Literature DB >> 31595088

Comparison of gaseous and particulate emissions from a pilot-scale combustor using three varieties of coal.

Tiffany L B Yelverton1, Angelina T Brashear2, David G Nash3, James E Brown1, Carl F Singer4, Peter H Kariher1, Jeffrey V Ryan1.   

Abstract

Gaseous and particulate emissions generated from the combustion of coal have been associated with adverse effects on human health and the environment, and have therefore been the subject of regulation by federal and state government agencies. Detailed emission characterizations are needed to better understand the impacts of pre- and post-combustion controls on a variety of coals found in the United States (U.S.). While the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires industry reporting of emissions for criteria and several hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), many of the methods for monitoring and measuring these gaseous and particulate emissions rely on time-integrated sampling techniques. Though these emissions reports provide an overall representation of day-to-day operations, they represent well-controlled operations and do not encompass real combustion events that occur sporadically. The current study not only characterizes emissions from three coals (bituminous, sub-bituminous, and lignite), but also investigates the use of instrumentation for improved measurement and monitoring techniques that provide real-time, continuous emissions data. Testing was completed using the U.S. EPA's Multi-Pollutant Control Research Facility, a pilot-scale coal-fired combustor using industry-standard emission control technologies, in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Emissions were calculated based on measurements from the flue gas (pre- and post-electrostatic precipitator), to characterize gaseous species (CO, CO2, O2, NOX, SO2, other acid gases, and several organic HAPs) as well as fine and ultrafine particulate (mass, size distribution, number count, elemental carbon, organic carbon, and black carbon). Comparisons of traditional EPA methods to those made via Fourier Transfer Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy for CO, NOX, and SO2 are also reported.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coal combustion; Emissions characterization; Methods comparison

Year:  2018        PMID: 31595088      PMCID: PMC6781234          DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fuel (Lond)        ISSN: 0016-2361            Impact factor:   6.609


  11 in total

1.  Acute health effects of ambient air pollution: the ultrafine particle hypothesis.

Authors:  M J Utell; M W Frampton
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2000

2.  Source profiles of particulate matter emissions from a pilot-scale boiler burning North American coal blends.

Authors:  S W Lee
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Acute cardiovascular and inflammatory toxicity induced by inhalation of diesel and biodiesel exhaust particles.

Authors:  Jôse Mára Brito; Luciano Belotti; Alessandra C Toledo; Leila Antonangelo; Flávio S Silva; Débora S Alvim; Paulo A Andre; Paulo H N Saldiva; Dolores H R F Rivero
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect.

Authors:  C Arden Pope; Douglas W Dockery
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Uncertainty and variability in health-related damages from coal-fired power plants in the United States.

Authors:  Jonathan I Levy; Lisa K Baxter; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 6.  Combustion aerosols: factors governing their size and composition and implications to human health.

Authors:  J S Lighty; J M Veranth; A F Sarofim
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 7.  Particle characteristics responsible for effects on human lung epithelial cells.

Authors:  Ann E Aust; James C Ball; Autumn A Hu; JoAnn S Lighty; Kevin R Smith; Ann M Straccia; John M Veranth; Willie C Young
Journal:  Res Rep Health Eff Inst       Date:  2002-12

8.  Differential pulmonary inflammation and in vitro cytotoxicity of size-fractionated fly ash particles from pulverized coal combustion.

Authors:  M Ian Gilmour; Silvia O'Connor; Colin A J Dick; C Andrew Miller; William P Linak
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.235

9.  Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States.

Authors:  C Arden Pope; Majid Ezzati; Douglas W Dockery
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Ischemic Heart Disease Mortality and Long-Term Exposure to Source-Related Components of U.S. Fine Particle Air Pollution.

Authors:  George D Thurston; Richard T Burnett; Michelle C Turner; Yuanli Shi; Daniel Krewski; Ramona Lall; Kazuhiko Ito; Michael Jerrett; Susan M Gapstur; W Ryan Diver; C Arden Pope
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characterization of emissions from a pilot-scale combustor operating on coal blended with woody biomass.

Authors:  Tiffany L B Yelverton; Angelina T Brashear; David G Nash; James E Brown; Carl F Singer; Peter H Kariher; Jeffrey V Ryan; Preston Burnette
Journal:  Fuel (Lond)       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 8.035

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.