suggests that is one of the
important factors associated with HCC initiation and
progression leading to hepatotumorigenesis. Elevation
of cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta expression in liver
cancer might be associated with dysregulation of lipid
metabolism and liver damage, causing cancer initiation
in tissue at precancerous stage, while the epithelial
cells are actively proliferating.
Conclusion
Taken together, the present study suggests that
evaluation of cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta
concentration, alone or in consolidation with other
conventional markers, may provide critical knowledge
for the early noninvasive disclosure of HCC.
Moreover, cytosolic phospholipase A2 delta might also
be served as a potential target to find out the status and
progression of liver cancer.
Authors: Chang Han; William C Bowen; Guiying Li; Anthony J Demetris; George K Michalopoulos; Tong Wu Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Syed Haq; Heiko Kilter; Ashour Michael; Jingzang Tao; Eileen O'Leary; Xio Ming Sun; Brian Walters; Kausik Bhattacharya; Xin Chen; Lei Cui; Michele Andreucci; Anthony Rosenzweig; J Luis Guerrero; Richard Patten; Ronglih Liao; Jeffery Molkentin; Michael Picard; Joseph V Bonventre; Thomas Force Journal: Nat Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 53.440