| Literature DB >> 31590363 |
Marina Khodanovich1, Anna Pishchelko2, Valentina Glazacheva3, Edgar Pan4, Andrey Akulov5, Mikhail Svetlik6, Yana Tyumentseva7, Tatyana Anan'ina8, Vasily Yarnykh9,10.
Abstract
Macromolecular proton fraction (MPF) has been established as a quantitative clinically-targeted MRI myelin biomarker based on recent demyelination studies. This study aimed to assess the capability of MPF to quantify remyelination using the murine cuprizone-induced reversible demyelination model. MPF was measured in vivo using the fast single-point method in three animal groups (control, cuprizone-induced demyelination, and remyelination after cuprizone withdrawal) and compared to quantitative immunohistochemistry for myelin basic protein (MBP), myelinating oligodendrocytes (CNP-positive cells), and oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPC, NG2-positive cells) in the corpus callosum, caudate putamen, hippocampus, and cortex. In the demyelination group, MPF, MBP-stained area, and oligodendrocyte count were significantly reduced, while OPC count was significantly increased as compared to both control and remyelination groups in all anatomic structures (p < 0.05). All variables were similar in the control and remyelination groups. MPF and MBP-stained area strongly correlated in each anatomic structure (Pearson's correlation coefficients, r = 0.80-0.90, p < 0.001). MPF and MBP correlated positively with oligodendrocyte count (r = 0.70-0.84, p < 0.01 for MPF; r = 0.81-0.92, p < 0.001 for MBP) and negatively with OPC count (r = -0.69--0.77, p < 0.01 for MPF; r = -0.72--0.89, p < 0.01 for MBP). This study provides immunohistological validation of fast MPF mapping as a non-invasive tool for quantitative assessment of de- and remyelination in white and gray matter and indicates the feasibility of using MPF as a surrogate marker of reparative processes in demyelinating diseases.Entities:
Keywords: MPF; cuprizone model; demyelination; immunohistochemistry; macromolecular proton fraction; magnetic resonance imaging; myelin; oligodendrocyte precursors; oligodendrocytes; remyelination
Year: 2019 PMID: 31590363 PMCID: PMC6830095 DOI: 10.3390/cells8101204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1The scheme of image processing for macromolecular proton fraction (MPF) maps (a,b) and myelin basic protein (MBP)-stained images (c). Cross-sections of a 3D MPF map of a control mouse taken at the locations of +0.74 mm (a) and −1.58 mm (b) from bregma and superimposed with regions-of-interest (ROIs) corresponding to the following brain structures: 1, 2—caudate putamen; 3, 4, 5—corpus callosum; 6, 7—hippocampus, 8, 9, 10, 11—cortex. MBP-stained image at the location of −1.58 mm from bregma (c) is presented in the native (left) and binarized (right) forms with ROIs corresponding to the corpus callosum (5,6), hippocampus (7), and cortex (10,11).
Figure 2Example MPF maps of the mice from the control (left), demyelination (center), and remyelination (right) groups. Cross-sections of 3D MPF maps were taken through the caudate putamen (+0.74 mm from bregma, top) and hippocampus (−1.58 mm from bregma, bottom). Arrows show a visible reduction in MPF in the corpus callosum. MPF maps are presented with the grayscale range corresponding to 2–16% and window centered at 9%.
Figure 3Effect of cuprizone-induced demyelination and remyelination after cuprizone discontinuation on MBP immunostaining. Example microphotographs of MBP-stained sections are presented for the corpus callosum, caudate putamen, cortex, and hippocampus with magnification of ×100.
Figure 4Effect of cuprizone-induced demyelination and remyelination after cuprizone discontinuation on the number of myelinating oligodendrocytes (CNP-positive cells). Example microphotographs of CNP-stained sections are presented for the corpus callosum, caudate putamen, cortex, and hippocampus with magnification of ×200.
Figure 5Effect of cuprizone-induced demyelination and remyelination after cuprizone discontinuation on the amount of OPC (NG2-positive cells). (a) Example microphotographs of NG2-stained sections corresponding to the corpus callosum, caudate putamen, cortex, and hippocampus with magnification of ×200. (b) 3D reconstructions of separate NG2-positive cells in the corpus callosum illustrating distinctions in OPC morphology. Magnification: ×200.
Figure 6Summary statistics of MPF measurements and quantitative histological variables in the brain anatomic structures across the control, demyelination, and remyelination animal groups: MPF values (a), myelin content according to the percentage of MBP staining area (b), the count of myelinating oligodendrocytes (CNP-positive cells) (c), and OPC count (NG2-positive cells) (d). Anatomic structures are abbreviated as follows: CC—corpus callosum, Cor—cortex, CPu—caudate putamen, and Hip—hippocampus. Significant differences between the groups according to the LSD test are marked by asterisks: * – p < 0.05, ** – p < 0.01, and *** – p < 0.001. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.
Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) corresponding to the demyelination and remyelination states in the corpus callosum, caudate putamen, cortex, and hippocampus based on MPF and quantitative histology variables.
| Variable | Control-Demyelination: d [−CI, +CI] | Demyelination-Remyelination: d [−CI, +CI] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | CPu | Cor | Hip | CC | CPu | Cor | Hip | |
| MPF | 2.7 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 | −2.3 | −2.1 | −1.8 | −2.8 |
| MBP area percentage | 3.9 | 3.8 | 5.6 | 4.6 | −3.1 | −2.8 | −4.4 | −4.0 |
| CNP-positive cell count | 5.7 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 3.0 | −5.4 | −4.3 | −3.5 | −2.4 |
| NG2-positive cell count | −4.4 | −1.7 | −3.5 | −2.6 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Figure 7Linear regression analysis of MPF values vs. myelin content according to MBP staining (a), the number of myelinating oligodendrocytes according to CNP staining (b), and the number of OPC according to NG2 staining (c) in the corpus callosum, caudate putamen, hippocampus, and cortex. Blue, red and green dots correspond to the control, demyelination, and remyelination groups, respectively. Black lines depict the plots of the regression equations for the pooled datasets including all groups. Dotted lines represent confidence intervals of the regression lines.
Linear regression analysis of associations between MPF, MBP-stained percentage of the total area, CNP-positive cell count, and NG2-positive cell count in the corpus callosum, caudate putamen, hippocampus, and cortex.
| Parameters | Brain Structure | r | r2 |
| Slope (95% CI), | Intercept (95% CI), |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPF vs. MBP | CC | 0.90 | 0.82 | <0.001 | 0.06 (0.04, 0.07), <0.001 | 7.84 (6.57, 9.12), <0.001 |
| CPu | 0.83 | 0.69 | <0.001 | 0.04 (0.02, 0.06), <0.001 | 6.57 (5.68, 7.46), <0.001 | |
| Hip | 0.80 | 0.64 | < 0.001 | 0.06 (0.03, 0.09), 0.001 | 6.20 (5.46, 6.95), <0.001 | |
| Cor | 0.88 | 0.78 | <0.001 | 0.04 (0.02, 0.05), <0.001 | 7.04 (6.52, 7.56), <0.001 | |
| MPF vs | CC | 0.84 | 0.71 | <0.001 | 0.57 (0.33, 0.81), <0.001 | 8.96 (7.70, 10.21), <0.001 |
| CPu | 0.71 | 0.51 | 0.006 | 0.38 (0.13, 0.63), 0.006 | 6.87 (5. 76, 7.98), <0.001 | |
| Hip | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.007 | 0.77 (0.26, 1.29), 0.007 | 5.78 (4. 54, 7.01), <0.001 | |
| Cor | 0.79 | 0.63 | 0.001 | 0.35 (0.17, 0.53), 0.001 | 6.49 (5.46, 7.51), <0.001 | |
| MPF vs | CC | −0.69 | 0.47 | 0.009 | −0.82 (−1.40, −0.25), 0.009 | 14.83 (12.57, 17.10), <0.001 |
| CPu | −0.76 | 0.58 | 0.006 | −0.67 (−1.04, −0.29), 0.002 | 14.67 (12.94, 16.41), <0.001 | |
| Hip | −0.75 | 0.57 | 0.003 | −0.60 (−0.95, −0.25), 0.003 | 8.79 (7.95, 9.63), <0.001 | |
| Cor | −0.77 | 0.59 | 0.002 | −0.34 (−0.52, −0.15), 0.002 | 10.43 (9.28, 11.59), <0.001 | |
| MBP % total | CC | 0.92 | 0.85 | <0.001 | 10.13 (7.36, 12.87), <0.001 | 20.32 (6.02, 34.61), 0.01 |
| CPu | 0.85 | 0.72 | <0.001 | 8.49 (4.46, 12.52), <0.001 | 7.47 (−9.04, 23.98), 0.34 | |
| Hip | 0.82 | 0.67 | <0.001 | 11.43 (6.11, 16.74), <0.001 | −4.90 (−17.57, 7.77), 0.41 | |
| Cor | 0.81 | 0.66 | <0.001 | 8.49 (4.46, 12.52), <0.001 | −10.05 (−32.95, 12.86), 0.36 | |
| MBP % total | CC | −0.72 | 0.62 | 0.005 | −13.87 (-22.78, −4.96), 0.005 | 121.88 (86.93, 156.82), <0.001 |
| CPu | −0.81 | 0.65 | <0.001 | −8.21 (−12.18, −4.25), <0.001 | 81.81 (63.41, 100.20), <0.001 | |
| Hip | −0.74 | 0.54 | 0.004 | −7.45 (−11.98, −2.91), 0.004 | 36.59 (25.57, 47.62), <0.001 | |
| Cor | −0.89 | 0.78 | <0.001 | −9.14 (−12.32, −5.96), <0.001 | 91.48 (71.83, 111.13), <0.001 | |
| CNP + cells vs | CC | −0.79 | 0.62 | 0.001 | −1.39 (−2.11, −0.67), 0.001 | 10.10 (7.28, 12.93), <0.001 |
| CPu | −0.68 | 0.47 | 0.01 | −0.66 (−1.12, −0.19), 0.01 | 7.14 (4.99, 9.31), <0.001 | |
| Hip | −0.79 | 0.62 | 0.001 | −0.57 (−0.87, −0.27), 0.001 | 3.45 (2.73, 4.17), <0.001 | |
| Cor | −0.63 | 0.39 | 0.02 | −0.62 (−1.13, −0.11), 0.02 | 9.22 (6.07, 12.38), <0.001 |
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval; CC, corpus callosum; CPu, caudate putamen; Hip, hippocampus; Cor, cortex.