Literature DB >> 31606088

Quantitative analysis of global protein lysine methylation by mass spectrometry.

Peder J Lund1, Stephanie M Lehman1, Benjamin A Garcia2.   

Abstract

Since protein activity is often regulated by posttranslational modifications, the qualitative and quantitative analysis of modification sites is critical for understanding the regulation of biological pathways that control cell function and phenotype. Methylation constitutes one of the many types of posttranslational modifications that target lysine residues. Although lysine methylation is perhaps most commonly associated with histone proteins and the epigenetic regulation of processes involving chromatin, methylation has also been observed as an important regulatory modification on other proteins, which has spurred the development of methods to profile lysine methylation sites more globally. As with many posttranslational modifications, tandem mass spectrometry represents an ideal platform for the high-throughput analysis of lysine methylation due to its high sensitivity and resolving power. The following protocol outlines a general method to assay lysine methylation across the proteome using SILAC and quantitative proteomics. First, cells are labeled by SILAC to allow for relative quantitation across different experimental conditions, such as cells with or without ectopic expression of a methyltransferase. Next, cells are lysed and proteins are digested into peptides. Methylated peptides are then enriched by immunoprecipitation with pan-specific antibodies against methylated lysine. Finally, the enriched peptides are analyzed by LC-MS/MS to identify methylated peptides and their modification sites and to compare the relative abundance of methylation events between different conditions. This approach should yield detection of a couple hundred lysine methylation sites, and those showing differential abundance may then be prioritized for further study.
© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affinity purification; Lysine methylation; Mass spectrometry; Posttranslational modifications; SILAC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31606088      PMCID: PMC8259617          DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2019.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  33 in total

1.  Large Scale Mass Spectrometry-based Identifications of Enzyme-mediated Protein Methylation Are Subject to High False Discovery Rates.

Authors:  Gene Hart-Smith; Daniel Yagoub; Aidan P Tay; Russell Pickford; Marc R Wilkins
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Quantitative Profiling of the Activity of Protein Lysine Methyltransferase SMYD2 Using SILAC-Based Proteomics.

Authors:  Jonathan B Olsen; Xing-Jun Cao; Bomie Han; Lisa Hong Chen; Alexander Horvath; Timothy I Richardson; Robert M Campbell; Benjamin A Garcia; Hannah Nguyen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Quantitative protein analysis by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Vishwajeeth R Pagala; Anthony A High; Xusheng Wang; Haiyan Tan; Kiran Kodali; Ashutosh Mishra; Kanisha Kavdia; Yanji Xu; Zhiping Wu; Junmin Peng
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2015

Review 4.  Chromatin modifications and their function.

Authors:  Tony Kouzarides
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  MaxQuant for in-depth analysis of large SILAC datasets.

Authors:  Stefka Tyanova; Matthias Mann; Jürgen Cox
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

6.  A method for systematic mapping of protein lysine methylation identifies functions for HP1β in DNA damage response.

Authors:  Huadong Liu; Marek Galka; Eiichiro Mori; Xuguang Liu; Yu-Fen Lin; Ran Wei; Paula Pittock; Courtney Voss; Gurpreet Dhami; Xing Li; Masaaki Miyaji; Gilles Lajoie; Benjamin Chen; Shawn Shun-Cheng Li
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Large-scale global identification of protein lysine methylation in vivo.

Authors:  Xing-Jun Cao; Anna M Arnaudo; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.528

8.  SMYD3 links lysine methylation of MAP3K2 to Ras-driven cancer.

Authors:  Pawel K Mazur; Nicolas Reynoird; Purvesh Khatri; Pascal W T C Jansen; Alex W Wilkinson; Shichong Liu; Olena Barbash; Glenn S Van Aller; Michael Huddleston; Dashyant Dhanak; Peter J Tummino; Ryan G Kruger; Benjamin A Garcia; Atul J Butte; Michiel Vermeulen; Julien Sage; Or Gozani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control.

Authors:  C David Allis; Thomas Jenuwein
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Semi-Quantitative Mass Spectrometry in AML Cells Identifies New Non-Genomic Targets of the EZH2 Methyltransferase.

Authors:  Yordan Sbirkov; Colin Kwok; Amandeep Bhamra; Andrew J Thompson; Veronica Gil; Arthur Zelent; Kevin Petrie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  3 in total

1.  Characterization of SET-Domain Histone Lysine Methyltransferase Substrates Using a Cofactor S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine Surrogate.

Authors:  Alexandre Désert; Karine Guitot; Audrey Michaud; Daniel Holoch; Raphaël Margueron; Fabienne Burlina; Dominique Guianvarc'h
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Both prokaryotes and eukaryotes produce an immune response against plasmids with 5'-GTTTGTT-3'.

Authors:  Nan Li; Dongya Jiang; Luqingqing He; Yunyun Yue; Qinxin Zhang; Shuang Wang; Yunfeng Zhang; Yuxuan Wei; Qingshun Zhao
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 9.584

3.  Measuring Site-specific Glycosylation Similarity between Influenza a Virus Variants with Statistical Certainty.

Authors:  Deborah Chang; William E Hackett; Lei Zhong; Xiu-Feng Wan; Joseph Zaia
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.911

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.