Literature DB >> 31595731

Combined gastroscopic and choledochoscopic transabdominal nasobiliary drainage.

Song-Mei Lou1, Min Zhang1, Zheng-Rong Wu1, Gui-Xing Jiang1, Hua Shen2, Yi Dai1, Yue-Long Liang1, Li-Ping Cao1, Guo-Ping Ding1.   

Abstract

Common bile duct (CBD) stones are a frequent problem in Chinese populations, and their incidence is particularly high in certain areas (Wang et al., 2013). In recent years, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have been the main surgical procedures for CBD stones, although each has different advantages and disadvantages in the treatment of choledocholithiasis (Loor et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2017). For patients with large stones, a dilated CBD, especially concurrent gallstones, LCBDE is the preferred and most economical minimally invasive procedure (Koc et al., 2013). However, a T-tube is often placed during LCBDE to prevent postoperative bile leakage; this is associated with problems such as bile loss, electrolyte disturbance, and decreased gastric intake (Martin et al., 1998). In addition, the T-tube usually must remain in place for more than a month, during which time the patient's quality of life is seriously compromised. Many skilled surgeons currently perform primary closure of the CBD following LCBDE, which effectively speeds up rehabilitation (Hua et al., 2015). However, even in sophisticated medical centers, the incidence of postoperative bile leakage still reaches ≥10% (Liu et al., 2017). Especially for a beginner, bile leakage remains a key problem (Kemp Bohan et al., 2017). Therefore, a safe and effective minimally invasive surgical approach to preventing bile leakage during primary closure of the CBD after LCBDE is still urgently needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choledochoscope; Gastroscope; laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE); Nasobiliary drainage

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31595731      PMCID: PMC6825810          DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1900060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B        ISSN: 1673-1581            Impact factor:   3.066


  14 in total

1.  Single-setting endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and cholecystectomy improve the rate of surgical site infection.

Authors:  Michele M Loor; Jean Dominique Morancy; James K Glover; Gregory J Beilman; Catherine L Statz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones: system review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Zhenying Guo; Zhenjie Liu; Yuan Wang; Yi Si; Yuefeng Zhu; Mingjuan Jin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Three modalities on management of choledocholithiasis: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yong Zhou; Wen-Zhang Zha; Xu-Dong Wu; Ren-Gen Fan; Biao Zhang; Yong-Hua Xu; Cheng-Lin Qin; Jing Jia
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 6.071

4.  Long-term Outcome of Primary Closure After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Combined With Choledochoscopy.

Authors:  Hee Jung Yi; Geun Hong; Seog Ki Min; Hyeon Kook Lee
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.719

5.  Early analysis of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulation.

Authors:  Phillip M Kemp Bohan; Christopher R Connelly; Jeff Crawford; Nathan W Bronson; Martin A Schreiber; Chris W Lucius; John G Hunter; Laszlo N Kiraly; Bruce Ham
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Role of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Nikhil Gupta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-05-27

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Bora Koc; Servet Karahan; Gokhan Adas; Firat Tutal; Hakan Guven; Ayhan Ozsoy
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  I J Martin; I S Bailey; M Rhodes; N O'Rourke; L Nathanson; G Fielding
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transpapillary stenting or external biliary drainage?

Authors:  Agustin Dietrich; Fernando Alvarez; Nicolas Resio; Oscar Mazza; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Rodrigo Sanchez Clariá; Martin de Santibañes
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Spontaneously removed biliary stent drainage versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Yakun Xu; Chengyong Dong; Kexin Ma; Fei Long; Keqiu Jiang; Ping Shao; Rui Liang; Liming Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  2 in total

1.  Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Taifeng Zhu; Haoming Lin; Jian Sun; Chao Liu; Rui Zhang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Analysis of an improved workflow of endoscope reprocessing for bedside endoscopic diagnosis and treatment on COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Qing Gu; Hua-Fen Wang; Ying Fang; Ye Lu; Zhe Shen; Yan Wang; Xin Wu; Li Cen; Yi-Shu Chen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.066

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.