Nadine Serhan1, Lilian Basso1, Riccardo Sibilano2,3, Camille Petitfils4, James Meixiong5, Chrystelle Bonnart4, Laurent L Reber6,7, Thomas Marichal8,9, Philipp Starkl10,11, Nicolas Cenac4, Xinzhong Dong5,12, Mindy Tsai2,3, Stephen J Galli13,14,15, Nicolas Gaudenzio16. 1. Unité de Différenciation Epithéliale et Autoimmunité Rhumatoïde, UMR 1056, INSERM, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. 2. Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 3. Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 4. IRSD, INSERM, INRA, INP-ENVT, Université de Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. 5. The Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Center for Sensory Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Unit for Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, Institut Pasteur, UMR1222 INSERM, Paris, France. 7. Center for Pathophysiology Toulouse Purpan, INSERM U1043, CNRS UMR 5282, Toulouse III University, Toulouse, France. 8. GIGA Institute and Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Liege University, Liege, Belgium. 9. WELBIO, Walloon Excellence in Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Wallonia, Belgium. 10. CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria. 11. Laboratory of Infection Biology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 12. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 13. Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. sgalli@stanford.edu. 14. Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. sgalli@stanford.edu. 15. Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. sgalli@stanford.edu. 16. Unité de Différenciation Epithéliale et Autoimmunité Rhumatoïde, UMR 1056, INSERM, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. nicolas.gaudenzio@inserm.fr.
Abstract
Allergic skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis, are clinically characterized by severe itching and type 2 immunity-associated hypersensitivity to widely distributed allergens, including those derived from house dust mites (HDMs). Here we found that HDMs with cysteine protease activity directly activated peptidergic nociceptors, which are neuropeptide-producing nociceptive sensory neurons that express the ion channel TRPV1 and Tac1, the gene encoding the precursor for the neuropeptide substance P. Intravital imaging and genetic approaches indicated that HDM-activated nociceptors drive the development of allergic skin inflammation by inducing the degranulation of mast cells contiguous to such nociceptors, through the release of substance P and the activation of the cationic molecule receptor MRGPRB2 on mast cells. These data indicate that, after exposure to HDM allergens, activation of TRPV1+Tac1+ nociceptor-MRGPRB2+ mast cell sensory clusters represents a key early event in the development of allergic skin reactions.
Allergic skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis, are clinically characterized by severe itching and type 2 immunity-associated hypersensitivity to widely distributed allergens, including those derived from house dust mites (HDMs). Here we found that HDMs with cysteine protease activity directly activated peptidergic nociceptors, which are neuropeptide-producing nociceptive sensory neurons that express the ion channel TRPV1 and Tac1, the gene encoding the precursor for the neuropeptide substance P. Intravital imaging and genetic approaches indicated that HDM-activated nociceptors drive the development of allergic skin inflammation by inducing the degranulation of mast cells contiguous to such nociceptors, through the release of substance P and the activation of the cationic molecule receptor MRGPRB2 on mast cells. These data indicate that, after exposure to HDM allergens, activation of TRPV1+Tac1+ nociceptor-MRGPRB2+ mast cell sensory clusters represents a key early event in the development of allergic skin reactions.
Altered tissue sensitivity to environmental triggers is thought to contribute to
the development of allergic inflammation, frequently starting with type 2 (allergic)
skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD)[1] during childhood. AD is a chronic relapsing skin inflammatory
disease characterized by severe itching of the skin, eczema and hypersensitivity to
otherwise innocuous environmental substances[2]. The etiology of AD is incompletely understood, but many factors,
such as genetic or environmental elements and immune or structural cells are thought to
contribute to the development of skin lesions[2].Aberrantly activated type 2 immunity against common sources of indoor allergens
such as house dust mites (HDMs) and increased numbers of activated mast cells and
eosinophils in the lesional skin[2-4] might have
important roles in the pathology of AD. Moreover, 80-100% of patients with AD are
colonized with Staphylococcus aureus, compared to only 5-30% of healthy
individuals[5], and patients
whose skin is colonized with exotoxin-producing S. aureus, such as
staphylococcal enterotoxins B (SEB)[4,6,7]
have a higher severity of AD than patients who are colonized with non-toxigenic
strains[6]. Finally, although
abnormalities of the epidermis leading to loss of skin barrier have been reported to
contribute to skin lesions development[8,9,10], many patients with AD don’t have loss-of-function mutations
of epidermal structural proteins such as filaggrin[11-13]. Therefore,
the full spectrum of factors which contribute to skin barrier disorganization and the
development of type 2 immunity and skin lesions remains to be determined.The skin is innervated by an intricate network of nociceptive sensory neurons,
known as nociceptors, with cell bodies located in the dorsal root or trigeminal
ganglia[14]. Their primary
function is the transmission of sensations of temperature, pain and itch in order to
elicit appropriate behavioral responses such as withdrawal (to avoid tissue injury) and
scratching (to remove irritants). Nociceptors may be involved in manifestations of AD by
promoting itch and scratching behavior[13,15], an idea supported by
clinical studies showing that the serum of patients with AD exhibits high amounts of
neuropeptides, such as the cationic neuropeptide substance P (SP), and that the amounts
detected correlate with the severity of the disease[15,16]. While much remains
to be learned about itching sensations, peripheral neurons also have the potential to
influence immune cells and inflammatory responses[17-22].Mast cells are innate immune cells thought to be involved in allergic diseases,
including AD, in which they recognize a specific antigen through their high-affinity
receptors for IgE (FcεRI)[23].
Under homeostatic conditions, skin and peritoneal mast cells in mice specifically
express MRGPRB2, a receptor for cationic molecules from the Mas-related G
protein-coupled receptors family[24].
MRGPRX2, the human ortholog of MRGPRB2, and not the neurokinin 1 receptor, is the main
receptor for cationic molecules, including SP, in human skin mast cells[25,26]. MRGPRX2 or MRGPRB2-mediated activation of mast cells can result in
a remarkably fast degranulation dynamics, which is associated with the development of
rapid and localized mast cell-dependent inflammation[25].Whether specialized neuro-immune cross-talk has a role in the development of
allergic skin inflammation remains unclear. Combining genetically-modified mouse models
with intravital imaging approaches, we show here that a large proportion of
TRPV1+ nociceptor projections form physical contacts with
MRGPRB2+ mast cells. These neuro-immune clusters can sense the presence
of allergic cues and can trigger pathogenic type 2 immune responses and associated
lesions in the skin.
Results
Tac1 expression is required for allergic skin
inflammation
We used a mouse model of allergic skin inflammation driven by six
epicutaneous exposures over one month to two antigens found together in the
lesional skin of 80-100% of AD patients[2-7,26], 10 μg of the HDM
strain Dermatophagoides farinae (D. farinae)
and 500 ng of the bacterial exotoxin SEB from S. aureus (Supplementary Fig. 1a,b).
Compared to healthy subjects, AD patients often suffer from S.
aureus skin infections which are thought to play an important role
in the pathogenesis and/or worsening of AD[6]. This model recapitulates moderate to severe AD-like
disease, associated with both the histopathological features of an exacerbated
type 2 immune response and a global gene expression pattern statistically
similar to that seen in human AD[8,27]. Wild-type
mice sensitized with a combination of SEB and D. farinae
developed more severe skin inflammation than those treated with SEB or
D. farinae alone, while D. farinae alone
induced more skin lesions than SEB alone (Supplementary Fig. 1c,d).
Compared to vehicle, treatment with D. farinae + SEB induced a
systemic D. farinae-specific TH2 response (Supplementary Fig. 1e,f).
In accord with reports that patients with moderate to severe AD were treated
successfully with dupilumab[28],
a human monoclonal antibody against the IL-4 receptor α (IL-4Rα)
that inhibits both IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, systemic treatment with blocking
antibodies for the mouse IL-4Rα significantly decreased the skin lesions
and the histopathological features in the AD-like mouse model (Supplementary Fig. 1g,h).
These data indicate that treatment with D. farinae + SEB leads
to the development of AD-like allergic skin inflammation dependent on type 2
cytokines.The neuropeptide SP is thought to be released primarily from a unique
subpopulation of TRPV1+ TRPA1- peptidergic nociceptors
that highly express Tac1[29], the gene encoding the SP precursor. Using publicly
available gene expression data[30], we mapped the expression of Trpv1,
Tac1 and Trpa1 among different mouse
tissues and various subpopulations of immune cells. Trpv1,
Tac1 and Trpa1 were highly (or
exclusively, in the case of Trpv1 and Trpa1)
expressed in dorsal root ganglia (DRG), where the somas of sensory neurons are
located, with weak additional expression of Tac1 in the central
and the enteric nervous systems (Fig. 1a
and Supplementary Fig.
1i). In whole-mounted skin biopsies from C57BL/6J wild-type mice, SP
expression was restricted to PGP9.5+cutaneous neuronal fibers (Fig. 1b).
Figure 1
Tac1 gene expression is required for the full development of
pathological features in a model of allergic skin inflammation.
a, Publicly available microarray gene expression data of
Trpv1, Tac1 and Trpa1 in
different mouse tissues (GSE 10246); data are shown using a heat map of mRNA
expression levels. b, Representative 3D confocal microscopy picture
of whole-mounted normal back skin stained for PGP9.5 (a pan neuronal marker,
cyan) and substance P (red). c, Representative hematoxylin &
eosin (H&E) staining of vehicle- or D. farinae +
SEB-treated areas in WT or Tac1 mice.
d, Clinical scores (0-12) of vehicle- or D.
farinae + SEB-treated areas in WT or
Tac1 mice treated as in c.
e, Epidermal thickness (μm) (left), number of
eosinophils (middle) and neutrophils (right) in skin sections in WT or
Tac1 mice treated as in c.
f, Serum levels (arbitrary unit [a.u]) of D.
farinae-specific IgG1 (left) and IgE (right) antibodies in vehicle-
or D. farinae + SEB-treated WT or
Tac1 mice as in c.
g,h, Representative confocal microscopy pictures of back skin
sections (g) and fluorescence analysis (h) of
filaggrin staining in the epidermis of vehicle- or D. farinae +
SEB-treated areas in WT or Tac1 mice treated as
in c. Bars = 100 μm, dotted black (c) or white
(g) lines indicate the junction epidermis/dermis. Each circle =
one mouse. Number of mice: (b) n = 3; (c-h) n = 6 (WT
Vehicle), n = 14 (WT D. farinae + SEB), n = 7
(Tac1-/-). (e,f,h)
Open bars: WT mice; black bars: Tac1-/- mice.
(b-h) Data from three independent experiments, mean ±
SEM (d), mean + SEM (e,f,h); 1-way ANOVA
with Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons, *P<.05 **P<.01
***P<.001.
To analyze the role of SP in the development of allergic skin
inflammation, we treated wild-type and Tac1 mice
with D. farinae + SEB and assessed the development of key
pathological features associated with AD[8]. Compared to vehicle-treated wild-type mice, D.
farinae + SEB-treated wild-type mice developed macroscopic skin
lesions (Fig. 1d), increased epidermal
thickness, strong infiltration of eosinophils and neutrophils (Fig. 1e) and elevated serum D.
farinae-specific IgG1 and IgE (Fig. 1f), along with a profound alteration of filaggrin
protein expression (Fig. 1g,h), a key
component of skin barrier function linked to human AD[12]. In addition, D. farinae +
SEB-treated wild-type mice had increased expression of keratin 6 (K6), a marker
of inflammatory stress in keratinocytes (Supplementary Fig. 2a,b) and alterations in claudin-1, K14
and K10 expression (Supplementary Fig. 2c-h). Expressions of two other structural
proteins loricrin and E-cadherin were not significantly affected (Supplementary Fig. 2i-l).
By contrast, D. farinae + SEB-treated
Tac1 mice were mostly protected from
disease, with substantial reduction in skin lesion development, histological
abnormalities, infiltration of immune cells, serum levels of D.
farinae-specific IgG1 and IgE and changes in skin
barrier architecture (Fig. 1c-h and Supplementary Fig. 2).
Taken together, this data suggested that expression of Tac1 and
SP was restricted to the neuronal compartment of the skin and that expression of
Tac1 was required for the full development of the
pathological features associated with allergic skin inflammation in this
model.
To analyze the role of TRPV1+ nociceptors in the development
of allergic skin inflammation, we treated wild-type mice systemically with
resiniferatoxin (RTX), which is a potent TRPV1 agonist selectively ablating
TRPV1+ nociceptors[17,18] (Supplementary Fig. 3a,b).
RTX-treated mice and control DMSO-treated mice were subsequently treated with
D. farinae + SEB to induce allergic skin inflammation.
RTX-treated mice had a strong reduction of skin lesions (Fig. 2a,b) and lesion-associated histopathological features
compared to control DMSO-treated mice (Fig.
2c), along with restored filaggrin organization and decreased
expression of the stress marker K6 (Supplementary Fig. 3), suggesting that TRPV1+
nociceptors were required for the full development of allergic skin inflammation
in this model.
Figure 2
TRPV1+ nociceptors are required for the full development of
allergic skin inflammation and D. farinae extracts directly
induce neuronal activation.
a, Representative H&E staining of D. farinae
+ SEB-treated areas in mock (dimethylsulphoxide [DMSO])-treated or RTX-treated
(TRPV1+ nociceptor ablated) mice. b, Clinical scores
(0-12) of D. farinae + SEB-treated areas in DMSO- or
RTX-treated mice as in a. c, Epidermal thickness
(μm) (left), number of eosinophils (middle) and neutrophils (right) of
D. farinae + SEB-treated areas in DMSO- or RTX-treated mice
as in a. Number of mice: (a-c) n = 4 (DMSO) and n = 5
(RTX); data are from two independent experiments; mean + SEM, two-tailed,
unpaired t-test, *P<.05 **P<.01 ***P<.001.
d-h, Representative Fura-2 ratiometric fields (d),
associated calcium traces (e-g) and (h) proportion of
responding DRG neurons (%) of ex vivo cultured DRG neurons
(expressed as % of DRG neurons responding to 50 mM KCL) stimulated with 5 ng/ml
SEB (top d,e,h) or 5 ng/ml D. farinae
(middle d,f,h) or both (bottom d,g,h) and
1 μM capsaicin (d-h). (d) Bars = 50 μm,
white arrow heads indicate neurons with increased Fura-2 fluorescence.
(d-h) Data are from three independent experiments performed
with DRGs from n = 3 (for the condition of vehicle-, D.
farinae, SEB or D. farinae + SEB-treated DRG neurons)
and n = 6 (for the condition of capsaicin-treated DRG neurons) different mice;
mean + SEM, two-tailed, unpaired t-test, *P<.05 **P<.01.
i, Venn diagrams of responding DRG neurons. j,k,
Substance P secretion in DRG neurons cultured ex vivo from
(j) WT mice, (k) DMSO (open bars)- versus RTX
(black bars)-treated mice and stimulated as indicated. Data are from
(j) 4 and (k) 3 independent experiments, mean +
SEM, two-tailed, unpaired t-test, *P<.05 **P<.01 ***P<.001.
Each circle = one mouse.
The primary function of nociceptors is to detect potentially damaging
stimuli and initiate appropriate behavioral responses such as removal or
scratching. We investigated whether D. farinae and SEB were
directly detected by TRPV1+ DRG neurons cultured ex
vivo. We found that 5 ng/ml SEB alone induced only a weak (barely
detectable in some experiments) influx of calcium in DRG neurons (Fig. 2d,e), while concentrations ranging from
5 ng/ml of D. farinae, either alone (Fig. 2d,f) or in combination with 5 ng/ml SEB (Fig. 2d,g) triggered an increase in
intracellular calcium in a subpopulation of DRG neurons that also responded to
the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin (Fig.
2h,i).D. farinae alone or in combination with SEB also
triggered the secretion of SP from DRG neurons, with a tendency, in some
experiments, for D. farinae + SEB to trigger less secretion of
SP compared to either alone (Fig. 2j).
Moreover, cultured DRG neurons from RTX-treated mice did not secrete SP in
response to D. farinae alone or D. farinae +
SEB, while DRG neurons from DMSO-treated mice secreted SP (Fig. 2k). Importantly, DRG neurons from RTX-treated mice
were also unresponsive to capsaicin (Fig.
2k) indicating that in vivo RTX-treatment
efficiently depleted TRPV1+ neurons. These data indicated that
D. farinae directly triggered the secretion of SP from
TRPV1+ DRG neurons cultured ex vivo.Next, we investigated by which mechanism D. farinae
activated TRPV1+ DRG neurons. Treatment of DRG neurons with
NBP2-29328, a MYD88 inhibitory peptide[8], did not prevent D. farinae-induced
activation of DRG neurons compared to DRG neurons treated with a non-relevant
control peptide (Supplementary
Fig. 4a,b), indicating that, at least under the culture conditions
used here, DRG neurons activation was not dependent on MYD88-dependent signaling
through Toll like receptors (TLR). Next, we investigated whether the proteolytic
activity of D. farinae was required for triggering DRG neuron
activation ex vivo. Like other common environmental allergens,
HDM strains, including D. farinae[31] have intrinsic proteolytic activity that can
degrade epithelial junctions[32-35] or
full-length IL-33[36]
in vivo. To characterize the type of proteolytic activity
present in the D. farinae extracts used, we measured the
proteolytic activities of D. farinae with or without specific
and irreversible inhibitors of cysteine or serine protease activities.
Pretreatment with the cysteine protease inhibitor E64, but not with the serine
protease inhibitor AEBSF, completely inhibited the proteolytic activity of
D. farinae, at levels comparable to heat-inactivation of
D. farinae (Fig. 3a).
No proteolytic activity was measured in the absence of dithiothreitol (DTT), a
reducing agent required for cysteine protease activity in cell-free conditions
(Fig. 3a), indicating the presence of
cysteine protease activities in the D. farinae extract. SEB
alone neither exhibited protease-like activity nor enhanced D.
farinae proteolytic activity (Supplementary Fig.
4c).
Figure 3
Activation of DRG neurons by D. farinae extract depends on
cysteine protease activity.
a, Protease activity in D. farinae extracts heat
inactivated at 95°C for 60 minutes (Heated), or treated with cysteine-
(E64, 100 nM) or serine- (AEBSF, 1 mM) protease inhibitors, with or without
dithiothreitol (DTT). Data are from three independent experiments performed with
three independent biological samples, mean + SEM, One way ANOVA and
Holm-Sidak’s post- hoc test, *** P<.001. b-e,
Representative Fura-2 ratiometric fields (b), associated calcium
traces (c,d) and (e) proportion of responding DRG
neurons (%) in ex vivo cultured DRG neurons (expressed as % of
DRG neurons responding to 50 mM KCL) stimulated sequentially with 5 ng/ml heated
D. farinae (top b,c) or 5 ng/ml E64 (2.5
pM)-treated D. farinae (bottom b,d),
5 ng/ml D. farinae and 50 mM KCL. Data are from five
independent experiments performed with 22 (for the conditions Vehicle and
D. farinae), 14 (for the condition Heated D.
farinae) and 5 (for the condition E64-treated D.
farinae) independent experiments performed with independent
biological samples, mean + SEM, two-tailed, unpaired t-test, ***P<.001.
f, Proportion of responding DRG neurons stimulated with either
Vehicle, 5 ng/ml D. pteronyssinus, 5 ng/ml German cockroach, 5
ng/ml A. alternata, or 5 ng/ml ragweed expressed as % of DRG
neurons responding to 50 mM KCL. Data are from six independent experiments
performed with six independent biological samples, mean + SEM, two-tailed,
unpaired t-test, *P<.05. Each circle = one mouse.
Heat-induced inactivation or treatment with E64 prevented the influx of
calcium in TRPV1+ DRG neurons by D. farinae ex vivo
(Fig. 3b-e). However, TRPV1+
DRG neurons activation was independent of the expression of the
protease-activated receptor PAR2 by the neurons (Supplementary Fig. 4a,b).
We next investigated whether other clinically-relevant environmental allergens
with either predominant cysteine protease activity, such as the HDM strain
D. pteronyssinus[31] or serine-like protease activities[36] from pollen (ragweed), fungus
(Alternaria alternata) or the German cockroach could also
directly activate DRG neurons. Only D. pteronyssinus triggered
significant influx of calcium in DRG neurons, comparable to those obtained after
stimulation with D. farinae (Fig.
3f). These data indicate that two common HDM strains with predominant
cysteine protease activity involved in allergic inflammation and suspected to
have major roles in various allergic disorders, could trigger the activation of
a subset of nociceptors directly, predominantly via a cysteine protease
activity-dependent mechanism.
Functional MRGPRB2 is required for allergic skin inflammation
Mouse MRGPRB2 and its human ortholog, MRGPRX2 are mast cell-restricted
receptors for several cationic substances, including the neuropeptide SP. We
used Kit-dependent Kit
mast cell-deficient mice, in which KIT, the receptor for the main mast cell
growth and survival factor SCF is mutated, and Kit-independent
Cpa3-CreMcl-1
mast cell-deficient mice, in which the antiapoptotic factor Mcl-1 is deleted in
the mast cell lineage (Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig 6a-d) to study the role of mast cells in
the development of allergic skin inflammation. After treatment with D.
farinae + SEB, both Kit and
Cpa3-CreMcl-1
mice had a marked reduction in skin lesions compared to
Kit and
Cpa3-CreMcl-1
littermate controls, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 5). Importantly,
Tac1 mice or RTX-treated wild-type mice
had normal numbers of dermal mast cells (Supplementary Fig. 6e,f), indicating that the reduced
pathological features in these mice after treatment with D.
farinae + SEB could not be attributed simply to a lack or reduction
in the number of skin mast cells.To assess whether MRGPRB2 contributed to the development of allergic
skin inflammation, we used Mrgprb2 mice, in
which MRGPRB2 is genetically inactivated by mutation, but have normal numbers of
mast cells[24] (Supplementary Fig. 6g,h).
In contrast to Mrgprb2littermates,
Mrgprb2 mice did not develop allergic
skin inflammation after treatment with D. farinae + SEB, and
had substantial reductions in skin lesions (Fig.
4a,b), histological abnormalities, infiltration of eosinophils and
neutrophils (Fig. 4c), D.
farinae-specific IgE (Fig. 4d)
and disruption of skin barrier architecture (Fig.
4e,f and Supplementary Fig. 7), suggesting that MRGPRB2 expressed on mast
cells contributed to the development of this model of allergic skin inflammation
induced by D. farinae + SEB.
Figure 4
Genetic inactivation of MRGPRB2 largely prevents development of pathology in
a model of allergic skin inflammation.
a, Representative H&E staining of D. farinae
+ SEB-treated areas in Mrgprb2 and
Mrgprb2 mice; dotted black lines indicate
the junction epidermis/dermis. b, Clinical scores (0-12) of
D. farinae + SEB-treated areas in
Mrgprb2 and
Mrgprb2 mice as in a.
c, Epidermal thickness (μm) (left), number of
eosinophils (middle) and neutrophils (right) in D. farinae +
SEB-treated areas in Mrgprb2 and
Mrgprb2 mice treated as in
a. d, Serum levels (arbitrary unit [a.u]) of
D. farinae-specific IgG1 (left) and IgE (right) antibodies
of D. farinae + SEB-treated
Mrgprb2 and
Mrgprb2 mice as in a.
e,f, Representative confocal microscopy of back skin section
(e) and fluorescence analysis (f) of filaggrin
staining of D. farinae + SEB-treated areas in
Mrgprb2 and
Mrgprb2 mice as in a. White
lines indicate the junction epidermis/dermis. Bars = 100 μm. Each open
circle = one mouse. Number of mice: (a-c,e,f) n = 6
(Mrgprb2), n = 7
(Mrgprb2); (d) n = 5
(Mrgprb2), n = 9
(Mrgprb2). Mean ± SEM
(b), mean + SEM (c,d,f), two-tailed, unpaired
t-test, *P<.05 **P<.01 ***P<.001.
TRPV1+ nociceptors activate skin mast cells through
MRGPRB2
We next explored whether D. farinae and SEB triggered
the degranulation of dermal mast cells in vivo through the
activation of TRPV1+Tac1+ nociceptors and
MRGPRB2. A single intradermal (i.d.) injection of sulforhodamine 101-labeled
avidin (Av-SRho) can be used to monitor skin mast cell granule structures
specifically in live mice by two-photon microscopy or ex vivo
by confocal microscopy[37]. We
injected vehicle or 1 μg D. farinae + 50 ng SEB i.d.
into the ear pinna of Av.SRho-injected mice and measured tissue swelling, as an
early readout of inflammation and Av.SRho+ mast cell degranulation in
whole-mounted ear skin using ex vivo volumetric confocal
microscopy 45 minutes post D. farinae + SEB injection (Supplementary Fig. 8a).
I.d. injection of vehicle induced very mild swelling of the ear tissue (Fig. 5a) and did not trigger substantial skin
mast cell degranulation (Fig. 5b,c) in
DMSO-treated wild-type mice or Mrgprb2 mice,
while injection of D. farinae + SEB induced strong ear swelling
(Fig. 5a) and abundant degranulation of
Av.SRho+ mast cells (Fig.
5b,d). After injection of D. farinae + SEB,
RTX-treated wild-type mice or Mrgprb2 mice
had a substantial reduction of both ear swelling (Fig. 5a) and degranulation of Av.SRho+ mast cells (Fig. 5b,d) compared to DMSO-treated wild-type
or Mrgprb2 mice. Wild-type mice injected i.d.
with blocking antibodies against SP had a strong reduction of both ear swelling
(Fig. 5e) and mast cell degranulation
(Fig. 5f,g) compared to IgG
isotype-treated control mice. In addition, a 30 minute pretreatment of
D. farinae + SEB with the cysteine protease inhibitor E64
decreased ear swelling significantly (Supplementary Fig. 8b,c). D. farinae
and/or SEB did not trigger the degranulation of in
vitro-cultured mouse or human mast cells at the tested concentrations
(Supplementary Fig.
8d,e).
Figure 5
Sensory neurons, MRGPRB2 and substance P are required to trigger in
vivo mast cell degranulation and associated skin swelling in
response to D. farinae and SEB antigens.
a, Changes (Δ) in ear thickness 45 minutes after i.d.
injection of vehicle or D. farinae + SEB in DMSO-treated (open
squares), RTX-treated (grey squares), Mrgprb2
(open circles) or Mrgprb2 (grey circles) mice.
b, 3D representative confocal microscopy pictures of Av.SRho
fluorescent signal (red) in whole-mounted ears in mice treated as in
a. c, Quantification of not degranulated (i.e.,
lacking exteriorized granules, white bars) or degranulated mast cells (i.e.,
presence of exteriorized Av.SRho+ granule structures, indicated with
yellow arrows in b and grey bars) in DMSO-treated, RTX-treated,
Mrgprb2 or
Mrgprb2 mice 45 minutes after i.d.
injection of vehicle. d, Same experiment as in c but
45 minutes after i.d. injection of D. farinae + SEB.
e, Changes (Δ) in ear thickness 45 minutes after i.d.
injection of D. farinae + SEB with IgG control isotype (open
triangles) or with IgG anti-SP (grey triangles) in WT mice. f, 3D
representative confocal microscopy pictures of Av.SRho fluorescent signal (red)
in whole-mounted ears in mice treated as in e. g, Quantification of
not degranulated or degranulated mast cells in mice treated as in
e. h, Same experiment as in a but 45
after i.d. injection of capsaicin. i. Same experiment as in
b but 45 after i.d. injection of capsaicin. j,
Same experiment as in d but 45 after i.d. injection of capsaicin.
Bars = 20 μm. All data are from two independent experiments with the
following number of mice: (a-d) n = 6 (DMSO Vehicle), n = 5 (RTX
Vehicle), n = 5 (Mrgprb2 Vehicle), n = 6
(Mrgprb2 Vehicle), n = 7 (DMSO
D. farinae + SEB), n = 7 (RTX D. farinae +
SEB), n = 9 (Mrgprb2 + SEB), n = 9
(Mrgprb2 + SEB);
(e-g) n = 7 (IgG control isotype), n = 7 (IgG anti-SP);
(h-j) n = 7 (DMSO), n = 7 (RTX), n = 7
(Mrgprb2), n = 7
(Mrgprb2). Mean ± SEM
(a,e,h), mean + SEM (c,d,g,j), two-tailed,
unpaired t-test, *P<.05 **P<.01 ***P<.001.
We next tested whether activation of TRPV1+ nociceptors in
the skin using the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin would result in MRGPRB2-dependent
mast cell degranulation in vivo. I.d. injection of 1 μM
capsaicin did not induce significant ear tissue swelling (Fig. 5h) or Av.SRho+ mast cell degranulation
(Fig. 5i,j) in RTX-treated wild-type
mice or Mrgprb2 mice, while strong ear
swelling (Fig. 5h) and linked degranulation
of Av.SRho+ mast cells (Fig.
5i,j) were observed in DMSO-treated wild-type and
Mrgprb2mice, indicating that the effect
was largely dependent on TRPV1+ nociceptors and MRGPRB2. These
results indicate that, upon i.d. injection of D. farinae + SEB
or capsaicin, the observed mast cell degranulation and associated early signs of
inflammation require functional TRPV1+ nociceptors, release of SP and
signaling through MRGPRB2.Next, we adapted the fluorescent avidin-based mast cell imaging approach
to visualize the activation of TRPV1+ nociceptors and the activation
of mast cells simultaneously using intravital two-photon microscopy[37]. For this purpose we used
Pirt-GCaMP3 mice, in which expression of the calcium tracer GCaMP3 is driven by
the Pirt promoter in sensory neurons[38] in order to track the spatiotemporal dynamics
of skin mast cell granule structures and TRPV1+ nociceptors
activation in living mice (Supplementary Fig. 8f). Low basal expression of GCaMP3 fluorescence
(Fig. 6a,b and Supplementary Fig. 8g) in
sensory neurons, but no degranulation of Av.SRho+ mast cells (Fig. 6a,c and Supplementary Fig. 8h)
were detected after i.d. injection of vehicle. In contrast, i.d. injection of 1
μM of the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin induced strong increases in GCaMP3
fluorescence (Fig. 6a,b and Supplementary Fig. 8g),
revealing the presence of an abundant network of activated TRPV1+
nociceptors in the mouse dermis, as well as degranulation of ~50-60 % of
Av.SRho+ mast cells (Fig.
6a,c and Supplementary Fig. 8h). After i.d. infusion of 1 μg
D. farinae + 50 ng SEB, either in combination or
separately, in Av.SRho-labelled Pirt-GCaMP3 mice we observed a significant
increase in GCaMP3 fluorescence in skin neurons compared to vehicle-injected
mice (Fig. 6a,b) and degranulation of
~ 50% Av.SRho+ mast cells (Fig.
6a,c), suggesting that the presence of D. farinae
and/or SEB antigens in the dermis could lead to the activation of
TRPV1+ nociceptors and mast cells in vivo.
Finally, we used an automated computer-assisted calculation method to perform an
unbiased analysis of the spatial organization of activated TRPV1+
nociceptors and Av.SRho+ mast cells in the dermis of Pirt-GCaMP3 mice
as assessed by live imaging. About 62 % of Av.SRho+ mast cells either
formed contacts with activated TRPV1+ nociceptors in the skin (25%)
or resided in close proximity to activated nociceptors (37% of
Av.SRho+ mast cells were within less than 25 μm from
activated TRPV1+ nociceptors) (Fig.
6d-f). These data suggest that mast cells and TRPV1+
nociceptors formed cellular clusters in the skin that can be activated in the
presence of D. farinae and SEB. Together, these results
indicated that the ear swelling observed upon i.d. injection of D.
farinae + SEB resulted from the activation of skin
TRPV1+ nociceptors which induced the degranulation of mast cells
through the release of SP and the activation of MRGPRB2.
Figure 6
Dermal mast cells and TPRV1+ nociceptors form sensory clusters in
the skin that respond to D. farinae and SEB.
a, Representative high-resolution 3-D images of the dermis; merged
fluorescence of Av.SRho (red), GCaMP3 calcium tracer (pseudocolor intensity
scale) and collagen structures (blue) in Av.SRho-labeled ear pinna of
Pirt-GCaMP3 mice 30-60 minutes after i.d. injection of vehicle or 1 μM
capsaicin or 1 μg D. farinae and 50 ng SEB (alone or in
combination). White lines identify magnified areas shown in lower images. Bars =
100 μm. b, Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of GCaMP3
fluorescent signal per field of view in mice treated as in a.
c, Proportion (%) of Av.SRho+ mast cells with
exteriorized granule structures (i.e., activated to degranulate) per field of
view in mice treated as in a. One symbol = one field analyzed.
(a-c) All data are from three independent experiments with the
following number of mice: n = 4 (vehicle), n = 5 (capsaicin), n = 5 (D.
farinae), n = 3 (SEB), n = 5 (D. farinae + SEB).
Mean + SEM, two-tailed, unpaired t-test, **P<.01
***P<.001. d, Automated computational analysis of the
minimum distance between modeled Av.SRho+ mast cell bodies detected
and modeled capsaicin-activated TRPV1+ Pirt-GCaMP3+
sensory neurons. e, Examples of modeled Av.SRho+ mast
cell bodies forming physical contact with (left) or in proximity to (right)
modeled capsaicin-activated TRPV1+ Pirt-GCaMP3+ sensory
neurons. f, Proportion (%) of 453 modeled Av.SRho+ mast
cell bodies from the ear pinnae of 3 different mice in physical contact with
(red), at 1 to 25 μm (black), at 25 to 50 μm (dark grey) or at
more than 50 μm (light grey) from modeled capsaicin-activated
TRPV1+ Pirt-GCaMP3+ sensory neurons.
Discussion
Here we found that TRPV1+Tac1+
nociceptors and MRGPRB2+ mast cells formed clusters in the mouse skin
that could be activated by allergens, such as HDMs. This, in turn, drove the
development of type 2 immunity-associated skin inflammation in mice that mimicked
many features of human AD. In addition, our results identified MRGPRB2 as a key
receptor that facilitated communication between skin mast cells and
TRPV1+Tac1 nociceptors.Based on the generated high-resolution 3D images, it is interesting to
speculate that the close anatomical co-localization of mast cells and
TRPV1+ nociceptors in the mouse dermis might enable the accumulation
of high enough amounts of secreted neuropeptide such as SP to reach the previously
reported high activation threshold of MRGPRB2[39]. Fixed biopsies have indicated proximity or contact between
nerve fibers and mast cells in mice, pigs and humans[40-43],
while mouse and human mast cells can be directly activated by neuropeptides
(including SP) in vitro[25,42,44]. A bi-directional activation process between mast
cells and submucosal neurons in cultured gut biopsies has been reported[45]. Our study offers direct evidence
of functional interactions between nociceptors and mast cells in
vivo and identified these interactions as a critical element in the
development of type 2 skin inflammation. Targeting SP-enabled interactions between
TRPV1+ nociceptors and MRGPRX2+ mast cells might therefore
represent a promising therapeutic approach for the prevention and/or treatment of
human AD pathology.Recent studies have reported that MRGPRB2 on mast cells has an important
role in the regulation of inflammatory pain[46] and itch sensation[47]. SP and MRGPRB2 were reported to be directly involved in
the regulation of inflammatory mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia, and in the
recruitment of innate immune cells at the site of injury[46]. In addition, compared to activation through
canonical FcεRI, mast cell activation through MRGPRB2 induces itch distinct
from classical histaminergic itch[47]. MRGPRB2-mediated activation of mast cells results in the
differential release of granule-associated mediators (including some with known
pruritogen function such as histamine, serotonin or tryptase), and MRGPRB2
deficiency significantly decreases itch in different models of allergic contact
dermatitis, which is thought to be associated with pathogenic CD8+ T cell
responses[48]. These
observations indicate that MRGPRB2 activation on mast cells modulates the
transmission of sensations of pain and itch in different inflammatory contexts.Mast cells can drive certain types of IgE-independent pseudo-allergic
reactions through the binding of a wide range of cationic drugs (such as the
FDA-approved mivacurium or icatibant) to MRGPRX2 or MRGPRB2[24,49,50]. It is tempting
to speculate that MRGPRX2 or MRGPRB2-mediated mast cell activation by cationic drugs
could lead to the activation of nociceptors at the site of injection and the
subsequent development of pain and/or itch. However, more in vivo
work is needed to define whether the clusters of
TRPV1+Tac1+ nociceptors and
MRGPRB2+ mast cells described here are involved in drug-induced
adverse events.We found that D. farinae, but not SEB, directly activated
TRPV1+ DRG neurons ex vivo through a cysteine
protease-dependent mechanism. We can’t rule out the possibility that direct
effects of D. farinae and/or SEB on skin mast cells, apart from
effects on degranulation, also may have contributed to our findings. However, the
data presented suggest that, under the conditions studied, D.
farinae + SEB-induced cutaneous inflammation required TRPV1+
nociceptors and the release of SP, which then activated skin mast cells.Most patients with severe AD are colonized with exotoxin-producing
S. aureus[4,6,7]. In agreement to that, we found that D. farinae
in combination with SEB triggered the development of more severe skin inflammation
than when the two antigens were used separately. While SEB alone did not activate
DRG neurons cultured ex vivo, after i.d. injection in
vivo it triggered GCaMP3 fluorescence in skin neurons comparable to
that observed after injection of D. farinae. This might indicate
that SEB activated nociceptors through an indirect mechanism; however, the precise
mechanism(s) remain(s) to be elucidated. It is possible that SEB, which is known to
be a potent superantigen, could also favor the proliferation of T cells in our
model. However, SEB treatment alone in wild-type mice triggered less severe skin
inflammation and skin lesions than treatment with D. farinae alone.
It is therefore possible that a direct mechanism of nociceptor activation by
D. farinae cysteine protease activity might be required to
efficiently trigger the development of this model of D. farinae +
SEB-induced allergic skin inflammation.The sensing of allergen-associated proteolytic activity has been proposed to
be an important mechanism of environmental allergen detection that could contribute
to the initiation of allergic diseases[31,36]. Our data suggest
that the clusters of TRPV1+ nociceptors and MRGPRB2+ mast
cells might represent tissue-resident “sensory systems” that would
detect allergens with cysteine-like protease activity in the skin and initiate type
2 immunity-associated allergic skin disease. Sensory nerve fibers and mast cells are
also present in the upper airways, lungs and gastro-intestinal tract, which are
organs continuously exposed to environmental allergens and within which allergic
diseases are also known to develop. However, the extent to which neuron-mast cell
clusters are involved in the development of other allergic disorders in different
organs remains to be investigated.
Methods
Mice
Four- to 8-week-old C57BL/6J and Tac1
mice were purchased from Charles River or the Jackson Laboratory; both
age-matched male and female mice were used in experiments.
Mrgprb2 mice (which are homozygous
for a mutation that induces a genetic inactivation of
Mrgprb2[24]) and Pirt-GCaMP3 mice (in which a genetically encoded
calcium tracer [GCaMP3] is driven into sensory neurons by the
Pirt promoter[38]) were provided by X. Dong and both male and female mice
were used in experiments. The mast cell-deficient
Kit and
Cpa3-cre mice have
been described previously[25,37]; both male and female mice
were used in experiments. PAR-2-deficient mice were a generous gift from N.
Vergnolle. Mice were bred and housed in the local animal facilities of CREFRE
(Toulouse, France) or Stanford University (CA, USA), and littermate control mice
were used in all experiments. All animal care and experimentation were conducted
in France and in the USA. Experiments conducted in USA (Galli Lab, Stanford
University, CA) were in compliance with the guidelines of the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
of Stanford University. Experiments conducted in France (Gaudenzio Lab, INSERM,
University of Toulouse) were in compliance with the guidelines of the European
Union (86/609/EEC) and the French Committee of Ethics (87/848) policies and with
the specific approval from the local ministry-approved committee on ethics in
animal experimentation (Ethics Committee UMS006 CEEA-122, project n°
13283 2018031416055447V3). 8 to 12-week-old mice were used in experiments,
excepted for RTX treatment for which 4-week-old mice were used.
Reagents and antibodies
Sodium citrate, Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA), DMSO, saponin, Capsaicin,
Resiniferatoxin and Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B (SEB) were from Sigma-Aldrich.
HDM extracts of the strain Dermatophagoides farinae were
purchased from Greer Laboratories. The following antibodies were obtained from
Covance: anti-Keratin (K) 14, anti-K6, anti-K10, anti-loricrin and
anti-filaggrin. Anti-Claudin 1 was from Abcam. Alexa594-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit IgG, Alexa488-conjugated avidin and DAPI were from Life Technologies
Invitrogen. The following reagent and antibodies were from eBioscience
Thermofisher Scientific: CellTrace™ CFSE Cell Proliferation Kit,
anti-CD4-APC, anti-IL4-PE, anti-IL-5-PE, anti-IL-13-PE, and anti-IFNγ-PE.
Purified NA/LE Rat Anti-Mouse CD124 (mIL4R-M1) or control Istoype (R35-95) were
from BD Bioscience. MYD88 inhibitory peptide (i.e., a cell permeant peptide
sequence that selectively blocks MYD88 homodimerization) and a control peptide
(i.e., an inactive and cell permeant truncated form of the MYD88 inhibitory
peptide) were from Novus. Alternaria alternata (A. alternata),
Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (D. pteronyssinus), ragweed and
German Coackroach were all from Stallergenes Greer.
Model of allergic skin inflammation
Allergic skin inflammation was induced as previously described[8,27] (described in Supplementary Fig. 1). Briefly, back skin was shaved and a
solution of 500 ng of Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB, Sigma-Aldrich) and of
10 μg of Dermatophagoides farinae extract (HDM,
Stallergen Greer) in PBS was applied on a gauze pad placed on the shaved back
and occluded with a Tegaderm™ Transparent Dressing (3M HealthCare). Three
days later, the gauze pads were replaced. Mice were monitored on a daily basis
and if a mouse removed the bandage, a new dressing was immediately applied on
this mouse and all of the other mice within the same experiment (so that they
received the same treatment and equal amounts of antigens). Four days later,
dressings were removed and mice were kept without treatment for the next week.
This "3 + 4 days” pattern of treatment was repeated two more
times, so that the mice were subjected to three cycles of such treatment. Two
days after the last cycle of treatment, the mice were euthanized and back skin
specimens corresponding to the treated areas were obtained for analyses. In a
set of experiments, mice were also treated with either IgG isotype control or
anti-CD124 antibody (100 μL; i.p.) at 2.8 mg/kg twice a week for the
entire period of treatment. The last treatment with either of these antibodies
was done one day before sacrifice. This model has been efficiently used in both
Inserm Toulouse and Stanford University and key experiments have been repeated
in both animal facilities.
Ablation of Trpv1+ nociceptors in mice
To ablate Trpv1+ nociceptors, 4-week-old C57BL/6J mice were
subcutaneously injected with increasing resiniferatoxin (RTX) doses of 30
μg/kg, 70 μg/kg and 100 μg/kg in 100 μL of PBS for 3
consecutive days. Control mice were injected with similar volumes of DMSO in 100
μL of PBS. 4 weeks later, denervation was assessed using the classical
tail flick assay.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived human mast cell culture
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained from buffy coats of
healthy blood donors at the Etablissement Francais du Sang (EFS) and were
cultured as described in Gaudenzio et al.[25]. Briefly, isolated
CD34+ cells (EasySep Human CD34 Positive Selection Kit, STEMCELL
Technologies) were cultured for one to two weeks in StemSpan medium (STEMCELL
Technologies) supplemented with recombinant human IL-6 (50 ng/ml; Peprotech),
human IL-3 (10 ng/ml; Peprotech), ciprofloxacin (10 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich)
and 3% supernatant of CHO transfectants secreting mouse SCF. After two weeks,
cells were transferred to IMDM Glutamax supplemented with sodium pyruvate,
2-β-mercaptoethanol (50 μM), 0.5% BSA, 1% insulin transferrin
selenium (all from Invitrogen), ciprofloxacin (10 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich),
IL-6 (50 ng/ml) and 3% supernatant of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) transfectants
secreting mouse SCF. Mast cells were usually ready for experiments after
~10 weeks in culture.
Bone marrow-derived cultured mouse mast cells (BMCMCs)
Hematopoietic cells were collected from C57BL/6 mouse femurs and
cultured in DMEM supplemented with L-Glutamax, 2-β-mercaptoethanol (50
μM; Invitrogen), murine IL-3 (10 ng/mL; Peprotech), 10% Fetal Bovine
Serum (FBS, Invitrogen) and Peni/Strep (100X). Twenty-four hours later, adherent
cells were removed, and fresh culture medium was added to non-adherent cells.
Three days later, cells were resuspended in fresh culture medium. The same
procedure was repeated twice a week. Cells were used for experiments between
week 4 and week 10.
β-Hexosaminidase release assay
Human mast cells were incubated in culture medium with or without human
IgE (1 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 37°C. BMCMCs were
incubated with or without anti-dinitrophenol (DNP) IgE (0.5 μg/mL; Sigma
Aldrich) overnight at 37°C. The cells were then washed and distributed in
96-well flat-bottom plates at a density of 105 cells in 50 μL
of Tyrode’s buffer at 37°C. 40 minutes later, cells were treated
with 50 μL of prewarmed stimuli diluted in Tyrode’s buffer for 45
minutes at 37°C. As a positive control of functional activation, human
mast cells were stimulated with anti-IgE (10 ng/mL; Euromedex) and BMCMCs with
DNP-BSA (10 ng/mL; Sigma Aldrich). To assess whether AD antigens could activate
mast cells, human mast cells and BMCMCs were stimulated with increasing
concentrations of D. farinae and SEB (5 ng/mL, 50 ng/mL and 500
ng/mL), alone or together. β-Hexosaminidase release in the supernatants
was measured as previously described[25].
Intracellular flow cytometry of D. farinae-specific
CD4+ T cells
Following induction of allergic skin inflammation, spleens from
vehicle-treated or D. farinae + SEB-treated mice were harvested
and dissociated to obtain a suspension of cells. 200,000 spleen cells were
stained with CFSE for 7 minutes at 37°C and incubated for 5 days with 10
μg/ml of D. farinae in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10%
FCS GlutaMAX-I, sodium pyruvate, 2-mercaptoethanol, and 10μg/ml
ciprofloxacin. Intracellular cytokines were analyzed by gating on proliferating
(CFSElow) CD4+ T cells after a 5-hour restimulation
with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (50 ng/mL, Sigma) and ionomycin (1 mg/mL,
Sigma) in the presence of GolgiStop (BD Pharmingen). Cells were fixed,
permeabilized (0.1% saponin in PBS 0.5% BSA), and stained with antibodies
directed against mouse IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 or IFN-γ. Flow cytometric data
were acquired on a BD FACSCanto cytometer and were analyzed using FlowJo
software (Tree Star, Inc, Ashland, Ore).
Skin section preparation, histology, immunofluorescence, and confocal
microscopy
Mouse back skin (1-2 cm2) samples were fixed in 10% formalin
and embedded in paraffin. Four-micrometer-thick sections were stained with
H&E, and photographs were taken using a Nikon H600L microscope and
analyzed with NIS-Elements imaging Software. All sections were
“coded” so the evaluator was not aware of their identity, as
previously described[8].
Eosinophils and neutrophils were counted on H&E-stained skin sections
from all mouse strains. For immunostaining of mouse specimens, 4-μm-thick
sections were pretreated using a heat-induced epitope retrieval method[8] in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer
(pH 6.0), then permeabilized for 30 minutes in PBS supplemented with 0.5% BSA
and 0.1% saponin. Permeabilized skin sections were incubated overnight at
4°C with primary antibodies, extensively washed, and incubated with
appropriate secondary antibodies for 2 hours at room temperature in the dark.
Images of 1024 x 1024 pixels were acquired using a Zeiss LSM780 and LSM710 Meta
inverted confocal laser-scanning microscopes. Images were processed using Zen
software (Zeiss). Epidermal K6, K17, Claudin 1, Filaggrin, Loricrin and
E-cadherin mean fluorescence intensities were analyzed using the
"measurement function" of ImageJ software on randomly chosen
epidermal areas of identical size (i.e., same total number of pixels).
Amounts of serum D. farinae-specific IgG1 and IgE antibodies
by ELISA
Each incubation step described below was followed by 3 to 5 washing
steps using PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20. MaxiSorp ELISA plates (Nunc) were
coated with 5 μg/ml D. farinae at 4°C overnight.
Plates were then blocked with 1% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) in PBS for at least
2 hours at room temperature. Sera diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA were added
and incubated in the blocked wells for 2 hours at 37°C. Afterwards,
biotinylated detection antibodies (rat anti-mouse IgG1 and rat anti-mouse IgE;
BD Biosciences; 1:1000) were then added for 1 hour at room temperature followed
by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (BD
Biosciences; 1:2000) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Reaction was then
revealed using supersensitive 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB;
Sigma Aldrich) substrate and OD was measured at 450 nm.
D. farinae proteolytic activity assay
D. farinae samples were diluted to 200 μg/mL in
a reaction buffer composed of Sodium Phosphate 100 mM pH 6, EDTA 10 mM, and DTT
1 mM. The extract was incubated or not with irreversible protease inhibitors
(cysteine protease inhibitor E64 100 nM or serine protease inhibitor AEBSF 1 mM)
in a reaction volume of 50 μL. Activity was measured using
Boc-Gln-Ala-Arg-AMC fluorogenic substrate (200 μM, diluted in the same
reaction buffer). D. farinae extracts and substrate solutions
were incubated separately for 20 minutes at 37°C. Immediately after
addition of 50 μL substrate solution on the D. farinae
extracts, the release of AMC fluorescence was followed over time using a
varioskan Flash apparatus (Thermo Scientific). The initial velocity reflecting
proteolytic activity was calculated from the kinetics curves. A control was
performed by heat-inactivating D. farinae extract for 60
minutes at 95°C before addition of substrate. An additional control was
performed in a reaction buffer devoid of DTT.
Dorsal Root Ganglia (DRG) dissociation, culture, and Ca2+
imaging
DRG neurons from all spinal levels were collected in ice-cold
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/F-12 supplemented with
10% FBS, penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL). DRGs were
digested with a mixture of dispase (5 mg/ml) and collagenase type I (1 mg/ml)
enzyme at 37°C for 45 minutes. After dissociation, cells were spun at
300g and re-suspended in media before being plated on glass
coverslips coated with poly-D-lysine (0.5 mg/ml) and laminin (10 μg/ml,
Invitrogen) or Lab-tek II chambers slide with cover (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
DRGs were cultured in media supplemented with 50 ng/mL NGF at 37°C
overnight (12-24 hours) before experimentation. In some experiments, control
peptide, or MyD88 inhibitory peptide (100 μM), were added to the DRG
cultures for 16 h. Cells were imaged in calcium imaging buffer (CIB; 10 mM
HEPES, 1.2 mM NaHCO3, 130 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2,
0.6 mM MgCl2, 20 mM glucose, and 20 mM sucrose at pH 7.4 and 290-300
mOsm) or HBSS. To monitor changes in intracellular [Ca2+]
([Ca2+]i), cells were loaded with Fura2-AM or Fluo-4
for 30 minutes in the dark at 37°C in CIB or Hepes /HBSS just prior to
imaging. Emission at 520 nm was monitored after excitation at 340 nm
(Ca2+ bound) or 380 (unbound). Cells were imaged for 20 seconds
to establish a baseline before compounds were added. DRG were stimulated with 5
ng/ml D. farinae, 5 ng/ml heat-treated D.
farinae (95°C for 60 minutes), 5 ng/ml D.
farinae treated with 2.5 pM E64, 37°C for 30 minutes), 5
ng/ml SEB or 1 μM capsaicin. At the end of every imaging trial, 50 mM KCl
was added as a positive control. Cells were identified as responding if the
intracellular [Ca2+] rose by either 50% compared to baseline or 50%
compared to the [Ca2+]i change assayed during addition of
50 mM KCl (neurons only). Damaged, detached, high-baseline and motion-activated
cells were excluded from analyses. Those experiments were performed in the Dong
Lab at Johns Hopkins University (and confirmed in the Gaudenzio Lab at INSERM,
Toulouse France) in compliance with Johns Hopkins University ethical guidelines
and Inserm Toulouse guidelines.
Quantification of SP secretion
DRG of mice were cultured as described above, rinsed in Hanks Balanced
Salt Solution (HBSS; Sigma), and incubated in L-cysteine containing 1% Papain
(Sigma) for 10 minutes at 37°C. After a wash with filtered
Leibovitz’s L-15 Medium (Gibco) containing 10% FBS (Sigma), they were
incubated in HBSS containing collagenase (1 mg/ml; Sigma) and dispase (4 mg/ml,
Sigma) at 37°C for 10 min. After titration, cells were plated in a
Poly-D-lysine-laminin (Sigma)-coated 12 well-plate (Corning) and recovered with
the complete culture media (DMEM-Glutamax, 2.5% FBS, 1% pen/strep and ARAC,
FUDR, uridine – 10 μM each; all from Sigma). Cells were incubated
for 5 minutes with vehicle or 5 ng/ml D. farinae or 5 ng/ml SEB
or and 125 nM capsaicin. Cell supernatants were tested with a Substance P Elisa
kit (Enzo) following the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Ear pinna injection, mast cell staining, and ear thickness
measurement
8 μg of Av.SRho in 20 μl of PBS were injected i.d. into
both ear pinnae of WT, Mrgprb2, and
RTX-treated mice, and the respective Mrgprb2 or
DMSO-treated control mice, to selectively label mast cell secretory granules
in vivo, as previously described[37]. 7 days later, ear thickness was measured and
then right ear pinnae were injected i.d. with 1 μg D.
farinae + 50 ng SEB (pre-incubated or not for 30 minutes at
37°C with 100 nM of E64 cysteine protease inhibitor) or 1 μM
capsaicin in 20 μl PBS. In some experiments, ear pinnae were injected
i.d. with 1 μg D. farinae + 50 ng SEB with 15 μg
of IgG anti-SP (Sigma Aldrich) in 20 μl PBS. Left ear pinnae were
injected with 20 μL of respective control solutions: vehicle alone or in
combination with IgG isotype control. 45 minutes later, ear thickness was
measured again and mice were euthanized before ear excision. Whole ears were
fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) overnight, then mounted on microscopy slides
and placed under a LSM710 Meta inverted confocal laser-scanning microscope. High
resolution Z-stack images 1024 x 1024 pixels of Av.SRho fluorescent signal were
acquired using a 20x objective. Images were then processed using Image J and
Imaris (Bitplane) softwares.
In vivo two-photon microscopy of living mice
Experiments were conducted as previously described[25,37]. Briefly, 8 μg of Av.SRho in 20 μl of PBS
were injected i.d. into the ear pinna of Pirt-GCaMP3 mice. 1 week later, mice
were injected i.d. with vehicle, 1 μM capsaicin, or 1 μg
D. farinae and 50 ng SEB (used alone or in combination) in
a final volume of 20 μl then placed under the two-photon microscope on a
custom-built 3-D printed mouse platform; anesthesia was maintained by a mixture
of Isoflurane/O2 and the animal’s ear pinna was kept at 36°C using
a heating pad system. The fluorescence corresponding to Av.SRho+ mast
cell granule structures or GCaMP3+ skin neurons was measured using a
Prairie Ultima IV two-photon microscope (Spectra Physics Mai Tai HP Ti:sapphire
laser, tunable from 690 to 1040 nm). Images were acquired in 3-D up to 100-150
μm depth, with 20x Olympus XLUM Plan Fl N.A. 0.95 water-immersion
objective and a software zoom setting of 1 or 3 (8 bits/pixel 1024x1024, scaling
x= 0.228 μm, y= 0.228 μm, z= 0.5−μm). Modeling and
analysis of fluorescent signals were performed using untreated image sequences,
as previously described[25],
using Imaris software (Bitplane) and Image J software version Fiji,
respectively.
Automated computational analysis of the minimum distance between mast cells
and neurons in the dermis of living mice
1) 3D high resolution images were taken using a Prairie Ultima IV
two-photon microscope as described above. The following steps have been
automated in the software Imaris Bitplane version 9.2. 2) Hair follicles’
autofluorescent signals were modeled into matched 3D objects using the
isosurface algorithm. 3) Autofluorescent signals corresponding to the generated
isosurfaces were depleted from the GCaMP3 fluorescence detection channel so that
the hair follicles were no longer detectable in that particular channel. 4) The
filament tracer algorithm was applied in the GCaMP3 fluorescence detection
channel in order to precisely trace the trajectories and exact shapes of GCaMP3
fluorescent signals. Filament traces were then converted into fluorescent
signals in a new fluorescent channel. 5) Those newly generated fluorescent
signals were modeled into matched 3D objects using the isosurface algorithm. The
distance transformation algorithm was applied to those new isosurfaces resulting
in the generation of a new distance transformation channel. 6) Av.SRho
fluorescent signals were modeled into matched 3D objects using the isosurface
algorithm. The intensity minimum (i.e., distance minimum in μm) to the
distance transformation channel (i.e., modeled sensory neurons) was calculated
for each of the Av.SRho+ isosurfaces of at least 5 μm of
diameter (corresponding to Av.SRho+ mast cell cellular bodies and
excluding small exteriorized Av.SRho+ granules structures). 7)
Results per field of view were generated into separated Excel sheets. The exact
same procedure was automatically applied to all analyzed 3D images.
Statistics
Statistical tests were performed with the software Prism 6 (GraphPad
Software). Two-tailed unpaired/paired Student’s t tests,
1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons or
Holm-Sidak’s post-hoc test were performed on samples as noted in the
respective figure legends. A P value of less than 0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
Authors: R Bunikowski; M E Mielke; H Skarabis; M Worm; I Anagnostopoulos; G Kolde; U Wahn; H Renz Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Caroline Perner; Cameron H Flayer; Xueping Zhu; Pamela A Aderhold; Zaynah N A Dewan; Tiphaine Voisin; Ryan B Camire; Ohn A Chow; Isaac M Chiu; Caroline L Sokol Journal: Immunity Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Shiqun Zhang; Tara N Edwards; Virendra K Chaudhri; Jianing Wu; Jonathan A Cohen; Toshiro Hirai; Natalie Rittenhouse; Elizabeth G Schmitz; Paul Yifan Zhou; Benjamin D McNeil; Yi Yang; H Richard Koerber; Tina L Sumpter; Amanda C Poholek; Brian M Davis; Kathryn M Albers; Harinder Singh; Daniel H Kaplan Journal: Cell Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Bonnie Douglas; Oyebola Oyesola; Martha M Cooper; Avery Posey; Elia Tait Wojno; Paul R Giacomin; De'Broski R Herbert Journal: Annu Rev Immunol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 28.527
Authors: Caspar Schiffers; Milena Hristova; Aida Habibovic; Christopher M Dustin; Karamatullah Danyal; Niki L Reynaert; Emiel F M Wouters; Albert van der Vliet Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 6.914