Literature DB >> 31592208

Comparison of computed tomography findings with clinical risks factors for endoscopic therapy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding cases.

Fumitake Jono1, Hiroshi Iida2, Koji Fujita3, Megumi Kaai4, Kenji Kanoshima2, Kanji Ohkuma2, Takashi Nonaka2, Tomonori Ida1, Akihiko Kusakabe3, Atsushi Nakamura5, Shigeru Koyama5, Atsushi Nakajima2, Masahiko Inamori1.   

Abstract

Several risk scoring systems exist for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). The clinical Rockall score (clinical RS) and the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) are major risk scores that consider only clinical data. Computed tomography (CT) findings are equivocal in non-variceal UGIB. We compared CT findings with clinical data to predict mortality, rebleeding and need for endoscopic therapy in non-variceal UGIB patients. This retrospective, single-center study included 386 patients admitted to our emergency department with diagnosis of non-variceal UGIB by urgent endoscopy between January 2009 and March 2015. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate CT findings and risk factors derived from clinical data. CT findings could not significantly predict mortality and rebleeding in non-variceal UGIB patients. However, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in CT findings better predicted the need for endoscopic therapy than clinical data. The adjusted odds ratios were 10.10 (95% CI 5.01-20.40) for clinical RS and 10.70 (95% CI 5.08-22.70) for the GBS. UGI hemorrhage in CT findings could predict the need for endoscopic therapy in non-variceal UGIB patients in our emergency department. CT findings as well as risk score systems may be useful for predicting the need for endoscopic therapy.
Copyright © 2019 JCBNCopyright © 2019 JCBN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage; computed tomography; risk assessment

Year:  2019        PMID: 31592208      PMCID: PMC6769404          DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.18-115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr        ISSN: 0912-0009            Impact factor:   3.114


  25 in total

1.  Clinical triage decision vs risk scores in predicting the need for endotherapy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Farees T Farooq; Michael H Lee; Ananya Das; Rahul Dixit; Richard C K Wong
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Role of urgent contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients undergoing early colonoscopy.

Authors:  Naoyoshi Nagata; Ryota Niikura; Tomonori Aoki; Shiori Moriyasu; Toshiyuki Sakurai; Takuro Shimbo; Masafumi Shinozaki; Katsunori Sekine; Hidetaka Okubo; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Chizu Yokoi; Mikio Yanase; Junichi Akiyama; Naomi Uemura
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Comparing the Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in predicting the need for endoscopic therapy in patients with upper GI hemorrhage.

Authors:  Sandy H Pang; Jessica Y L Ching; James Y W Lau; Joseph J Y Sung; David Y Graham; Francis K L Chan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  A J Stanley; H R Dalton; O Blatchford; D Ashley; C Mowat; A Cahill; D R Gaya; E Thompson; U Warshow; N Hare; M Groome; G Benson; W Murray
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting.

Authors:  Subhash Chandra; Erik P Hess; Dipti Agarwal; David M Nestler; Victor M Montori; Louis M Wong Kee Song; George A Wells; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  Validity of the Rockall scoring system after endoscopic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nicholas I Church; Helen J Dallal; John Masson; N Ashley G Mowat; David A Johnston; Esme Radin; Marc Turner; Grant Fullarton; Robin J Prescott; Kelvin R Palmer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  E M Vreeburg; C B Terwee; P Snel; E A Rauws; J F Bartelsman; J H Meulen; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding.

Authors:  Brian H Hyett; Marwan S Abougergi; Joseph P Charpentier; Navin L Kumar; Suzana Brozovic; Brian L Claggett; Anne C Travis; John R Saltzman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Enhanced CT for initial localization of active lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  T Yamaguchi; K Yoshikawa
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

10.  Usefulness and validity of diagnostic nasogastric aspiration in patients without hematemesis.

Authors:  Michael D Witting; Laurence Magder; Alan E Heins; Amal Mattu; Carlos A Granja; Mona Baumgarten
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.721

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.