Gavin Yong-Quan Ng1, Sung-Wook Kang1, Joonki Kim1,2, Asfa Alli-Shaik3, Sang-Ha Baik1, Dong-Gyu Jo4, M Prakash Hande1, Christopher G Sobey5, Jayantha Gunaratne3,6, David Yang-Wei Fann1, Thiruma V Arumugam1,4,7. 1. Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 2. Natural Product Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Gangneung, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea. 3. Translational Biomedical Proteomics, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore. 4. School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia. 6. Department of Anatomy, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 7. Neurobiology Programme, Life Sciences Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
Scope: Intermittent fasting (IF) has been extensively reported to promote improved energy homeostasis and metabolic switching. While IF may be a plausible strategy to ameliorate the epidemiological burden of disease in many societies, our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms behind such effects is still lacking. The present study has sought to investigate the relationship between IF and changes in gene expression. We focused on the liver, which is highly sensitive to metabolic changes due to energy status. Mice were randomly assigned to ad libitum feeding or IF for 16 hours per day or for 24 hours on alternate days for 3 months, after which genome-wide transcriptome analysis of the liver was performed using RNA sequencing. Our findings revealed that IF caused robust transcriptomic changes in the liver that led to a complex array of metabolic changes. We also observed that the IF regimen produced distinct profiles of transcriptomic changes, highlighting the significance of temporally different periods of energy restriction. Our results suggest that IF can regulate metabolism via transcriptomic mechanisms and provide insight into how genetic interactions within the liver might lead to the numerous metabolic benefits of IF.
Scope: Intermittent fasting (IF) has been extensively reported to promote improved energy homeostasis and metabolic switching. While IF may be a plausible strategy to ameliorate the epidemiological burden of disease in many societies, our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms behind such effects is still lacking. The present study has sought to investigate the relationship between IF and changes in gene expression. We focused on the liver, which is highly sensitive to metabolic changes due to energy status. Mice were randomly assigned to ad libitum feeding or IF for 16 hours per day or for 24 hours on alternate days for 3 months, after which genome-wide transcriptome analysis of the liver was performed using RNA sequencing. Our findings revealed that IF caused robust transcriptomic changes in the liver that led to a complex array of metabolic changes. We also observed that the IF regimen produced distinct profiles of transcriptomic changes, highlighting the significance of temporally different periods of energy restriction. Our results suggest that IF can regulate metabolism via transcriptomic mechanisms and provide insight into how genetic interactions within the liver might lead to the numerous metabolic benefits of IF.
There is a great need to address the increased global burden of noncommunicable
diseases, such as obesity, type II diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular and
neurodegenerative diseases.[1] There is a consensus that excessive dietary energy intake increases the risk
of development of such diseases.[2] It has been observed in rodent studies that chronic ad libitum (AL) feeding
conditions also results in the development of a metabolic syndrome-like phenotype.[3] Moreover, energy restriction through continuously limiting caloric intake
(ie, caloric restriction [CR]) results in an increased life span in many animal
models and the amelioration of several age-associated diseases.[4-6] It has been reported that during CR, metabolic switching from glucose
utilization to preferential ketone metabolism alters both glucose and ketone
homeostasis, which in turn promotes metabolic health and reduces metabolic syndrome development.[7] Intermittent fasting (IF) is another variant of energy restriction that has
gained public and scientific interest. Compared to CR, IF involves restricting daily
food intake to within defined periods which has been found to be a more sustainable
long-term eating pattern.[8] Intermittent fasting has also been found to induce longevity in many animal
models and has extensive systemic effects that may trigger biological pathways
beneficial for metabolic health. For example, IF has been reported to influence the
circadian clock, intestinal microbiota niche, and to metabolically regulate insulin
sensitivity, lipid metabolism, and inflammatory responses which likely contribute to
the development of resistance to cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, and metabolic diseases.[9-11]Despite many reported health benefits from IF, studies have also shown that IF may
not be sufficiently robust to ameliorate many age-related degenerative pathways, and
this lack of translation in slowing down systemic aging has led to poor
understanding of IF-induced benefits still.[12] Besides that, the transcriptome-associated changes mediated by IF in the
metabolic regulation arm is relatively not well-understood. Therefore, we designed
an experimental study to investigate the transcriptomic changes resulting from 2
common IF regimens, time-restricted fasting for 16 hours (IF16) or for 24 hours on
alternate days (ie, every other day [EOD]), in mice for a period of 3 months. The
liver, which is highly sensitive to metabolic changes due to energy status, was
selected for this study. We identified that both IF16 and EOD regimens
differentially induce changes in gene expression profiles and signaling pathways to
produce distinct metabolic profiles. Our data provide novel insights to the varied
transcriptomic changes that can occur as a result of IF.
Material and Methods
Animals and IF Regimen
C57/BL6NTac male mice (InVivos Pte Ltd, Singapore) were raised to 3-month-old
with AL food using standard Teklad Global 18% protein rodent diet (Envigo,
Huntingdon, UK) and water. Mice were then randomly assigned and subjected to AL
feeding, or IF for 16 hours per day (IF16) or for 24 hours on alternate days
(ie, EOD) for 3 months. For the IF16 regimen, food was provided at 7 AM and then
removed at 3 PM for 16 hours daily. For the EOD regimen, food was provided at 7
AM and removed at 7 AM the next day for a further 24 hours. All mice had AL
access to water, with AL mice having free access to both food and water. During
the entire experiment, the mice were housed in animal rooms at 20°C to 22°C with
30% to 40% relative humidity under a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Blood glucose and
ketones were measured using a FreeStyle Optimum Meter and corresponding test
strips (Abbott Laboratories, UK) at baseline and monthly via the tail bleed
method. Both tests were performed at 7 am. Body weight was measured
weekly. Monthly food/energy consumption was recorded (weight of food consumed ×
kcal/g of food). Data from these additional tests are not provided in this
article. All animal procedures were approved by the National University of
Singapore Animal Care and Use Committee and performed according to the
guidelines set forth by the National Advisory Committee for Laboratory Animal
Research, Singapore. All sections of the article were performed in accordance
with Animal Research: Reporting in Vivo Experiments guidelines. The entire
experimental workflow can be visualized in the Supplemental Information Section
(Figure S1).
Liver Tissue Collection
After the 3-month AL/IF protocol, animals were anesthetized and euthanized. Every
other day mice were euthanized on a food-deprivation day. All mice were
euthanized between 7 am and noon. The left lateral liver lobe was
harvested, immediately flash frozen, and stored at −80°C.
Total RNA Extraction and Quality Control Validation
RNA from the liver was isolated using EZ-10 DNAaway RNA Mini-Preps Kit (Bio
Basic, Markham, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly,
frozen liver samples were homogenized and lysed in the provided lysis buffer.
Prevention of contamination by genomic DNA was achieved using the provided gDNA
eliminator column. RNA purity was determined using Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo
Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA), whereas the RNA integrity was assessed via
agarose gel electrophoresis and the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent).
Enrichment of samples with high-quality RNA should demonstrate an OD260/OD280
ratio of 1.9 to 2.0 from Nanodrop readings, 2 distinct bands indicating 28S and
18S following agarose gel electrophoresis, and ≥6.8 RNA integrity number with a
smooth baseline using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara,
USA).
cDNA Library Construction and Sequencing
Following the isolation of high-quality and pure total RNA samples from liver
tissue, complementary DNA (cDNA) library construction was performed using the
NEBNext UltraTM RNA library preparation kit as per the manufacturer’s protocol
(New England BioLabs, Ipswich, USA). Messenger RNA was first purified by
addition of poly-T-oligo-attached magnetic beads, before subjecting them to
random fragmentation by a fragmentation buffer. The initial strand of the cDNA
is first synthesized through the utilization of a random hexamer primer and
RNase H (M-MuLV reverse transcriptase). The second strand of cDNA is then
synthesized using DNA polymerase I and RNase H, and the resulting double
stranded cDNA is purified using AMPure XP beads. The overhangs of these purified
double-stranded cDNA were then processed by exonuclease and polymerase to become
blunt ends, before subjecting the 3′ ends of the DNA fragments to adenylation
and subsequent ligation of NEBNext hairpin loop structure adaptor on both ends
for hybridization. For optimal isolation of cDNA fragments of approximately 150
to 200 base pairs in length, DNA fragments were purified using the AMPure XP
system (Beckman Coulter, Brea, USA), before utilizing both PCR amplification and
purification by AMPure XP beads to obtain the completed library DNA fragments.
The resultant libraries were then sequenced using HiSeqTM 2500 Illumina
platforms to obtain 12 gB of raw data per sample (Illumina, San Diego, USA).
Transcriptome Reads Mapping to the Reference Genome
The reference genome for Mus musculus (mm10) and gene model annotation files were
downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information genome website
browser. Indexes of the reference genome were constructed before the paired-end
and clean reads were then mapped to the reference genome using STAR (version 2.5)[13] for the liver transcriptome.
Quantification of Gene Expression Levels
HTSeq (version 0.6.1)[14] was used to compute the reads mapped onto each gene. Then, the Reads Per
Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped reads (FPKM) of each gene was then
computed using the length of the gene and reads count mapped to that particular
gene. The FPKM value was then used for estimation of gene expression levels. A
total of 35 275 unique RNA transcripts each were quantified in total for liver
data sets.
Differential Expression Analysis
Differential gene expression analysis between 5 biological replicates per
condition was performed using the DESeq2R Package (v2_1.6.3). A negative
binomial distribution was used to model a statistical analysis for differential
gene expression as achieved in DESeq2. The resultant P values
were then adjusted using Benjamini and Hochberg’s test to control false
discovery rate. Genes with adjusted P < .05 were assigned as
being differentially expressed.[15] Principal component plots, Venn diagrams, and volcano plots were prepared
using the ggplot2R package (version 3.0.0).[16]
Correlations and Clustering
To allow logarithm adjustment, genes showing FPKM values of zero were assigned a
corresponding value of 0.01. Correlation was then determined using the
“cor.test” function in R with options set alternative = “greater” and method =
“Spearman”. All experiments were performed using at least 5 biological
replicates per condition, and Pearson correlation coefficients obtained of at
least 0.9 demonstrated high coverage and reproducibility (Figure S2). To then
establish relationships between samples, clustering was performed using the FPKM
expression level by utilizing the hierarchical clustering distance method with
the aid of heatmap, self-organization mapping and k-means via silhouette
coefficient in order to adapt optimal classification with R’s default parameters
imbued. Heatmap illustrated in this article was prepared using pheatmap R
package (version 1.0.10).[17]
Enrichment Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes
To understand the gene ontology (GO) as well as the pathway association for
differentially expressed genes, gprofile R package (version 0.6.7)[18] and clusterProfiler R package (version 3.8)19 were utilized. After
correction of gene length bias, GO terms with adjusted P value
<.05 were assigned as being significantly enriched among the pool of
differentially expressed genes. Diagrams demonstrating enrichment analysis was
plotted using ggplot2R package (version 3.0.0) and Sigmaplot (version 1.3).
Results
Intermittent Fasting Induces Differential Transcriptomic Profiling in the
Liver
Our initial goal was to characterize the effects of 2 IF regimens on the liver,
an organ that is highly responsive to energy restriction and, also a central
metabolic adaptor in response to energy status.[20,21] Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that biological replicates have
high similarity to each other within AL, IF16, and EOD groups through occupation
of unique cluster regions (Figure 1A). However, unique cluster regions representing each
condition showed minimal overlap, suggesting that transcriptome patterns of IF16
and EOD largely differ from that of AL. Notably, the 2 different IF regimens
seems to distinctly modulate transcript expression changes.
Figure 1.
Intermittent fasting regimens induce differential gene expression in the
liver. (A) Principal component (PCA) analysis discriminates the variance
in a data set in terms of principal components. The two most significant
principal components (PC1 and PC2) are displayed on the x- and y-axes,
respectively. Principal component analysis discriminated AL, IF16, and
EOD into three unique cluster regions. (B) Unsupervised hierarchical
clustering segregated AL, IF16 and EOD into three distinct cluster
regions shown using a heatmap (black, green and red, respectively).
Intermittent fasting16 transcriptomic pattern appears to be more similar
to EOD than to AL. Notably, one IF16 sample appeared to be clustered
with AL replicates. Despite this observation, this IF16 anomaly was
being clustered as green, which indicates higher similarity to its
respective replicates than to AL. Red indicates high expression of genes
whereas blue indicates low expression of genes. (C) Volcano plot of
statistical significance (−log10 q-value) against enrichment (log2-fold
change) of differentially expressed genes in IF16 and EOD against AL.
Number of upregulated genes are expressed in red, whereas those that are
downregulated are expressed in blue. Insignificant differentially
expressed genes are expressed in black. IF indicates intermittent
fasting. AL indicates ad libitum; EOD, every other day; IF, intermittent
fasting.
Intermittent fasting regimens induce differential gene expression in the
liver. (A) Principal component (PCA) analysis discriminates the variance
in a data set in terms of principal components. The two most significant
principal components (PC1 and PC2) are displayed on the x- and y-axes,
respectively. Principal component analysis discriminated AL, IF16, and
EOD into three unique cluster regions. (B) Unsupervised hierarchical
clustering segregated AL, IF16 and EOD into three distinct cluster
regions shown using a heatmap (black, green and red, respectively).
Intermittent fasting16 transcriptomic pattern appears to be more similar
to EOD than to AL. Notably, one IF16 sample appeared to be clustered
with AL replicates. Despite this observation, this IF16 anomaly was
being clustered as green, which indicates higher similarity to its
respective replicates than to AL. Red indicates high expression of genes
whereas blue indicates low expression of genes. (C) Volcano plot of
statistical significance (−log10 q-value) against enrichment (log2-fold
change) of differentially expressed genes in IF16 and EOD against AL.
Number of upregulated genes are expressed in red, whereas those that are
downregulated are expressed in blue. Insignificant differentially
expressed genes are expressed in black. IF indicates intermittent
fasting. AL indicates ad libitum; EOD, every other day; IF, intermittent
fasting.Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of global RNA transcripts sequenced revealed
distinct segregation of AL, IF16, and EOD groups under 3 separate clusters
(Figure 1B). This
demonstrated that both IF16 and EOD induces differential expression of
transcripts as compared to AL. Moreover, the IF16 transcriptomic pattern appears
to be more similar to EOD than to AL. Despite this observation, IF16 and EOD
groups were discriminated after clustering, which reinforced the finding that
the patterns of gene expression were still largely distinct between IF16 and
EOD, consistent with the PCA analysis (Figure 1A and B).Next, we quantified the differentially expressed transcripts between individual
IF regimens and AL. We observed a total of 1077 significantly differentially
expressed transcripts (468 up- and 609 downregulated) between IF16 and AL, and
4646 significantly differentially expressed transcripts (2325 up- and 2321
downregulated) between EOD and AL. Notably, the number of differentially
expressed transcripts for EOD was higher than for IF16 when compared to AL
(Figure 1C).
Intermittent Fasting Results in Distinct Gene Ontologies Enrichment Profiles
in the Liver
We next annotated these differentially expressed transcripts that are modulated
as a result of the 2 IF regimens. To achieve this, differential enrichment
analysis was performed using clusterProfiler. The results showed that the top 20
significantly enriched gene ontologies for IF16 as compared to AL belonged to a
myriad of metabolic processes, such as sulfur compound (GO:0006790), sterol
(GO:0016125), alcohol (GO:1902652), lipid (GO:0008610 and GO:0006631), and
cholesterol modulation (GO:0008203 and GO:0006695) in the liver (Figure 2A). This analysis
also revealed that IF16 induces a vast number of other key processes in the
liver as compared to AL, such as regulation of carbohydrate metabolism
(GO:0006109) and circadian rhythm (GO:0007623; Table S1).
Figure 2.
Transcriptomic gene ontologies (GO) analysis of liver following IF. (A)
Intermittent fasting 16 induces modulation of a myriad of metabolic
processes such as sulfur compound, sterol, alcohol, lipid and
cholesterol in the liver. (B) Every other day induces changes in key
metabolic processes such as fatty acid metabolism, a plethora of
cellular changes involving both mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum,
as well as major modulation of ribosomal involvement. Top 20
significantly enriched gene ontologies are reflected in this
illustration. Gene ontology terms are listed on the left whereas
GeneRatio is calculated and reflected on the x-axis. The size of the
dots represents gene counts, and red symbolizes highly significant
adjusted P value whereas blue symbolizes nonsignificant
P
adj value. Nonsignificant GO terms are not displayed. IF
indicates intermittent fasting; GO, gene ontology.
Transcriptomic gene ontologies (GO) analysis of liver following IF. (A)
Intermittent fasting 16 induces modulation of a myriad of metabolic
processes such as sulfur compound, sterol, alcohol, lipid and
cholesterol in the liver. (B) Every other day induces changes in key
metabolic processes such as fatty acid metabolism, a plethora of
cellular changes involving both mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum,
as well as major modulation of ribosomal involvement. Top 20
significantly enriched gene ontologies are reflected in this
illustration. Gene ontology terms are listed on the left whereas
GeneRatio is calculated and reflected on the x-axis. The size of the
dots represents gene counts, and red symbolizes highly significant
adjusted P value whereas blue symbolizes nonsignificant
P
adj value. Nonsignificant GO terms are not displayed. IF
indicates intermittent fasting; GO, gene ontology.However, the top 20 significantly enriched gene ontologies for EOD as compared to
AL belong to key metabolic processes such as fatty acid metabolism (GO:0008610
and GO:0006631), a plethora of cellular changes involving both mitochondria
(GO:0005743) and endoplasmic reticulum (GO:0042175), and major modulation of
ribosomal involvement (GO:0005840 and GO:0003735; Figure 2B). Furthermore, EOD also induced
other key processes in the liver as compared to AL, such as nucleotide
metabolism (GO:0019362 and GO:0006163), autophagy (GO:0006914), carbohydrate
(GO:0033500), and protein metabolism (GO:1903052 and GO:0042177) as well as
circadian rhythm (GO:0007623; Table S2).
Intermittent Fasting Results in Distinct Pathway Enrichment Profiles in the
Liver
Our next goal was to decipher the roles of the differentially expressed
transcripts modulated by IF16 and EOD in various pathways. For this we used
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways statistical enrichment
tool from clusterProfiler. Notably, a high number of IF16-induced differentially
expressed genes showed a significant functional bias toward metabolic pathways
(mmu01100) in the liver. A deeper exploration of metabolic pathways revealed
that IF16 modulated transcriptomic changes in steroid biosynthesis (mmu00100),
terpenoid backbone biosynthesis (mmu00900), retinol (mmu00830), drug (mmu00982),
and nitrogen (mmu00910) metabolism. Intermittent Fasting 16 was also found to
influence the peroxisome (mmu04146) and peroxisome proliferator activator
receptor (PPAR) signaling pathways (mmu03320) in the liver, as compared to AL.
In addition, consistent with gene ontologies data, IF16 influenced the circadian
rhythm axis (mmu04710) (Figure
3A and Table S3).
Figure 3.
Transcriptomic pathways enrichment analysis of liver following
intermittent fasting. (A) and (B) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and
Genomes (KEGG) pathways enrichment analysis revealed that both IF16 and
EOD regimens share modulation of similar pathways. Notably, IF16 and EOD
are able to most significantly modulate changes in metabolic pathways.
IF indicates intermittent fasting; EOD, every other day.
Transcriptomic pathways enrichment analysis of liver following
intermittent fasting. (A) and (B) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and
Genomes (KEGG) pathways enrichment analysis revealed that both IF16 and
EOD regimens share modulation of similar pathways. Notably, IF16 and EOD
are able to most significantly modulate changes in metabolic pathways.
IF indicates intermittent fasting; EOD, every other day.Similar to IF16, KEGG analysis revealed that EOD-induced differentially expressed
genes were significantly involved in metabolic pathways (mmu01100) in the liver.
However, it was evident that EOD induced a higher number of gene changes than
IF16. Many of the pathway enrichments observed in IF16 were also seen during
EOD, but the quantity of differentially expressed transcripts was consistently
higher in EOD. We also noted that EOD modulates a wider spectrum of pathway
changes as compared to IF16 that included similar pathways as well as other
areas of metabolic changes such as fatty acid degradation (mmu00071) and
biosynthesis (mmu00061), glutathione (mmu00480) and beta-alanine (mmu00410)
metabolism. In brief, it appears that EOD can influence more metabolic cascades
than IF16 in the liver. In addition, EOD is able to induce changes in the
circadian rhythm (mmu04710) and p53 signaling pathway (mmu04115) axes (Figure 3B and Table
S4).Considering the plethora of transcriptomic changes associated with significant
biological pathways as a result of these 2 IF regimens, we investigated the
coverage distribution of the interaction between pathway enrichment and the
transcriptomic changes. Reactome analysis results indicated that IF16 induces
the immune system, and signal transduction and metabolism, as compared to AL. On
the other hand, pathway coverage of EOD was strikingly different from that of
IF16 with better representation of pathways in signal transduction, immune
system, cell cycle, and development, in addition to enrichment of metabolic
pathways as compared to AL (Figure 4A and B, and Table S5-6).
Figure 4.
Biological pathway analysis using reactome in the liver. (A) Biological
pathway enrichment for differentially expressed genes for the IF16
regimen as compared to AL falls under the categories of immune system,
signal transduction and metabolism. (B) Biological pathway enrichment
for differentially expressed genes for the EOD regimen as compared to AL
falls under the categories of immune system, signal transduction and
metabolism, metabolism of proteins, cell cycle, and developmental
biology. Every other day appears to induce more robust pathway
enrichment as compared to IF16. AL indicates ad libitum; EOD, every
other day; IF, intermittent fasting.
Biological pathway analysis using reactome in the liver. (A) Biological
pathway enrichment for differentially expressed genes for the IF16
regimen as compared to AL falls under the categories of immune system,
signal transduction and metabolism. (B) Biological pathway enrichment
for differentially expressed genes for the EOD regimen as compared to AL
falls under the categories of immune system, signal transduction and
metabolism, metabolism of proteins, cell cycle, and developmental
biology. Every other day appears to induce more robust pathway
enrichment as compared to IF16. AL indicates ad libitum; EOD, every
other day; IF, intermittent fasting.
Both IF16 and EOD Transcriptomic Changes Induce Common and Unique Metabolic
Changes in the Liver
Since both IF regimens were able to modulate key metabolic changes in the liver,
we next investigated the common and unique metabolic pathway changes that
occurred. We observed a total of 847 differentially expressed genes that were
common to IF16 and EOD as compared to AL. Two hundred thirty genes were
differentially expressed uniquely in IF16 as compared to AL, whereas 3799 genes
were differentially expressed uniquely in EOD as compared to AL (Figure 5A). Subsequently,
we analyzed the top 50 commonly expressed genes exhibited by both IF16 and EOD
as compared to AL by ranking FPKM of each gene in a descending manner. Gene
ontology analysis of these transcripts using gProfiler showed that many of these
common genes fall under the biological function categories of lipid (GO:
0006629) or sulfur (GO: 0006790) compound metabolic processes,
oxidation-reduction (GO: 0055114), and cofactor metabolic processes (GO:
0051186; Figure 5B and
Table S7). Other metabolic pathways associated with these common genes include
linoleic acid (mmu00591) and retinol metabolism (mmu00830), peroxisome
(mmu04146) and PPAR signaling (mmu03320), steroid hormone biosynthesis
(mmu00140), and chemical carcinogenesis pathways (mmu05240; Table S8).
Figure 5.
Both IF16 and EOD transcriptomic changes induce common and unique
metabolic changes in the liver. (A) Venn diagram illustrates the number
of differentially expressed genes that are common and distinct in each
type of IF regimen when compared to AL. (B) Unsupervised hierarchical
clustering of the top 50 common genes that were differentially expressed
in both IF16 and EOD against AL using a heatmap. Both IF16 and EOD
expression patterns showed distinct segregation to AL and between
themselves. Red indicates high expression of genes whereas blue
indicates low expression of genes. Top 50 common gene identity is
illustrated in each row on the right. (C) Gene ontologies of
differentially expressed genes of IF16 and EOD compared to AL plotted
against enrichment score (represented as percentage). Number of
differentially expressed genes belonging to a single gene ontology term
is shown in brackets beside the term. Differentially expressed genes of
IF16 relative to AL are shown in green, and the gene ontology with the
highest enrichment score belonged to hydrogen sulfide biosynthetic
process. On the other hand, differentially expressed genes of EOD
against AL are shown in red, and the gene ontology with the highest
enrichment score belonged to ribosomal small subunit assembly. AL
indicates ad libitum; EOD, every other day; IF, intermittent
fasting.
Both IF16 and EOD transcriptomic changes induce common and unique
metabolic changes in the liver. (A) Venn diagram illustrates the number
of differentially expressed genes that are common and distinct in each
type of IF regimen when compared to AL. (B) Unsupervised hierarchical
clustering of the top 50 common genes that were differentially expressed
in both IF16 and EOD against AL using a heatmap. Both IF16 and EOD
expression patterns showed distinct segregation to AL and between
themselves. Red indicates high expression of genes whereas blue
indicates low expression of genes. Top 50 common gene identity is
illustrated in each row on the right. (C) Gene ontologies of
differentially expressed genes of IF16 and EOD compared to AL plotted
against enrichment score (represented as percentage). Number of
differentially expressed genes belonging to a single gene ontology term
is shown in brackets beside the term. Differentially expressed genes of
IF16 relative to AL are shown in green, and the gene ontology with the
highest enrichment score belonged to hydrogen sulfide biosynthetic
process. On the other hand, differentially expressed genes of EOD
against AL are shown in red, and the gene ontology with the highest
enrichment score belonged to ribosomal small subunit assembly. AL
indicates ad libitum; EOD, every other day; IF, intermittent
fasting.Based on this observation, we analyzed differential effects of the 2 IF regimens
independently as compared to AL using gProfiler software. The highest cluster
enrichment that was differentially expressed during IF16 when compared to AL
belonged to the hydrogen sulfide biosynthetic process (GO:0070814). In addition,
IF16 appeared to induce differentiation of other genes belonging to regulation
of immunity (GO:0031347), translation (GO:006412), mitochondrion organization
(GO:0007005), rhythmic process (GO:0048511), phospholipid translocation
(GO:0045332), and various metabolic processes related to carbohydrate
(GO:0033500), amino acid (GO: 0000096), lipid (GO: 0055088), and toxin (GO:
0009404) homeostasis (Figure
5C and Table S9). On the other hand, the highest enrichment of genes
that were differentially expressed during EOD when compared to AL in the liver
belonged to ribosomal small subunit assembly (GO:0000028). Moreover, EOD was
able to induce distinct differentiation of other genes as compared to AL with
profiles belonging to endothelial cell migration (GO:0043542), mitochondrial
disassembly (GO:0061726), endoplasmic reticulum organization (GO:0007029), and
metabolic processes related to alcohol (GO:0046165), DNA (GO:2000278), α amino
acid (GO:1901607), protein (GO:1903050), and ketones (GO:0010565; Figure 5C and Table S10).
Altogether, these results supported our hypothesis that the temporal period of
energy restriction can differentially regulate transcriptomic and pathway
changes and could therefore eventually be translated to distinct cellular
changes being achieved through adoption of different IF regimens.
Discussion
Intermittent fasting has gained increasing popularity in recent years as a plausible
intervention for metabolic syndrome.[19-21] However, there is limited mechanistic information as to how fasting might
lead to such beneficial alterations in metabolism. The findings of our present study
reveal that IF triggers robust and complex changes in gene expression in the liver
and that different fasting regimens can have profoundly different profiles of
effect.The liver is a key metabolic organ that strictly controls different facets of
carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism. During IF, the liver is highly responsive
to energy deficiency and triggers a plethora of cellular responses to achieve energy
homeostasis. Transcriptomic data sets of liver subjected to IF16 or EOD reveal
robust changes in gene expression when compared to AL, indicating that IF-induced
metabolic changes are regulated via a transcriptomic axis. Interestingly, the
duration of fasting distinctly impacts the transcriptome. Our data set shows that
the gene signatures exhibited by IF16 and EOD remained highly varied according to
the PCA and distinct clustering of experimental groups using heatmap analysis.
Despite this observation, the anomaly in IF16 gene expression patterns remain
similar to the other IF16 replicates, demonstrating a higher degree of similarity in
gene expression within IF16 replicates than in AL. Moreover, volcano map analysis
provided a clearer depiction that the differential gene expression patterns of IF16
and EOD are highly disparate. Even though common genes that are differentially
expressed by both IF regimen when compared to AL are present, it can be further
observed that a large number of differentially expressed genes are unique to either
the IF16 or the EOD regimen. Moreover, relative to AL, EOD exhibited a higher number
of differentially expressed genes than IF16. Interestingly, our data set has
revealed common robust transcriptomic differences induced by both IF16 and EOD that
have been reported by other studies. For instance, common genes such as Ehhadh and
Angptl4 were both upregulated following IF16 and EOD and seemed to regulate sulfur
compound and lipid metabolic processes, respectively. During fasting, Ehhadh has
been reported to be involved in the mitochondrial and peroxisomal β-oxidation fatty
acid pathway that is highly dependent on PPARα signaling in the liver.[22,23] This hepatic sulfur compound metabolism induced by Ehhadh also seems to be
implicated in lipid metabolic processes through a synergistic relationship with
Angptl4, which catalyses the release of fatty acids from adipose tissue.[24] While there have been previous reports that both protein products are
implicated during fasting, our data set implies that upregulation of these 2 genes
may represent cross talk between liver and adipose tissue in mediating a
preferential utilization of fat to meet energy demands. Besides that, other common
differentially expressed genes, such as Fsn, Cry1, and Ppar were also modulated as a
result of both IF regimen which have been involved in lipid homeostasis during
time-restricted feeding.[25-27] Our study has provided us with information that was previously reported by
other groups, yet the adoption of different IF regimens allow us to compare the
similarities and differences in the transcriptomic signatures in the liver.In liver tissue from mice subjected to the IF16 regimen, gene ontologies that
possessed the highest enrichment scores belonged to the hydrogen sulfide
biosynthetic process. Hydrogen sulfide is an important gaseous modulator reported to
be a key factor in protecting against various liver diseases.[28,29] Moreover, IF16 also seemed to induce expression of genes that modulate
metabolic processes such as carbohydrate and lipid homeostasis. In contrast, during
EOD, gene ontologies that possessed the highest enrichment scores belonged to
ribosomal small subunit assembly, suggesting that translational processes and
protein synthesis are being significantly modulated in the liver. These findings are
consistent with the concomitant upregulation of many key genes in α-amino acid
biosynthetic and cellular protein catabolic processes. Interestingly, many genes
that were modulated by the EOD regimen have not yet been reported. Furthermore, EOD
appears to induce greater disparity in gene expression changes than IF16.Our study has provided a detailed analysis of the transcriptomic changes which occur
in the liver as a result of 2 IF regimens, allowing a better understanding of the
temporal regulation of genes to bring about the IF-induced cellular changes
previously reported.[30] Thus, a novel aspect of our findings is that there appears to be strong
evidence that the adoption of different IF regimens may produce common or distinct
metabolic changes in an organism that may be translated into differential cellular
effects. We also have gained a better understanding that different IF regimens may
induce differential metabolic switching processes, which may result in varying
degrees of metabolic adaptation. However, there is a need to consider confounding
factors in our present study. For instance, the present study provided mice with
food at 0700 hours for both IF16 and EOD groups, which represent 12 hours off
synchronization from AL mice’s normal nocturnal circadian rhythm for feeding. The
lack of synchronization in feeding and fasting chronobiology of mice in this study
may thereby manifest as a confounding variable to this study. This in turn may also
affect the chronobiology of the transcriptome, and nonconsistent adoption of
time-restricted feeding at different time points may eventually lead to
nontranslatable results.[25,31] Despite this, our study has provided the impetus to consider in more detail
the circumstances of the effects reported in many IF studies, as differences in IF
regimens may be a confounding factor in reproducibility of results. Ultimately, the
complexity of these IF-induced cellular changes in the liver may substantially
contribute to the metabolic adaptations commonly observed during fasting.Click here for additional data file.Research Data abstract for Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals
Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan
Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M.
Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and
Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Research Data abstract for Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals
Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan
Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M.
Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and
Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Research Data abstract for Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals
Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan
Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M.
Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and
Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Research Data abstract for Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals
Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan
Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M.
Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and
Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Research Data abstract for Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals
Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan
Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M.
Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and
Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Research Data abstract for Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals
Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan
Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M.
Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and
Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Research Data abstract for Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals
Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan
Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M.
Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and
Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Research Data abstract for Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals
Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan
Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M.
Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and
Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Research Data abstract for Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals
Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan
Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M.
Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and
Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Research Data abstract for Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals
Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan
Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M.
Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and
Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material,
1._Ng_et_al.,_2019-Table_S1_IF16_vs_AL_clusterProfiler_Liver for Genome-Wide
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring
in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik,
Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M. Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha
Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material,
2._Ng_et_al.,_2019-Table_S2_EOD_vs_AL_clusterProfiler_Liver for Genome-Wide
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring
in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik,
Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M. Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha
Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material,
3._Ng_et_al.,_2019-Table_S3_IF16_vs_AL_clusterProfiler_Liver for Genome-Wide
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring
in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik,
Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M. Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha
Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material,
4._Ng_et_al.,_2019-Table_S4_EOD_vs_AL_clusterProfiler_Liver for Genome-Wide
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring
in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik,
Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M. Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha
Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, 5._Ng_et_al.,_2019-Table_S5_Reactome_IF16vsAL_Liver for
Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Intermittent Fasting-Induced
Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki
Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M. Prakash Hande, Christopher
G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and Thiruma V. Arumugam in
Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, 6._Ng_et_al.,_2019-Table_S6_Reactome_EODvsAL_Liver for
Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Intermittent Fasting-Induced
Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki
Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M. Prakash Hande, Christopher
G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and Thiruma V. Arumugam in
Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material,
7._Ng_et_al.,_2019-Table_S7_Top_50_Common_Genes_Liver_gProfiler for Genome-Wide
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring
in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik,
Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M. Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha
Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, 8._Ng_et_al.,_2019-Table_S8_Top_50_Common_Genes_Liver_List
for Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Intermittent Fasting-Induced
Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki
Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M. Prakash Hande, Christopher
G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and Thiruma V. Arumugam in
Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material,
9._Ng_et_al.,_2019-Table_S9_Gene_Ontologies_IF16_against_AL_Liver. for
Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Intermittent Fasting-Induced
Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki
Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M. Prakash Hande, Christopher
G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and Thiruma V. Arumugam in
Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material,
10._Ng_et_al.,_2019-Table_S10_Gene_Ontologies_EOD_against_AL_Liver. for
Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Intermittent Fasting-Induced
Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by Gavin Yong-Quan Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki
Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik, Dong-Gyu Jo, M. Prakash Hande, Christopher
G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David Yang-Wei Fann and Thiruma V. Arumugam in
Dose-ResponseClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, Supplemental_Information for Genome-Wide Transcriptome
Analysis Reveals Intermittent Fasting-Induced Metabolic Rewiring in the Liver by
Gavin Yong-Quan Ng, Sung-Wook Kang, Joonki Kim, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Sang-Ha Baik,
Dong-Gyu Jo, M. Prakash Hande, Christopher G. Sobey, Jayantha Gunaratne, David
Yang-Wei Fann and Thiruma V. Arumugam in Dose-Response
Authors: A E Larsen; R J Tunstall; K A Carey; G Nicholas; R Kambadur; T C Crowe; D Cameron-Smith Journal: Ann Nutr Metab Date: 2006-08-24 Impact factor: 3.374
Authors: Christopher Vollmers; Shubhroz Gill; Luciano DiTacchio; Sandhya R Pulivarthy; Hiep D Le; Satchidananda Panda Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Susie S Y Huang; Melanie Makhlouf; Eman H AbouMoussa; Mayra L Ruiz Tejada Segura; Lisa S Mathew; Kun Wang; Man C Leung; Damien Chaussabel; Darren W Logan; Antonio Scialdone; Mathieu Garand; Luis R Saraiva Journal: Mol Metab Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 7.422