Literature DB >> 31605622

Correlative climatic niche models predict real and virtual species distributions equally well.

Valentin Journé1,2, Jean-Yves Barnagaud3, Cyril Bernard1, Pierre-André Crochet1, Xavier Morin1.   

Abstract

Climate is one of the main factors driving species distributions and global biodiversity patterns. Obtaining accurate predictions of species' range shifts in response to ongoing climate change has thus become a key issue in ecology and conservation. Correlative species distribution models (cSDMs) have become a prominent tool to this aim in the last decade and have demonstrated good predictive abilities with current conditions, irrespective of the studied taxon. However, cSDMs rely on statistical association between species' presence and environmental conditions and have rarely been challenged on their actual capacity to reflect causal relationships between species and climate. In this study, we question whether cSDMs can accurately identify if climate and species distributions are causally linked, a prerequisite for accurate prediction of range shift in relation to climate change. We compared the performance of cSDMs in predicting the distributions of 132 European terrestrial species, chosen randomly within five taxonomic groups (three vertebrate groups and two plant groups), and of 1,320 virtual species whose distribution is causally fully independent from climate. We found that (1) for real species, the performance of cSDMs varied principally with range size, rather than with taxonomic groups and (2) cSDMs did not predict the distributions of real species with a greater accuracy than the virtual ones. Our results unambiguously show that the high predictive power of cSDMs can be driven by spatial autocorrelation in climatic and distributional data and does not necessarily reflect causal relationships between climate and species distributions. Thus, high predictive performance of cSDMs does not ensure that they accurately depict the role of climate in shaping species distributions. Our findings therefore call for strong caution when using cSDMs to provide predictions on future range shifts in response to climate change.
© 2019 by the Ecological Society of America.

Keywords:  blocked cross-validation; climate change; model evaluation; null models; range shift; spatial autocorrelation; species distribution models

Year:  2019        PMID: 31605622     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  4 in total

Review 1.  Tackling unresolved questions in forest ecology: The past and future role of simulation models.

Authors:  Isabelle Maréchaux; Fanny Langerwisch; Andreas Huth; Harald Bugmann; Xavier Morin; Christopher P O Reyer; Rupert Seidl; Alessio Collalti; Mateus Dantas de Paula; Rico Fischer; Martin Gutsch; Manfred J Lexer; Heike Lischke; Anja Rammig; Edna Rödig; Boris Sakschewski; Franziska Taubert; Kirsten Thonicke; Giorgio Vacchiano; Friedrich J Bohn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Planning priority conservation areas for biodiversity under climate change in topographically complex areas: A case study in Sichuan province, China.

Authors:  Yafeng Lu; Pei Xu; Qinwen Li; Yukuan Wang; Cheng Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Climate change and the increase of human population will threaten conservation of Asian cobras.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdul Wahed Chowdhury; Johannes Müller; Sara Varela
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Habitat selection patterns are density dependent under the ideal free distribution.

Authors:  Tal Avgar; Gustavo S Betini; John M Fryxell
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.606

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.