Literature DB >> 31605213

Improving attainment of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Tetsuya Nakazato1,2,3, Bailey Su1,2, Stephanie Novak1, Shanley B Deal4, Kristine Kuchta1, Michael Ujiki5,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We hypothesized that practicing surgeons would successfully achieve a better and more frequent Critical View of Safety (CVS) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after participation in a structured Safe CVS Curriculum.
METHODS: All surgeons performing LC at a regional health system had four LC cases recorded: twice before and twice after a curriculum focused on the CVS, which was led by a member of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Safe LC Task Force. Videos were then de-identified and randomly ordered for grading on a 6-point CVS assessment tool by two expert surgeons, who were blinded to the operator and whether the surgeries were performed before or after the curriculum. Confidence surveys and performance on a CVS identification video quiz were also compared pre- and post-curriculum.
RESULTS: Twelve surgeons (five general, four acute care, and three minimally invasive) with an average experience of 17.9 ± 6.3 years participated in the study. After the curriculum, surgeons achieved all three CVS criteria in more cases (1/24 (4%) versus 10/24 (42%), p < 0.004). There was also significant improvement in correctly identifying whether the CVS was achieved in 10 video clips from the Internet (7.9 ± 1.5 vs. 9.3 ± 0.8, p = 0.006) and increased confidence on a 5-point Likert scale in accurately identifying the CVS (4.5 ± 0.5 vs. 4.9 ± 0.3, p = 0.017).
CONCLUSION: A structured curriculum on achieving a quality CVS for practicing, experienced surgeons improved their confidence and frequency of obtaining the Critical View of Safety during LC. We recommend that the Safe CVS Curriculum be considered for widespread use in order to increase the quality and frequency of attaining the Critical View of Safety.

Keywords:  Bile duct injury; Critical view of safety; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Structured curriculum; Surgical education

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31605213     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07178-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  Are YouTube Videos a Reliable Training Method for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Simulated Decision-Making Exercise to Assess the Critical View of Safety.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Manatakis; Emmanouil Mylonakis; Petros Anagnostopoulos; Konstantinos Lamprakakis; Christos Agalianos; Dimitrios P Korkolis; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2021-12-23

2.  Application of Intelligent Detection of Neural Signal in Depth Evaluation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Anesthesia.

Authors:  Xiushuang Zhang; Mingjun Xu; Xiaoguang Li; Xiuling Cao; Xiangming Che
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective investigation from both cognitive and executive aspects.

Authors:  Yi Jin; Runwen Liu; Yonghua Chen; Jie Liu; Ying Zhao; Ailin Wei; Yichuan Li; Hai Li; Jun Xu; Xin Wang; Ang Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-01

4.  Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  James Lucocq; John Scollay; Pradeep Patil
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.