Literature DB >> 31597748

Evaluation of the Direct MacConkey Method for Identification of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms from Rectal Swabs: Reevaluating Zone Diameter Cutoffs.

Meklit Workneh1, Ruibin Wang2, Abida Q Kazmi1, Krizia K Chambers1, Belita N A Opene1, Shawna Lewis1, Katherine Goodman3, Pranita D Tamma4, Karen C Carroll1, Aaron M Milstone4,5, Patricia J Simner6.   

Abstract

The optimal method to screen for gastrointestinal colonization with carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) has yet to be established. The direct MacConkey (direct MAC) plate method demonstrates high sensitivity for CRO detection, but established zone diameter (ZD) criteria for ertapenem (≤27 mm) and meropenem (≤32 mm) result in high rates of false positives upon confirmatory testing. To increase specificity, we screened for CRO in two high-risk wards using the direct MAC plate method, recorded ZDs for each sample, and generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the optimal ZD cutoff criteria. Of 6,868 swabs obtained over an 18-month period, 4,766 (69%) had growth on MAC plates, and 2,500 (36%) met criteria for further evaluation based on previously established ZDs around the carbapenem disks. A total of 812 (12%) swabs were confirmed positive for at least one CRO and included 213 (3%) carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO), resulting in a specificity of 78% for the direct MAC plate method. Reducing the ertapenem and meropenem ZDs to ≤25 mm improved specificity to 83%, decreasing the confirmatory testing workload by 32%. The sensitivities with the lower ZD criteria were 89% for CRO and 94% for CPO, respectively. The direct MAC plate method criteria for CRO testing can be modified to balance the sensitivity and specificity of CRO while reducing the burden on clinical microbiology laboratories. These modifications can be particularly helpful in regions with a low CRO prevalence.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRO; carbapenem-resistant organism; colonization; direct MacConkey Plate method; method

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31597748      PMCID: PMC6879279          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01127-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Clinical Performance of Check-Direct CPE, a Multiplex PCR for Direct Detection of bla(KPC), bla(NDM) and/or bla(VIM), and bla(OXA)-48 from Perirectal Swabs.

Authors:  Anna F Lau; Gary A Fahle; Margaret A Kemp; Agatha N Jassem; John P Dekker; Karen M Frank
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Intestinal Carriage of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: Current Status of Surveillance Methods.

Authors:  Roberto Viau; Karen M Frank; Michael R Jacobs; Brigid Wilson; Keith Kaye; Curtis J Donskey; Federico Perez; Andrea Endimiani; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Evaluation of CHROMagar KPC for rapid detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Zmira Samra; Judi Bahar; Liora Madar-Shapiro; Nazi Aziz; Sara Israel; Jihad Bishara
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of Multiple Methods for Detection of Gastrointestinal Colonization of Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms from Rectal Swabs.

Authors:  Patricia J Simner; Isabella Martin; Belita Opene; Pranita D Tamma; Karen C Carroll; Aaron M Milstone
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Resolution of Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Outbreak in a Tertiary Cancer Center; the Role of Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Clare Rock; Melanie S Curless; Maggie Cantara; Seema Mehta; Kristen A Marrone; Karen C Carroll; Patricia Simner; Lisa L Maragakis
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Comparison of the CHROMagar™ KPC, Remel Spectra™ CRE, and a direct ertapenem disk method for the detection of KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae from perirectal swabs.

Authors:  Shawn Vasoo; Karen Lolans; Haiying Li; Kavitha Prabaker; Mary K Hayden
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  Laboratory and clinical evaluation of screening agar plates for detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from surveillance rectal swabs.

Authors:  Amos Adler; Shiri Navon-Venezia; Jacob Moran-Gilad; Evgeniya Marcos; David Schwartz; Yehuda Carmeli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid Identification of Five Classes of Carbapenem Resistance Genes Directly from Rectal Swabs by Use of the Xpert Carba-R Assay.

Authors:  Nicholas M Moore; Rafael Cantón; Edoardo Carretto; Lance R Peterson; Robert L Sautter; Maria M Traczewski
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Direct ertapenem disk screening method for identification of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in surveillance swab specimens.

Authors:  Karen Lolans; Karen Calvert; Sarah Won; James Clark; Mary K Hayden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Carbapenem disks on MacConkey agar in screening methods for detection of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative rods in stools.

Authors:  Julie Blackburn; Catherine Tsimiklis; Valéry Lavergne; Josée Pilotte; Sophie Grenier; Andrée Gilbert; Brigitte Lefebvre; Marc-Christian Domingo; Cécile Tremblay; Anne-Marie Bourgault
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.