Mary K Quinn1, Emily R Smith1,2, Paige L Williams3,4, Willy Urassa5, Joy Shi4, Gernard Msamanga6, Wafaie W Fawzi1,4,7, Christopher R Sudfeld1,7. 1. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 6. Department of Community Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 7. Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Maternal micronutrient supplementation in pregnancy (MMS) has been shown to improve birth weight among infants in low- and middle-income countries. Recent evidence suggests that the survival benefits of MMS are greater for female infants compared to male infants, but the mechanisms leading to differential effects remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the potential mechanisms through which MMS acts on infant mortality among Tanzanian infants. METHODS: We used data collected from pregnant women and newborns in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of MMS conducted in Tanzania to examine mediators of the effect of MMS on 6-wk infant mortality (NCT00197548). Causal mediation analyses with the counterfactual approach were conducted to assess the contributions of MMS on survival via their effects on birth weight, gestational age, weight-for-gestational age, and the joint effect of gestational age and weight-for-gestational age. The weighting method allowed for interaction between gestational age and weight-for-gestational age. RESULTS: Among 7486 newborns, the effect of MMS on 6-wk survival was fully mediated (100%) through the joint effect of gestational age and weight-for-gestational age. MMS was also found to have a significant natural indirect effect through increased birth weight (P-value < 0.001) that explained 75% of the total effect on 6-wk mortality. When analyses were stratified by sex, changes in gestational age and weight-for-gestational age fully mediated the mortality effect among female infants (n = 3570), but these mediators only explained 34% of the effect among males (n = 3833). CONCLUSIONS: The potential sex-specific effects of MMS on mortality may be a result of differences in mechanisms related to birth outcomes. In the context of the Tanzanian trial, the observed effect of MMS on 6-wk mortality for female infants was entirely mediated by increased gestation duration and improved intrauterine growth, while these mechanisms did not appear to be major contributors among male infants.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Maternal micronutrient supplementation in pregnancy (MMS) has been shown to improve birth weight among infants in low- and middle-income countries. Recent evidence suggests that the survival benefits of MMS are greater for female infants compared to male infants, but the mechanisms leading to differential effects remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the potential mechanisms through which MMS acts on infant mortality among Tanzanian infants. METHODS: We used data collected from pregnant women and newborns in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of MMS conducted in Tanzania to examine mediators of the effect of MMS on 6-wk infant mortality (NCT00197548). Causal mediation analyses with the counterfactual approach were conducted to assess the contributions of MMS on survival via their effects on birth weight, gestational age, weight-for-gestational age, and the joint effect of gestational age and weight-for-gestational age. The weighting method allowed for interaction between gestational age and weight-for-gestational age. RESULTS: Among 7486 newborns, the effect of MMS on 6-wk survival was fully mediated (100%) through the joint effect of gestational age and weight-for-gestational age. MMS was also found to have a significant natural indirect effect through increased birth weight (P-value < 0.001) that explained 75% of the total effect on 6-wk mortality. When analyses were stratified by sex, changes in gestational age and weight-for-gestational age fully mediated the mortality effect among female infants (n = 3570), but these mediators only explained 34% of the effect among males (n = 3833). CONCLUSIONS: The potential sex-specific effects of MMS on mortality may be a result of differences in mechanisms related to birth outcomes. In the context of the Tanzanian trial, the observed effect of MMS on 6-wk mortality for female infants was entirely mediated by increased gestation duration and improved intrauterine growth, while these mechanisms did not appear to be major contributors among male infants.
Authors: Lidwina Priliani; Elizabeth L Prado; Restuadi Restuadi; Diana E Waturangi; Anuraj H Shankar; Safarina G Malik Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Wafaie W Fawzi; Gernard I Msamanga; Willy Urassa; Ellen Hertzmark; Paul Petraro; Walter C Willett; Donna Spiegelman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-04-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Keith P West; Abu Ahmed Shamim; Sucheta Mehra; Alain B Labrique; Hasmot Ali; Saijuddin Shaikh; Rolf D W Klemm; Lee S-F Wu; Maithilee Mitra; Rezwanul Haque; Abu A M Hanif; Allan B Massie; Rebecca Day Merrill; Kerry J Schulze; Parul Christian Journal: JAMA Date: 2014 Dec 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anna C Seale; Hannah Blencowe; Anita Zaidi; Hammad Ganatra; Sana Syed; Cyril Engmann; Charles R Newton; Stefania Vergnano; Barbara J Stoll; Simon N Cousens; Joy E Lawn Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Li Liu; Shefali Oza; Dan Hogan; Yue Chu; Jamie Perin; Jun Zhu; Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J Stirnemann; J Villar; L J Salomon; E Ohuma; P Ruyan; D G Altman; F Nosten; R Craik; S Munim; L Cheikh Ismail; F C Barros; A Lambert; S Norris; M Carvalho; Y A Jaffer; J A Noble; E Bertino; M G Gravett; M Purwar; C G Victora; R Uauy; Z Bhutta; S Kennedy; A T Papageorghiou Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-03-05 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Sandra G Okala; Momodou K Darboe; Fatou Sosseh; Bakary Sonko; Tisbeh Faye-Joof; Andrew M Prentice; Sophie E Moore Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 11.069