Literature DB >> 31603150

Electrochemical sensors for rapid diagnosis of pathogens in real time.

Olja Simoska1, Keith J Stevenson.   

Abstract

Microbial infections remain the principal cause for high morbidity and mortality rates. While approximately 1400 human pathogens have been recognized, the majority of healthcare-associated infectious diseases are caused by only a few opportunistic pathogens (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli), which are associated with increased antibiotic and antimicrobial resistance. Rapid detection, reliable identification and real-time monitoring of these pathogens remain not only a scientific problem but also a practical challenge of vast importance, especially in tailoring effective treatment strategies. Although the development of vaccinations and antibacterial drug treatments are the leading research, progress, and implementation of early warning, quantitative systems indicative of confirming pathogen presence are necessary. Over the years, various approaches, such as conventional culturing, straining, molecular methods (e.g., polymerase chain reaction and immunological assays), microscopy-based and mass spectrometry techniques, have been employed to identify and quantify pathogenic agents. While being sensitive in some cases, these procedures are costly, time-consuming, mostly qualitative, and are indirect detection methods. A great challenge is therefore to develop rapid, highly sensitive, specific devices with adequate figures of merit to corroborate the presence of microbes and enable dynamic real-time measurements of metabolism. As an alternative, electrochemical sensor platforms have been developed as powerful quantitative tools for label-free detection of infection-related biomarkers with high sensitivity. This minireview is focused on the latest electrochemical-based approaches for pathogen sensing, putting them into the context of standard sensing methods, such as cell culturing, mass spectrometry, and fluorescent-based approaches. Description of the latest, impactful electrochemical sensors for pathogen detection will be presented. Recent breakthroughs will be highlighted, including the use of micro- and nano-electrode arrays for real-time detection of bacteria in polymicrobial infections and microfluidic devices for pathogen separation analysis. We will conclude with perspectives and outlooks to understand shortcomings in designing future sensing schemes. The need for high sensitivity and selectivity, low-cost implementation, fast detection, and screening increases provides an impetus for further development in electrochemical detectors for microorganisms and biologically relevant targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31603150     DOI: 10.1039/c9an01747j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  9 in total

Review 1.  Electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical characterization of bacteria and bacterial systems.

Authors:  Vignesh Sundaresan; Hyein Do; Joshua D Shrout; Paul W Bohn
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.616

2.  The fabrication of a chemical sensor with PANI-TiO2 nanocomposites.

Authors:  Mohammad R Karim; M M Alam; M O Aijaz; Abdullah M Asiri; F S AlMubaddel; Mohammed M Rahman
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  The Use of Electroactive Halophilic Bacteria for Improvements and Advancements in Environmental High Saline Biosensing.

Authors:  Erin M Gaffney; Olja Simoska; Shelley D Minteer
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-12

4.  Redox cycling-based detection of phenazine metabolites secreted from Pseudomonas aeruginosa in nanopore electrode arrays.

Authors:  Hyein Do; Seung-Ryong Kwon; Seol Baek; Chinedu S Madukoma; Marina K Smiley; Lars E Dietrich; Joshua D Shrout; Paul W Bohn
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.616

5.  Harnessing recombinase polymerase amplification for rapid multi-gene detection of SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Dounia Cherkaoui; Da Huang; Benjamin S Miller; Valérian Turbé; Rachel A McKendry
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 6.  Microneedle-based devices for point-of-care infectious disease diagnostics.

Authors:  Rachael V Dixon; Eldhose Skaria; Wing Man Lau; Philip Manning; Mark A Birch-Machin; S Moein Moghimi; Keng Wooi Ng
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.413

Review 7.  Electrochemical Immuno- and Aptamer-Based Assays for Bacteria: Pros and Cons over Traditional Detection Schemes.

Authors:  Rimsha Binte Jamal; Stepan Shipovskov; Elena E Ferapontova
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Recent advances and challenges in electrochemical biosensors for emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases.

Authors:  Shalini Menon; Manna Rachel Mathew; Sonia Sam; K Keerthi; K Girish Kumar
Journal:  J Electroanal Chem (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.464

Review 9.  A Comprehensive Review of Metal-Organic Framework: Synthesis, Characterization, and Investigation of Their Application in Electrochemical Biosensors for Biomedical Analysis.

Authors:  Zahra Dourandish; Somayeh Tajik; Hadi Beitollahi; Peyman Mohammadzadeh Jahani; Fariba Garkani Nejad; Iran Sheikhshoaie; Antonio Di Bartolomeo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.