Literature DB >> 31595415

Genetic Background and Sex: Impact on Generalizability of Research Findings in Pharmacology Studies.

Stacey J Sukoff Rizzo1, Stephanie McTighe2, David L McKinzie3.   

Abstract

Animal models consisting of inbred laboratory rodent strains have been a powerful tool for decades, helping to unravel the underpinnings of biological problems and employed to evaluate potential therapeutic treatments in drug discovery. While inbred strains demonstrate relatively reliable and predictable responses, using a single inbred strain alone or as a background to a mutation is analogous to running a clinical trial in a single individual and their identical twins. Indeed, complex etiologies drive the most common human diseases, and a single inbred strain that is a surrogate of a single genome, or data generated from a single sex, is not representative of the genetically diverse patient populations. Further, pharmacological and toxicology data generated in otherwise healthy animals may not translate to disease states where physiology, metabolism, and general health are compromised. The purpose of this chapter is to provide guidance for improving generalizability of preclinical studies by providing insight into necessary considerations for introducing systematic variation within the study design, such as genetic diversity, the use of both sexes, and selection of appropriate age and disease model. The outcome of implementing these considerations should be that reproducibility and generalizability of significant results are significantly enhanced leading to improved clinical translation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal models; Genetic diversity; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Sex

Year:  2020        PMID: 31595415     DOI: 10.1007/164_2019_282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol        ISSN: 0171-2004


  4 in total

1.  Lost in translation: At the crossroads of face validity and translational utility of behavioral assays in animal models for the development of therapeutics.

Authors:  J L Silverman; J Nithianantharajah; A Der-Avakian; J W Young; S J Sukoff Rizzo
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  Reconsidering animal models used to study autism spectrum disorder: Current state and optimizing future.

Authors:  Jill L Silverman; Audrey Thurm; Sarah B Ethridge; Makayla M Soller; Stela P Petkova; Ted Abel; Melissa D Bauman; Edward S Brodkin; Hala Harony-Nicolas; Markus Wöhr; Alycia Halladay
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Perspectives on Cognitive Phenotypes and Models of Vascular Disease.

Authors:  Selen C Muratoglu; Marc F Charette; Stacey J Sukoff Rizzo; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe; Zorina S Galis; Adam S Greenstein; Alan Daugherty; Anne Joutel; Beth A Kozel; Donna M Wilcock; Emily C Collins; Farzaneh A Sorond; Gareth R Howell; Hyacinth I Hyacinth; Kent K C Lloyd; Kurt R Stenmark; Manfred Boehm; Mark L Kahn; Roderick Corriveau; Sara Wells; Timothy J Bussey
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 10.514

Review 4.  Emerging Electroencephalographic Biomarkers to Improve Preclinical to Clinical Translation in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Zackary A Cope; Takeshi Murai; Stacey J Sukoff Rizzo
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.750

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.