Literature DB >> 31595332

Less noise during dual-task walking in healthy young adults: an analysis of different gait variability components.

Daniel Hamacher1, Monique Koch2, Susanna Löwe2, Astrid Zech2.   

Abstract

Dual-task costs of gait (variability) parameters are frequently used to probe the grade of automaticity of walking. However, recent studies reported contradicting dual-task costs for different gait variability measures within the same cohorts. The effects of a dual-task on the gait pattern are, thus, not fully understood. The aim of the current study was to analyze the different gait variability components ('Tolerance', 'Noise', and 'Covariation') during dual-task walking compared to single-task walking. In an experimental study, 21 young and healthy adults (11 males, 10 females, age: 24 ± 3 years) were included. The participants completed three experimental conditions: (a) single-task walking, (b) dual-task walking (serial-seven subtractions), and (c) cognitive single task in sitting position. To analyze different gait variability components, we applied a method which distinguishes the three components: 'Tolerance', 'Noise', and 'Covariation' (TNC). To test for differences, we used the statistical parametric mapping method. Compared to single-task walking, the results depict lower gait variability of the result parameters during the dual-task condition at 0-15% (p = 0.010) and 94-100% (p = 0.040) of the stance phase and 0-63% (p < 0.001) during the swing phase. The decreased result parameter variability was due to less (sensorimotor) 'Noise' (stance: 2-100%, p < 0.001; swing: 2-59%, p < 0.001) during the dual-task walking condition. In further studies, the sources of the reduced unstructured (sensorimotor) noise in the dual-task condition should be analyzed to better understand the effect of a cognitive dual task on the gait pattern.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Covariation; Functional variability; Gait; Noise; TNC analysis; Uncontrolled manifold

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31595332     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05664-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  When paying attention becomes counterproductive: impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills.

Authors:  Sian L Beilock; Thomas H Carr; Clare MacMahon; Janet L Starkes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2002-03

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement.

Authors:  Hermann Müller; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Uncontrolled manifold analysis of gait variability: effects of load carriage and fatigue.

Authors:  Xingda Qu
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing.

Authors:  Angelo M Sabatini; Chiara Martelloni; Sergio Scapellato; Filippo Cavallo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping in Python.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Development of functional variability during the motor learning process of a complex cyclic movement.

Authors:  Daniel Hamacher; Astrid Zech
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The Effect of a Cognitive Dual Task on the Control of Minimum Toe Clearance While Walking.

Authors:  Daniel Hamacher; Dennis Hamacher; Roy Müller; Lutz Schega; Astrid Zech
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 1.422

9.  Gait variability and motor control in patients with knee osteoarthritis as measured by the uncontrolled manifold technique.

Authors:  Gwenllian Fflur Tawy; Philip Rowe; Leela Biant
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  2 in total

1.  Stride-to-Stride Variability of the Center of Mass in Male Trained Runners After an Exhaustive Run: A Three Dimensional Movement Variability Analysis With a Subject-Specific Anthropometric Model.

Authors:  Felix Möhler; Bernd Stetter; Hermann Müller; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-05-24

2.  Neural markers of proactive and reactive cognitive control are altered during walking: A Mobile Brain-Body Imaging (MoBI) study.

Authors:  David P Richardson; John J Foxe; Kevin A Mazurek; Nicholas Abraham; Edward G Freedman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.556

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.