Literature DB >> 31605209

Is the administration of vancomycin to operative field effective? Studying from operative wound drainage tube culture.

Hirohito Takeuchi1, Itaru Oda2, Shigeki Oshima2, Masaru Suzuki2, Masanori Fujiya2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of application of VCM powder to surgical wounds.
METHODS: A total of 314 patients who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation with local application of VCM (VCM group) were compared to 354 patients without VCM (control). The wound drainage tube was submitted for bacterial culture. The number of positive cultures, types of bacteria, and incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) were investigated.
RESULTS: Drainage tube culture was positive in 1.6% (5/314 cases) and 7.3% (26/354 cases) of the VCM and control groups, respectively (P = 0.004). Among the five positive cases in the VCM group, one had an SSI, compared to three of 26 in the control group. Among the culture-negative cases, 0 and six, respectively, had an SSI. Finally, the incidence of SSI was 0.3% (1/314 cases) and 2.5% (9/354 cases), respectively. SSI occurred significantly less often in the VCM than in the control group (P = 0.01). The pathogenic bacterium was P. aeruginosa in the VCM group and MSSE, S. marcescens, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), etc., in the control group.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the amount of bacteria in the operative field was decreased by local application of VCM. However, the incidence of positive culture of VCM-resistant bacteria was not decreased by VCM. Importantly, pathogenic bacteria in the VCM group were only VCM-resistant, supporting the efficacy of VCM. In conclusion, local application of VCM decreases the amount of bacteria in the operative field and leads to fewer SSIs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drainage tube culture; Spinal instrumentation surgery; Surgical site infection (SSI); Vancomycin

Year:  2019        PMID: 31605209     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02579-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  14 in total

1.  Prophylactic intraoperative powdered vancomycin and postoperative deep spinal wound infection: 1,512 consecutive surgical cases over a 6-year period.

Authors:  Robert W Molinari; Oner A Khera; William J Molinari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Vancomycin versus cefazolin prophylaxis for cardiac surgery in the setting of a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections.

Authors:  R Finkelstein; G Rabino; T Mashiah; Y Bar-El; Z Adler; V Kertzman; O Cohen; S Milo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Infection after spinal fusion using internal fixation instrumentation.

Authors:  R B Keller; A M Pappas
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures.

Authors:  M A Weinstein; J P McCabe; F P Cammisa
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-10

Review 5.  Complications from the use of intrawound vancomycin in lumbar spinal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  George M Ghobrial; David W Cadotte; Kim Williams; Michael G Fehlings; James S Harrop
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Drain Tip Culture is Not Prognostic for Surgical Site Infection in Spinal Surgery Under Prophylactic Use of Antibiotics.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Yamada; Toshitaka Yoshii; Satoru Egawa; Ryohei Takada; Takashi Hirai; Hiroyuki Inose; Tsuyoshi Kato; Tetsuya Jinno; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Does Intrawound Vancomycin Application During Spine Surgery Create Vancomycin-Resistant Organism?

Authors:  Silky Chotai; Patty W Wright; Andrew T Hale; Whitney A Jones; Matthew J McGirt; Joshua C Patt; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  The influence of surveillance methods on surgical wound infection rates in a tertiary care spinal surgery service.

Authors:  F J Roberts; A Walsh; P Wing; M Dvorak; J Schweigel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Cost of medical care for postoperative spinal infections.

Authors:  R R Calderone; D E Garland; D A Capen; H Oster
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Japanese 2011 nationwide survey on complications from spine surgery.

Authors:  Yasuaki Imajo; Toshihiko Taguchi; Kazunori Yone; Atsushi Okawa; Koji Otani; Tadanori Ogata; Hiroshi Ozawa; Yoichi Shimada; Masashi Neo; Tetsuhiro Iguchi
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.601

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Prophylactic Topical Antibiotics in Fracture Repair and Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Eric K Kim; Claire A Donnelley; Madeline Tiee; Heather J Roberts; Ericka Von Kaeppler; David Shearer; Saam Morshed
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2021-10-14

Review 2.  Intraoperative vancomycin powder to reduce surgical site infections after posterior spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hua Luo; Yu Ren; Yongwei Su; Feng Xue; Zhenghua Hong
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-02-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.