| Literature DB >> 31601139 |
Giovanni Nicoletti1,2,3, Marco Saler1, Marco Mario Tresoldi1,2, Angela Faga3, Mattia Benedet4, Mario Cristofolini5.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Regeneration; bacterial lysate; cell culture; fibroblast; microbiota; spring water
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31601139 PMCID: PMC6862889 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519880371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Figure 1.Human skin fibroblasts ready for culture under different experimental conditions (bar: 10 µm).
Absorbance values at different times in the different experimental conditions.
| Time | Culture conditions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMEM | DMEM + lysate 1 | DMEM + lysate 2 | DMEM + lysate 3 | DMEM + lysate 4 | |
| 24 hours | 0.022 (0.009) | 0.019 (0.013) | 0.273 (0.284) | 0.420 (0.223) | 0.491 (0.123) |
| 48 hours | 0.766 (0.029) | 0.686 (0.161) | 0.750 (0.160) | 0.737 (0.161) | 0.840 (0.067) |
| 72 hours | 0.915 (0.079) | 0.842 (0.059) | 0.776 (0.057) | 0.771 (0.044) | 1.006 (0.055) |
Footnote: Values are mean (standard deviation).
DMEM: Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium. Lysate 1: Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Xanthomonadales, Rhondobacteraceae, Rudaea sp. Lysate 2: Proteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Rhizobiales, Phyllobacteriaceae, Mesorhizobium sp. Lysate 3: Actinobacteria, Microbacteriaceae. Lysate 4: Firmicutes, Bacillaceae.
Figure 2.Mean absorbance values ± standard deviation at different times in the different experimental conditions.