Literature DB >> 31600011

The use of personal and indoor air pollution monitors in reproductive epidemiology studies.

Audrey J Gaskins1, Jaime E Hart2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Personal and indoor air pollution monitors represent two ways to assess acute air pollution exposures; however, few reproductive epidemiology studies have incorporated these tools.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the unique challenges and opportunities that arise when measuring acute exposure to air pollution in two ongoing reproductive epidemiology studies.
METHODS: The Air Pollution, In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), and Reproductive Outcomes (AIR) Study recruits women undergoing IVF to wear a personal particulate matter (PM) air pollution monitor (AirBeam2©) for the 72-hour period following the start of controlled ovarian stimulation. The Reproductive Effects of Chemicals and Air Pollutants (RECAP) Study recruits men across the United States to place an air pollution monitor (emmET) in their home for 3 months, use a smartphone application, and provide a semen sample. We highlight the key issues identified in implementing exposure assessment for both studies.
RESULTS: The main advantages of using the AirBeam2© personal monitor are as follows: (a) the low cost, (b) the ability to collect multiple size fractions of PM data every second, (c) the portability, (d) its capability to track GPS location, and (e) the ability for the participant to observe their real-time exposure information. The limited battery life, incompatibility with iOS-based smartphones, and frequent connection issues that arise between the AirBeam2© and smartphone are the main disadvantages. The main advantages of the emmET are the ability to measure multiple air pollutants at a high level of accuracy, collect data for a long period of time without burdening the participant, and ship monitors to participants around the country without the need for in-person set-up by trained technicians; however, the monitor only measures the indoor home environment.
CONCLUSIONS: Novel methods can be utilised to characterise short-term air pollution exposure in reproductive epidemiology studies and represent an exciting area for future research.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air pollution; indoor monitors; personal monitors; reproductive epidemiology; study design

Year:  2019        PMID: 31600011      PMCID: PMC7145751          DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  29 in total

1.  Performance of low-cost monitors to assess household air pollution.

Authors:  A Curto; D Donaire-Gonzalez; J Barrera-Gómez; J D Marshall; M J Nieuwenhuijsen; G A Wellenius; C Tonne
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 2.  Amperometric Gas Sensors as a Low Cost Emerging Technology Platform for Air Quality Monitoring Applications: A Review.

Authors:  Ronan Baron; John Saffell
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 7.711

3.  Response of consumer and research grade indoor air quality monitors to residential sources of fine particles.

Authors:  B C Singer; W W Delp
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 4.  Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone?

Authors:  Lidia Morawska; Phong K Thai; Xiaoting Liu; Akwasi Asumadu-Sakyi; Godwin Ayoko; Alena Bartonova; Andrea Bedini; Fahe Chai; Bryce Christensen; Matthew Dunbabin; Jian Gao; Gayle S W Hagler; Rohan Jayaratne; Prashant Kumar; Alexis K H Lau; Peter K K Louie; Mandana Mazaheri; Zhi Ning; Nunzio Motta; Ben Mullins; Md Mahmudur Rahman; Zoran Ristovski; Mahnaz Shafiei; Dian Tjondronegoro; Dane Westerdahl; Ron Williams
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  An automated smartphone-based diagnostic assay for point-of-care semen analysis.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy; Magesh Sadasivam; Anupriya Singh; Collin Preston; Prudhvi Thirumalaraju; Maanasa Venkataraman; Charles L Bormann; Mohamed Shehata Draz; John C Petrozza; Hadi Shafiee
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  The Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study: A Prospective Preconception Cohort.

Authors:  Carmen Messerlian; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Jorge E Chavarro; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Ramace Dadd; Joseph M Braun; Audrey J Gaskins; John D Meeker; Tamarra James-Todd; Yu-Han Chiu; Feiby L Nassan; Irene Souter; John Petrozza; Myra Keller; Thomas L Toth; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-02-20

7.  Analysing the performance of low-cost air quality sensors, their drivers, relative benefits and calibration in cities-a case study in Sheffield.

Authors:  Said Munir; Martin Mayfield; Daniel Coca; Stephen A Jubb; Ogo Osammor
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Estimating error in using residential outdoor PM2.5 concentrations as proxies for personal exposures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christy L Avery; Katherine T Mills; Ronald Williams; Kathleen A McGraw; Charles Poole; Richard L Smith; Eric A Whitsel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Development of quantitative screen for 1550 chemicals with GC-MS.

Authors:  Alan J Bergmann; Gary L Points; Richard P Scott; Glenn Wilson; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.142

10.  Silicone wristbands compared with traditional polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure assessment methods.

Authors:  Holly M Dixon; Richard P Scott; Darrell Holmes; Lehyla Calero; Laurel D Kincl; Katrina M Waters; David E Camann; Antonia M Calafat; Julie B Herbstman; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.142

View more
  2 in total

1.  Feasibility and acceptability of monitoring personal air pollution exposure with sensors for asthma self-management.

Authors:  Sherrie Xie; Jessica R Meeker; Luzmercy Perez; Whitney Eriksen; Anna Localio; Hami Park; Alicia Jen; Madison Goldstein; Akua F Temeng; Sarai M Morales; Colin Christie; Rebecca E Greenblatt; Frances K Barg; Andrea J Apter; Blanca E Himes
Journal:  Asthma Res Pract       Date:  2021-09-05

2.  GeoAir-A Novel Portable, GPS-Enabled, Low-Cost Air-Pollution Sensor: Design Strategies to Facilitate Citizen Science Research and Geospatial Assessments of Personal Exposure.

Authors:  Yoo Min Park; Sinan Sousan; Dillon Streuber; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.