Literature DB >> 31590156

Update on the Implementation of NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management by NCCN Member Institutions.

Kristine A Donovan1, Teresa L Deshields2, Cheyenne Corbett3, Michelle B Riba4.   

Abstract

The first NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Distress Management were published in 1999. Since then, a number of other organizations have advocated for distress screening. Previous surveys of distress screening showed modest progress in implementation of the NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management by NCCN Member Institutions (MIs); this review examined whether further progress has been made. Representatives appointed to the NCCN Distress Management Panel or their designee were asked to complete an online survey in the summer of 2018. The survey was developed based on similar surveys performed in 2005 and 2012 and a survey of psychosocial staffing conducted in NCCN MIs in 2012. New items solicited details about triaging, rescreening, formal screening protocols, and tracking of distressed patients. The survey was completed by representatives from 23 of 27 NCCN MIs (85%). Among the responding institutions, 20 (87%) currently conduct routine screening for distress and 3 are piloting routine screening. All respondents reported use of a self-report measure to screen for distress, with the Distress Thermometer most often used. A total of 70% of respondents rescreen patients for distress and 83% reported having a formal distress screening protocol in place. Once triaged, 65% of institutions who routinely screen for distress track clinical contacts and referrals; 70% track rates of adherence to screening protocols. Findings suggest wide acceptance and implementation of the NCCN Guidelines. Most respondents reported the existence of a formal distress screening protocol, with routine tracking of clinical contacts and referrals and rates of protocol adherence. Clinical experience and the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer accreditation standard for cancer centers appear to have resulted in greater adoption and implementation of the guidelines, but considerable opportunities for improvement remain.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31590156     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  8 in total

Review 1.  Living Your Best Life: Lifestyle Medicine for All Women.

Authors:  John McHugh; Megan Alexander; Rashmi Kudesia; Jessica Krant; Amy Comander; Michelle Tollefson; Cynthia Geyer
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  "I Want to Help Others Like Me": A Pilot Qualitative Study on Patients' Participation in a Screening for Distress Program.

Authors:  Jacynthe Rivest; Véronique Desbeaumes Jodoin; Joé T Martineau; Nathalie Folch; Danielle Charpentier
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-06-12

3.  Integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (isPO): a new form of care for newly diagnosed cancer patients in Germany.

Authors:  Michael Kusch; Hildegard Labouvie; Vera Schiewer; Natalie Talalaev; Jan C Cwik; Sonja Bussmann; Lusine Vaganian; Alexander L Gerlach; Antje Dresen; Natalia Cecon; Sandra Salm; Theresia Krieger; Holger Pfaff; Clarissa Lemmen; Lisa Derendorf; Stephanie Stock; Christina Samel; Anna Hagemeier; Martin Hellmich; Bernd Leicher; Gregor Hültenschmidt; Jessica Swoboda; Peter Haas; Anna Arning; Andrea Göttel; Kathrin Schwickerath; Ullrich Graeven; Stefanie Houwaart; Hedy Kerek-Bodden; Steffen Krebs; Christiana Muth; Christina Hecker; Marcel Reiser; Cornelia Mauch; Jennifer Benner; Gerdamarie Schmidt; Christiane Karlowsky; Gisela Vimalanandan; Lukas Matyschik; Lars Galonska; Annette Francke; Karin Osborne; Ursula Nestle; Markus Bäumer; Kordula Schmitz; Jürgen Wolf; Michael Hallek
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.908

4.  Collusion: The Facade and its Implications on Total Pain Management in Palliative Care.

Authors:  Bincy Mathew; Bidhu Kalyan Mohanti; Saipriya Tewari; Vedant Kabra; Pushpinder Gulia; Peush Bajpai; Anusheel Munshi
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2021-02-17

5.  Implementation and Feasibility of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Patient-Reported Outcomes Symptom and Needs Monitoring Pilot in Ambulatory Oncology.

Authors:  Frank J Penedo; Heidy N Medina; Patricia I Moreno; Vandana Sookdeo; Akina Natori; Cody Boland; Matthew P Schlumbrecht; Carmen Calfa; Jessica MacIntyre; Tracy E Crane; Sofia F Garcia
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  Advancing the science of distress screening and management in cancer care.

Authors:  Kristine A Donovan; Luigi Grassi; Teresa L Deshields; Cheyenne Corbett; Michelle B Riba
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 7.  Outcome Measures in Cancer Rehabilitation: Pain, Function, and Symptom Assessment.

Authors:  Eduardo Maldonado; Nirguna Thalla; Sargoon Nepaul; Eric Wisotzky
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-09-29

8.  Oncology social work practice behaviors: a national survey of AOSW members.

Authors:  Elizabeth Y Perlmutter; Freida B Herron; Elizabeth A Rohan; Elizabeth Thomas
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.