Literature DB >> 31591644

Development of a Brief Patient-Administered Screening Tool for Prescription Opioid Dependence for Primary Care Settings.

Suzanne Nielsen1,2, Louisa Picco2, Gabrielle Campbell1, Nicholas Lintzeris3,4, Briony Larance1,5, Michael Farrell1, Louisa Degenhardt1,6, Raimondo Bruno7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a short, patient-administered screening tool that will allow for earlier assessment of prescription opioid dependence (often referred to as addiction) in primary care settings. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis (N = 1,134) from the two-year time point of the Pain and Opioids IN Treatment (POINT) cohort was used in the scale development.
SUBJECTS: Participants who completed two-year interviews in the POINT study, a prospective cohort study that followed people with chronic noncancer pain over a five-year period, and who were prescribed strong opioids for a minimum of six weeks at baseline.
METHODS: An advisory committee provided advice on wording and content for screening in primary care settings. Univariate logistic regression identified individual items that were significantly associated with meeting ICD-11 criteria for prescription opioid dependence. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) were conducted, and items were reduced to identify a small item set that were discriminative and shared a simple underlying structure.
RESULTS: Sixty-four variables associated with ICD-11 criteria for prescription opioid dependence were initially identified. Four rounds of EFA were performed, resulting in five items remaining. CFA identified two possible four-item combinations, with the final combination chosen based on greater item endorsement and the results of goodness-of-fit indices.
CONCLUSIONS: Addressing prescription opioid dependence is an important part of the global public health challenge surrounding rising opioid-related harm. This study addresses an important initial requisite step to develop a brief screening tool. Further studies are required to validate the tool in clinical settings.
© 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic Pain; Opioid Dependence; Opioid Use Disorder; Screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31591644      PMCID: PMC8204889          DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  57 in total

1.  Choosing a cut-off on the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) for amphetamine users.

Authors:  L Topp; R P Mattick
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 2.  The prescription opioid and heroin crisis: a public health approach to an epidemic of addiction.

Authors:  Andrew Kolodny; David T Courtwright; Catherine S Hwang; Peter Kreiner; John L Eadie; Thomas W Clark; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Development of a Brief Version of the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM): The COMM-9.

Authors:  Stacey A McCaffrey; Ryan A Black; Albert J Villapiano; Robert N Jamison; Stephen F Butler
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health surveys.

Authors:  Josep Maria Haro; Saena Arbabzadeh-Bouchez; Traolach S Brugha; Giovanni de Girolamo; Margaret E Guyer; Robert Jin; Jean Pierre Lepine; Fausto Mazzi; Blanca Reneses; Gemma Vilagut; Nancy A Sampson; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 5.  Prescription opioid abuse in chronic pain: a review of opioid abuse predictors and strategies to curb opioid abuse.

Authors:  Nalini Sehgal; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Howard S Smith
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Determining a cut-off on the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) for alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Peter Lawrinson; Jan Copeland; Saul Gerber; Stuart Gilmour
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  What do the numbers mean? Normative data in chronic pain measures.

Authors:  Michael K Nicholas; Ali Asghari; Fiona M Blyth
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Consolidated principles for screening based on a systematic review and consensus process.

Authors:  Mark J Dobrow; Victoria Hagens; Roger Chafe; Terrence Sullivan; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Cohort protocol paper: the Pain and Opioids In Treatment (POINT) study.

Authors:  Gabrielle Campbell; Richard Mattick; Raimondo Bruno; Briony Larance; Suzanne Nielsen; Milton Cohen; Nicholas Lintzeris; Fiona Shand; Wayne D Hall; Bianca Hoban; Chyanne Kehler; Michael Farrell; Louisa Degenhardt
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 10.  Implementing SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment) in primary care: lessons learned from a multi-practice evaluation portfolio.

Authors:  Daniel Hargraves; Christopher White; Rachel Frederick; Margaret Cinibulk; Meriden Peters; Ashlee Young; Nancy Elder
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2017-12-29
View more
  1 in total

1.  What predicts pharmacists' engagement with opioid-outcome screening? Secondary analysis from an implementation study in community pharmacy.

Authors:  Suzanne Nielsen; Paul Sanfilippo; Louisa Picco; Raimondo Bruno; Michala Kowalski; Pene Wood; Sarah Larney
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2020-06-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.