Masataka Yokode1, Keiji Hanada1, Akinori Shimizu1, Tomoyuki Minami1, Ryosuke Hirohata2, Tomoyuki Abe2, Hironobu Amano2, Shuji Yonehara3, Yoh Zen4. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Hiroshima 722-8508, Japan. 2. Department of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Hiroshima 722-8508, Japan. 3. Department of Pathology, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Hiroshima 722-8508, Japan. 4. Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK.
Keywords:
gastric-type; intracholecystic papillary neoplasm of the gallbladder; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct; mucin-producing tumor; oncocytic-type
Intracholecystic papillary neoplasm (ICPN) of the gallbladder is a relatively new concept and suspected to share clinicopathologic features with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas and intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) (1,2). Because of its rarity, the imaging characteristics of ICPN have not yet been definitively standardized. Herein, we report a unique case of ICPN of the gallbladder extending to the common bile duct (CBD) without superficial spread.
Case report
A 58-year-old woman with no significant medical history presented with fever lasting for three days. Her physical examination was unremarkable. Laboratory analysis showed elevations in C-reactive protein (2.1 mg/dl; normal range: <0.2 mg/dl), aspartate aminotransferase (44 IU/l; 13–33 IU/l), alanine aminotransferase (169 IU/l; 8–42 IU/l), alkaline phosphatase (1675 IU/l; 115–359 IU/l), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (757 IU/l; 8–42 IU/l). Her leukocyte count and serum levels of total bilirubin, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were within normal ranges. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an enlarged gallbladder filled with a polypoid, papillary lesion. The CBD was also dilated with a similar intraluminal papillary tumor, suggesting superficial spread of the gallbladder neoplasm (Figs. 1 and 2). Endoscopic ultrasonography showed the polypoid lesion spreading from the gallbladder into the CBD without signs of stromal invasion (Fig. 3). She also underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, which showed filling defects within the CBD, but the gallbladder and cystic duct could not be visualized (Fig. 4A). Endoscopic examination with intraductal ultrasound revealed a papillary lesion extending from the cystic duct orifice to the lower CBD (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, peroral cholangioscopy demonstrated a mucin-producing papillary tumor at the same site, while the confluence of hepatic ducts was tumor-free (Fig. 4C). The biopsy specimen taken from the papillary tumor and bile cytology showed atypical glandular cells consistent with adenocarcinoma. Based on the diagnosis of ICPN with spread into the CBD, she underwent subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD) and gallbladder bed resection.
Figure 1.
Findings of contrast-enhanced CT. (A) Contrast-enhanced CT revealed that the gallbladder was almost completely filled with papillary lesions. (B) The tumor extended to the common bile duct (arrow) through the cystic duct (arrow head). CT, computed tomography.
Figure 2.
Findings of T2-weighted MRI. (A) T2-weighted MRI (coronal image) showed the papillary tumors filling the gallbladder and spreading to the cystic duct (arrow). (B) The tumors protruded into the common bile duct (arrow head). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 3.
Findings of EUS. (A) EUS demonstrated polypoid lesions (B) extending from the gallbladder into the common bile duct (arrow) without invasion of the gallbladder wall or the bile duct. EUS, endoscopic ultrasonography.
Figure 4.
Findings of ERC, IDUS and POCS. (A) ERC showed filling defects within the common hepatic duct, but the gallbladder and cystic duct could not be visualized. (B) IDUS revealed papillary lesions protruding into the common bile duct (arrow) through the cystic duct (arrow head). (C) POCS revealed mucin-producing papillary tumors around the cystic duct orifice and extending to the lower common bile duct. ERC, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography; IDUS, intraductal ultrasound; POCS, peroral cholangioscopy.
Gross examination showed an enlarged gallbladder and dilated cystic duct, which were filled with significant amounts of mucus as well as the papillary neoplasm. However, the mucosa of the CBD was unremarkable with no tumor identified (Fig. 5). Microscopically, the gallbladder neoplasm consisted of atypical glandular epithelium arranged in a highly papillary architecture along fibrovascular stalks. The tumor showed extensive superficial spread along the gallbladder mucosa, and also into the Rokitansky-Aschoff sinus. Most tumor cells had gastric-type features such as intracytoplasmic mucus, round nuclei, and clear cytoplasms. Small foci consisting of highly eosinophilic cells with centrally located round nuclei, consistent with the oncocytic-type, were also present. The tumor was mostly non-invasive, but there was a small focus (<1 cm) of stromal invasion in the subserosal layer (Fig. 6).
Figure 5.
Macroscopic findings in the intracholecystic papillary neoplasm. Macroscopically, the papillary tumor was present in the gallbladder along with a large amount of mucin spreading to the cystic duct. No tumors were observed in the common bile duct (arrows).
Figure 6.
Microscopic findings in the intracholecystic papillary neoplasm. (A) The tumor consisted of atypical glandular epithelium arranged in a high papillary architecture along thin fibrovascular stalks (hematoxylin and eosin staining; magnification, ×40). (B) Most tumor cells showed a gastric-type morphology (magnification, ×200). (C) Small lesions consistent with the oncocytic-type were also present (magnification, ×200). (D) Focal invasion of the subserosa was observed (magnification, ×200).
On immunostaining, the cells were diffusely positive for MUC1, MUC5AC, and MUC6, and negative for MUC2. On the basis of the histologic findings, the tumor was diagnosed as a gastric-type ICPN with an associated adenocarcinoma. Although the patient refused adjuvant chemotherapy, the post-operative course was uneventful with no recurrence observed at 6 months of follow-up.
Discussion
ICPN is a comparatively new entity, first described in the 2010 World Health Organization classification (1). Adsay et al (2) defined ICPN as an exophytic intramucosal gallbladder mass (>1.0 cm) composed of dysplastic cells forming a lesion distinct from the adjacent mucosa. However, this definition is suspected of being excessively lax, and papillary invasive carcinomas or intraductal tubular neoplasms (e.g., pyloric gland adenoma) may also meet the criteria.It has been reported that ICPNs are more common in women older than 60 years and that they are present in <0.5% of gallbladders removed for cholelithiasis or chronic cholecystitis (2,3). These rare tumors present with an intramucosal papillary or polypoid mass, often associated with overproduction of mucin. ICPN is suspected to share characteristics with IPMN and IPNB; however, they differ in some aspects. Low-grade lesions and GNAS mutations were markedly less common in IPNBs and ICPNs than in IPMNs of the pancreas (4–6).Although 50% of patients with ICPN have invasive malignant components, the prognosis of ICPN is reportedly favorable. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of patients with noninvasive ICPN were 90, 90 and 78%, respectively. Even patients with associated invasive carcinoma have a significantly better clinical outcome than those with ordinary invasive gallbladder cancer (2). The difference in prognosis can be at least partly explained by the exophytic growth of ICPN, which increases the chances of diagnosis at an early stage and curative resection.In the present case, multimodality imaging studies suggested superficial spread to the CBD, requiring SSPPD. However, no tumor was found in the CBD, suggesting that the papillary mass observed inside the bile duct was a prolapsed gallbladder neoplasm. This discrepancy highlights the challenge in determining the degree of lateral extension of ICPNs. Distinguishing tumor protrusion without surface invasion from ordinary tumor extension is difficult. Repeated CT and/or MRI may play an important role in telling them apart in the case of a tumor moving easily between the gallbladder and the CBD. Intraoperative ultrasonography may also be useful for determining the degree of lateral tumor extension. Another discrepancy between the imaging interpretations and pathological diagnosis was the presence of stromal invasion. Small foci of stromal invasion are difficult to identify on imaging, as in the case of IPNB and IPMN of the pancreas. Considering this limitation of the imaging studies, gallbladder bed resection was performed.Almost 50% of patients with ICPN present with right upper outer quadrant pain, whereas the remaining 50% are found to have a tumor incidentally without any associated symptoms (2). The fever in our patient was likely due to cholangitis, suggesting that prolapsed ICPN can cause cholangitis even without true bile duct involvement. In addition to the tumor, the large amount of thick mucus might have also caused the cholangitis. In contrast, obstructive jaundice is unusual in the context of ICPN with only 2 reported cases presenting with biliary obstruction to our knowledge (7,8). In both cases, the tumors were present in the CBD mucosa as well. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to suggest that ICPN may protrude into the CBD without superficial spread.In conclusion, when ICPNs increase in size, they may protrude into the CBD due to the increased intracholecystic pressure, which increases the risk of overestimation of tumor extension and may result in unnecessary additional bile duct resection.
Authors: Volkan Adsay; Kee-Taek Jang; Juan Carlos Roa; Nevra Dursun; Nobuyuki Ohike; Pelin Bagci; Olca Basturk; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Jeanette D Cheng; Juan M Sarmiento; Oscar Tapia Escalona; Michael Goodman; So Yeon Kong; Paul Terry Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Hanno Matthaei; Jian Wu; Marco Dal Molin; Marija Debeljak; Philipp Lingohr; Nora Katabi; David S Klimstra; N Volkan Adsay; James R Eshleman; Richard D Schulick; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Ralph H Hruban; Anirban Maitra Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 3.647