Giovanna Gallo1, Allegra Battistoni1, Roberta Coluccia2, Giuliano Tocci1,2, Massimo Volpe3,4. 1. Hypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy. 2. IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy. 3. Hypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy. massimo.volpe@uniroma1.it. 4. IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy. massimo.volpe@uniroma1.it.
Abstract
RECENT FINDINGS: Essential hypertension is the main determinant of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. During the last decades, several antihypertensive drug therapies have been introduced and tested in clinical trials, both as monotherapies and combination therapies. The current recommended therapeutic approaches effectively reduce the lifetime risk of experiencing major cardiovascular outcomes and disabling comorbidities, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and congestive heart failure. On the basis of multiple proofs, antihypertensive therapy is currently recommended for improving event-free survival rate and quality of life in different clinical settings and conditions. At the same time, other cardiovascular drugs, including novel lipid-lowering, anti-platelet, and anti-coagulation agents, have been made available and also contribute to reduce the incidence of atherothrombotic diseases. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Beyond the beneficial aspects obtained by pharmacological treatment of major cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, including hypertension, several aspects remain to be defined. One major limitation linked to randomized, controlled clinical trials is represented by the relatively short duration of the studies, which usually ranges between 1 and 5 years. Whether antihypertensive therapy should be maintained for a longer time (after 5 years) and whether this is supported by sufficient evidence of a persisting benefit is supported by limited post-trial observations but mostly by findings derived from large clinical registries. The so-called legacy effect in the treatment of hypertension, in which patients who are treated with a given antihypertensive therapy may derive a long-term benefit after discontinuation of therapy, has been recently proposed on the basis of accumulating evidence and, in particular, on the availability of long-term post-trial observations in randomized controlled clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the evidence witnessing a legacy effect of antihypertensive therapy and whether this supports sufficiently lifetime drug treatment of hypertension.
RECENT FINDINGS: Essential hypertension is the main determinant of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. During the last decades, several antihypertensive drug therapies have been introduced and tested in clinical trials, both as monotherapies and combination therapies. The current recommended therapeutic approaches effectively reduce the lifetime risk of experiencing major cardiovascular outcomes and disabling comorbidities, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and congestive heart failure. On the basis of multiple proofs, antihypertensive therapy is currently recommended for improving event-free survival rate and quality of life in different clinical settings and conditions. At the same time, other cardiovascular drugs, including novel lipid-lowering, anti-platelet, and anti-coagulation agents, have been made available and also contribute to reduce the incidence of atherothrombotic diseases. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Beyond the beneficial aspects obtained by pharmacological treatment of major cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, including hypertension, several aspects remain to be defined. One major limitation linked to randomized, controlled clinical trials is represented by the relatively short duration of the studies, which usually ranges between 1 and 5 years. Whether antihypertensive therapy should be maintained for a longer time (after 5 years) and whether this is supported by sufficient evidence of a persisting benefit is supported by limited post-trial observations but mostly by findings derived from large clinical registries. The so-called legacy effect in the treatment of hypertension, in which patients who are treated with a given antihypertensive therapy may derive a long-term benefit after discontinuation of therapy, has been recently proposed on the basis of accumulating evidence and, in particular, on the availability of long-term post-trial observations in randomized controlled clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the evidence witnessing a legacy effect of antihypertensive therapy and whether this supports sufficiently lifetime drug treatment of hypertension.
Authors: Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright Journal: J Am Soc Hypertens Date: 2018-08
Authors: Dena Ettehad; Connor A Emdin; Amit Kiran; Simon G Anderson; Thomas Callender; Jonathan Emberson; John Chalmers; Anthony Rodgers; Kazem Rahimi Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Peter S Sever; Neil R Poulter; Björn Dahlöf; Hans Wedel; Rory Collins; Gareth Beevers; Mark Caulfield; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Arni Kristinsson; Gordon T McInnes; Jesper Mehlsen; Markku Nieminen; Eoin O'Brien; Jan Ostergren Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: L Hansson; A Zanchetti; S G Carruthers; B Dahlöf; D Elmfeldt; S Julius; J Ménard; K H Rahn; H Wedel; S Westerling Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-06-13 Impact factor: 79.321