Literature DB >> 31593702

Efficacy of Dupilumab in a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Adults With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Ikuo Hirano1, Evan S Dellon2, Jennifer D Hamilton3, Margaret H Collins4, Kathryn Peterson5, Mirna Chehade6, Alain M Schoepfer7, Ekaterina Safroneeva8, Marc E Rothenberg4, Gary W Falk9, Yehudith Assouline-Dayan10, Qiong Zhao3, Zhen Chen3, Brian N Swanson11, Gianluca Pirozzi11, Leda Mannent12, Neil M H Graham3, Bolanle Akinlade3, Neil Stahl3, George D Yancopoulos3, Allen Radin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergen-mediated inflammatory disease with no approved treatment in the United States. Dupilumab, a VelocImmune-derived human monoclonal antibody against the interleukin (IL) 4 receptor, inhibits IL4 and IL13 signaling. Dupilumab is effective in the treatment of allergic, atopic, and type 2 diseases, so we assessed its efficacy and safety in patients with EoE.
METHODS: We performed a phase 2 study of adults with active EoE (2 episodes of dysphagia/week with peak esophageal eosinophil density of 15 or more eosinophils per high-power field), from May 12, 2015, through November 9, 2016, at 14 sites. Participants were randomly assigned to groups that received weekly subcutaneous injections of dupilumab (300 mg, n = 23) or placebo (n = 24) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 10 in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) patient-reported outcome (PRO) score. We also assessed histologic features of EoE (peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count and EoE histologic scores), endoscopically visualized features (endoscopic reference score), esophageal distensibility, and safety.
RESULTS: The mean SDI PRO score was 6.4 when the study began. In the dupilumab group, SDI PRO scores were reduced by a mean value of 3.0 at week 10 compared with a mean reduction of 1.3 in the placebo group (P = .0304). At week 12, dupilumab reduced the peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count by a mean 86.8 eosinophils per high-power field (reduction of 107.1%; P < .0001 vs placebo), the EoE-histologic scoring system (HSS) severity score by 68.3% (P < .0001 vs placebo), and the endoscopic reference score by 1.6 (P = .0006 vs placebo). Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility by 18% vs placebo (P < .0001). Higher proportions of patients in the dupilumab group developed injection-site erythema (35% vs 8% in the placebo group) and nasopharyngitis (17% vs 4% in the placebo group).
CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 2 trial of patients with active EoE, dupilumab reduced dysphagia, histologic features of disease (including eosinophilic infiltration and a marker of type 2 inflammation), and abnormal endoscopic features compared with placebo. Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility and was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02379052.
Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EREFS; Esophagus; Food Allergy; HSS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31593702     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  69 in total

1.  Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Claire Beveridge; Gary W Falk
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-06

Review 2.  Emerging therapies for eosinophilic esophagitis.

Authors:  Thomas Greuter; Ikuo Hirano; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 3.  Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Existing and Upcoming Therapies in an Age of Emerging Molecular and Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Ian F Slack; Justin T Schwartz; Vincent A Mukkada; Shawna Hottinger; J Pablo Abonia
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 4.  Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies.

Authors:  Joshua S Davis; David Ferreira; Emma Paige; Craig Gedye; Michael Boyle
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Intestinal eosinophils: multifaceted roles in tissue homeostasis and disease.

Authors:  G Coakley; H Wang; N L Harris
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 9.623

6.  Utility of major basic protein, eotaxin-3, and mast cell tryptase staining for prediction of response to topical steroid treatment in eosinophilic esophagitis: analysis of a randomized, double-blind, double dummy clinical trial.

Authors:  Evan S Dellon; John T Woosley; Sarah J McGee; Susan E Moist; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 7.  Red Between the Lines: Evolution of Eosinophilic Esophagitis as a Distinct Clinicopathologic Syndrome.

Authors:  Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Medical algorithm: Diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis in adults.

Authors:  Thomas Greuter; Alex Straumann
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 13.146

9.  AGA institute and the joint task force on allergy-immunology practice parameters clinical guidelines for the management of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Authors:  Ikuo Hirano; Edmond S Chan; Matthew A Rank; Rajiv N Sharaf; Neil H Stollman; David R Stukus; Kenneth Wang; Matthew Greenhawt; Yngve T Falck-Ytter
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 10.  Technical review on the management of eosinophilic esophagitis: a report from the AGA institute and the joint task force on allergy-immunology practice parameters.

Authors:  Matthew A Rank; Rajiv N Sharaf; Glenn T Furuta; Seema S Aceves; Matthew Greenhawt; Jonathan M Spergel; Yngve T Falck-Ytter; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 6.347

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.