Literature DB >> 31596990

From reproduction to production, stomata are the master regulators.

Timothy J Brodribb1, Frances Sussmilch2, Scott A M McAdam3.   

Abstract

The best predictor of leaf level photosynthetic rate is the porosity of the leaf surface, as determined by the number and aperture of stomata on the leaf. This remarkable correlation between stomatal porosity (or diffusive conductance to water vapour gs ) and CO2 assimilation rate (A) applies to all major lineages of vascular plants (Figure 1) and is sufficiently predictable that it provides the basis for the model most widely used to predict water and CO2 fluxes from leaves and canopies. Yet the Ball-Berry formulation is only a phenomenological approximation that captures the emergent character of stomatal behaviour. Progressing to a more mechanistic prediction of plant gas exchange is challenging because of the diversity of biological components regulating stomatal action. These processes are the product of more than 400 million years of co-evolution between stomatal, vascular and photosynthetic tissues. Both molecular and structural components link the abiotic world of the whole plant with the turgor pressure of the epidermis and guard cells, which ultimately determine stomatal pore size and porosity to water and CO2 exchange (New Phytol., 168, 2005, 275). In this review we seek to simplify stomatal behaviour by using an evolutionary perspective to understand the principal selective pressures involved in stomatal evolution, thus identifying the primary regulators of stomatal aperture. We start by considering the adaptive process that has locked together the regulation of water and carbon fluxes in vascular plants, finally examining specific evidence for evolution in the proteins responsible for regulating guard cell turgor.
© 2019 The Authors The Plant Journal © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 diffusion; stomata/guard cells; water

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31596990     DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  4 in total

1.  Atavistic Stomatal Responses to Blue Light in Marsileaceae.

Authors:  Anna S Westbrook; Scott A M McAdam
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  The physiology of drought stress in grapevine: towards an integrative definition of drought tolerance.

Authors:  Gregory A Gambetta; Jose Carlos Herrera; Silvina Dayer; Quishuo Feng; Uri Hochberg; Simone D Castellarin
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  Metabolic, physiological and anatomical responses of soybean plants under water deficit and high temperature condition.

Authors:  Roberto Gomes Vital; Caroline Müller; Francisco Bruno Silva Freire; Fábia Barbosa Silva; Priscila Ferreira Batista; David Fuentes; Arthur Almeida Rodrigues; Luciana Minervina Freitas Moura; Danilo Menezes Daloso; Adinan Alves Silva; Andrew Merchant; Alan Carlos Costa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  When everything changes at once: finding a new normal after genome duplication.

Authors:  Kirsten Bomblies
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.349

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.