| Literature DB >> 31598163 |
Keitaro Eizuka1, Dai Nakashima1, Noritoshi Oka1, Sho Wagai1, Toshikazu Takahara2, Tomoaki Saito2, Kazuyuki Koike2, Atsushi Kasamatsu2, Masashi Shiiba3, Hideki Tanzawa1,2, Katsuhiro Uzawa1,2.
Abstract
Synaptotagmin12 (SYT12) has been well characterized as the regulator of transmitter release in the nervous system, however the relevance and molecular mechanisms of SYT12 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) are not understood. In the current study, we investigated the expression of SYT12 and its molecular biological functions in OSCC by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, immunoblot analysis, and immunohistochemistry. SYT12 were up-regulated significantly in OSCC-derived cell lines and primary OSCC tissue compared with the normal counterparts (P<0.05) and the SYT12 expression levels were correlated significantly with clinical indicators, such as the primary tumoral size, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage (P<0.05). SYT12 knockdown OSCC cells showed depressed cellular proliferation, migration, and invasion with cell cycle arrest at G1 phase. Surprisingly, we found increased calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase 2 (CAMK2) inhibitor 1 (CAMK2N1) and decreased CAMK2-phosphorylation in the knockdown cells. Furthermore, treatment with L-3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa), a drug approved for Parkinson's disease, led to down-regulation of SYT12 and similar phenotypes to SYT12 knockdown cells. Taken together, we concluded that SYT12 plays a significant role in OSCC progression via CAMK2N1 and CAMK2, and that L-dopa would be a new drug for OSCC treatment through the SYT12 expression. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: CAMK2; CAMK2N1; L-dopa; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; SYT12
Year: 2019 PMID: 31598163 PMCID: PMC6775516 DOI: 10.7150/jca.32582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Fig 1SYT12 expression in OSCC-derived cell lines and primary OSCCs. (A) Quantification of SYT12 mRNA expression in OSCC-derived cell lines by qRT-PCR analysis (N=3). (B) Representative immunoblot analysis of SYT12 protein expression. The densitometric SYT12 protein data are normalized to GAPDH protein levels. The values are expressed as a percentage of the HNOKs (N=3). (C) The SYT12 IHC scores of the normal oral tissues and OSCCs (N=112). (D) Representative IHC results for SYT12 protein in normal tissue, primary OSCCs, and metastatic regional lymph nodes. Original magnification, x200. Scale bars, 50 μm.
Correlation between SYT12 expression and clinical classification in OSCCs.
| Clinical classification | Results of immunostaining | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | SYT12 negative | SYT12 positive | ||
| Age at surgery (years) | ||||
| < 60 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 0.823 |
| ≧60 | 86 | 44 | 42 | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 66 | 32 | 34 | 0.706 |
| Female | 46 | 24 | 22 | |
| T-primary tumor | ||||
| T1+T2 | 64 | 38 | 26 | 0.035‡ |
| T3+T4 | 48 | 18 | 30 | |
| N-regional lymph node | ||||
| Negative | 74 | 43 | 31 | 0.028‡ |
| Positive | 38 | 13 | 25 | |
| TNM Stage | ||||
| I+II | 46 | 30 | 16 | 0.012‡ |
| III+IV | 66 | 26 | 40 | |
| Vascular invasion | ||||
| Negative | 88 | 48 | 40 | 0.106 |
| Positive | 24 | 8 | 16 | |
| Histopathologic type | ||||
| Well | 86 | 45 | 41 | 0.503 |
| Moderately+Poorly | 26 | 11 | 15 | |
Fisher's exact test, ‡P < 0.05.
Fig 2Establishment of SYT12 knockdown cells and decreased cell growth via cell cycle arrest at G1 phase. (A, B) Expression of SYT12 mRNA and protein in shMock and shSYT12 cells (HSC-3 and SAS-derived transfectants) (N=3). (C) The cellular growth of the shSYT12 cells are decreased significantly (P < 0.05) compared with the shMock cells after 7 days (168 h) (N=3). (D) A flow cytometric analysis shows that the percentage of the shSYT12 cells in the G1 phase is increased compared with the shMock cells (N=3). (E) Immunoblotting analysis shows up-regulation of p27Kip1 and down-regulation of cyclin E and CDK2 in the shSYT12 cells compared with the shMock cells (N=3).
Fig 3Involvement of the SYT12 signaling pathways that mediate the migratory and invasiveness phenotype of OSCCs. (A) Migration assay of shMock cells and shSYT12 cells (N=3). (B) Invasion assay of shMock cells and shSYT12 cells at 24h (N=3). (C) Immunoblot analysis shows CAMK2N1 expression is increased in the shSYT12 cells, CAMK2 expression is similar in the shMock cells and shSYT12, but phosphorylation of CAMK2 (p-CAMK2) is decreased in the shSYT12 cells compared with the shMock cells (N=3).
Fig 4L-dopa treatment. (A) An MTS assay shows a significant decrease in cellular viability above L-dopa concentrations of 200 µM in a concentration-dependent manner (N=3). (B, C) L-dopa concentrations above 50 µM inhibit SYT12 mRNA and protein expression levels in the L-dopa-treated cells compared with controls (N=3). (D) The cellular growth of the L-dopa-treated cells is significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that of the control cells after 7 days (168 h) (N=3). (E) A flow cytometric analysis shows the percentage of L-dopa-treated cells in the G1 phase is increased compared with the control cells (N=3). (F) Immunoblot analysis shows up-regulation of p27Kip1 and down-regulation of CDK2 and cyclin E in the L-dopa-treated cells compared with the control cells (N=3).