Literature DB >> 31591475

Contribution of SLC22A12 on hypouricemia and its clinical significance for screening purposes.

Do Hyeon Cha1, Heon Yung Gee1, Raul Cachau2, Jong Mun Choi3, Daeui Park4, Sun Ha Jee5, Seungho Ryu6, Kyeong Kyu Kim7, Hong-Hee Won7, Sophie Limou8,9,10,11, Woojae Myung12, Cheryl A Winkler11, Sung Kweon Cho13,14.   

Abstract

Differentiating between inherited renal hypouricemia and transient hypouricemic status is challenging. Here, we aimed to describe the genetic background of hypouricemia patients using whole-exome sequencing (WES) and assess the feasibility for genetic diagnosis using two founder variants in primary screening. We selected all cases (N = 31) with extreme hypouricemia (<1.3 mg/dl) from a Korean urban cohort of 179,381 subjects without underlying conditions. WES and corresponding downstream analyses were performed for the discovery of rare causal variants for hypouricemia. Two known recessive variants within SLC22A12 (p.Trp258*, pArg90His) were identified in 24 out of 31 subjects (77.4%). In an independent cohort, we identified 50 individuals with hypouricemia and genotyped the p.Trp258* and p.Arg90His variants; 47 of the 50 (94%) hypouricemia cases were explained by only two mutations. Four novel coding variants in SLC22A12, p.Asn136Lys, p.Thr225Lys, p.Arg284Gln, and p.Glu429Lys, were additionally identified. In silico studies predict these as pathogenic variants. This is the first study to show the value of genetic diagnostic screening for hypouricemia in the clinical setting. Screening of just two ethnic-specific variants (p.Trp258* and p.Arg90His) identified 87.7% (71/81) of Korean patients with monogenic hypouricemia. Early genetic identification of constitutive hypouricemia may prevent acute kidney injury by avoidance of dehydration and excessive exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31591475      PMCID: PMC6779878          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50798-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Uric acid (UA) is the final product of purine metabolism in humans[1]. After reuptake in the renal proximal tubule, only 10% of initially filtered UA is eliminated in the urine[2]. Serum UA level is determined by the balance between the rate of purine metabolism and clearance. Serum UA level converges to a normal distribution in general population[3]. At present, the heritability of serum urate has been estimated in several studies to account for 25% to 60% of the variance in serum UA level[4]. Common variants within SLC2A9 and ABCG2 were reported to be highly associated with serum UA levels with an additional 28 genetic loci affecting serum urate level in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of more than 140,000 individuals of European ancestry[5]. Hypouricemia, defined as extremely low serum UA level, is a rare condition which can be affected by malnutrition, and by genetic defects in critical pathways involving UA synthesis and reabsorption system. Deficiencies of xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH), Molybdenum Cofactor Sulfurase (MOCOS), purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), and 5-phosphoribosyl-pyrophosphate (PRPP) are related to the defects in UA synthesis[6]. Renal hypouricemia (RHUC), with a prevalence of 0.19% to 0.53% in several studies, is diagnosed based on laboratory criteria as 1) hypouricemia (<2 mg/dL) and 2) increased fractional excretion of UA (>10%)[7]. RHUC is asymptomatic and rarely identified unless an individual presents with severe renal symptoms including exercise-induced acute kidney injury (EIAKI), renal failure and nephrolithiasis[8]. Despite these important clinical implications, differentiating between inherited and transient hypouricemia is challenging because a low level of UA may reflect malnutrition status, which can be resolved by genetic screening using a panel with well-established genetic variants[9]. Two types of RHUC have been currently reported: type 1 (OMIM: 220150) caused by mutations in SLC22A12 and type 2 (OMIM: 612076) caused by mutations in SLC2A9. A Japanese study first identified the protein-truncating p.Trp258* mutation in the SLC22A12 gene, which encodes a drug transporter in the renal proximal tubule[10]. Recently, coding variants in SLC22A12 and SLC2A9 causal for RHUC has been reported in various ethnic groups including Israeli-Arab, Iraqi-Jewish, and Roma populations in the Czech Republic and Slovakia[7,11-15]. In this study, we investigated unrelated subjects with extremely low levels of UA using whole-exome sequencing (WES) to identify monogenic coding variants responsible for RHUC, which could be used for genetic screening of RHUC in Asians. After the discovery of candidate variants, we performed direct genotyping of the most frequent mutations (p.Trp258* and p.Arg90His) in SLC22A12 to replicate and quantify their contribution to RHUC in an independent Korean cohort, and to assess diagnostic feasibility of cost-effective genetic screening using these small subset of variants in hypouricemic patients.

Results

Hypouricemia prevalence and demographic information of 81 selected hypouricemic subjects

The prevalence of extreme hypouricemia (serum UA < 1.3 mg/dL) is 0.083% for the KoGES urban cohort (148/179,318). A total of 81 individuals (31 subjects in the KoGES urban cohort and 50 additional subjects from KCPS-II cohorts) were genetically tested for RHUC diagnostic assessment. Their baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The 81 participants with RHUC (UA 0.74 ± 0.24 mg/dL; age, 47 ± 10 years; BMI, 23.3 ± 2.3 kg/m2; total cholesterol level, 189.2 ± 26.5 mg/dL) were healthy without chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus or other metabolic diseases and without any history of smoking or malnutrition.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics.

CharacteristicsDiscovery groupReplication groupTotal
n = 31n = 50n = 81
Age (years)47 ± 747 ± 1247 ± 10
BMI* (kg/m2)23.5 ± 2.023.1 ± 2.523.3 ± 2.3
Waist circumstance, cm79.1 ± 6.379.5 ± 9.379.2 ± 7.0
Blood pressure, mmHg
Systolic120 ± 13117 ± 15118 ± 14
Diastolic74 ± 1172 ± 1173 ± 11
Smoking status
Never smokers, no. (%)31 (100.00)33 (34.00)64 (79.0)
Ever smokers, no. (%)0 (0)17 (66.00)17 (21.0)
Alcohol consumption
Never drinkers, no. (%)19 (61.29)18 (36.00)37 (45.7)
Ever drinkers, no. (%)12 (38.71)32 (64.00)44 (54.3)
Uric acid, mg/dL0.77 ± 0.250.73 ± 0.240.74 ± 0.24
Total cholesterol, mg/dL195.1 ± 25.4185.5 ± 26.8189.2 ± 26.5
Triglycerides, mg/dL113.5 ± 66.6113.8 ± 67.9113.6 ± 67.0
Fasting glucose, mg/dL90.2 ± 12.892.7 ± 21.291.7 ± 18.4
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL115.5 ± 23.3108.9 ± 22.0111.4 ± 22.6
HDL cholesterol, mg/dL56.9 ± 12.355.0 ± 14.155.7 ± 13.4
Creatinine, mg/dL0.78 ± 0.140.86 ± 0.170.83 ± 0.16

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous data.

*The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; ¶LDL Cholesterol: Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; HDL Cholesterol: †High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.

Demographic characteristics. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous data. *The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; ¶LDL Cholesterol: Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; HDL Cholesterol: †High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.

Identification of coding variants in SLC22A12 by whole-exome sequencing

WES analysis was performed in 31 individuals with hypouricemia of the KoGES cohort (Fig. 1). The average depth coverage for these individuals was 85-fold. We performed variant calling and downstream filtering analyses assuming an autosomal recessive inheritance model. Coding variants in SLC22A12 were observed in 87.1% (27/31) of the individuals (Table 2). One subject was a compound heterozygote for SLC2A9 variants. In the remaining three individuals, variants within other genes were identified that appeared to have disease-causing potential and will be further investigated. 76% (24/31) individuals had variants previously reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) and the remaining 9.7% (3/31) exhibited novel missense mutations that had not been previously reported (Supplementary Table 3). 32.3% (10/31) of hypouricemia individuals were homozygous for the SLC22A12 p.Trp258* resulting in a premature stop codon, the most reported disease-causing variant to date. We also identified two homozygous individuals for the SLC22A12 p.Arg90His variants[16]. We found 12 compound heterozygous individuals for previously reported variants in the HGMD. In another individual, the p.Glu429Lys mutation was compound heterozygous with p.Trp258* in SLC22A12 (NIH17A8865148). Two novel SLC22A12 missense variants, p.Thr225Lys and p.Arg284Gln, were identified as compound heterozygotes (NIH17A8798528). Finally, we identified the novel p.Asn136Lys variant in the compound heterozygous state with the previously reported p.Leu418Arg variant (NIH17K4930892) (Supplementary Table 3).
Figure 1

Overall flowchart for investigating novel variants associated with renal hypouricemia (DM: Diabetes Mellitus, HTN: Hypertension).

Table 2

Distribution of SLC22A12 variants in discovery and replication cohorts.

Number of Subjects (%)Number of risk alleles in SLC22A12Other than SLC22A12
p.Trp258*p.Arg90HisOthers*
Discovery cohort, n = 31
10 (32.3%)200
7 (22.6%)110
2 (6.5%)020
5 (16.1%)101
3 (9.7%)002
27 (87.1%)4 (12.9%)
Replication cohort, n = 50
10 (20.0%)200
22 (44.0%)110
1 (2.0%)020
10 (20.0%)100
4 (8.0%)010
47 (94.0%)3 (6.6%)

*p.Asn136Lys, p.Thr217Met, p.Gln382Leu, p.Leu418Arg, p.Glu429Lys or p.Arg477His.

Distribution of SLC22A12 variants in 27 hypouricemia individuals out of 31 in discovery cohort.

Overall flowchart for investigating novel variants associated with renal hypouricemia (DM: Diabetes Mellitus, HTN: Hypertension). Distribution of SLC22A12 variants in discovery and replication cohorts. *p.Asn136Lys, p.Thr217Met, p.Gln382Leu, p.Leu418Arg, p.Glu429Lys or p.Arg477His. Distribution of SLC22A12 variants in 27 hypouricemia individuals out of 31 in discovery cohort. The overall distribution of allele frequencies of the SLC22A12 variants within our study is shown in Fig. 2. The novel SLC22A12 variants were confirmed in the participant DNA samples by direct Sanger sequencing (Supplementary Fig. 1). Detailed properties of the four novel mutations in SLC22A12 are shown in Table 3 and Supplementary Table 3. This information was collected by querying several methods for functional prediction (Mutation Taster, Polyphen-2, SIFT, Condel). All four tools predicted the two SLC22A12 variants (p.Thr225Lys and p.Arg284Gln) reported in the NIH17A8798528 individual as deleterious. Amino acid sequence conservation was compared with R. macaque, M. musculus, C. lupus familiaris, and L. africana (Table 3). SLC22A12 p.Glu429Lys is not conserved in M. musculus and p.Asn136Lysd is not conserved in M. musculus, C. lupus familiaris, and L. africana.
Figure 2

(A) Allele frequency distribution in SLC22A12 variants from KoGES cohorts (n = 31). (B) A schematic diagram of the exonic location of SLC22A12 variants found in 27 subjects. Newly discovered coding variants are marked in red.

Table 3

Novel missense variants of SLC22A12 identified in individuals with renal hypouricemia via whole-exome sequencing.

GenesymbolIndividualChrBasepositionNucleotide changeaAmino acidchangeAmino acidconservationFrequency in thedbSNP databasebFrequencyin thegnomADdatabasecMutationTasterePP2HumvarfSIFTgCondelh
Rhesus macaque Mus musculus Canis lupus familiaris Loxodonta africana
SLC22A12 NIH17A88651481164367362c.1285G > Ap.Glu429LysGluGlyGluGlu

rs139140123

0.00005/5

(ExAC)

0.00008/1

(GO-ESP)

0.000044

(no homozygote)

DC

Bn

(0.37)

Tol

(0.05)

Neu

(0.463)

NIH17A87985281164361119c.674C > Ap.Thr225LysThrThrThrThrNoNoDC

Dam

(0.998)

Del

(0)

Del

(0.919)

1164366008c.851G > Ap.Arg284GlnArgArgArgArgNo

0.000019

(no homozygote)

DC

Dam

(0.527)

Del

(0.03)

Del

(0.542)

NIH17K49308921164360256c.408C > Ap.Asn136LysAsnAspAspAspNo

0.000004

(no homozygote)

PM

Bn

(0.345)

Del

(0)

Del

(0.553)

Abbreviations are as follows: Chr, chromosome; Bn, benign; Condel, consensus deleteriousness score of non-synonymous single nucleotide variants; Dam, damaging; DC, disease causing; Del, deleterious; Neu, neutral; PM, polymorphism; PP2, PolyPhen-2 prediction score Humvar; SIFT, sorting intolerant from tolerant; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; Tol, tolerant. cDNA mutations are numbered according to human cDNA reference sequence NM_144585.2 (SLC22A12). bdbSNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP). cgnomAD browser (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). eMutation taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/). fPolyPhen-2 prediction score HumVar ranges from 0 to 1.0; 0 = benign, 1.0 = probably damaging (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/). gSIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/). hCondel (http://bbglab.irbbarcelona.org/fannsdb/).

(A) Allele frequency distribution in SLC22A12 variants from KoGES cohorts (n = 31). (B) A schematic diagram of the exonic location of SLC22A12 variants found in 27 subjects. Newly discovered coding variants are marked in red. Novel missense variants of SLC22A12 identified in individuals with renal hypouricemia via whole-exome sequencing. rs139140123 0.00005/5 (ExAC) 0.00008/1 (GO-ESP) 0.000044 (no homozygote) Bn (0.37) Tol (0.05) Neu (0.463) Dam (0.998) Del (0) Del (0.919) 0.000019 (no homozygote) Dam (0.527) Del (0.03) Del (0.542) 0.000004 (no homozygote) Bn (0.345) Del (0) Del (0.553) Abbreviations are as follows: Chr, chromosome; Bn, benign; Condel, consensus deleteriousness score of non-synonymous single nucleotide variants; Dam, damaging; DC, disease causing; Del, deleterious; Neu, neutral; PM, polymorphism; PP2, PolyPhen-2 prediction score Humvar; SIFT, sorting intolerant from tolerant; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; Tol, tolerant. cDNA mutations are numbered according to human cDNA reference sequence NM_144585.2 (SLC22A12). bdbSNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP). cgnomAD browser (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). eMutation taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/). fPolyPhen-2 prediction score HumVar ranges from 0 to 1.0; 0 = benign, 1.0 = probably damaging (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/). gSIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/). hCondel (http://bbglab.irbbarcelona.org/fannsdb/).

Molecular dynamic prediction of SLC22A12 and novel variant location

The amino acid substitutions in SLC22A12 (10 variants) were considered for a molecular dynamic prediction analysis. The predicted functional impact of the amino acid change is illustrated in Supplementary Table 4. Our overall organization of the SLC22A12 protein was similar to the molecular dynamics approach described by Clemencon et al.[17]. Steered dynamic simulations of urate transport were performed with mutations in SLC22A12 and are presented in Fig. 3. Assessing the extent of the effect of the variants in the S set is difficult in a qualitative analysis due to the large changes observed during the molecular dynamics trajectory. p.Arg90His, p.Thr217Met, p.Thr225Lys, p.Trp258*, and p.Leu418Arg for SLC22A12 were predicted to alter protein structure defect. p.Arg284Gln and p.Arg477His were predicted to affect transport of uric acid. p.Asn136Lys and p.Gln382Leu for SLC22A12 were predicted to affect binding of urate. SLC22A12 p.Arg477His was predicted to both lower binding of urate and block the transportation pathway.
Figure 3

Residue mapping in the SLC22A12 predicted models.

Residue mapping in the SLC22A12 predicted models.

Utility of screening with two genetic SLC22A12 variants: c.774G > A (p.Trp258*) and c.269G > A (p.Arg90His)

Among 50 hypouricemia individuals from the KCPS-II replication cohort, 47 individuals carried at least one of these two genetic variants (Supplementary Table 2): 10 individuals carried the c.774G > A (p.Trp258*) homozygous stop codon; one individual carried a c.269G > A (p.Arg90His) homozygous mutation; 22 individuals carried c.269G > A (p.Arg90His) and c.774G > A (p.Trp258*) in the compound heterozygous state; and 14 individuals carried either c.269G > A (p.Arg90His) or c.774G > A (p.Trp258*) heterozygous variants.

Discussion

In this study, we comprehensively evaluated the contribution of SLC22A12 to severe hypouricemia through WES of 31 RHUC cases and replication of two implicated SNVs in 50 RHUC cases for a total of 81 unrelated Korean subjects. This is the first study to evaluate causal genetic variants for their diagnostic potential for RHUC. Overall, our study confirmed the importance of two mutations (p.Trp258* and p.Arg90His) in SLC22A12 for RHUC diagnosis found in 71/81(87.7%) of hypouricemia subjects. Among the individuals exhibiting SLC22A12 mutations, we described four novel variants that had not been previously reported in the HGMD: p.Asn136Lys, p.Thr225Lys, p.Arg284Gln, and p.Glu429Lys. p.Asn136Lys (exon2) was located at the end of an intracellular loop, p.Thr225Lys (exon4) was present at the beginning of an extracellular loop, p.Arg284Gln (exon5) was localized in the largest extracellular loop, and p.Glu429Lys, in which the distal end of exon 7 and the first part of exon 8 are connected via splicing, was found to be within the membrane before an intracellular loop (Fig. 2B.)[16]. p.Asn136Lys occurred together with p.Leu418Arg in the case of NIH17K4930892; however, we could not determine cis or trans configuration. p.Thr225Lys: p.Arg284Gln and p.Glu429Lys:p.Trp258* were found in the compound heterozygous state, respectively in in NIH17A8798528 and NIH17A8865148. None of these variants were not found in Japanese (OMIM #220150, RHUC type 1)[16,18-20]. Further studies are needed to elucidate the pathogenicity of rare variants of unknown significance located within novel genes in six unexplained cases. Family-based WES studies for cases not explained by the two founder variants in SLC22A12 might identify additional monogenic genes that cause extremely low serum UA levels. Hypouricemia is often regarded as an unrecognized or neglected disorder from a public health aspect[21]. The prevalence of renal stone due to excess of UA excretion is 6–7 times higher in patients with RHUC than in individuals with normal uric acid levels[16]. Evidence of oxidative stress has accumulated not only in EIAKI and renal stone but also in neurodegenerative disease (e.g., Parkinson’s disease) in persons with RHUC, reflecting the ability of UA to act as a powerful scavenger of approximately 60% of peroxide radicals in the plasma[22-26]. The anti-oxidative stress hypothesis is also supported by the results of Facheris et al., which show that the SLC2A9 mutation, associated with lower serum UA, increases the risk for early onset of neurodegenerative diseases[27]. Early identification and intervention of hypouricemia (avoidance of hard exercise, adequate hydration, and pre-emptively taking XO inhibitors) may prevent adverse events, especially among military personnel and athletics. XO inhibitor use (allopurinol or febuxostat) may be beneficial by lowering filtered UA. Screening of just two SLC22A12 variants (p.Trp258*/rs121907892 and p.Arg90His/rs121907896) for soldiers or athletics will provide early diagnosis of inherited RHUC and increase awareness among primary care physicians and medical care professionals (e.g. military, sport physicians, urologists) of the potential adverse health outcomes in at-risk individuals. Here, we have shown that two Asian founder variants can provide a precision molecular diagnosis for 90% of inherited hypouricemia in the homogeneous Korean population. Recently, large scale WES have identified novel variants in SLC22A12 and SLC2A9 in individuals with European ancestry[28]. Like other genetic traits and conditions, RHUC shows genetic allelic and locus heterogeneity. Given that genetic architecture and causal variants, particularly rare variants, differ among ethnic and racial groups, collaborative genomic research may identify novel, population-specific variants associated with RHUC. Considering all of the population-specific rare variants observed in hypouricemia patients in Japanese, Roma, and African populations, a cosmopolitan screening panel may yield high diagnostic power even among heterogeneous populations that present with complex genetic admixture. In summary, this study indicates the cost-effectiveness of screening for just two variants to diagnosis monogenic renal hypouricemia, and its potential utility in at-risk groups.

Materials and Methods

Study participants

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (IRB# KBSMC 2016-12-016). We screened the subjects in the Korean genome and epidemiology study (KoGES) – KoGES health examinee study (urban cohort) and KoGES twin and family study. Out of 179,318 individuals, we selected 31 (M:11, F:20) individuals of hypouricemia (<1.3 mg/dL) who exhibited no other syndromic features or secondary causes (chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus or any other metabolic diseases) and without any history of smoking. We also excluded people who have poor nutrition status. We obtained genomic DNA samples from the National Biobank of Korea[29]. In addition, 50 additional hypouricemic subjects without secondary causes were selected from the Korean Cancer Prevention Study (KCPS-II) cohort from the Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea (IRB#4-2011-0277)[30]. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was done in first 31 individuals, whereas SNaPshot genotyping of two variants (p.Trp258* and p.Arg90His) within SLC22A12 was performed to assess its screening purpose for second 50 subjects. A total of 81 hypouricemic patients were therefore recruited for this study. All patients had given informed consent before they were enrolled in the study, which was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The overall flowchart for this study is presented in Fig. 1.

DNA preparation and whole-exome sequencing

Genomic DNA was obtained from peripheral blood leukocytes. We checked the quality of the DNA with an OD260/280 ratio of 1.8–2.0 by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and PicoGreen® dsDNA Assay (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). SureSelect sequencing libraries were prepared (Agilent SureSelect All Exon kit 50 Mb, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the enriched library was then sequenced using the HiSeq 2500 sequencing system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Image analysis and base calling were performed with the pipeline software using default parameters. Mapping was done using the human reference genome assembly (GRCh37/hg19), and all variants were called and annotated using CLC Genomic Workbench (version 9.0.1) software (QIAGEN bioinformatics, Redwood city, CA, USA).

WES variant filtering analysis

We performed variant-filtering analysis assuming an autosomal recessive or X-linked recessive pattern according to the predominantly observed inheritance mode in hereditary RHUC[31]. First, we systematically excluded variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) > 1%, which has been the conventional threshold for a rare variant, using dbSNP database (version 150), 1000 Genomes Projects phase 3 data (2,504 individuals), Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org), and Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/)[29]. Second, variants present in the homozygous or hemizygous state in in-house database consisting of 46 healthy Koreans without hypouricemia were excluded. Third, non-synonymous variants, small insertion/deletion (indel) or splice-site variants were selected. In the further analysis, we excluded single heterozygous variants so that only bi-allelic variants (homozygous, compound heterozygous, hemizygous for male) finally remained

Direct Sanger sequencing

Confirmation of called variants was conducted via direct Sanger sequencing. The DNA sequences spanning the variants were amplified using specific primers (Supplementary Table 1) and sequenced using an Applied Biosystems 3500xl genetic analyzer3500XL (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

SNaPshot method

The SNaPshot assay of rs121907896 (p.Arg90His) and rs121907892 (p.Trp258*) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ABI PRISM SNaPshot Multiplex kit, Foster City, CA, USA). The analysis was carried out using GeneMapper software (version 4.0; Applied Biosystems). The primer sets for the SNaPshot assay are described in Supplementary Table 1.

In silico analysis of novel missense variants

Prior to the analysis, known pathogenic variants of SLC22A12 were screened in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD®) as a public reference. For the newly discovered missense SLC22A12 variants, we checked if the mutated amino acid resides are highly conserved across the vertebrate orthologs using the UCSC Genome Browser (https://genome.ucsc.edu/). Given the role of the nitrogen excretion function in the evolutionary process, we identified amino acid sequences in several mammals (Rhesus macaque, Mus musculus, Canis lupus familiaris, and Loxodonta africana) that share the urea cycle rather than direct UA excretion. Third, the prediction of the functional effect of missense variants was performed using the latest version of PolyPhen-2, SIFT, Condel, and Mutation Taster algorithms[32-35].

In silico prediction of molecular dynamics

We initially predicted the structure of SLC22A12 using a homology modeling program, SWISS-MODEL (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/). The quality of predicted 3D structures was estimated on the basis of the geometrical analysis of the single model, global model quality estimation (GMQE) score and qualitative model energy analysis (QMEAN)[36]. The GenBank accession number used for each amino acid sequence was NP_653186 for SLC22A12. After homology modeling was completed, we selected a suitable SLC2A3 X-ray structure for SLC22A12 (PDB ID: 4ZW9, SLC2A3)[37,38]. For the more stable molecular dynamics simulations, we used I-Tasser generated models[39]. All models were generated and made publicly available and can be recovered together with the statistics from the server site (https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/about.html). All graphical representations were made using the initial I-Tasser generated models to aid reproducibility. A qualitative evaluation of the mutation effect was conducted based on four simple criteria. Binding urate (U) indicates the effect of the mutation on binding or urate because of the exposure of the mutated residue to the vestibular region or the urate binding motif cavity and/or involves a polar/nonpolar mutation affecting the interaction with urate. The structural effect (S) was evaluated as an increase in the root mean square displacement (RMSD) deviation computed during 25 ns of molecular dynamics (after 25 ns of equilibration) measured against the conformations obtained during a 25 ns trajectory for the initial sequence using either a solvated model or a Feedback Restrained Molecular Dynamics model (FRMD). FRMD affords a simple protocol to maximally retain structural features during a molecular dynamics trajectory while minimizing distortions imposed by an external restrain[40]. The transport effect (T) indicates that the mutation intrudes into the vestibular area blocking the possible passage of urate and is assigned based on a reduction of the internal cavity volume. We used all the models to identify geometries compatible with the mutation extending the initial molecular dynamic trajectory for SLC22A12 (10 mutations) to 125 ns. All molecular dynamics calculations were performed using NAMD2[41] and the ff99SB force field in the NVT ensemble with typical settings (T = 298 K, 2fs integration time, 12A cutoffs) obtained using QwikMD with default parameters to prepare the input files. Supplementary tables and figures
  41 in total

1.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; Rosemary Braun; Wei Wang; James Gumbart; Emad Tajkhorshid; Elizabeth Villa; Christophe Chipot; Robert D Skeel; Laxmikant Kalé; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age.

Authors:  Jana Marie Schwarz; David N Cooper; Markus Schuelke; Dominik Seelow
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  URAT1 mutations cause renal hypouricemia type 1 in Iraqi Jews.

Authors:  Dganit Dinour; Andrew Bahn; Liat Ganon; Rotem Ron; Ossie Geifman-Holtzman; Aaron Knecht; Uzi Gafter; Ruth Rachamimov; Ben-Ami Sela; Gerhard Burckhardt; Eliezer J Holtzman
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 4.  [Inherited disorders of uric acid metabolism--classification, enzymatic- and DNA-diagnosis].

Authors:  H Iwahana; M Itakura
Journal:  Nihon Rinsho       Date:  1996-12

5.  A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.

Authors:  Ivan A Adzhubei; Steffen Schmidt; Leonid Peshkin; Vasily E Ramensky; Anna Gerasimova; Peer Bork; Alexey S Kondrashov; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  A Novel Homozygous SLC2A9 Mutation Associated with Renal-Induced Hypouricemia.

Authors:  Martin Windpessl; Marco Ritelli; Manfred Wallner; Marina Colombi
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 7.  Recent insights into the pathogenesis of hyperuricaemia and gout.

Authors:  Philip L Riches; Alan F Wright; Stuart H Ralston
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Cohort Profile: The Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) Consortium.

Authors:  Yeonjung Kim; Bok-Ghee Han
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Large-scale whole-exome sequencing association studies identify rare functional variants influencing serum urate levels.

Authors:  Adrienne Tin; Yong Li; Jennifer A Brody; Teresa Nutile; Audrey Y Chu; Jennifer E Huffman; Qiong Yang; Ming-Huei Chen; Cassianne Robinson-Cohen; Aurélien Macé; Jun Liu; Ayşe Demirkan; Rossella Sorice; Sanaz Sedaghat; Melody Swen; Bing Yu; Sahar Ghasemi; Alexanda Teumer; Peter Vollenweider; Marina Ciullo; Meng Li; André G Uitterlinden; Robert Kraaij; Najaf Amin; Jeroen van Rooij; Zoltán Kutalik; Abbas Dehghan; Barbara McKnight; Cornelia M van Duijn; Alanna Morrison; Bruce M Psaty; Eric Boerwinkle; Caroline S Fox; Owen M Woodward; Anna Köttgen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Discovery of URAT1 SNPs and association between serum uric acid levels and URAT1.

Authors:  Sung Kweon Cho; Soriul Kim; Jae-Yong Chung; Sun Ha Jee
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  5 in total

1.  Emerging Roles of the Human Solute Carrier 22 Family.

Authors:  Sook Wah Yee; Kathleen M Giacomini
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.579

Review 2.  Genetic Basis of the Epidemiological Features and Clinical Significance of Renal Hypouricemia.

Authors:  Masayuki Hakoda; Kimiyoshi Ichida
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-13

3.  Polygenic analysis of the effect of common and low-frequency genetic variants on serum uric acid levels in Korean individuals.

Authors:  Sung Kweon Cho; Beomsu Kim; Woojae Myung; Yoosoo Chang; Seungho Ryu; Han-Na Kim; Hyung-Lae Kim; Po-Hsiu Kuo; Cheryl A Winkler; Hong-Hee Won
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Rational selection of a biomarker panel targeting unmet clinical needs in kidney injury.

Authors:  T T van Duijl; D Soonawala; J W de Fijter; L R Ruhaak; C M Cobbaert
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.988

5.  Function of Uric Acid Transporters and Their Inhibitors in Hyperuricaemia.

Authors:  Hao-Lu Sun; Yi-Wan Wu; He-Ge Bian; Hui Yang; Heng Wang; Xiao-Ming Meng; Juan Jin
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.