Literature DB >> 31592946

Facial Recognition Neural Networks Confirm Success of Facial Feminization Surgery.

Kevin Chen1, Stephen M Lu1, Roger Cheng1, Mark Fisher1, Ben H Zhang1, Marcelo Di Maggio1, James P Bradley1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Male-to-female transgender patients desire to be identified, and treated, as female, in public and social settings. Facial feminization surgery entails a combination of highly visible changes in facial features. To study the effectiveness of facial feminization surgery, we investigated preoperative/postoperative gender-typing using facial recognition neural networks.
METHODS: In this study, standardized frontal and lateral view preoperative and postoperative images of 20 male-to-female patients who completed hard- and soft-tissue facial feminization surgery procedures were used, along with control images of unoperated cisgender men and women (n = 120 images). Four public neural networks trained to identify gender based on facial features analyzed the images. Correct gender-typing, improvement in gender-typing (preoperatively to postoperatively), and confidence in femininity were analyzed.
RESULTS: Cisgender male and female control frontal images were correctly identified 100 percent and 98 percent of the time, respectively. Preoperative facial feminization surgery images were misgendered 47 percent of the time (recognized as male) and only correctly identified as female 53 percent of the time. Postoperative facial feminization surgery images were gendered correctly 98 percent of the time; this was an improvement of 45 percent. Confidence in femininity also improved from a mean score of 0.27 before facial feminization surgery to 0.87 after facial feminization surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: In the first study of its kind, facial recognition neural networks showed improved gender-typing of transgender women from preoperative facial feminization surgery to postoperative facial feminization surgery. This demonstrated the effectiveness of facial feminization surgery by artificial intelligence methods. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31592946     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

Review 1.  Point of care virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in facial gender confirmation surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Doga Kuruoglu; Maria Yan; Samyd S Bustos; Jonathan M Morris; Amy E Alexander; Basel Sharaf
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence in medico-dental diagnostics of the face: a narrative review of opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Raphael Patcas; Michael M Bornstein; Marc A Schätzle; Radu Timofte
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Perception of femininity and attractiveness in Facial Feminization Surgery.

Authors:  Ann Hui Ching; Allister Hirschman; Xiaona Lu; Seija Maniskas; Antonio J Forte; Michael Alperovich; John A Persing
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

4.  Toward a Universal Measure of Facial Difference Using Two Novel Machine Learning Models.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Takiddin; Mohammad Shaqfeh; Osman Boyaci; Erchin Serpedin; Mitchell A Stotland
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-01-18

5.  A high-performance, hardware-based deep learning system for disease diagnosis.

Authors:  Ali Siddique; Muhammad Azhar Iqbal; Muhammad Aleem; Jerry Chun-Wei Lin
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2022-07-19

6.  Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery: Current Applications, Future Directions, and Ethical Implications.

Authors:  Tyler Jarvis; Danielle Thornburg; Alanna M Rebecca; Chad M Teven
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.