Peng Liu1, Bin Yan2, Yanhui Zhang3, Jingwei Yan1, Chong Ma1, Guodong Wang1, Tao Jian1, Ziqiang Sun1. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272029, P.R. China. 2. Intensive Care Unit of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China. 3. Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272029, P.R. China.
Cystic adventitial disease (CAD), also called adventitial cystic disease, is a rare vascular disorder that involves the arteries and rarely affects the veins, and most commonly occurs in the popliteal artery of male patients (1,2). Venous CAD (VCAD) is a rare disease with an incidence of only 0.1% among all types of vascular disease (3). A study by Levien and Benn (4) reported that of the 323 cases of CAD encountered in 1998, only 17 cases (5.3%) had venous system involvement. VCAD frequently occurs in the venous vessel wall of the proximal joint, and cysts form between the inner and adventitial membranes (5). The progressive enlargement of a cyst, which in turn forces the lumen, leads to the formation of a lesion in the distal vein and causes a series of clinical symptoms. Due to the low incidence and absence of specific symptoms, the diagnostic rate of VCAD is low (6). The present study reported on two cases of VCAD in femoral veins presenting as an enlarging lower limb swelling and pain, and discussed the relevant literature.
Case report
Case 1
A 63-year-old male patient presented with pain and swelling of left the lower limb for one month and was admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University (Jining, China) in July 2017. No obvious causes of the swelling in the left lower limb were apparent and the patient had experienced persistent calfpain for one month. The patient was diagnosed with ‘deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the left lower limb’ at a local hospital; however, after treatment with warfarin, the symptoms did not significantly improve. Hematological examination indicated that the concentration of plasma D-dimer was normal at 0.1 mg/l (normal concentration <0.2 mg/l), and blood routine and coagulation parameters were normal. Color ultrasonography revealed that the left femoral vein (above the great saphenous vein junction) had a thin lumen and blood flow stagnation. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), slight thickening and abnormal signals of the left femoral vein were apparent (Fig. 1A). An enhanced computed tomography (CT) venography scan indicated low-density shadows of the left femoral vein (Fig. 1B).
Figure 1.
Medical imaging examination of Case 1 after admission. (A) Magnetic resonance imaging indicated that the left femoral vein had slightly thickened and abnormal signals were present. (B) Enhanced computed tomographic venography scan revealed low-density shadows of the left femoral vein. The location of the lesion is indicated by a white arrow.
Subsequently, the patient was given symptomatic treatment, including reduction of the swelling by improving microcirculation using infrared therapy, and was subjected to open surgical treatment after exclusion of contraindications. During the operation, two cysts in the femoral vein, which were located ~1 cm above the confluence of the saphenous and femoral veins, were identified. The approximate size of the small and the larger cyst was 2.5 cm × 1.5 cm and 1.5 cm × 1.0 cm, respectively (Fig. 2A). The small cyst was slit and removed, and the intact endothelium was visible after complete resection of the large cyst (Fig. 2B). Subsequently, a 30 cm × 10 mm artificial blood vessel was used to match the end of the femoral vein (Fig. 2C). After various treatments, including chemotherapy using ceftriaxone (1 g/d; constant intravenous drip), reducing of the swelling by infrared therapy and fluid replacement (7), the swelling of the left lower limb was significantly reduced and the pain disappeared. The circumference of left lower limb at 10 cm on the tibia, 10 cm below the tibia and 2 cm on the ankle joint was 48, 35 and 20 cm at the preoperative stage, respectively (Fig. 3A). The circumference of the left lower limb on these locations was 43, 33 and 20 cm at 7 days postoperatively, respectively, resembling a reduction by 5, 2 and 0 cm, respectively, compared with the preoperative measures (Fig. 3B). A postoperative histological examination confirmed that the mass was a venous cyst (Fig. 4A). At 7 days after the surgery, the enhanced CT venography scan revealed patency of the left femoral vein (Fig. 4B). At the 2-month follow-up, the circumferences of the patient's left lower limb had returned to normal compared with 7 days postoperatively.
Figure 2.
Locations, sizes and surgical procedures for venous cystic adventitial disease in Case 1. (A) The two cysts were located ~1 cm above the confluence of the saphenous and femoral veins, and the approximate size of the small and larger cyst was 2.5 cm × 1.5 cm and 1.5 cm × 1.0 cm, respectively. (B) The small cyst was slit and removed, and the intact endothelium was observed after complete resection of the large cyst. (C) A 30 cm × 10 mm artificial blood vessel was used to match the end of the femoral vein. White arrow: The small cyst; black arrow: The larger cyst; blue arrow: Endothelium; green arrow: Artificial blood vessel.
Figure 3.
Swelling of the left lower limb was significantly relieved following surgery in Case 1. (A) The circumferences of the left lower limb at 10 cm on the tibia, 10 cm below the tibia and 2 cm on the ankle joint were 48, 35 and 20 cm at the preoperative stage, respectively. (B) The circumferences of the left lower limb on these locations were 43, 33 and 20 cm at 7 days postoperatively, respectively.
Figure 4.
Pathology and enhanced CT examination of Case 1 after surgery. (A) Postoperative histological examination indicated a cystic structure with layers of collagen separated by scanty elastic fibers, and the excised tissues were infiltrated by inflammatory cells (hematoxylin and eosin staining; magnification, ×100). (B) The enhanced CT venography scan indicated patency of the left femoral vein. White arrow: Normal flow of left femoral vein. CT, computed tomography.
Case 2
A 57-year-old male was admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University (Jining, China) due to ‘right lower limb pain and swelling for half a month’. Color ultrasonography revealed a cystic echo below the bifurcation of the femoral artery. The size of the cyst was 1.7 cm × 1.4 cm × 1.6 cm with a clear boundary. Hematological examination indicated that the concentration of plasma D-dimer was significantly increased at 1.35 mg/l (normal concentration <0.2 mg/l), and blood routine and coagulation parameters were normal. MRI revealed a cystic abnormality signal in the right groin, indicating the expansion and effusion of the iliopsoas sac (Fig. 5). After preoperative examination, open surgical treatment was performed. During the operation, a cyst (~2 cm in diameter) was located behind the right femoral artery, causing the right femoral vein to move inward and downward. The cyst was closely attached to the wall of the right femoral vein and was difficult to separate. Forcible separation may cause massive bleeding of the femoral vein. Therefore, part of the cyst wall was slit, and a yellow jelly-like substance was removed. Postoperative pathology confirmed that the mass was a venous cyst. The patient's pain and swelling disappeared after postoperative treatment with infrared therapy and fluid replacement, and no obvious abnormalities remained at the 2-month follow-up.
Figure 5.
Magnetic resonance image of Case 2 indicated a cystic abnormality signal (white arrow) in the right groin, indicating expansion of effusion of the iliopsoas sac.
Discussion
In 1947, Atkins and Key (8) first reported on a cystic disease that occurred in the external iliac artery, and Mentha (9) reported on a cystic disease in the venous system (small saphenous vein) in 1963, whereas neither article described the causes of VCAD. To date, the etiology of VCAD has remained elusive. The following hypotheses regarding the occurrence of VCAD have been made: i) The ‘Repeat Traumatic Theory’ (4,10), suggests that due to joint movement, the blood vessels in the proximal joint are repeatedly stretched, resulting in damage to the vessel wall. The accumulation of such tiny wounds causes chronic degeneration of the wall and the gradual formation of a cyst; ii) During embryonic development, certain poorly differentiated mesenchymal cells with mucin secretion function in adjacent joints are incorrectly implanted into the adventitia, and these cells gradually begin to secrete mucin and eventually form a cyst (11); iii) Ectopic implantation of ganglion cyst (12) and iv) Systemic connective tissue lesions (2).The clinical manifestations of VCAD are not specific. Most patients present with unilateral limb swelling and the onset is usually slow (up to several months or even one year) (2). When VCAD occurs in a superficial blood vessel, the cyst may be localized by palpitation during the examination (6). In previously reported cases, cysts were mostly located in the groin (3,13). In the present study, the two cases presented with unilateral limb swelling and slow disease onset, which was consistent with the clinical manifestations of VCAD. The diagnosis for VCAD mainly relies on data of the medical imaging examination. Angiography may determine the degree of lumen stenosis, but it is difficult to observe the structure of the cyst. Compared with angiography for the diagnosis of VCAD, ultrasound, CT and MRI are more advantageous, which may allow for observation of the cyst structure and facilitate the diagnosis (14). Compared with MRI and ultrasound, enhanced CT venography scan may provide oblique images taken from different angles, comprehensively evaluate the shape and degree of the cyst and provide a basis for its treatment (15,16). In the present study, the preoperative data from the enhanced CT had an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of VCAD.At present, the therapeutic methods for VCAD mostly comprise surgical treatment. The major surgical methods are as follows: Cyst incision, cyst wall resection, cyst puncture and drainage, and cyst and vascular resection + artificial/autologous vascular transplantation (17,18). There are significant differences in recurrence rates depending on the type of surgery. Bascone et al (17) analyzed the medical records of 45 patients diagnosed with VCAD between January 1947 and March 2016, and determined that the recurrence rate in patients with cyst incision and cyst wall resection was 20.0%, while the recurrence rate in patients with cyst and vascular resection + artificial/autologous vascular transplantation was 14.3%, and the recurrence rate in patients with cyst puncture and drainage was as high as 83.3%. The overall recurrence rate of VCAD is ~26.7%. For patients with VCAD, the root cause of vascular compression cannot be relieved by interventional surgery. If the vascular stent is required to cross the joint, the stent may be displaced or morphologically changed due to joint activity, and the blood vessel will again appear narrow (19). Therefore, VCAD is less commonly treated by vascular interventional therapy. Furthermore, certain reports suggest that cyst drainage and sclerotherapy may also have high clinical efficacy (19,20).VCAD is a rare vascular disease, and the underlying causes remain elusive. Medical imaging examination is of high significance in the diagnosis of VCAD. Preoperative CT three-dimensional reconstruction may provide guidance for surgical treatment. In clinical practice, for patients with suspected DVT, VCAD should be considered when patients have no evidence of vein thrombosis, and further imaging examination is required to confirm the diagnosis. At present, only few domestic studies on VCAD are available. As the knowledge of this disease deepens, it is likely that a larger quantity of VCAD cases are reported in the future, the etiology and pathogenesis of VCAD will gradually be elucidated and its treatment will become standardized.
Authors: Francis P Dix; Michael McDonald; Jude Obomighie; Nicholas Chalmers; David Thompson; Emyr W Benbow; J Vincent Smyth Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Young-Kyun Kim; Ho Jong Chun; Jeong Kye Hwang; Ji Il Kim; Sang Dong Kim; Sun-Cheol Park; In Sung Moon Journal: Asian J Surg Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 2.767
Authors: Robert J Spinner; Nicholas M Desy; Gautum Agarwal; Wojciech Pawlina; Manju Kalra; Kimberly K Amrami Journal: Clin Anat Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 2.414
Authors: Jason M Johnson; Armin Kiankhooy; Daniel J Bertges; Christopher S Morris Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2009-05-16 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Corey Bascone; Mazen Iqbal; Patrick Narh-Martey; Mauricio Szuchmacher; Michael Cicchillo; Kambhampaty V Krishnasastry Journal: Int J Vasc Med Date: 2016-11-03