Literature DB >> 31600598

A two-part phase 1 study to establish and compare the safety and local tolerability of two nasal formulations of XF-73 for decolonisation of Staphylococcus aureus: A previously investigated 0.5mg/g viscosified gel formulation versus a modified formulation.

George A Yendewa1, J McLeod Griffiss2, Michael R Jacobs3, Scott A Fulton4, Mary Ann O'Riordan5, Wesley A Gray6, Howard M Proskin7, Peter Winkle8, Robert A Salata4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Successful decolonisation of nasal Staphylococcus aureus (SA) carriage by mupirocin is limited by increasing drug resistance. This randomised, open-label, phase 1 study compared the safety and local tolerability of two nasal formulations of XF-73, a novel porphyrinic antibacterial with rapid intrinsic activity against SA.
METHODS: The study was performed in 60 healthy adults. In Part 1, eight non-SA carriers were randomised to groups of four subjects each and were treated with XF-73 concentrations of 0.5mg/g 2% gel or 2.0mg/g 2% gel. In Part 2, 52 persistent SA carriers were randomised to groups of 13 subjects each and were treated with XF-73 concentrations of 0.5mg/g 2% gel, 2.0mg/g 2% gel, 0.5mg/g 4% gel or 4% viscosified placebo gel. Plasma pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed. Antistaphylococcal activity was assessed as the presence/absence of SA and by quantification of colonisation using a semiquantitative scale (SA score).
RESULTS: 56 subjects (8/8 from Part 1 and 48/52 from Part 2) completed the study, with 47/60 comprising the pharmacokinetic population and 48/60 the pharmacodynamic population. There was no measurable systemic absorption of XF-73. XF-73 treatment was associated with rapid reduction in SA score in all subjects. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were rhinorrhoea and nasal dryness (15.5% each in Parts 1 and 2). TEAEs were mild and resolved spontaneously.
CONCLUSION: XF-73 was well tolerated with minimal side effects at doses of 0.5mg/g 2% gel and 2.0mg/g 2% gel. These findings support further development of XF-73.
Copyright © 2019 International Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial resistance; Decolonisation; Staphylococcus aureus; XF-73

Year:  2019        PMID: 31600598      PMCID: PMC7136135          DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist        ISSN: 2213-7165            Impact factor:   4.035


  19 in total

1.  The relation between the nasal-staphylococcal-carrier state and the incidence of postoperative complications.

Authors:  H J WEINSTEIN
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1959-06-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparison of two PCR-based methods and conventional culture for the detection of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in pre-operative patients.

Authors:  G I Andriesse; M van Rijen; D Bogaers; A M C Bergmans; J A J W Kluytmans
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Decolonization therapy in infection control.

Authors:  Courtney Hebert; Ari Robicsek
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.915

Review 4.  Mupirocin resistance: clinical implications and potential alternatives for the eradication of MRSA.

Authors:  T Poovelikunnel; G Gethin; H Humphreys
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 5.  An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  T G Emori; R P Gaynes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  New approaches to reduce Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial infection rates: treating S. aureus nasal carriage.

Authors:  T M Perl; J E Golub
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Development of mupirocin resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after widespread use of nasal mupirocin ointment.

Authors:  M A Miller; A Dascal; J Portnoy; J Mendelson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Preventing surgical-site infections in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lonneke G M Bode; Jan A J W Kluytmans; Heiman F L Wertheim; Diana Bogaers; Christina M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls; Robert Roosendaal; Annet Troelstra; Adrienne T A Box; Andreas Voss; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Alex van Belkum; Henri A Verbrugh; Margreet C Vos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Use of perioperative mupirocin to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) orthopaedic surgical site infections.

Authors:  M H Wilcox; J Hall; H Pike; P A Templeton; W N Fawley; P Parnell; P Verity
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Mupirocin resistance in patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Jones; Theodore J Rogers; Peter Brookmeyer; William Michael Dunne; Gregory A Storch; Craig M Coopersmith; Victoria J Fraser; David K Warren
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial Mechanisms and Clinical Application Prospects of Antimicrobial Peptides.

Authors:  Xin Li; Siyao Zuo; Bin Wang; Kaiyu Zhang; Yang Wang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 2.  Bacterial Biofilm Eradication Agents: A Current Review.

Authors:  Anthony D Verderosa; Makrina Totsika; Kathryn E Fairfull-Smith
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.221

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.