Literature DB >> 31603995

Application of the adverse outcome pathway framework to genotoxic modes of action.

Jennifer C Sasaki1, Ashley Allemang2, Steven M Bryce3, Laura Custer4, Kerry L Dearfield5, Yasmin Dietz6, Azeddine Elhajouji7, Patricia A Escobar8, Albert J Fornace9, Roland Froetschl10, Sheila Galloway8, Ulrike Hemmann6, Giel Hendriks11, Heng-Hong Li9, Mirjam Luijten12, Gladys Ouedraogo13, Lauren Peel14, Stefan Pfuhler2, Daniel J Roberts15, Véronique Thybaud16, Jan van Benthem12, Carole L Yauk17, Maik Schuler18.   

Abstract

In May 2017, the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute's Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee hosted a workshop to discuss whether mode of action (MOA) investigation is enhanced through the application of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework. As AOPs are a relatively new approach in genetic toxicology, this report describes how AOPs could be harnessed to advance MOA analysis of genotoxicity pathways using five example case studies. Each of these genetic toxicology AOPs proposed for further development includes the relevant molecular initiating events, key events, and adverse outcomes (AOs), identification and/or further development of the appropriate assays to link an agent to these events, and discussion regarding the biological plausibility of the proposed AOP. A key difference between these proposed genetic toxicology AOPs versus traditional AOPs is that the AO is a genetic toxicology endpoint of potential significance in risk characterization, in contrast to an adverse state of an organism or a population. The first two detailed case studies describe provisional AOPs for aurora kinase inhibition and tubulin binding, leading to the common AO of aneuploidy. The remaining three case studies highlight provisional AOPs that lead to chromosome breakage or mutation via indirect DNA interaction (inhibition of topoisomerase II, production of cellular reactive oxygen species, and inhibition of DNA synthesis). These case studies serve as starting points for genotoxicity AOPs that could ultimately be published and utilized by the broader toxicology community and illustrate the practical considerations and evidence required to formalize such AOPs so that they may be applied to genetic toxicity evaluation schemes. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:114-134, 2020.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse outcome pathway; genotoxicity; mode of action

Year:  2019        PMID: 31603995     DOI: 10.1002/em.22339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  11 in total

Review 1.  Overview of Adverse Outcome Pathways and Current Applications on Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Dora Rolo; Ana Tavares; Nádia Vital; Maria João Silva; Henriqueta Louro
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Reactive Oxygen Species in the Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework: Toward Creation of Harmonized Consensus Key Events.

Authors:  Shihori Tanabe; Jason O'Brien; Knut Erik Tollefsen; Youngjun Kim; Vinita Chauhan; Carole Yauk; Elizabeth Huliganga; Ruthann A Rudel; Jennifer E Kay; Jessica S Helm; Danielle Beaton; Julija Filipovska; Iva Sovadinova; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; Angela Mally; Sarah Søs Poulsen; Nathalie Delrue; Ellen Fritsche; Karsta Luettich; Cinzia La Rocca; Hasmik Yepiskoposyan; Jördis Klose; Pernille Høgh Danielsen; Maranda Esterhuizen; Nicklas Raun Jacobsen; Ulla Vogel; Timothy W Gant; Ian Choi; Rex FitzGerald
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-06

3.  In vitro human cell-based aneugen molecular mechanism assay.

Authors:  Nikki E Hall; Kyle Tichenor; Steven M Bryce; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.579

Review 4.  Role of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Light of Modern Environmental Research: A Tautological Approach.

Authors:  Walter Gottlieb Land
Journal:  Int J Environ Res       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  A Case Study on Integrating a New Key Event Into an Existing Adverse Outcome Pathway on Oxidative DNA Damage: Challenges and Approaches in a Data-Rich Area.

Authors:  Elizabeth Huliganga; Francesco Marchetti; Jason M O'Brien; Vinita Chauhan; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-28

Review 6.  Utility of a next-generation framework for assessment of genomic damage: A case study using the pharmaceutical drug candidate etoposide.

Authors:  John Nicolette; Mirjam Luijten; Jennifer C Sasaki; Laura Custer; Michelle Embry; Roland Froetschl; George Johnson; Gladys Ouedraogo; Raja Settivari; Veronique Thybaud; Kerry L Dearfield
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.579

7.  A comparison of classical and 21st century genotoxicity tools: A proof of concept study of 18 chemicals comparing in vitro micronucleus, ToxTracker and genomics-based methods (TGx-DDI, whole genome clustering and connectivity mapping).

Authors:  Ashley Allemang; K Nadira De Abrew; Yuqing K Shan; Jesse M Krailler; Stefan Pfuhler
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Heritable hazards of smoking: Applying the "clean sheet" framework to further science and policy.

Authors:  Abigail P Bline; Kerry L Dearfield; David M DeMarini; Francesco Marchetti; Carole L Yauk; Jill Escher
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Comparative Analysis of Transcriptional Responses to Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Agents in the Blood Cell Model TK6 and the Liver Model HepaRG.

Authors:  Katrin Kreuzer; Heike Sprenger; Albert Braeuning
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Adverse Outcome Pathway Development for Assessment of Lung Carcinogenicity by Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Penny Nymark; Hanna L Karlsson; Sabina Halappanavar; Ulla Vogel
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.