| Literature DB >> 31598304 |
Ying Luo1, Min Liu1,2, Ying Chen1,2, Tingting Wang1, Wei Zhang3.
Abstract
In this study, nanocellulose (CNFs) was prepared by a mechanical shearing method, a simple and pollution-free process. Iron hydroxide was loaded on nanocellulose, a natural macromolecule derived from bamboo, to produce the second-generation iron-loaded nanocellulose for the removal of low-concentration phosphorus from wastewater. We found that the best modified ferric salt was ferric chloride. When the mass ratio of Fe(OH)3 and CNFs was 1.5 : 1, freeze-drying with liquid nitrogen yielded the best adsorption performance. The adsorption process of Fe(OH)3@CNFs followed the pseudo-second-order kinetics and belonged to chemical adsorption. Regeneration experiments showed that after 10 cycles of adsorption-regenerations of the adsorbent, the phosphorus adsorption efficiency was still stable at 80% of the initial material. The prepared adsorbent was characterized by the BET surface area measurement, scanning electron microscopy and FT-IR. The surface morphology, pore size and elements of materials before and after iron loading were analysed. Compared with other adsorbents, the phosphorus removal performances of the second-generation iron-loaded nanocellulose were superior. Compared with the first-generation material, the second-generation adsorbent is simpler and more environmentally friendly.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; bamboo nanocellulose; ferric hydroxide; regeneration
Year: 2019 PMID: 31598304 PMCID: PMC6774935 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.Schematic diagram of the optimized materials experimental programme.
Figure 2.Scanning electron microscope (a) CNFs × 10 000 and (b) Fe(OH)3@CNFs × 10 000.
Analysis of CNFs elements before and after modification.
| elements | CNFs (%) | Fe(OH)3@CNFs (%) |
|---|---|---|
| C | 55.1 | 53.81 |
| O | 44.9 | 12.54 |
| M | 0 | 33.65 |
Analysis of specific surface area and pore size of CNFs before and after modification.
| analyte | Langmuir specific surface area (m2 g−1) | total pore volume (cm3 g−1) | average pore diameter (nm) | BJH average pore diameter (nm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNFs | 14.481 | 19.412 | 0.353 | 97.379 | 200.540 |
| Fe(OH)3@CNFs | 138.907 | 189.214 | 0.122 | 3.518 | 2.052 |
Figure 3.Infrared spectra of CNFs before and after modification.
Figure 4.Phosphorus removal effect of CNFs and Fe(OH)3@CNFs under different pH conditions.
Figure 5.Phosphorus removal effect of different concentrations of Fe(OH)3@CNFs after freezing in refrigerator and liquid nitrogen.
Figure 6.Phosphorus removal effect of the second-generation iron-loaded nanocellulose. Modified by different Fe(OH)3 and CNFs mass ratio. The inset shows iron dissolution.
Figure 7.Sorption kinetics of phosphate on Fe(OH)3@CNFs.
Parameters for the adsorption kinetics model of Fe(OH)3@CNFs.
| pseudo-first-order model | pseudo-second-order model | Morris–Weber intraparticle diffusion model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| adsorbent | ||||||||
| mg g−1 | min−1 | mg g−1 | g (mg min)−1 | g (mg min1/2)−1 | ||||
| Fe(OH)3@ CNFs | 8.95 | 0.011 | 0.809 | 10.14 | 0.001 | 0.998 | 0.158 | 0.816 |
Figure 8.Effect of NaOH concentration on desorption.
Figure 9.Effect of regeneration times on adsorption efficiency of the second-generation iron-modified nanocellulose.