Literature DB >> 31590654

Past history of stage I/II solid tumor malignancy impacts considerably on sepsis mortality: a propensity score matching analysis from the hellenic sepsis study group.

George Dimopoulos1, Nikoletta Rovina2, Maria Patrani3, Eleni Antoniadou4, Dimitrios Konstantonis1, Konstantina Vryza5, Glykeria Vlachogianni6, Miltiades Kyprianou7, Christina Routsi8, Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether past history of solid stage I/II inactive cancer has an impact on 28-day mortality of sepsis remains unclear. We aimed to determine the impact of history of stage I or II solid tumor malignancy in complete remission the last 3 years on sepsis outcome.
METHODS: Using the database of the Hellenic Sepsis Study Group from 1553 patients with sepsis admitted in the ICU, 83 patients with sepsis by Sepsis-3 definition with past-history of stage I/II inactive solid malignancy the last 3 years were depicted. A comparator group of 83 patients fully matched for age, severity, type of infection and comorbidities was selected by propensity score matching.
RESULTS: Mortality after 28 days was 37.3% in the comparator group and 54.2% in the solid tumor stage I/II group (odds ratio for death 1.98; p: 0.030). Following step-wise forward Cox regression analysis, septic shock (hazard ratio 1.80), acute renal injury (hazard ratio 2.06), history of coronary heart disease (hazard ratio 0.36) and history of stage I/II solid tumor malignancy (hazard ratio 1.79) were the only independent variables associated with 28-day mortality. Serum levels of procalcitonin and of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor were similar between the two groups of comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS: Past history of stage I/II solid malignancy is an independent risk factor for unfavorable outcome from sepsis the first 28 days.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; ICU; Outcome; Severity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31590654      PMCID: PMC6781365          DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4448-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


Background

Throughout the past decades the low survival rates of critically ill patients suffering from malignancies led clinicians to the decision to avoid admission of these patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) [1]. The advances in early detection and management of hematological malignancies and solid tumors over the last years have resulted in an increased number of ICU admissions of cancer patients who had significantly lower mortality in comparison to the 1980’s and the 1990’s [2, 3]. Large multicenter studies have shown that these patients account for 15–20% of all ICU admissions [4, 5]. The main causes of ICU admission do not differ between patients with malignancies and the general population [6] with sepsis being the second most frequent reason for ICU admission of cancer patients following postoperative care [5]. It is largely conceived that cancer patients are more prone to sepsis and unfavorable outcome due to factors associated with their malignancies like chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression and metastasis-associated organ obstructions [7]. However, no data are available if history of cancer that remains inactive may per se become a comorbidity driving towards unfavorable outcome. In order to reply to this question, we used the database of the Hellenic Sepsis Study Group (HSSG) (www.sepsis.gr) that includes a broad collection of clinical data from both non-ICU and ICU patients with sepsis. We aimed to analyze the impact of history of stage I or II solid tumor malignancies in complete remission the last 3 years on the 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis admitted in the ICU.

Methods

Patients

The HSSG is collecting since June 2006 clinical data of patients with clinically and/or microbiologically documented infections and systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) from 55 departments across Greece; 21 study sites are ICUs. This is done by a central protocol that has been approved by the Ethics Committees of the participating hospitals where the study sites are located. Adult patients are enrolled after written informed consent provided by the patients or first degree relatives in the case of patients unable to consent. Since March 2016 all patients in the database were re-classified into infection, sepsis and septic shock using the Sepsis-3 classification criteria [8]. Patients with febrile neutropenia and infection by the human immunodeficiency virus are excluded from the HSSG registry. In January 2019, it was decided to investigate the role of history of inactive stage I/II lung and colorectal adenocarcinoma in the final outcome of sepsis among patients admitted for sepsis in the ICU. Investigators from all ICUs participating in the HSSG defined specific criteria for the selection of patients of the database for this analysis. These criteria were: a) admission in the ICU; b) sepsis defined by Sepsis-3 definition; c) history of stage I or II solid tumor in complete remission the last 3 years that did not predispose to infection; and d) lung cancer and colorectal cancer. Exclusion criteria were: a) any solid tumor malignancy of stages III or IV; b) any hematologic malignancy; c) any lymphoma; d) intake of chemotherapy; e) ICU admission due to postoperative care for cancer resection; and f) malignancy as direct predisposition to sepsis. The last exclusion criterion comprised, but was not limited, to the following conditions: acute ascending cholangitis due to biliary tract obstruction by tumor; acute ascending pyelonephritis due to ureter obstruction by tumor; lung infection due to bronchial obstruction by tumor; and intraabdominal infection developing after tumor resection. Patients remaining after the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria were divided into two groups; those with stage I/II solid tumor malignancy and comparators without any malignancy. Two fully matched groups were formatted with an equal number of patients using specific matching criteria. These criteria were age, SOFA score, APACHE II score, Charlson’s Comorbidity Index (CCI), presence of septic shock and type of infection. Matching was done by propensity score calculation. Blood was sampled from all enrolled patients within the first 24 h from enrolment. Blood was collected into sterile and pyrogen-free and anticoagulant-free tubes (Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville Md). Tubes were transported within 1 day by a courier service to the Laboratory of Immunology of Infectious Diseases of the 4th Department of Internal Medicine at ATTIKON University Hospital of Athens. Tubes were centrifuged and serum was kept refrigerated at -70 °C until assayed. Procalcitonin (PCT) was estimated in serum in duplicate by an immuno-time-resolved amplified cryptate technology assay (Kryptor PCT; BRAHMS GmbH, Henningdorf, Germany) with a functional assay sensitivity of 0.06 ng/ml. Concentrations of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) were measured by an enzyme immunosorbent assay with a functional assay sensitivity of 2.1 ng/ml (suPARnostic, Virogates, Medicon Valley, Denmark). The following information was recorded per patient: demographics, severity using the APACHE II score and SOFA score, comorbidities, microbiology, and administered antimicrobials. Patients were followed-up for 28 days. The selection and dose of administered antimicrobials for all patients was done according to the national guidelines that are published by the Hellenic Society for Infectious Diseases (www.loimoxeis.gr). The collection of data in each study site was confirmed by independent monitors.

Study endpoints

The primary study endpoint was to determine whether history of stage I/II cancer is influencing 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis who are hospitalized in the ICU. The secondary endpoint was to define if there are differences in the concentrations of PCT and suPAR between the two groups.

Statistical analysis

Comparisons between comparators and patients with history of stage I/II solid malignancy were done by the Fisher exact test for binary variables, by the Student’s t-test for parametric continuous variables and by the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric continuous variables. Survival was compared by the log-rank test. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined by the Mantel and Haenszel test. Variables differing significantly between survivors and non-survivors entered the equation of forward step-wise Cox regression analysis as dependent variables with 28-day mortality as the independent variables. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were calculated. Concentrations of PCT and suPAR were expressed as median and 95% CIs. Any p-value below 0.05 was considered significant. Analysis was done using IBM SPSS statistics version 25.0.

Results

The study flow chart is shown in Fig. 1. Using propensity score matching, two groups were formatted; comparators without malignancy (n = 83) and patients with history of stage I/II solid malignancy (n = 83). The two groups were fully matched for APACHE II score, SOFA score, CCI, age and organ dysfunctions. The time to the administration of the first dose of antimicrobials from the onset of sepsis or vasopressors did not differ between groups. Microbiological confirmation of the pathogen was available in 86 patients. Susceptibilities of the isolated pathogens to the administered antimicrobials did not differ between the two groups (Table 1).
Fig. 1

Study flow chart. Abbreviations ICU: intensive care unit; SIRS: systemic inflammatory response syndrome

Table 1

Characteristics of analyzed patients

Sepsis without malignancy (n = 83)Sepsis with stage I/II solid malignancy (n = 83)p-value
Male gender (n, %)56 (67.5)53 (63.9)0.744
Age (years, mean ± SD)64.0 ± 18.469.10 ± 9.850.435
APACHE II score (mean ± SD)21.2 ± 8.121.9 ± 6.90.782
SOFA score (mean ± SD)8.47 ± 3.748.52 ± 3.390.915
CCI (mean ± SD)4.70 ± 3.375.64 ± 2.270.057
White blood cells (/mm3, mean ± SD)15,783.3 ± 8868.614,121.2 ± 8977.10.120
Infection site (n, %)
 Hospital-acquired pneumonia26 (31.3)25 (30.1)1.00
 Primary bacteremia15 (18.1)15 (18.1)1.00
 Intrabdominal infection14 (16.9)21 (25.3)0.253
 Community-acquired pneumonia14 (16.9)10 (12.0)0.509
 Acute pyelonephritis5 (6.0)3 (3.6)0.720
 Acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infection4 (4.8)0 (0)0.120
 Bacterial meningitis1 (1.2)1 (1.2)1.00
 Other4 (4.8)8 (9.6)0.369
Organ dysfunction (n, %)
 Septic shock56 (67.5)56 (67.5)1.00
 Acute respiratory distress syndrome44 (53.0)46 (55.4)0.876
 Acute kidney injury22 (26.5)12 (14.5)0.083
 Disseminated intravascular coagulation17 (20.5)22 (26.5)0.464
Bloodstream isolate (n, %)
Acinetobacter baumannii7 (8.4)9 (10.8)0.793
Klebsiella pneumoniae3 (3.6)5 (6.0)0.720
Pseudomonas aeruginosa3 (3.6)5 (6.0)0.720
Staphylococcus aureus3 (3.6)0 (0)0.245
Enterococcus faecalis3 (3.6)3 (3.6)1.00
Enterococcus faecium1 (1.3)3 (3.6)0.621
 Other9 (10.8)6 (7.2)0.600
Urine isolate (n, %)
Klebsiella pneumoniae2 (2.4)2 (2.4)1.00
Acinetobacter baumannii3 (3.6)1 (1.3)0.620
Tracheobronchial secretions isolate (quantity > 105 cfu/ml)
Klebsiella pneumoniae4 (4.8)8 (9.6)0.370
Pseudomonas aeruginosa6 (7.2)7 (8.4)1.00
Acinetobacter baumannii14 (16.9)22 (26.5)0.187
Staphylococcus aureus3 (3.6)0 (0)0.245
 Other6 (7.2)4 (4.8)0.746
Co-morbidities (n, %)
 Type 2 diabetes mellitus22 (26.5)16 (19.3)0.356
 Chronic heart failure23 (27.7)18 (21.7)0.472
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease17 (20.5)17 (20.5)1.00
 Chronic renal disease11 (13.3)6 (7.2)0.306
 Coronary heart disease12 (14.5)11 (3.3)1.00
 Vascular hypertension18 (21.7)21 (25.3)0.715
 Atrial fibrillation9 (10.8)8 (9.6)1.00
 Stroke13 (15.7)10 (12.0)0.654
 Time (hours) from sepsis onset to the administration of the first dose of antimicrobials (median, range)5 (0–125)6 (0–216)0.112
 Time (hours) from onset of vasopressors to the administration of the first dose of antimicrobials (median, range)2.7 (0–55)2.8 (0–168)0.444
 Susceptibility of the isolated pathogen to the administered antimicrobials based on antibiogram (n, %)22 (26.5)22 (26.5)1.00

Abbreviations APACHE Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, CCI Charlson’s comorbidity index, SOFA Sequential organ failure assessment

Study flow chart. Abbreviations ICU: intensive care unit; SIRS: systemic inflammatory response syndrome Characteristics of analyzed patients Abbreviations APACHE Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, CCI Charlson’s comorbidity index, SOFA Sequential organ failure assessment Mortality after 28 days was 37.3% in the comparator group (31 out of 83 patients) and 54.2% in the solid tumor stage I/II group (45 out of 83) (Fig. 2). The OR for death among patients with history of solid tumor was 1.98 (95%CIs: 1.07–3.69; p: 0.030). Nil patients in the malignancy group died due to cancer.
Fig. 2

Survival of 83 patients with sepsis and history of stage I/II malignancy and of 83 fully-matched sepsis comparators. The log-rank test of comparison and the respective p-value are provided

Survival of 83 patients with sepsis and history of stage I/II malignancy and of 83 fully-matched sepsis comparators. The log-rank test of comparison and the respective p-value are provided At a next step, baseline demographics were compared between 28-day survivors and non-survivors. Variables being significantly different between the two groups of comparisons were septic shock, acute kidney and history of stage I/II solid malignancy that were more common among non-survivors; and history of coronary heart disease that was more common among survivors (Table 2). The impact of these four variables was confirmed after forward step-wise Cox regression analysis (Table 3). Analysis was repeated for these variables among the 86 patients with microbiologically confirmed infections. Susceptibility of the pathogen to the administered antimicrobials was included as another variable in the equation. History of stage I/II solid malignancy was again confirmed to be an independent variable associated with unfavorable 28-day outcome (Table 4).
Table 2

Differences in baseline characteristics between survivors and non-survivors

Survivors (n = 90)Non-survivors (n = 76)p-value
Infection site (n, %)
 Hospital-acquired pneumonia27 (30.0)24 (31.6)1.00
 Primary bacteremia13 (14.4)17 (22.4)0.226
 Intrabdominal infection14 (16.9)21 (25.3)0.253
 Community-acquired pneumonia12 (13.3)12 (15.8)0.665
 Acute pyelonephritis6 (6.7)2 (2.6)0.291
 Acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infection4 (4.4)0 (0)0.126
 Bacterial meningitis2 (2.2)0 (0)0.501
 Other3 (3.3)0 (0)0.251
Organ dysfunction (n, %)
 Septic shock52 (57.8)60 (78.9)0.005
 Acute respiratory distress syndrome43 (47.8)47 (61.8)0.086
 Acute kidney injury12 (13.3)22 (28.9)0.020
 Disseminated intravascular coagulation17 (18.9)22 (28.9)0.144
Co-morbidities (n, %)
 Type 2 diabetes mellitus21 (23.3)17 (22.4)1.00
 Chronic heart failure21 (23.3)20 (26.3)0.719
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease16 (17.8)18 (23.7)0.440
 Chronic renal disease9 (10.0)8 (10.5)1.00
 Coronary heart disease18 (20.0)5 (6.6)0.014
 Vascular hypertension23 (25.6)16 (21.1)0.583
 Atrial fibrillation11 (12.2)6 (7.9)0.445
 Stroke12 (13.3)11 (14.5)1.00
 History of stage I/II solid malignancy38 (42.2)45 (59.2)0.043
Table 3

Forward step-wise Cox regression analysis of variables associated with 28-day mortality

VariableHazard ratio95% confidence intervalsp-value
Septic shock1.801.01–3.220.046
Acute kidney injury2.061.21–3.490.007
History of coronary heart disease0.360.14–0.890.028
History of stage I/II solid malignancy1.791.13–2.850.014

Variables significantly different between survivors and non-survivors of Table 2 entered the equation as dependent variables. Variables remaining significant after four steps of analysis are shown

Table 4

Cox regression analysis of variables associated with 28-day mortality among patients with microbiologically confirmed infections

VariableHazard ratio95% confidence intervalsp-value
Septic shock1.450.67–3.150.345
Acute kidney injury2.060.94–4.550.073
History of coronary heart disease0.740.25–2.190.587
Susceptibility of the pathogen to the administered antimicrobials0.540.26–1.110.096
History of stage I/II solid malignancy2.721.37–5.400.004

Variables described in Table 3 entered the equation along with susceptibility of the isolated pathogen to the administered antimicrobials

Differences in baseline characteristics between survivors and non-survivors Forward step-wise Cox regression analysis of variables associated with 28-day mortality Variables significantly different between survivors and non-survivors of Table 2 entered the equation as dependent variables. Variables remaining significant after four steps of analysis are shown Cox regression analysis of variables associated with 28-day mortality among patients with microbiologically confirmed infections Variables described in Table 3 entered the equation along with susceptibility of the isolated pathogen to the administered antimicrobials No differences in PCT and suPAR concentrations were found between the two groups of comparison (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Concentrations of procalcitonin (PCT) and of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) of 83 patients with sepsis and history of stage I/II malignancy and of 83 well-matched sepsis comparators. The respective p-values of comparisons are provided

Concentrations of procalcitonin (PCT) and of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) of 83 patients with sepsis and history of stage I/II malignancy and of 83 well-matched sepsis comparators. The respective p-values of comparisons are provided

Discussion

The present study used a unique study design and tried to provide answers to a common medical question that remains unanswered. The medical question is whether past-history of stage I/II solid tumor malignancy that remains inactive impacts on 28-day mortality. Findings were affirmative but in order to answer this question an extensive filtering process was needed. During this process, only patients without treatment for their malignancy and without any apparent role of the malignancy as a factor predisposing to sepsis were analyzed. They were compared to patients matched not only for age but also for severity, organ dysfunction, type of infection and comorbidities. A similar approach has never been done before. Available studies that investigate the outcome of patients with cancer and sepsis enroll only patients suffering from cancers and they do not narrow their analysis on stage I/II patients. Instead they enroll all patients irrespective of the presence or not of metastasis, of the intake or not of chemotherapy and of the presence of neutropenia. Analysis ends-up that 28-day mortality is dependent on the severity of organ failures where neutropenia post-chemotherapy is another independent prognostic variable for unfavorable outcome [5, 9–12]. This is in line with the results of our Cox regression analysis showing organ dysfunction as a salient risk factor for unfavorable outcome. However, most of patients with malignancy bear the risk for infections by multidrug-resistant bacteria probably due to frequent hospitalizations leading to colonization by that species [13]. It is evident that this has a major impact on 28-day outcome through the intake of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy [13, 14]. Two major limitations of the study need to be addressed; matching for appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy and quality of care between study sites. Regarding administered antimicrobials therapy it needs to be outscored that although not all variables were addressed, patients with history of stage I/II solid tumor malignancy and comparators did not differ in timing of administration and susceptibilities of the isolated pathogens to the administered antimicrobials. There are two more studies that are trying to address the same question but that have not succeeded to provide comparators with similar severity and comorbidities. The first study is coming from Lebanon and it is retrospective analysis of 176 oncological patients with active hematologic or solid tumor malignancy on chemotherapy or radiation therapy. These were compared to another 176 non-oncological patients coming from the same database. Although the hospital mortality of the oncological patients was significantly greater than the non-oncological patients, their severity as defined by their vital signs and requirement for vasopressors was also significantly greater than the non-oncological patients [15]. The second study is a retrospective analysis of the REGARDS database. Cancer survivors were compared to patients without cancer history with regards to hospital death and to the time until the first sepsis event. Cancer survivors were defined as patients without need of chemotherapy or radiation the past 2 years. Results showed that the time to the first sepsis event was significantly shorter among cancer survivors and that in the case of infection hospital mortality was 8.29% among cancer survivors and 3.93% among non-cancer comparators. However, the two groups were not adequately matched since cancer survivors were older and they were presenting with significantly more comorbidities than the comparators. Moreover, the analysis did not exclude patients with stage III/IV malignancies [16]. The mechanism explaining why a past history of stage I/II solid tumor malignancy predisposes to death in case of sepsis cannot be derived by our findings. It may be argued that cancer survivors are more immune debilitated due to either cancer itself or to previous cancer treatment. This is compatible with the difference of the survival curves between cases and comparators of our study starting to separate by day 7. It is remarkable that measured PCT and suPAR are similar with comparators showing that in these patients biomarkers need to be interpreted as in the non-cancer populations. It needs to be underscored that suPAR is a non-specific biomarker of mortality irrespective of causality [17]. Although suPAR is early increased among cancer patients with unfavorable outcome [18], results presented here indicate that past history of malignancy cannot affect circulating levels more than the septic process. Another interesting finding of the present study, although bizarre at first glance, is the protective role of coronary heart disease. It is not the first time where a similar finding is reported. An analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database on 7.1 million of hospitalizations for severe sepsis during the period 2007 to 2013 in the United States reported 0.15% incidence of cases of Tako-Scubo cardiomyopathy (TCC). TCC is characterized by hypokinesia, akinesia or dyskinesia of the left ventricle in the absence of coronary obstruction. TCC was an independent protective factor from 28-day mortality [19]. The low number of the studied patients, probably influencing the power of the results, signifies that this finding should be interpreted with caution.

Conclusions

The present study revealed that past history of stage I/II solid malignancy is an independent risk factor for 28-day mortality in sepsis. Results suggest that past history of stage I/II malignancy should be a variable taken into consideration in the endpoint analysis of sepsis trials.
  19 in total

1.  Compliance with triage to intensive care recommendations.

Authors:  E Azoulay; F Pochard; S Chevret; C Vinsonneau; M Garrouste; Y Cohen; M Thuong; C Paugam; C Apperre; B De Cagny; F Brun; C Bornstain; A Parrot; F Thamion; J C Lacherade; Y Bouffard; J R Le Gall; C Herve; M Grassin; R Zittoun; B Schlemmer; J F Dhainaut
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Multicenter outcome study of cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a probability of mortality model.

Authors:  J S Groeger; S Lemeshow; K Price; D M Nierman; P White; J Klar; S Granovsky; D Horak; S K Kish
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor as a screening test for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Athina Chounta; Christofer Ellinas; Vassiliki Tzanetakou; Fani Pliarhopoulou; Virginia Mplani; Angelos Oikonomou; Kostantinos Leventogiannis; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 5.828

4.  Bacteraemia due to AmpC β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in hospitalized cancer patients: risk factors, antibiotic therapy, and outcomes.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Wenfang Zhang; Zheng Li; Changsen Bai; Ding Li; Shan Zheng; Peng Zhang; Sihe Zhang
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Continued survival gains in recent years among critically ill myeloma patients.

Authors:  Vincent Peigne; Katerina Rusinová; Lionel Karlin; Michael Darmon; Jean-Paul Fermand; Benoît Schlemmer; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer requiring admission to intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Márcio Soares; Pedro Caruso; Eliézer Silva; José M M Teles; Suzana M A Lobo; Gilberto Friedman; Felipe Dal Pizzol; Patricia V C Mello; Fernando A Bozza; Ulisses V A Silva; André P Torelly; Marcos F Knibel; Ederlon Rezende; José J Netto; Claudio Piras; Aline Castro; Bruno S Ferreira; Alvaro Réa-Neto; Patrícia B Olmedo; Jorge I F Salluh
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  suPAR: The unspecific marker for disease presence, severity and prognosis.

Authors:  Jesper Eugen-Olsen; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 5.283

8.  Hospitalized cancer patients with severe sepsis: analysis of incidence, mortality, and associated costs of care.

Authors:  Mark D Williams; Lee Ann Braun; Liesl M Cooper; Joseph Johnston; Richard V Weiss; Rebecca L Qualy; Walter Linde-Zwirble
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients in European ICUs.

Authors:  Fabio Silvio Taccone; Antonio A Artigas; Charles L Sprung; Rui Moreno; Yasser Sakr; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Tako-Tsubo Cardiomyopathy in Severe Sepsis: Nationwide Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Abhishek J Deshmukh; Kianoush Kashani; Abhiram Prasad; Ankit Sakhuja
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  5 in total

1.  30-day postoperative sepsis risk factors following laminectomy for intradural extramedullary tumors.

Authors:  Kevin Mo; Arjun Gupta; Humaid Al Farii; Micheal Raad; Farah Musharbash; Britni Tran; Ming Zheng; Sang Hun Lee
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06

2.  Nosocomial infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria in cancer patients: a six-year retrospective study of an oncology Center in Western China.

Authors:  Ai-Min Jiang; Xin Shi; Na Liu; Huan Gao; Meng-Di Ren; Xiao-Qiang Zheng; Xiao Fu; Xuan Liang; Zhi-Ping Ruan; Yu Yao; Tao Tian
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Establishment and validation of a nomogram to predict the in-hospital death risk of nosocomial infections in cancer patients.

Authors:  Aimin Jiang; Xin Shi; Haoran Zheng; Na Liu; Shu Chen; Huan Gao; Mengdi Ren; Xiaoqiang Zheng; Xiao Fu; Xuan Liang; Zhiping Ruan; Tao Tian; Yu Yao
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.887

4.  Impact of cancer on mortality rates in patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of current studies.

Authors:  Mei-Jiao Xiang; Guo-Liang Chen
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 1.534

5.  Early administration of dobutamine in the treatment of septic shock patients with tumor-a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Ya-Fei Wu; Yin Pan; Qiang Tang; Ning Lou; Dao-Feng Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.