Literature DB >> 31592899

Meta-analysis, Meta-regression, and GRADE Assessment of Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Control Dressings for the Prevention of Postoperative Wound Complications.

Pieter R Zwanenburg1, Berend T Tol1, Miryam C Obdeijn2, Oren Lapid2, Sarah L Gans1, Marja A Boermeester1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of iNPWT for the prevention of postoperative wound complications such as SSI. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The 2016 WHO recommendation on the use of iNPWT for the prevention of SSI is based on low-level evidence, and many trials have been published since. Preclinical evidence suggests that iNPWT may also prevent wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, seroma, and hematoma.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized and nonrandomized studies that compared iNPWT with control dressings. The evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and GRADE. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models.
RESULTS: High level evidence indicated that iNPWT reduced SSI [28 RCTs, n = 4398, relative risk (RR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.76, P < 0.0001, I = 27%] with a number needed to treat of 19. Low level evidence indicated that iNPWT reduced wound dehiscence (16 RCTs, n = 3058, RR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64-0.94). Very low-level evidence indicated that iNPWT also reduced skin necrosis (RR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.33-0.74), seroma (RR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.32-0.59), and length of stay (pooled mean difference -2.01, 95% CI: -2.99 to 1.14).
CONCLUSIONS: High-level evidence indicates that incisional iNPWT reduces the risk of SSI with limited heterogeneity. Low to very low-level evidence indicates that iNPWT also reduces the risk of wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, and seroma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31592899     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  11 in total

1.  Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Abdominal Body Contouring: A Comparative Matched Analysis of Outcomes and Cost.

Authors:  Martin P Morris; Adrienne N Christopher; Viren Patel; Ginikanwa Onyekaba; Robyn B Broach; John P Fischer
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 0.558

Review 2.  Can prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy improve clinical outcomes in spinal fusion surgery? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi Chen; Jun Sun; Zhipeng Yao; Chenyang Song; Wenge Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 3.  The role of perineal application of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy for prevention of wound-related complications after abdomino-perineal resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeremy Meyer; Elin Roos; Ziad Abbassi; Christian Toso; Frédéric Ris; Nicolas C Buchs
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Delphi Consensus on Intraoperative Technical/Surgical Aspects to Prevent Surgical Site Infection after Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Jaime Ruiz-Tovar; Marja A Boermeester; Liliana Bordeianou; George J Chang; Emre Gorgun; Christoph Justinger; Elise H Lawson; David J Leaper; Najjia N Mahmoud; Christopher Mantyh; Michael F McGee; Valentine Nfonsam; Ines Rubio-Perez; Elizabeth C Wick; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.532

5.  Bioactive Fish Scale Scaffolds with MSCs-Loading for Skin Flap Regeneration.

Authors:  Xiang Lin; Bin Kong; Yujuan Zhu; Yuanjin Zhao
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 17.521

Review 6.  Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Prevention of Sternal Wound Infection after Adult Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Grazia Santoro; Federica Provenzano; Leonardo Savarese; Francesco Iorio; Salvatore Giordano; Carlo Zebele; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  The impact of incisional negative pressure wound therapy on scar quality and patient-reported outcomes: A within-patient-controlled, randomised trial.

Authors:  Floyd W Timmermans; Sterre E Mokken; Jan-Maerten Smit; Mark-Bram Bouman; Timotheus C van de Grift; Margriet G Mullender; Esther Middelkoop
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.401

8.  Negative pressure wound therapy compared with conventional wound dressings for closed incisions in orthopaedic trauma surgery: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weiwei Xie; Lingyan Dai; Yameng Qi; Xixi Jiang
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.099

Review 9.  Surgical site infection prevention and management in immunocompromised patients: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Mario Improta; Enrico Cicuttin; Fausto Catena; Massimo Sartelli; Raffaele Bova; Nicola De' Angelis; Stefano Gitto; Dario Tartaglia; Camilla Cremonini; Carlos Ordonez; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Massimo Chiarugi
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy for prevention of surgical site infection in abdominal surgery: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Elin Roos; Jonathan Douissard; Ziad Abbassi; Nicolas C Buchs; Christian Toso; Frédéric Ris; Jeremy Meyer
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.