| Literature DB >> 31601951 |
Ezatollah Nima Amini1, Mehdi Tajvidi2, Douglas W Bousfield3, Douglas J Gardner1, Stephen M Shaler1.
Abstract
The novel use of aqueous suspensions of cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) as an adhesive/binder in lignocellulosic-based composite manufacture requires the removal of a considerable amount of water from the furnish during processing, necessitating thorough understanding of the dewatering behavior referred to as "contact dewatering". The dewatering behavior of a wood-CNF particulate system (wet furnish) was studied through pressure filtration tests, centrifugation, and characterization of hard-to-remove (HR) water, i.e. moisture content in the wet furnish at the transition between constant rate part and the falling rate part of evaporative change in mass from an isothermal thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The effect of wood particle size thereby particle specific surface area on the dewatering performance of wet furnish was investigated. Permeability coefficients of wet furnish during pressure filtration experiments were also determined based on Darcy's law for volumetric flow through a porous medium. Results revealed that specific particle surface area has a significant effect on the dewatering of wet furnish where dewatering rate significantly increased at higher specific particle surface area levels. While the permeability of the systems decreased over time in almost all cases, the most significant portion of dewatering occurred at very early stages of dewatering (less than 200 seconds) leading to a considerable increase in instantaneous dewatering when CNF particles come in contact with wood particles.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31601951 PMCID: PMC6787033 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51177-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) WP size distribution and average specific surface area values in a given sample. WPs (b) larger than 2 mm (Group I) (c) larger than 1.4 mm and smaller than 2 mm (Group II) (d) larger than 1 mm and smaller than 1.4 mm (Group III) (e) larger than 0.5 mm and smaller than 1 mm (Group IV) (f) larger than 0.25 mm and smaller than 0.5 mm (Group V) (g) dust (Group VI).
Figure 2Schematic of the filtration model: (a) shortly after the beginning (b) in the middle (c) at the end of filtration experiment. (d) filter press and test setup.
Figure 3Representation of drying response during an isothermal heating protocol used to define hard-to-remove water.
Figure 4Average (a) water removal (b) dewatering rate over filtration time for various material formulations.
Average values of permeability over three regions and instantaneous dewatering.
| Formulation | Permeability (m2) | Instantaneous dewatering (g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 | k2 | k3 | ||
| CNF 3 wt.% | 10−16 | 7 × 10−17 | 1.7 × 10−17 | 3.3 |
| CNF 10 wt.% | 1.1 × 10−17 | 1.1 × 10−17 | 10−17 | 0.66 |
| WP (Group I)-CNF | 6.5 × 10−16 | 8.5 × 10−17 | 4.5 × 10−17 | 6.61 |
| WP (Group II)-CNF | 9.3 × 10−16 | 8.3 × 10−17 | 3.3 × 10−17 | 9.56 |
| WP (Group III)-CNF | 6.9 × 10−16 | 4 × 10−16 | 2.7 × 10−16 | 10.59 |
| WP (Group V)-CNF | 7.7 × 10−16 | 5.7 × 10−17 | 8 × 10−18 | 8.52 |
| WP (Group VI)-CNF | 8.3×10−16 | 2 × 10−17 | 2 × 10−18 | 9.55 |
Figure 5Average water retention values. Common letters over bars indicate no significant difference at 95% confidence level.
Figure 6HR water values of (a) neat samples (b) mixed samples. Common letters over bars indicate no significant difference at 95% confidence level.